User talk:Tournasol7/Archive28

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church of Montredon 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hard light, but acceptable for QI. --XRay 04:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius church in Cougousse (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old buildings in Grand Combe 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone cross at Puech du Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamlet of Aubrac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Lunel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Coursan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Puissalicon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Cardaillac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Camburat (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church of Montredon 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamlet of Aubrac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Lunel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Senergues (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Golinhac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Puissalicon (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Naves (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 05:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate in Martiel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 05:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Manhac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Conques (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Coursan (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George chapel in Entraygues (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Roujan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Fort in Cardaillac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Manhac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau de Malrieu (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Naves 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plague column in Mattersburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Mattersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 1 in Eisenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 17 in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 17 in Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 27 in Eisenstadt (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Resurrection church in Eisenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 11 in Eisenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 10 in Eisenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 6 in Eisenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plague column in Mattersburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 17 in Eisenstadt (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 17 in Eisenstadt (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 19 in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 27 in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 27 in Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brenner Hof in Neusiedl (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brenner Hof in Neusiedl (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire station in Gattendorf (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 19 in Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme de la Goudalie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 23 in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 1 in Eisenstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 1 in Eisenstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire station in Gattendorf (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groot Begijnhof in Leuven (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre Culturel des Roches-Rochefort (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge in Rochefort (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijle river in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Anthony chapel in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joseph-Haydn-Gasse 19 in Eisenstadt (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a cat wrt windows --Poco a poco 19:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)  Done. --Tournasol7 21:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 13:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilige Geestcollege in Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Rochefort (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijle river in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Poort in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naamsestraat in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilige Geestcollege in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Rochefort (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groot Begijnhof in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naamsestraat in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koningscollege in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julian church in Roussy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groot Begijnhof in Leuven (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! College van Premonstreit in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilige Geestcollege in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafelrond in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Anthony chapel in Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoge Heuvelcollege in Leuven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafelrond in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafelrond in Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafelrond in Leuven (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Het Moorinneken in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafe Gambrinus in Leuven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Markt 14 in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Ponts in Chateauroux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moulin de Vindoux in Chateauroux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groot Begijnhof in Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Markt in Leuven (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouwershuis in Leuven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Marche in Clermont-l'Herault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saponaria ocymoides in Aveyron (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin chapel in Chateauroux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Petite du Palan in Chateauroux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Le Poujol (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau des Ondes in Salles-la-Source (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican chapel in Clermont H (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellis perennis in Aveyron (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Le Poujol (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine du Griffe in Clermont H (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Jean Jaures in Castres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huis 't Sestich in Leuven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Naves 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamlet of Aubrac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Panat (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Alquier Bouffard in Castres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 quai des Jacobins in Castres 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 rue de la Liberation in Castres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 rue Gambetta in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Aspiran (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Salles-la-Source (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Camboulas (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manganel fountain in Cardaillac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Cardaillac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cardaillac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 rue Gambetta in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 21 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 24 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 31 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 38 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 39 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau des Ondes in Salles-la-Source (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith abbey church in Conques (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 09:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hersbrucker Strasse 1 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:33, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 38 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 43 Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 44 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 18 in Ansbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 20 in Ansbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 5 in Ansbach (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 22 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 19 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pegnitz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 3-5 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 12 in Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 20 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 22 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 6 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 21 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 25 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 6 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 9 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 11 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Camburat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Berthollet in Annecy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barthstrasse 17 in Lauf an der Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bath house in Neuenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 22:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 1 in Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 14 in Creussen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 47 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 43 Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 18 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 29-31 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montgelasplatz 1 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaitbergerstrasse 14 in Ansbach (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Gumbertus church in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahnfried house in Bayreuth (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 3 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 6 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 14 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 6 in Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 10 in Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzes Tor in Rottweil (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapellenkirche in Rottweil (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Rottweil (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Predigerkirche in Rottweil (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Oehringen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahnfried house in Bayreuth (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richard-Wagner-Strasse 46 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 12 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 2 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziegenbalgplatz 2 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bautzner Strasse in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 5 in Ansbach (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 6 in Ansbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montgelasplatz 1 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promenade 24 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenz in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurze Gasse 7 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Evian-les-Bains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges du Pont du Diable (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from La Bourgeoise 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Steindy 19:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helleborus viridis in La Jaysinia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Col de l'Ecuell (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Neuvecelle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dranse de Morzine in La Forclaz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 21:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lac de Montriond 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lac de Montriond 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvedere de Trechauffe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.-- George Chernilevsky 04:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Stephen church in Vacheresse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Vonnes in Chatel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Giffre valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe Percee from Col de Joux Plane (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Nyon-Guerin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaine des Aravis & Massif des Bornes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Hauts Forts 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Marignier 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Les Gets 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --UnpetitproleX 07:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Nantaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea montana at Col de Tavaneuse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges du Pont du Diable (63).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Neuvecelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Abondance 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula barbata near Col de Coux (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Thorens-Glieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in La Roche-sur-Foron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Massif du Giffre 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 08:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned house near Lac de Vallon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 08:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Coux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Misidentification of the plant on File:Trifolium dubium in Tarn-et-Garonne (1).jpg

