User talk:Tournasol7/Archive26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-de-Rives 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Yenne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Michael church in St-Urcize (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Blaise church in Lugan Tarn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des bouchers in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Place de la Republique in Ribeauville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 6 in Neuenstein (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 rue de la Poterne in Rouffach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 72 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --V.Boldychev 20:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johannesstrasse 3 in Blankenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zuckerberg 8 in Blankenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 42 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Rouffac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 rue des Oignons in Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Poterne in Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue de la Poterne in Rouffach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des bouchers in Ribeauville 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 rue du Marche in Rouffach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Belcastel 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Famberhorst 07:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Agnan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Garrigues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John church in Bannieres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Villeneuve-les-Lavaur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Margaret church in Gotha (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Fraternité in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 3 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
too dark, may be improved imho --Ezarate 23:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 20:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 00:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7 rue du Marechal-Joffre in Rouffach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue de la Prevote in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue de la Prevote in Rouffach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 rue du Marechal Joffre in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilarius church in Pratviel (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Viviers-les-Lavaur (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Maurens-Scopont (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Veilhes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Marzens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Catherine chapel in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Salvator church in Nova Gorica 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Nova Gorica 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recollets church in Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Albinus church in Prades (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Roquevidal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Algans (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Salvius church in Saint-Salvy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City hall of Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21 rue Poincare in Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in Cadix (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lacroisille (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bertre (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter church in Cambon-les-Lavaur (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 rue Poincare in Rouffach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:03, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 rue Poincare in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:03, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 rue Walch in Rouffach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ximonic 15:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aguts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cuq-Toulza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Cuq-Toulza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Pechaudier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Montgey (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Lempaut (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sor river in Soual (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 place Fouyssac in Puylaurens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Lescout (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granary in Rouffach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 65 rue du 40e-Reg.-des-Spahis-Marocains in Rouffach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --The night rainbow 06:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de l'Oeuvre Notre-Dame in Rouffach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 07:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Rouffach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 07:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Rouffach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 07:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Rouffach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 07:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Avitus church in Saint-Avit (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Lempaut (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montagne Noire from Lagardiolle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cambounet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 23 rue Callinet in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 23 rue Poincare in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings at rue du Marechal Joffre in Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granary in Rouffach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Rouffach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Rouffach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Rouffach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michel church in Semalens (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary church in Frejeville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of Rouffach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 04:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of Rouffach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 04:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Haut-Koenigsbourg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cuq Tarn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michel church in Semalens (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary church in Frejeville (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 rue du Marechal Joffre in Rouffach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 rue du Marechal Joffre in Rouffach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockbrunnen in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 09:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lloyd Palace in Bydgoszcz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lloyd Palace in Bydgoszcz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Jonquieres Tarn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 22:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cuq Tarn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Salvator chapel in Lautrec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main Post Office in Bydgoszcz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stary Port 13 in Bydgoszcz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stary Port 13 in Bydgoszcz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary church in Frejeville (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue in Rouffach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brda in Bydgoszcz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brda in Bydgoszcz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brda in Bydgoszcz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Lempaut (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michel church in Semalens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Avit Tarn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mazieres (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Laboulbene (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cardaillac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvia officinalis in Cardaillac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Camburat (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Genevieve church in Lissac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Fourmagnac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 2 in Bydgoszcz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezuicka 2 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old buildings in Grand Combe 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 18:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Livinhac-le-Haut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stimoroll 18:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antoninus church in Combret 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferme de la Goudalie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montredon Lot (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 41 in Bydgoszcz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 37 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kordeckiego 14 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Verticals are straight, but it looks a bit deformed; a horizontal perspective correction might improve the photo. However quality good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 06:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hippolytus church in Saint-Hippolyte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lwowek (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granary in Lwowek (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Carcenac-Peyralès (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestiges of the castle in Muret-le-Chateau 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juniperus communis in Causse Comtal (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market Square in Lwowek (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue d'Empare in Castres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Rodez (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wenzelschloss in Lauf an der Pegnitz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 31 rue Henri IV in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 10:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Remigius church in Lautrec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:15, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Martin and Nicholas cathedral in Bydgoszcz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Bydgoszcz 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Please remove the Dust spots at the upper left corner. --Augustgeyler 16:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 07:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mickiewicza 1 in Pniewy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:44, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Golinhac 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Blaise church in Limogne-en-Quercy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wenzelschloss in Lauf an der Pegnitz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 32 in Lwowek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 24 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (visible violett chromatic aberration could be removed). --F. Riedelio 07:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miedzychodzka 1 in Pniewy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miedzychodzka 1 in Pniewy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BRPever 12:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 23:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gratus church in Memer (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Puylagarde (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 13:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saillac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qulity --Michielverbeek 07:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Saillagol 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 39 in Bydgoszcz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 13:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays![edit]

A somewhat naive, but nice nativity scene in Weil der Stadt, Germany Happy Holidays, Tournasol7
  • Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
  • Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года!

--Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bled Island 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bled Island 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would rotate the image 90 drgrees --Llez 07:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Amans church in Camboulazet (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Camboulazet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Salan 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of Verdun Castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stream in the placed named Verdun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lwowek (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 22 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Tournasol7! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- Johann Jaritz talk 07:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Tournasol7! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presbytery in Ceignac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Michael church in St-Urcize (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Camboulas (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dluga 31 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace in Pniewy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace in Pniewy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in Puylagarde 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Saillac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 rue Francisco Ferrer in Castres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parish church in Lwowek (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lwowek (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stary Port 1-3 in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment I marked two Dust spots and ask you to remove them. --Augustgeyler 16:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 21:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Limogne-en-Quercy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahonia aquifolium in Aveyron (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very soft. But QI. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft, but ghood quality --Michielverbeek 09:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit soft, but good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Manhac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau de Vayre (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gratus church in Memer (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Amans church in Camboulazet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 14:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lwowek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 17:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Fuzies in Castres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Adrian church in Livinhac-le-Haut 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presbytery in Ceignac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Puylagarde (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 38 in Szamotuly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Slight unsharpness at top right but OK for 17 MP IMO. --King of Hearts 21:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate in Szamotuly (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 21:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cele river in Viazac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiking sign near Mary Magdelene chapel in Guirande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Saint-Perdoux Lot (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viburnum lantana in Aveyron (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Magrin (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Maurens-Scopont 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchis purpurea in Aveyron (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sageretia thea bonsai (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Postcrossing stamp from Ukraine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old houses by the Agout river in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vitus Church in Rogozno (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cardamine pratensis[edit]

Hej, zajrzałem do wrzuconych na wikikonkurs zdjęć i tam masz serię podpisaną jako "Cardamine pratensis" z numerami od 24 do 45. Cardamine pratensis jest na fotkach nr 34, 35, 36, 41, 42, ale na pozostałych jest Saxifraga granulata (nr 24-27, 31-33, 37-40, 44-45) i Alliaria petiolata (nr 28-30). Na zdjęciu nr 43 na pierwszym plenie są pędy Cardamine pratensis, a na drugim Saxifraga granulata. Zajrzałem do wcześniej wrzuconych do kategorii Cardamine pratensis Twoich zdjęć (numery poniżej 24) i tam wszędzie jest ok. Kenraiz (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (7).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Lawrence church in Pniewy (7).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antoninus church in Combret 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum coccineum in Cardaillac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Cassagnes-Comtaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Clairvaux-d'Aveyron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferme de la Goudalie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Garrigues 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Viviers-les-Lavaur (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gratus church in Memer (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Amans church in Camboulazet (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Camboulazet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Salan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vitus Church in Rogozno (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image. As the subject is the church, I suggest to crop the extraneous road in the foreground. --Tagooty 11:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very sorry, but it seems ok for me... --Tournasol7 00:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Poudis (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 21:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau d'Humieres in Conques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:17, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Clairvaux-d'Aveyron (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Light is a bit harsh but ok --Christian Ferrer 10:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aude river in Coursan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Blan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Garrevaques (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cambon-les-Lavaur (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Pechaudier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Montgey (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Puylaurens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 04:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Appelle (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Lacroisille (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in Cadix (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman tower in Puissalicon (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Puissalicon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Puissalicon (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Roujan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue Saint-Guiraud in Puissalicon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Michael church in St-Urcize (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quercus robur stamp from Ukraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juglans regia stamp from Ukraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cucumis sativus stamp from Ukraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inkwell stamp from Ukraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Still life painting by Juan de Zurbaran stamp from Ukraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Palleville (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Poudis (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (53).