User talk:Tournasol7/Archive14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19 Grand'Rue in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26 Grand'Rue in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19 Grand'Rue in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 43 Grand'Rue in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand'Rue in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Serruriers in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2-4 rue du Chasseur in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Venice in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A spot in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 06:36, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 21:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 Place Jeanne d'Arc in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Marchands in Colmar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison zum Stork in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Shame about the motorbike though --Podzemnik 01:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former guard house in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Gintzburger & Maison Adolph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted to right Seven Pandas 01:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 rue des Augustins in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue Morel in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 rue de Turenne in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 rue de Turenne in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 place du General-Andre-Hartemann in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 Place de la Cathedrale in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19 Grand'Rue in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered market in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assize Court of Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Theophile Conrad Pfeffel in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victor Hugo College in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Venice in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue Morel in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 17:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand'Rue in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Kleber in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison des Tetes in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue des Boulangers in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Well on place des Dominicains in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 Place de la Cathedrale in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison zum Stork in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Gintzburger in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Gintzburger in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former guard house in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Bartholdi in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-14 rue des Marchands in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Place de la Cathedrale in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okarito Lagoon 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Peter and Paul church of Biesles 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice church of Armes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church in Camburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Nuces 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue des Boulangers in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Marchands in Colmar 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Boulangers in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Marchands in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --大诺史 17:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Marchands in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Court of Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Court of Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Venice in Colmar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie in Colmar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 rue de Turenne in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Six Montagnes Noires in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Chauffour in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please remove the large darker spot in the sky --Llez 06:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Venice in Colmar 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de l'Ancienne-Poste in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de l'Eglise in Kaysersberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 65 Rue du General de Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael chapel in Kaysersberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhof chapel in Kaysersberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison des Tetes in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 48 rue des Marchands in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Tetes in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Well on place des Dominicains in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 54 rue des Clefs in Colmar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Fleischhauer in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 23 rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Jean in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Minor traces of CAs at the top right, we can ignore them. --Aristeas 09:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oratory of the fortified bridge on the Weiss in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weiss river in Kaysersberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Herzer in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bath house in Kaysersberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vine in the vineyard in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Jean-Ittel in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 42 Rue du General de Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 47 Rue du General de Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael chapel in Kaysersberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former franciscan convent in Kaysersberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhof chapel in Kaysersberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhof chapel in Kaysersberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former franciscan convent in Kaysersberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 60 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 62-64 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 66 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Rue du General de Gaulle in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 Rue du General de Gaulle in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Gratte-Ciel in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Gratte-Ciel in Riquewihr 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 60-66 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Brief-Faller in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former franciscan convent in Kaysersberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de l'Ancien Hopital in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Commanderie in Kaysersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Gratte-Ciel in Riquewihr 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Dissler in Riquewihr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Margaret catholic church of in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House of Tobie Berger in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 rue Saint-Nicolas in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Place Voltaire in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former castle of the Counts of Montbeliard-Wurttemberg in Riquewihr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Dissler in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Six Montagnes Noires in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 40 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 39 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 27 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 33 rue du Général-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Kaslaiblin in Riquewihr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:38, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 rue du Cerf in Riquewihr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 rue du Cerf in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Thalinger in Riquewihr 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Thalinger in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 44 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Pfeffel in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 18:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 rue Berthe-Molly in Colmar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Lots of dust spots in the sky --Podzemnik 09:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ping User:Tournasol7 --Podzemnik 21:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 02:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks --Podzemnik 09:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Schongauer in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]