• 
  your photo
• 
  Trifolium dubium
• 
  Trifolium dubium
• 
  Trifolium dubium (illustration)
• 
  Medicago lupulina
• 
  Medicago lupulina
• 
  Medicago lupulina (illustration)

Hi Tournasol7/Archive28, your image File:Trifolium dubium in Tarn-et-Garonne (1).jpg shows Medicago lupulina, not Trifolium dubium. Even though the two species have some similarities, e.g. small yellow inflorescences, trifoliolate leaves, they look quite different. E.g., withered Medicago lupulina corollas fall off rather quickly showing the bent fruits after some time. The withered corollas of Trifolium dubium do not fall off but change their color to light brown. The inflorescences of Trifolium dubium look less compact than those of Medicago lupulina, because the flower stalks of the individual flowers of Trifolium dubium are slightly longer, so that there is more space between the flowers. If you have a look at the leaflets, then you might see a prominent tooth at the apex of Medicago leaflets, whereas Trifolium has got a thin hair at each apex (hardly visible). Anyway, your image shows Medicago lupulina. I changed the ID, but the image needs to be renamed. Best wishes --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Robert Flogaus-Faust;  Done, thanks for your review. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:05, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Some misidentified primrose images

• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  misidentified
• 
  Primula elatior (correct ID!)
• 
  Primula elatior
• 
  Primula elatior (illustration)
• 
  Primula veris
• 
  Primula veris (illustration)

Hi Tournasol7/Archive28, I changed the ID of a series of your primrose images to Primula veris, i.e. File:Primula elatior in Aveyron (1).jpg up to File:Primula elatior in Aveyron (14).jpg, i.e. 14 images. The rest of the series (starting from File:Primula elatior in Aveyron (15).jpg) is probably correctly identified as Primula elatior (unless I missed something). The flowers of the two species are rather different. Primula veris has a rather intensly yellow corolla with some orange stripes or dots, one per corolla lobe, and the corolla lobes are more strongly bent inwards than in Primula elatior. Flowers of Primula elatior are light yellow, the lobes are almost in one plane, and there is a darker yellow ring at the top of the corolla tube. The images need to be renamed. All the best --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Robert Flogaus-Faust;  Done, thank you very much! Tournasol7 (talk) 08:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Lamium maculatum misidentified as Lamium purpureum

