User talk:Thiotrix/Archive 3 (2018)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image categories[edit]

In this Category, there are now images for Hypomyces armerniacus , Hypomyces aurantius , Hypomyces banningiae , Hypomyces deformans , Hypomyces rosellus , Hypomyces ochraceus , Hypomyces melanocarpus , Hypomyces succineus , Hypomyces papulasporae , Hypomyces microspermus , Hypomyces macrosporus . If you want to create categories for them, please do so as I am not familiar with Mushroom Fungi. All I know is that Commons did not have these images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think we also have one image for Hypomyces spadiceus . Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now I have created the subcategories for Category:Hypomyces. Cheers, --Thiotrix (talk) 11:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Flowers_by_season[edit]

Category discussion warning

Flowers by season has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few more categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

In this category for Armillaria, I typed in a new category Here but I did not create it since I am not experienced with biology

Secondly, in this separate category, I uploaded a lot more different images for lichens like Lecanora albescens, Lecanora campestrsi, Lecanosa confuse down to Lecanora valesiaca but I did not create a category. There are several new images below in the Lecanora category...if you wish to create a new subcategory. Its your choice. All the images I uploaded have been reviewed. Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, the new categories for Armillaria and Lecanora have been created and images sorted. Cheers, --Thiotrix (talk) 13:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Several more categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have time, you can create several subcategories from this general Boletus category such as

There is also one Lecanora subcategory that you can create:

Secondly, I uploaded a few images for the Xylobus category like X. subpileatus & X. illudens.

Finally, I uploaded new images here, here here and here for Pyroformes juniperus & nobilissimus and Russula ballouii & bicolor fungi. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done
But Category:Boletus tenax and Category:Boletus fraternus seem to be synonyms.
Tell me and I will transform them into category redirect to the correct cat.
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 08:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Liné1, for creating the categories. I redirected Boletus tenax to Xerocomus tenax, as it is in homotypic synonymy at Index Fungorum and COL. Boletus fraternus is in synonymy at Index Fungorum, but listed as accepted at Mycobank. Being a heterotypic synonym, I left it (provisionally) as an own category and made it a subcategory of Hortiboletus rubellus. Regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 13:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Subcategories for Xylobolus ✓ Done. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 13:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russula bicolor

This is a separate Austroboletus category...if you wish to create a category of image I uploaded earlier. All images I uploaded have passed review

✓ Done. Best regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories created. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My final categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Here are my final subcategories. Sometimes, I typed in an empty subcategory...and someone else creates it but there is no genus information in it.

I have no more subcategories. Have a good day, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subcategories of Inocybe done. I wish you a good day, too, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank You. I actually found a single FINAL subcategory that someone created but it also has no taxonomic information below:
  • Category:Inocybe rennyi

A Question[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

These images are licensed freely but is it the right species? Is it worth it to upload to Commons? I am not sure if it is the right species since MycoBank says it is Inocybe fibrosa (Sowerby) Gillet but the MO person says it is a slightly different species-Kaufmann if you scroll through the page. Is it I. fibrosa? --Leoboudv (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, at Commons, we have an illustration of Inocybe fibrosa (Sowerby) Gillet, it looks a bit more yellowish-brounish than the images at MO. But I am not a mycologist, just a "categorizing expert", so I have to rely on databases like Mycobank and Fungorum. Of course, you can upload those photos of "Inocybe fibrosa sensu Kauffman" and store them provisionally in Category:Inocybe fibrosa. Additionally, we should put them in Category:Undescribed species, until someone will describe this entity as own taxon. --Thiotrix (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final final cats[edit]

I did not create them; I just typed them and someone else created them. So it has no taxonomic data.