Hallo Tournasol7,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Parayre 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal Theater in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Tour in Balsac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church in La Fouillade 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 13:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Margaret protestant church in Riquewihr 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 13:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 40 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 13:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Margaret protestant church in Riquewihr 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Kaysersberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Nicolas in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 44 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 48 rue du General-de-Gaulle in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Kaslaiblin in Riquewihr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings at Lambton Quay in Wellington.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenue de la Tour in Clairvaux-d'Aveyron 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 07:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jean Philippe in Rallye de Marcillac 2018 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Adolph in Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I am not sure about the colour balance; maybe with slightly changed values the image would be even better? --Aristeas 08:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolnosci Square 20 in Znin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Bank of Luxembourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haematopus finschi at Firth of Thames 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary Church of Pruines 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice clouds --Michielverbeek 06:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterfall in Muret-le-Chateau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice expose effect. --PantheraLeo1359531 07:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Balsac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Nuces 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Tekapo 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordallee 14-16 in Trier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of La Besse-Vors 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Place Maruejouls in Aubin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenue Jean Jaures in Cransac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Broquies 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I agree, but the unsharp airplain/bird in the middle of the picture should be removed --Llez 05:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotorua in Rotorua 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Place Champollion in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornblumengasse in Wetzlar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roeseplatz 1 in Eisenach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Laurent-les-Tours 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fox Glacier in Westland National Park 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Moroder 16:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunflowers cultivated in Southern France 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Princesse in Montauban 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 Rue Saint-Louis in Carcassone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Suzanne in Aurillac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sugar Loaf in Canterbury Region 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vinca minor in Aveyron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 15:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Towers of the Naumburg Cathedral 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waihi Beach Reserve 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Wenceslaus church in Naumburg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gangolf churches in Trier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Benvenuto Cellini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Eisenach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Lahnbruecke in Wetzlar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church of Toulonjac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Villefranche de Rouergue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wainui Bay 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Arenes de Nimes (18).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arenes de Nimes (18).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Sainte-Croix Aveyron 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, I like the composition. --ArildV 07:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 05:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apple Pink Lady.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. WB abit too yellow IMO --Ermell 07:04, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame des Anges church of Collioure 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaihinu Point and Maioio Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The horizon looks a bit tilted because of the bay on the very left and very right side of the image. If they would be the same distance, this would be fine. The islands in the front are in level --D-Kuru 19:20, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine tarn on Lewis Pass 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phormium cookianum in Westland NP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Sauveur Church in Severac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister next to treasury of medieval goldsmith in Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Balsac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commandery of Hospitallers of Saint John in Lugan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Castle of Montal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1-3 Place Nationale in Montauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Muntashir.islam 10:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitre Peak in Fiordland National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Montbazens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 15:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary Church of Pruines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 12:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maniola jurtina on Eupatorium cannabinum flowers 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bave River in Saint-Cere 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Avenue Pescatore in Luxembourg City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nazaire Basilica of Carcassonne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Tekapo 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont du Gard (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge in Belcastel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Clamecy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not easy to handle the perspective of such motifs. --Milseburg 15:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Liegnitz in Potsdam 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9-10 Place de Conques in Villeneuve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:53, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of commune of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not 100% about WB but otherwise fine --Poco a poco 08:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Highway 94 in Fiordland National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of F.C. Canrobert in Saint-Céré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Salles-la-Source 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fenton Street in Rotorua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 20:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern slope of Mount Ruapehu 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Laurian church of Bellerive-sur-Allier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch church of Le Cheix 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice church of Le Donjon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mueller Lake from Kea Point 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musee des Arts et Metiers Traditionnels 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Sharpenss and interesting angle make up for downsizing --Podzemnik 03:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Saint-Michel Priory of Grandmont (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dourdou River near Nauviale 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fox Glacier in Westland National Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the city hall of