• 
• 
• 

Hi Tournasol7/Archive28, these three images must be renamed because they show the larger perennial species Lamium maculatum, not the annual species Lamium purpureum. User:Kenraiz corrected the categorization some time ago and I corrected the description. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done, than you for your review. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnica montana at Col de Joux Plane (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cotoneaster obscurus in La Jaysinia (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade d'Ardent 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Bellevaux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genista sagittalis at Col de Joux Plane (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea nervosa at Col de Joux Plane (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)  Comment I wonder if the image should be rotated 90° clockwise. --Martinus KE 06:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC) I set the image to promotion again. Please set to discuss if you have any objections. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from La Bourgeoise 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Nyon from Tete du Vuargne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea nervosa at Col de Joux Plane (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 16:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)  Comment This is not Centaurea montana. See the file name, see the 2021 discussion in the user page archive #22. -- Martinus KE 21:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 04:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)  Support O.k. now. Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Etaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Morzine 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Charvonnex 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phyteuma betonicifolium at Col de Joux Plane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from La Bourgeoise 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Le Laouet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilobium angustifolium in Chablais (7) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Vonnes in Chatel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle des soeurs in Dienville 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 13:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Villemorien 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 13:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Germain church in Villemorien 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 13:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Valentine church in Lantages 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 13:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aube River in Dienville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 13:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Site Natura 2000 Mont de Grange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Visitation in Bonnevaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Althaea officinalis in Jardin des 5 sens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Hippolytus church in Thonon-les-Bains 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 place Saint-Francois de Sales in Annecy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12 rue Sainte-Claire in Annecy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Tavaneuse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Joux Plane 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a big refection spot on the left side. --Steindy 19:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 17:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe d'Uble from Lac de Roy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla alpina at Col de Tavaneuse (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Marignier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Les Gets 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Roy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Lac de Roy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thiou river in Annecy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent de la Visitation in Thonon-les-Bains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Symphorian church in Excenevex 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita muscaria near Lac de Mines d'Or (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minuartia graminifolia in La Jaysinia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Charvonnex 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Yvoire 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 13:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Aloysius Gonzaga church in Essert-Romand 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 12:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Pancratius church of Yvoire 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 12:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint George church in Vailly (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Nyon-Guerin 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aporia crataegi in Morzine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges du Pont du Diable (84).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac du Fouyet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe d'Uble from Lac de Roy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Hauts Forts 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc d'Enfer from Col de Tavaneuse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirsium eriophorum at Lac du Fouyet (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Morzine 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massif du Mont-Blanc from La Bourgeoise (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Nyon-Guerin 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massif du Mont-Blanc from Lac de Joux Plane 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:12, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Joux Plane 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilobium angustifolium at Lac des Plagnes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knautia dipsacifolia at Lac des Mines d'Or (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola calcarata & Alchemilla Sp. at Col de Tavaneuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking path in Saint-Jean-d'Aulps 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tete du Vuargne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicerbita alpina at Lac de Tavaneuse (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana purpurea at Col de Joux Plane (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Thonon-les-Bains (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Maurice and Francis church in Thorens-Glieres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe Percee from Lac de Joux Plane 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at La Combe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Tavaneuse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa floribunda 'Fée des Neiges' in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:35, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Abondance 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe Percee from Lac de Joux Plane 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirsium oleraceum at Lac des Plagnes (4) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Vanet France Switzerland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of the Assumption church in Samoens 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking path in Samoens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting motif --PantheraLeo1359531 15:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium sylvaticum at Lac de Mines d'Or (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 10:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Le Biot 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valeriana montana in Avoriaz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Nyon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Echelle Castle in La Roche-sur-Foron 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Joux Plane 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avoriaz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Morzine 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Lac des Plagnes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 08:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Les Gets 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Joux Plane 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charmoisy House in Annecy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at rue de l'Ile in Annecy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Symphorian church in Excenevex 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 quai des Vieilles Prisons in Annecy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Nyon & Pointe d'Angolon (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria della Scala in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Massif du Giffre 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lysimachia clethroides in Jardin des 5 sens (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Yvoire 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Bruno chapel in Bellevaux 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Vonnes in Chatel 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Episcopal Palace of Annecy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Annecy 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 06:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Annecy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Town hall of Aosta (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Town hall of Aosta (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Chatel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Massif du Giffre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Abondance 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern exposure of Les Hauts Forts 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Charvonnex 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Maurice and Francis church in Thorens-Glieres 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Etaux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Yvoire 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Echelle Castle in La Roche-sur-Foron 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe d'Angolon 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Morzine 03 (a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Massif du Giffre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dranse de Montriond 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Thonon-les-Bains (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Annecy 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain place de l'Hotel-de-Ville Thonon 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:27, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium sylvaticum at Lac de Mines d'Or (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Coux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Nyon & Pointe d'Angolon (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe Percee from Lac de Joux Plane 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardins de l'Europe in Annecy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Nernier in Yvoire 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4-24 quai Perriere in Annecy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus corniculatus at Lac des Plagnes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very peaceful and nice. Left side is a bit unsharp, but that's not a deal-breaker in this context. -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Aloysius Gonzaga church in Essert-Romand 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Bellevaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Massif du Giffre 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vonnes 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in La Forclaz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Stephen church in Vacheresse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Le Biot 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Nernier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Chatel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in La Forclaz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Stephen church in Vacheresse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vonnes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melan carthusian monastery 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:27, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thymus praecox at Lac de Mines d'Or (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac des Mines d'Or 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Marignier 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Les Gets 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Massif du Giffre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 rue Rousseau in Annecy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Spot (Drone?) in the sky is disturbing. --Ermell 07:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 10:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape of Chablais (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc d'Enfer (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Annecy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 11 in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richard-Wagner-Strasse 2 in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richard-Wagner-Strasse 14 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrieder Tor in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 5 in Ansbach (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 20 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrieder Tor in Ansbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenz in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Massif du Mont-Blanc from Lac de Joux Plane 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Massif du Mont-Blanc from Lac de Joux Plane 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstrasse 29 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Oberehe (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Gumbertus church in Ansbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Daun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sophienstrasse 32 in Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough for QI, but dull light. Some more contrast would probably help. --Palauenc05 15:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenz in Ansbach (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 13:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenz in Ansbach (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaitbergerstrasse 14 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Predigerkirche in Rottweil (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzes Tor in Rottweil (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 22 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 16 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 11:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 9 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 7 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 1 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz in Ansbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 12 in Ansbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 3 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Platz 8 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Nine misidentified images of Globularia

• 
  your image #1
• 
  your image #2
• 
  your image #3
• 
  your image #4
• 
  your image #5
• 
  your image #6
• 
  your image #7
• 
  your image #8
• 
  your image #9
• 
  Globularia nudicaulis
• 
  Globularia nudicaulis (illustration)
• 
  Globularia cordifolia
• 
  Globularia cordifolia (typical growth)
• 
  Globularia cordifolia (illustration)

Hi Tournasol7/Archive28, your nine photographs listed above do not show Globularia nudicaulis which has huge leaves (typically > 10 cm long). Your plants show a smaller species of the genus, Globularia cordifolia. I can see some of the typical leaves of Globularia cordifolia on each of the photographs, even on the last one were the leaves are completely out of focus. These typical leaves are emarginate at the apex, usually with a small tip in the middle. I moved the images to Category:Globularia cordifolia. I also corrected the descriptions. The images still need to be renamed. Best wishes --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Robert Flogaus-Faust; thank oyu very much for your review, the filenames have been submitted for change. Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 17:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Ste-Colombe (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in St-Cirgues (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Quezac (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Maurs (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauresses (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St Medard Nicourby (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montet-et-Bouxal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Montet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Radegund church in Bouxal (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Hilaire Lot 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)