Apparently, Inocybe aurea is a very rare mushroom from this comment.I have now went through all the Inocybe categories available in Commons and got these free images from MO above. I will not bother you any more...and I am finished with Mushroom Observer. Thanks for all your help and I hope you can categorise them with taxonomic data. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, the subcategories for Inocybe are created or filled with taxonavigation and links. For "Inocybe jurana sensu Hesler", I made a new category, as this seems to be different from Inocybe jurana (which is synonymous to Inocybe adaequata) and yet undescribed taxon. Thank you for uploading all these images. And be welcome, if you need again help with categories. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Thiotrix,

Thank You for all your help. Altogether I uploaded 295 images from Mushroom Observer from December 25, 2017 to now. Almost all were for images of species that did not exist on Commons. I am happy to help. If there is any more images, I will let you know. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My final total count is 314 images uploaded since December 25, 2017. The only image I wish I could get, but did not succeed since it was not free at Mushroom Observer or flickr was "Austroboletus occidentalis". Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final final cats[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Here are my final Boletus categories. It was very hard to get any Boletus specimens from Mushroom Observer.

  • PS: From my calculations, I uploaded 353 images out of nearly 7800 images from Mushroom Observer on Wikicommons or about 4.5% in nearly 2 months from December 25.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories done. Just ask me, if you need more categories. Best regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 11:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

Since you didn't mind dealing with creating categories, here are new Xylaria categories from images I just uploaded.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nemania[edit]

There is very little information on Nemania on Wikicommons but the wikipedia article above mentions these 3 species below.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ramaria rubiginosa

Amania

3 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix, If you have time, please create this 3 categories,

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

If you have time please create these categories or include taxonomic data in them.

Thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 categories[edit]

I have 7 categories...if you can help create them.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just one last one. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This category[edit]

Someone created this category but it has no taxonomic data.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:28, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also a new category. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My upload[edit]

Many thanks for your edit on my upload here, but i think it's something like in vitro or vivarium. i don't know what it's name but when i bought it, they told me we can't tell you because it's our secret.

but they explained me used 7 material in it, most wonderful thing they said is the thing like clay in bottom of glass, they said it's a special Bacteria that keep plant (i don't know what plant name but they told me only this plant can live in this bottle) alive and you only need to every month drop a few water in glass and close it's till next moth, and plants stay alive for 3 years.

do you have more information about that bacteria and plant name?

--89.39.107.198 13:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I added category terrariums (it's a very little one). I have not yet seen such a "plant in the bottle". But without flowers, the plants are not identifiable. Regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 13:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

First of all...thank you for taking the time to create proper categories with taxonimic data. It is appreciated.

Secondly, if you have the time, there are 6 more categories below. But take your time if you are tired.

It is surprising that no one uploaded this free images of missing species to Commons before. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These final categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

When you have time, please create a category for these images. It can be tomorrow. There is no need to rush if you are tired.

I have no more Lepiota categories anyway. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 11:14, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC) There is one separate category but only 1 image:[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

Thank You for creating those cats. These cats below may be my final ones for a time.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With your uploads, the fungi at Commons have been significantly extended. Be welcome if you need more categories. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Here are a few categories if you have the time.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:57, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I am stopping mass uploads from M.O. starting today. These are my final categories.

Thank You for all your help. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Thiotrix. I hope the images help other users on Commons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are my final ones...all Hygrocybe.

Thanks for everything Thiotrix. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are 6 categories. I did Not upload the image in the first category. Sasata uploaded that image in 2014 but never even typed a subcategory for it.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are 5 categories if you have the time:

The fourth category has no taxonomic data. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I think these will be my last categories for a long time.

Thanks for all your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Just 2 more here:[reply]

I uploaded this photo for one of the 2 categories above and am surprised why it was not on WikiCommons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

These will almost be my last categories here...if you can help.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:59, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 last cats:

Thank You Thiotrix, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final Categories from M.O.[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I have retired from M.O. My final uncategorised images from M.O. are below. I hope you have time to categorise them.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 cats[edit]

The first cat, not created by me, has no taxonomic data.