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michel church in Semalens (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Puimisson (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Puissalicon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Roujan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:05, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salix alba stamp from Ukraine, 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bananas on black background 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Avitus church in Saint-Avit (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over the Sor river in Soual (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leontius church in Corneilhan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Puimisson (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the most beautiful composition, but the quality is good --Michielverbeek 06:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Roujan (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Fabian & Sabastian church in Fijaguet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman tower in Puissalicon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 13:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Nissan-lez-Enserune (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Corneilhan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aude river in Coursan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Coursan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Laboulbene (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but the French flag is unfortuantely not very obvious (normally you have to wait for a little gust of wind) --Michielverbeek 18:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mazieres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de l'Hotel de Ville in Castres 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Alquier Bouffard in Castres 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old houses by the Agout river in Castres (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 quai des Jacobins in Castres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Nayrac in Castres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Magrin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Marzens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Blaise church in Limogne-en-Quercy 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Appelle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith abbey church in Conques (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 20:20, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate in Szamotuly (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO unfavorable cropping (disturbing cut off tree on the right side). --F. Riedelio 10:12, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't bother that much, and clone out would be a hassle. --Tournasol7 21:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment You don't have to clone that. You can also change the cropping. --F. Riedelio 08:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 10:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Belcastel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Agnan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-de-Rives 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Garrigues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bach Lot (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Blaise church in Limogne-en-Quercy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Albinus church in Prades (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 12:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Maurens-Scopont 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilarius church in Pratviel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge in Entraygues (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Entraygues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 place Albert Castanie in Entraygues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 place Albert Castanie in Entraygues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 place Albert Castanie in Entraygues 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Roquevidal (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Villeneuve-les-Lavaur 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cambon-les-Lavaur (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Salvius church in Saint-Salvy (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Lacroisille (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in Cadix (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Avitus church in Saint-Avit (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Amans church in Camboulazet (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Blaise church in Limogne-en-Quercy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Puylagarde (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John church in Bannieres 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Viviers-les-Lavaur (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Lempaut (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Little dust spot on the left, otherwise good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Rode in Lautrec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museum of Denys Puech 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB00:A05:D100:50A7:6C34:B9EA:D3FB 20:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Lempaut (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Grand Rue in Soual.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market hall in Palleville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestiges of the castle in Muret-le-Chateau 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Lunel (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Senergues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Carcenac-Peyralès (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz in Naumburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality and composition are good, lighting is even, but there's a strange bright spot on the tree on the right side, near the pushchair (leaves on the bottom). Could you try to fix it, please? (For example, by locally increasing contrast or turning down blacks). Thank you. --Lion-hearted85 20:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thank you very much for your detailed review. If it was my image I would do that immediately. Unfortunately I am not the author and not able to do any changes to this file. Please decide if you can support it with this error. Otherwise you should oppose on it. --Augustgeyler 23:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support It's not a significant flaw to me, and the picture is good overall. Maybe Tournasol7 will have time to have a look in the future. --Lion-hearted85 01:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cambounet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Clairvaux-d'Aveyron (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Aguts (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestiges of the castle in Muret-le-Chateau 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Senergues (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Espeyrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame-des-Hauteurs chapel in Golinhac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary church in Frejeville (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Lescout (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Blan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bach Lot (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour des Templiers in Martiel (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Marroule 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Escamps 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cuq-Toulza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Pechaudier (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Garrevaques (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 21:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moulin de la Salette in Lautrec (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge in Entraygues (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Entraygues (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George chapel in Entraygues (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lescout (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Algans (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Blaise church in Lugan Tarn 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]