Aurillac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienstrasse 12a in Naumburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome at night (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old stock exchange in Leipzig (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predigerhaus in Leipzig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predigerhaus in Leipzig (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predigerhaus in Leipzig (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Dr. Joseph Fau in Conques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Balsac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Hilary Church of Pruines 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taranaki Falls 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Saint-Julien-de-Piganiol 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Peter and Paul church in Naumburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 16:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Trier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 Stary Port Street in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcades Alphonse de Poitiers 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial Church of Marcillac-Vallon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Waimakariri River 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church in Camburg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pont du Gard (30).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pont du Gard (30).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 38 place de la Carriere in Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux Pont in Belcastel 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mare's Leg Cove 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very nice. Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:23, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Ingres in Montauban 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolnosci Square 13 in Znin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Lake 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 07:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew Bobola church in Bydgoszcz 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wydenbrugkstrasse 4 in Eisenach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Livinhac-le-Haut 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It will looks better after clone&stamp the upper left corner. --Moahim 08:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 09:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC) - Ok. --Moahim 05:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchis x hybrida in Aveyron 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose You'll have to the it identified to become QI --Poco a poco 08:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 12:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks, I guess that it needs now a new title? --Poco a poco 15:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion submitted. --Tournasol7 22:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cercle municipal in Luxembourg City 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waihi Beach Reserve 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue in Sanssouci Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter and St Paul church of Autoire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Tongariro National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church of Saint-Laurent-les-Tours 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaing (209).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nazaire Basilica of Carcassonne 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornblumengasse in Wetzlar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall tower in Znin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Therese Sanctuary of Saint Igest 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Sauveur Church in Severac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 08:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterfall in Muret-le-Chateau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port de Saleix 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Maison Carree in Nimes (16).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maison Carree in Nimes (16).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial Church in Gabriac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milford Sound in Fiordland National Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Notre-Dame d'Aurinques in Aurillac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Foncourieu in Marcillac-Vallon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Place de Las Oules in Villeneuve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church in Camburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Technical 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former church of Our Lady of Villegailhenc 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This image looks good. But I wonder, whether or not this church also bends in person. This might as well be some sort of viewing angle distortion. I'd also crop the image a little so the curch is centred. --Johannes Maximilian 07:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 12:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Notre-Dame du Gua in Aubin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The car on the left side is disturbing. --Steindy 22:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 05:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 08:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Peter and Paul church of Biesles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Fontaine in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wainui Bay 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Talabot 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin du Coustilles in Estaing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Caussade 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shakespeare Bay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Amaury de Severac in Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Genesius Church of Aynac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Waihi Beach Reserve 31.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waihi Beach Reserve 31.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Auguste Pierre Pont in Carcassone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:56, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of settlement Panat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Tekapo 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame collegiate church of Villefranche-de-Rouergue 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Autoire 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Tongariro National Park 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gerald church of Montbazens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Black Penitents in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City-Hochhaus in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulverturm in Bad Hersfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orangery in Gotha (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obergasse 21 in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church in Bensheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House of Johann Sebastian Bach in Eisenach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Big dust spots in the sky --Podzemnik 07:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 13:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks --Podzemnik 07:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Francois d'Estaing in Estaing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road sign in Brousse-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 06:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birds at Firth of Thames 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Geraud church of Salles-Curan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in La Roque-Valzergues 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Saint George church in Bensheim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lathyrus niger in Aveyron 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the castle of Severac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. WB is a bit cold IMO. --Ermell 06:40, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Caussade 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Church of Montbartier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Joseph SCV 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp photo, simple composition, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railway line Capdenac-Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 07:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Granary in Bydgoszcz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the images – and a little hint![edit]