The second and third cats are by me:

I just uploaded from M.O. this final time since most of these images are not on Commons.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: One advantage of this Mushroom Observer tool is that the template (with source,author...) is automatically generated and you know automatically if the image is already in Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

all ✓ Done. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This Category:Butyriboletus frostii[edit]

I don't know if this category (with its 2 images) exists or if it is Category:Exsudoporus frostii but MycoBank says this species exists under the 'Butyriboletus frostii' name and the uploader [http://mushroomobserver.org/observer/show_observation/208167 doesn't seem to agree that it is Exsudoporus frostii. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

11 categories only[edit]

Thank You, Thiotrix, Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:30, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Here are 4 categories. The first and last one is straightforward., The second is less so...but it has a MycoBank reference in the image file. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also Category:Helminthosphaeria H. clavarium Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image in this category was not created by me. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few categories and a wrong image category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix, Thanks for your help above. Below are 4 new categories,

As an aside, all these images in Gomphus floccus here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Gomphus_floccosus Should be Redirected to “Turbinellus floccosus” instead of the reverse situation.

Please read the first paragraph of this wikipedia article where it says this species was once known as Gomphus floccus but is now known as Turbinellus floccusus. Secondly Mycobank here says that Turbinellus floccusus’ “current name” is indeed Turbinellus floccusus . Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And 3 new cats:

Thanks for all your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you can help here. At least one image was very good. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is only 1 image in this rare category. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are 2 other categories and 1 has no taxonomic data. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

Here are some rare images for 16 species:

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, in 2008, Padamsee et al. published "The mushroom family Psathyrellaceae: Evidence for large-scale polyphyly of the genus Psathyrella." (PDF). Here they wanted to transfer Psathyrella echiniceps to Lacrymaria echiniceps. But neither Index Fungorum nor Mycobank nor NCBI have an entry for Lacrymaria echiniceps yet. Best regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 09:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have read in the publication of Padamsee et al. 2008. On page 427, they say: "Psathyrella echiniceps should be transferred to Lacrymella." But they did not made a taxonomically valid new combination, as they did not cite the basionym Hypholoma echiniceps G.F. Atk. with its full publication dates and page number. So the name Lacrymaria echiniceps is not validly published in this work (maybe elsewhere?). --Thiotrix (talk) 09:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Just 3 categories Thiotrix if you can help.

Goodnight from Canada. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some new categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Here are some new categories of you have the time to create them

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Kind regards from --Thiotrix (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix, I have only 3 new categories below

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:29, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

This also has no taxonomic data

And some new cats.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Thiotrix. Happy May 1 in Europe. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, I have been away in the "Real Life" for some days. A lot of categories were done meanwhile as a collective work, today I finished the rest of them. Best regards from --Thiotrix (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix, I have only 2 categories if you can help here.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I hope you can help create a category here:

Secondly, this Category:Panus similis category is incorrect as this species is called Lentinus similis today by MycoBank. As you see below:

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Thiotrix,

If possible, please provide some taxonomic data for this category that someone (not me) created:

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please help create categories for these 3 Hexagonia species when you can. I followed the 'Current name' given for these species on MycoBank for their titles.

And thank you for all your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 final ones of Russulas.

Thank You, Thiotrix, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I have some categories here if you can help create or fill them.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 10:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, you are right with Amanita roseotincta, so I made "roseitincta" (spelling at NCBI) a redirect. Cheers, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodnight from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All have no taxanomic data. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

I have 2 last categories her and then I am finished with M. Observer as I calculate I uploaded 1820 images from this site from December 26, 2017.

  • Dear Thiotrix,

If you have time, please consider creating categories for these 5 cats below.

I think I am really finished with M. Observer now...as I decided to check for any missing images one last time and found these ones. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suillus categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I checked through the large Suillus Category and found images for the species below. I hope that you don't mind cataloguing them. It is the last one...I promise.

I also found 4 images in the Hydropus category and more images in several separate categories.

Best Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:37, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

9 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please help 4 categories below if you can. I notice that MycoBank named them all.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

If you can, please create 3 categories below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice striped fungus. Best regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 12:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Thiotrix,

This category has no taxanomic data but I did not cretae it.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

13 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Is there any taxanomic data for this category below...which has 130 image files?

