User talk:Tonton Bernardo
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-- 03:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Dates[edit]
Bonjour Tonton, et bravo pour tes photos de La Réunion, que je te remercie d'avoir chargées. Cependant, n'oublie pas, à l'avenir, de mettre systématiquement en pied de page la catégorie de date correspondante, par exemple Category:January 2012 in Réunion. Thierry Caro (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Accents[edit]
Malheureusement, on ne peut pas renommer un endroit à cause d'une difficulté technique que l'on rencontre sur Commons. Grand Étang en anglais reste Grand Étang. Il faut donc continuer comme ça. Thierry Caro (talk) 09:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Moth[edit]
Hello Are you able to identify this moth of Madagascar? Thx. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 18:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I found en:Pingasa chlora, a crop pest. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 05:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Chien royal Bourbon.[edit]
- Bonjour Tonton Bernardo,
D'abord bravo pour tes photos, à tous les niveaux (choix, qualité,...) ... Sinon, je te contacte pour te demander si tu n'as pas dans tes stocks de photos, une ou deux photos de royal Bourbon, le chien de la Réunion, (un chien super: malheureusement, il y en a beaucoup trop, ils causent des dégâts et donc beaucoup connaissent un sort funeste)... En effet, je voulais illustrer la page royal Bourbon sur Wiktionnaire (le dictionnaire wiki) et je n'ai rien trouvé... Donc, voilà... Mais bon, ce n'est pas très important, c'est vraiment au cas où et Merci dans tous les cas pour tes supers photos... Bon mois de Juillet (en Métropole, c'est l'Eté). --34 super héros (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- PS: si quelqu'un d'autre a ce genre de photo en stock, n'hésitez pas, ça profitera à tout le monde...
=[edit]
Réponse à 34 super hero - Royal Bourbon[edit]
Eu, oui, bien sur ! J'ai un tas - mon chien est un bourbon veritable :) Mais ils sont très variable, en taille, couleur et forme....
Bon mois de juillet pour toi aussi (c'est toujours été chez nous... 26-28°) un salut du tonton Tonton Bernardo (talk) 02:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Réponse à Tonton Bernardo-Royal Bourbon.
- Bonjour, chez moi (à Montpellier), c'est l'enfer (34°), c'est la canicule (contrairement à Paris et au Nord ) et surtout, il n' y a pas d'air et c'est une chaleur sèche ... Je préfère le climat de la Réunion : il y a toujours un peu d'air et on claque même des dents le soir dans les Hauts (j'y ai séjourné (jadis) mon ex étant originaire du Sud).
Sinon, pour la photo, c'est pour illustrer sur le wiktionnaire la page royal Bourbon et il me semble que la majorité des chiens réunionnais ressemblent aux chiens de l'Inde (fauve, marron clair ou blanc, de petite taille (ou moyenne) et le haut des oreilles tombantes) ou aux chiens de Maurice... De toute façon, royal Bourbon, ce n'est pas une race, ça désigne des chiens bâtards (évidemment, c'est plus classe de dire royal Bourbon) mais c'est vrai que l'idée qu'on s'en fait c'est un peu comme sur la photo, un chien de taille moyenne... Après, peu importe, s'il est beige avec des tâches noires puisque c'est un mélange...
