User talk:Tournasol7/Archive2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Austremoine Church 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte du Vainqueur 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Maurice Church of Anglars.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in Caylus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cosmos sulphureus in Jardin botanique de la Charme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montricoux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montricoux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre Dame de l'Assomption de Vaour 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 13:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A added a specific category of the subject for you, otherwise QI --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Tournasol7 10:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand-Rue de l'Horloge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outbuildings at the Castle of Cas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Maurice Church of Anglars 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church of Pinet 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Source of Aveyron River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre Dame de l'Assomption Church of Bruniquel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 17:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Maurice Church of Anglars 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asphodeline lutea in Jardin botanique de la Charme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in Caylus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Goorsse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment 2 dust spots that should be removed and blue and purple CAs in the upper right (see the notes) --Halavar 13:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 13:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. Quality image for me --Halavar 15:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Crucifix Chapel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Julien Church of Ayrinhac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 14:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium endressii in Jardin botanique de la Charme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Harsh shadow but QI as I think -- Spurzem 13:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful composition and good quality -- Spurzem 13:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That's rather a wall (I added a cat), but ok --Poco a poco 15:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outbuildings at the Castle of Cas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and here with interesting shadow -- Spurzem 13:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delosperma lineare in Jardin botanique de la Charme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. PumpkinSky 00:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemerocallis Neyron Rose in Jardin botanique de la Charme 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quakity. PumpkinSky 00:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cistus albidus in Jardin botanique de la Charme 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft and could be sharper but OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10-14 Cours Jean Jaurès in Pezenas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Souyri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de l'Horloge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (including the pigeon ;-) ) --Llez 16:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Cambodia QIC nomination[edit]

FYI from the rules:

"If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below File:ImageNameHere.jpg|User talk:Tournasol7/Archive2/Nomination" PumpkinSky talk 19:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my mistake. sorry. PumpkinSky talk 21:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand-Rue de la Barbacane 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 13:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Townhall of Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 17:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cours Jean Jaures in Pezenas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Can you improve the cutout?--Famberhorst 17:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 18:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Julien Church of Ayrinhac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Poco a poco 17:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phytolacca decandra in Jardin botanique de la Charme 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaulieu-en-Rouergue Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre Dame de l'Assomption de Vaour 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top left corner not the best, but overall ok --Poco a poco 15:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 13:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Chapel in Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Lewis Hulbert 13:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Sauveur Church of Liaucous 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church of Pinet 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 13:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 00:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on Lac des Salhiens 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 16:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 24 Cours Jean Jaurès in Pezenas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 00:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cross near Lac de Saint-Andéol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clock tower in Bruniquel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des Ormeaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Famberhorst 15:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on Severac-le-Chateau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary Church of Nasbinals 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boralde de Saint-Chély-d'Aubrac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayon temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Saint-Andéol 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Julien Church of Ayrinhac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21 Place de la Porte Neuve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Cosmas Church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Pierre-es-Liens Church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Loubers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal of Saint Sauveur Church in Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Dionysius Church of Loubers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Antonin-Noble-Val 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Leris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sauveur Church in Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 22-24 Cours Jean Jaurès in Pezenas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amaury de Severac Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battlements in Conques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Panat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window of the Saint Cosmas Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK but could you add some window-related category, too? --Basotxerri 15:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 21:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Cornusson 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a blurry spot in the tree, I'm not sure if it can be fixed. Could you try? Further I think that there is plenty of sky, maybe you could crop a bit. --Basotxerri 15:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Cropped, Tournasol7 21:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me now. --Basotxerri 15:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Maurice Church of Anglars 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 10:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the church in Saint-Igne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Lacoste 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge upon Aveyron River in Montrozier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte du Fer 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Republique and Statue of Marianne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. IMHO, it would be better if you didn't lift the shadows so much, makes the tonality of the image weird and also, it would be great if you could clone out the car bottom left. --C messier 09:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Montrozier with the Saint Faith Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GR 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barn of the Castle of Cas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal of Saint Christopher Church in Saint-Christophe-Vallon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Atamari 15:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main street in Les Vignes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Chapel of Cambayrac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate to the Castle of Panat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montrozier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portail Obscur in Caylus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn River in Les Vignes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window of Saint Christopher Church in Saint-Christophe-Vallon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 14:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window of Saint Christopher Church in Saint-Christophe-Vallon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This would be a good candidate for a horizontal correction to get the brick rows straight. You could try, if you want. Anyway: Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church of Vindrac-Alayrac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe the right side is slightly leaning out (or maybe not?) but there are some blue and green CAs on the tree on the right. --Basotxerri 18:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 14:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaulieu-en-Rouergue Abbey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge Les Pelerins 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 13:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portail d'Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Pauvres d'Aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Rabax63 14:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clocher d'Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Pauvres d'Aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The perimeter of the building could have been a bit sharper. But good for me.--Famberhorst 15:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Place du Balat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Have you thought about a crop without the people on the left? Anyway, good quality. --Basotxerri 16:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juniperus communis, Aveyron, France A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alandmanson 13:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puech du Cayla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is "Puech du Cayla" the mountain in the back (and "Puech" is "Pic")? In this case you should add an according category to the "Puech du Cayla" category (like "Mountain in France", "Mountains in...") (as I understand that you've created this category, too). You could also add some mailbox-related category because it's quite dominant in the image. --Basotxerri 16:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category: Mailboxes in Occitanie added; "Puech" is a name occitan, Puech du Cayla is a hill situated in Vallon de Marcillac (natural region of France), which is a part of Massif Central. Tournasol7 14:40, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you!. I've added "Hills of France" to the category "Puech du Cayla". Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau des Pleches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana lutea in Nasbinals.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me. -- Achim Raschka 17:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cross and Lac de Saint-Andéol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor Wat 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.PumpkinSky 02:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Saint-Andéol 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Peyrade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hilarmont 15:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boralde de Saint-Chely-d'Aubrac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Hilarmont 15:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayon temple 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Hilarmont 15:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) @Tournasol7: Could you remove pls the white border at the top?[reply]
@Hilarmont: ✓ Done, Tournasol7 23:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC) thx! --Hilarmont 23:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montrozier 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate of the town of Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal of the Saint Catherine Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal of the Saint Mary Church of Nasbinals 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of the Church in Panat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Goorsse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Panat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre Dame de l'Assomption de Vaour 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Rue Droit 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Emile Roudier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bellis perennis in Jardin Botanique de l'Aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau d'Humieres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main door of the Church of Cornusson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on the Church in Panat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs some cropping. --Tsungam 14:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, good now. --Tsungam 09:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des Ormeaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are some spots in the sky (birds or insects), could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 20:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 15:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pézenas 1 Rue Alfred Sabatier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 14:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Christopher Church in Saint-Christophe-Vallon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Cornusson 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Cornusson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea montana in Jardin Botanique de l'Aubrac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Church in Montrozier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary Church of Nasbinals 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residential house in Penne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary Church of Nasbinals 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel and Vieux Pont 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Two things that should be done before promotion to QI (see the notes) --Halavar 14:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 14:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK now. PumpkinSky 17:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Dionysius Church of Loubers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Minor CAs at the leafs top left. --XRay 09:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau des Pleches 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate to the Castle of Panat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cross near Lac de Saint-Andéol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de l'Horloge 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please remove the bird(?) on the right side (see annotation) --Llez 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pézenas 35 Rue Anatole France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Anatole France in Pezenas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 08:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Christopher Church in Saint-Christophe-Vallon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 18:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Information about the Bridge Les Pelerins 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Tournasol7: ...but please add some sign-related category... --Basotxerri 17:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Category added, Tournasol7 18:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restes du chateau de Vaour 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Cougousse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal of the Saint Eligius Church in Saint-Chely-d'Aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. You could add some portal-related category. --Basotxerri 16:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Panat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI now, sorry for the delay, I'm traveling --Poco a poco 08:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Austremoine Church 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 19:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Saint-Andéol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Porte Theron in Saint-Come-d'Olt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1. Photo shows daily life at a square somewhere in the southern part of France. --Michielverbeek 17:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montricoux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Close-up photographs of Malva sylvestris flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 23:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on Conques 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 14:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Peyrat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte Theron in Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Place du Balat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau des Cardaillac SCL 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church of Vindrac-Alayrac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canoeing on Tarn River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue near the Church of Cornusson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality good enough for promotion IMHO--Nikhilb239 06:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotellerie de l abbaye Sainte-Foy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bruniquel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Chanoine Andre Benazech 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Austremoine Church 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice. Maybe even FP. PumpkinSky 14:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte du Barry 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe would have been better if you went a step backwards to get more of the arch on the left. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:56, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint-Antonin Church SANV 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge Les Pelerins 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35 Rue Anatole France 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Rue Droit 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO not a brilliant photo, corner too sharp and bottom crop not perfect. However quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Teysseroles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Pierre es Liens Church of Verfeil sur Seye 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Panat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Four in Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul Church in Salles-la-Source 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. But may be better with less sky and more cemetery. --XRay 15:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Round window of the Church of Cornusson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could have been better centered, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist office in Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe you could add some category about timber-framed buildings etc. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Category added, Tournasol7 21:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Montrozier 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please have a look at the crop of the lower left corner --Llez 15:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Croped, Tournasol7 22:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now --Llez 08:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convolvulus arvensis 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments composition is a bit bland but other then that ok by me. User:Sixflashphoto 14:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Belcastel 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battlements of the Castle of Bruniquel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 16:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux pont d'Albi 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church in Conques 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image coup de cœur de Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 en France, 3 September 2017[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 18.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 3 September 2017.

Cordialement, -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 05:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Side door of the Saint Faith Abbey Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre Dame de l'Assomption Church of Bruniquel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vermicellery of Albi 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clock tower in Bruniquel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 16:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boralde de Saint-Chély-d'Aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Pont and Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Calmontie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour du Greffe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Pauvres d'Aubrac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK but maybe a bit too flat. --C messier 16:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Severac 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Maybe a bit blueish, but OK. --C messier 16:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central courtyard of the Palais de la Berbie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Penitents in Saint-Come-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 09:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Chapel of Cambayrac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaulieu-en-Rouergue Abbey 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 26 rue Mariès in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea jacea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residential house in Penne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window of the Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on Severac-le-Chateau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Left side of the image is blurred. Try a crop:) --Halavar 15:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Cropped, Tournasol7 14:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Halavar: , can you check it, please. Tournasol7 22:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support No blurred region anymore. --Capricorn4049 21:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de l'Eglise in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful place and good photo. --ArildV 20:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 44 Rue Emile Grand in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting motif, good enough for QI. --Milseburg 14:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand-Rue de la Barbacane 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 16:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn River in Les Vignes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support sharpness could be better, geo location missing. --XRay 17:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Geo location missing? But you have the coordinates already... Tournasol7 20:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry. --XRay 15:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church of Vindrac-Alayrac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in Caylus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Michel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! College Laperouse in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]