Very strange. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

First of all, I am sorry that Germany lost its first FIFA game to Mexico...but hope Germany will win the rest of its 2 other games. Secondly, thank you for all your help. I have uploaded my 2000th image from MO today and intend to slow down now. Unfortunately another uploader named Josef Ppai tends to just create categories with no taxanomic data like these ones below.

Papi has many many image uploads (just click on 'next page' in his uploads and you can see) but we both have little time. Anyway...thank you for all your help and enjoy your night in Germany. Thank You...for everything. Best Regards from Metro Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • 2 categories.

This is my final request. If you have some time, please create or give taxanomic data for these 2 categories.

Best Regards Thiotrix, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, fortunately I am more interested in biodiversity than in football... Thank you for all your uploads of fungi images. The Commons is growing very fast, there are hundreds of new images of living organisms daily, so work for categorizing people appears to be never ending. Usually it was considered to be sufficient to have all genus categories with full taxonomic data and actual subtaxon lists. From time to time, the Liné1Bot would insert the taxonavigation for all species categories that are included in those subtaxon lists. But due to phylogenetic research, many organisms have changed their scientific names recently, and may now be categorized under two or more names. This will be detected by manual categorization only, as I did it for your fungi project. (e.g., Baorangia bicolor / Boletus bicolor). Best regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 13:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for all your efforts here. Best Regards and may you continue your work here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I do notice that that the fungi project is very complex and many species have 2 or 3 different names. In fact, my true hobby is Egyptology as my Wikipedia Userpage says. That is why I uploaded many free Ancient Egyptian images here and here many years ago from flickr copyright owners who were willing to make their pictures free by changing the license. Everyone thinks only about Tutankhamun's funerary mask but they forget that the grave and mask of pharaoh Psusennes I was also found intact. Some Egyptian art like this are considered masterpieces. Ancient Egyptian art is 2000-4500 years old and no one makes them anymore. BUT...since MO's default image license is CC BY SA 3.0 and is free for wikipedia, I was willing to spend almost 6 months from December 25, 2017 uploading 2006 images onto Wikicommons. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with people like Papi must be very stressful. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are 4 more categories mostly by Josef Papi.

Goodnight from Vancouver. Its 2 AM here. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I formed these 2 cats since these species do not exist on Commons. Can you create them please?

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Sorry to disturb you. Germany did very well yesterday in the World Cup. They fought and fought against Sweden to finally win. Anyway, if you can help, please give taxanomic data for these 5 categories. Strangely, there is no Heimiomyces category on Commons.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have time, please consider creating or giving taxanomic data for these categories below.

The last category is supposedly very rare. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please give taxanomic data for these categories when you have time to create them.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2018 (UTC) & 4 more categories.[reply]

Thank You, Thiotrix. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some free time, please help create or give taxanomic data for these categories below. Many are of quality images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please help create or give taxanomic data for these 2 categories when you can.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodnight from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

Thank You for your help in creating the categories above. If you have time, please consider creating this category or giving taxanomic data below.

  • Hypogymnia inactiva is supposed to exist and is mentioned by MycoBank and even Jason Hollinger agreed that where was a good possibility that this was probably the species. But its not mentioned on Index Fungorum. Don't know why.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Justicia_carthagenensis[edit]

Category discussion warning

Justicia carthagenensis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 13:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Thank You Thiotrix for your important help on the categories above. I have just 1 category below.

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please create these 2 categories below.

Thank You for all your efforts here. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please give taxanomic data for these categories when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix.