- Donc, si ça correspond, n'hésite pas à mettre une (ou quelques) photo sur Commons, il n' y en a pas du tout... Bonne fin de semaine. --34 super héros (talk) 12:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Désolé, c'est pas mon chien :)
J'ai décidé de quitter Wikipedia. Trop d'admins cons. C'est un projet mort pour moi. Désolé pour le chiens, pourquoi tu ne mets pas l'indien, il fera l'affaire aussi.... Ciao Tonton Bernardo (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Réponse. Dommage, pour ton départ... Pour le chien, tu as raison : pourquoi se compliquer la vie... Bye et bonne continuation. --34 super héros (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Moçambique-50meticais-banknote-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bulwersator (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:32-Acraea masamba.JPG[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:32-Acraea masamba.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Stefan4 (talk) 23:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:48-Lechriolepis ramdimby stumpffii (Saalmüller, 1880).JPG[edit]
.JPG){kind=link}
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:48-Lechriolepis ramdimby stumpffii (Saalmüller, 1880).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Stefan4 (talk) 23:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:55-Borocera jejuna (Saalmuller 1884).JPG[edit]
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:55-Borocera jejuna (Saalmuller 1884).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Stefan4 (talk) 23:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Can somebody delete my account please ![edit]
Who the hell understands those links in that license stuff links???
Not me - fuck. I'm tired of this.
Please, can somebody delete my account ! Thanks. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 05:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Calm down, may I help you. The license is void in these files, it needs a license. They seem more than 100 years old.
- How about: {{PD-old}} – for works in the public domain because their copyright has expired. This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
OK, take them all out - and please close my account.
Thanks
Tonton Bernardo (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC) => not forgotten !
OK, all files that had been uploaded under similar condiations have been marked the same way. See list here (my todays edits):Special:Contributions/Tonton_Bernardo Somebody can delete them please, and close my account for all wiki projects. Thanks, obrigado, gracias & ciao Tonton Bernardo (talk) 09:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ralgistalk 15:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 |
File:Arbela elegantula.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
FDMS 4 14:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Eurrhyparodes bracteolalis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
FDMS 4 14:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Glyphodes cadeti.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
FDMS 4 14:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Phycita diaphana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FDMS 4 14:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Condylorrhiza zyphalis-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FDMS 4 14:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
MikeReunion[edit]
If you own that Flickr account, contact OTRS. If you do, also note that using watermarks is strongly discouraged. FDMS 4 14:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 | Hello, Tonton Bernardo. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. |
FDMS 4 15:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Brasil-5Reais-banknote 031.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Brasil-1real-banknote 036.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:East-Caribbean-5dollar-banknote.041.JPG[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:East-Caribbean-5dollar-banknote.041.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
DrKiernan (talk) 13:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Moths vs Lepidoptera[edit]
Your last revision is inconsistent with Commons:Language policy. Commons is a multimedia storage for all Wikipedias and sister projects. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, so we have a rule on Commons, that scientific name goes first, especially in matters related to botany and zoology. Fix it, please. Wieralee (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
|
Poppaea sabina has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Achim (talk) 21:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Phaiogramma stibolepida-3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Lymantria (talk) 07:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
File:Somatina lia (Prout, 1915).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Lymantria (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
|
File:Hypeninae-Hypena obacerralis-16mm.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Lymantria (talk) 07:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Glyphodes.shafferorum-Pyralidae-21.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Lymantria (talk) 07:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Glyphodes mascarenalis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Lymantria (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Crambidae-Piletocera reunionalis-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bjh21 (talk) 13:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Ctenoplusia_orbifer has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Rots61 (talk) 22:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Please stop filing unecessary DR's..[edit]
Please stop filing unnecessary or poorly thought out Deletion Requests!
I've asked for an administrator to take a look at them:- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#Junk_DR_Filings...
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop hazzling people, that fill out DR[edit]
If you don't like them: you are allowed to vote for them. My opinion is up to my own, not yours and I will not take account of same. Tonton Bernardo (I'm not gender neutral) (talk) 00:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- We're also allowed to block people who aren't interesting in listening to other people's opinions and figuring out how to work with them. I suggest if you don't want blocked, you start paying attention to other people's opinions and post on that Administrator's noticeboard appropriately.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- is this a thread? Who ist we ? You don't want to vote ? So leave it.
Please pay attention also to my opinion: and that's different of yours. We are living in a democracy (maybe not your thing). Tonton Bernardo (I'm not gender neutral) (talk) 02:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked[edit]
 | You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. |