Two little errors in this image

Hello Krzysztof/Tournasol7,

currently I am participating in the prejury for the German “Wiki Loves Monuments” 2019 section. When I see a photo I particularily like, I give my vote and then take a glance who has created that file. Many of these good photos have been contributed by you. So I just wanted to say “thank you” for all the nice photographs of monuments in Germany you have contributed ;–).

At this opportunity I just want to give you a little hint. When editing this image of the Klausturm in Bad Hersfeld, something went wront – there are two strange places in the sky. I have marked them with image notes. I just wanted to let you know because your beautiful photograph really deserves that the little errors are fixed. ;–)

Best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 12:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aristeas, thank you for you too! I think the a have a problem with my camera, because this dust spots are often on my photos. I try to correct it, but somethimes I forget it. So now the 2 dust spots are fixed. Thank you for your review. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tournasol7/Archive14, your images above (the first two images in the gallery) show in my opinion rather hairy specimens of Vicia sepium, not Lathyrus niger. Vicia sepium has got inflorescences with rather short stalks, whereas those of Lathyrus niger are long. Lathyrus niger has got bluish green leaves that have not got a tendril at the apex, but one of your images clearly shows the base of the tendril (even though the top of it was cut off). So could you please correct the ID? THank you, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Flogaus-Faust; ✓ Done. Thank for your review. Best regards, Tournasol7 (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Highway 94 near Homer Tunnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de la Cite Carcassonne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cercle municipal in Luxembourg City 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Sauveur Church in Severac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Lake 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tasman Lake panorama (03-05-06-07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Caussade 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of commune of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier Lookout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Place Champollion in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Saint Julian church in Vabre-Tizac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Range 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of commune of Severac-le-Chateau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial Church in Gabriac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Cascade in Salles-la-Source 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A good photo! There are some strange structures in the sky (maybe not visible on every monitor); could you improve the sky? --Aristeas 08:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see with my monitor, so I decided to reved the sky. --Tournasol7 14:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Of course, the image is good now ;–). --Aristeas 08:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Cyr-et-Sainte-Julitte de Canac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of the town hall of Estaing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wainui Bay 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolnosci Square 5 in Znin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flowers of Viburnum lantana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 01:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Fontaine in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
there are some dust spots (birds) in the sky --Llez 06:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 14:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 01:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cercle municipal in Luxembourg City 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Cyr-et-Sainte-Julitte de Canac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dieffenbach Point 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 06:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Tournasol7 14:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Les noms des categories[edit]

Bonjour Gzen, je vois que tu changes les noms des categories. Ce sera pas mieux de les faire en anglais? Par example à la place de Maison au 4, rue Kilian à Riquewihr faire Building (or house) at 4 rue Kilian in Riquewihr. Qu'est-ce que t'en pense? Cordialement, Tournasol7 (talk) 13:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, oui sans doute, mais avec cette discussion ça ne parait pas aussi simple. Dans l'immédiat, quand la catégorie est en français, je préfère juste l'orthographier correctement. Gzen92 [discuter] 06:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, ça marche. Merci pour la réponse :) Bonne soirée! Tournasol7 (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Profitons l'occasion; est-ce que tu peux voter ici. C'est une de photos de Colmar qui j'ai nominé pour FP. Merci d'avance :) Tournasol7 (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oui j'ai vu que tu as fait cette proposition, mais je ne suis pas impartial, je ne peux que voter pour ;) Gzen92 [discuter] 06:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup! :) Tournasol7 (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fog in the valley of Duzou River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John Baptist of Capdenac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shore of Firth of Thames 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Aynac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Auberoques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Little Venice in Colmar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Little Venice in Colmar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tour Corbieres Rodez.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tour Corbieres Rodez.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Square town gate in Villeneuve 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hanooz 09:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 Rue Pavee in Villeneuve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodpecker Bay 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Dourdou de Conques 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Corbieres Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of Notre-Dame collegiate church of Villefranche-de-Rouergue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 07:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Saint-Jean-le-Froid 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Stitching error at the right at the rain pipe. Windows 8? ;-) --Ermell 10:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done (now, windows 10:) ). --Tournasol7 14:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Cliffs in Pukearuhe 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sign of Les Plus Beaux Villages de France in Brousse-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerastium arvense in Conques-en-Rouergue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John Baptist of Capdenac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Geraud church of Salles-Curan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 07:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TranzAlpine Railway in the valley of Waimakariri River 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Saint-Fleuret in Estaing 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Holy Sepulchre of Villeneuve 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass windows of the Our Lady Cathedral of Rodez 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in La Roque-Valzergues 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:59, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficaria verna in Conques-en-Rouergue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality for a habitus image of this really difficult plant. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moir Street in Eltham.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Vieillevie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Notre-Dame du Gua in Aubin 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Misery 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison des Consuls in Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Requista 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Pont-de-Salars 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de l'Eglise in Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meybille Bay 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin Church of Lunan 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]