Please let me first thank you for your help on creating these 2 categories. Secondly, it is good that you found this category] on Index Fungorum. I had looked for these species on Index Fungorum...and found nothing. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Thiotrix, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Thiotrix. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen the images in the genus category and made the category just when you added it here... Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create or give taxanomic data for these categories when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Fagopyrum dibotrys vs. Category:Fagopyrum cymosum[edit]

Hi Thiotrix, there seems a problem regarding these species. As your redirect link shows, for Tropicos, Fagopyrum cymosum is a synonym of Fagopyrum dibotrys. However, for GRIN it's just reverse: The later (1966) published Fagopyrum dibotrysis is a synonym of the first (1832) published Fagopyrum cymosum. See [1]. So what to do? Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to Tropicos, Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) H. Hara is based upon Polygonum dibotrys D. Don, which was described in Prodromus Florae Nepalensis 73., 1825. Fagopyrum cymosum (Trevir.) Meisn. is based upon Polygonum cymosum Trevir., which was described one year later (in Nova Acta Physico-medica Academiae Caesareae... 3: 177, 1826). So for Tropicos, the name Fagopyrum dibotrys has priority against Fagopyrum cymosum. But compare with IPNI, Polygonum cymosum Trevir., in: Index Seminum [Wroclaw/Breslau (Vratislav)] [2], 1824. If this description from 1824 is valid, the correct taxon name should be Fagopyrum cymosum. I will try to look for the protologues of the species descriptions. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 07:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the description of Polygonum dibotrys from 1825 and the description of Polygonum cymosum from 1826. But in the seedlist Index Seminum (Wroclaw) 2 from 1824 the listed name Polygonum cymosum is also accompanied by a short description. So this is a valid first description, and GRIN is right, the correct name of this taxon should be Fagopyrum cymosum. I will alter the categories at commons. Greetings, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please create these 2 categories with some taxanomic data.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Dear Thiotrix,

Thank you for all your help in categorisizing these images above. I am almost retired from MO. So, at most I may have only 5-6 categories for you to create in future as I uploaded 2552 images from MO already...and I think that is enough. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This are 2 the final 5/6 categories I mentioned. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment:

Thank You Thiotrix. This is the 3rd & 4th & 5th of the final 5/6 categories. It has no taxanomic data.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

I think this may be my last category...although I may find 1 or 2 more. Thank You for all your help creating the above categories. Here is one interesting category:

  • Species Fungorum says about it: "Ionomidotis irregularis (Schwein.) E.J. Durand (1923); Helotiaceae"

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

Thank you for your help on the 2 categories. This 3 may be my last ones.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Please help create these categories when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your help Thiotrix. By the Way, it is strange that the large category below has no referenced taxanomic data.
  • Category:Corallorhiza maculata

I assume that this was missed by its creator. Yes, I see you never edited this category. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:08, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a second new category:

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

Thank you for creating C. velutinus. If you have any data for Category:Corallorhiza maculata, please feel free to add some taxanomic data. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have a bit of time, please try to give some taxanomic data for these categories below. Have a great Sunday.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment:

Please give taxanomic data for this category if you can Thiotrix.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please help give some taxanomic data for this rare category below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:19, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please help create these 2 categories when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your notice, Leoboudv. I actualized the links to databases. All Wikipedias still use the name Fomitopsis cajanderi, so I think this category should not be renamed for now. (I guess when en-Wikipedia will update). Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 10:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have time, please create a new category for these images below

I found an Index Fungorum link to this missing species which is not on Commons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please consider giving some taxanomic data for this category.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Have a good day, kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 09:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodnight from Canada Thiotrix...and many thanks for your help, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

If you can, please help give some taxanomic data for this large category.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please help create this rare category below.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please consider creating these 2 categories below.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please help create this category if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

I have slowed down uploading images from MO and this may be one of my last requests here. Please create 2 categories below if you can.

I saw an ISF reference for them.

Kind Regards and Thank You for all your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:49, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create this category below when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please give some taxanomic data for this large category below when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chlorophytum comosum[edit]

Hi! Are you sure that these pictures: File:Chlorophytum comosum Variegatum.jpg and File:Chlorophytum comosum Variegatum 1zz.jpg show cultivar Variegatum? I thought that Variegatum has white margins, not center of the leaves. Salicyna (talk) 19:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Salicyna, yes, you are right. I will roll back my incorrect categorizing. --Thiotrix (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please give some taxanomic data for the 2 categories below if you can. There are some good photos in them.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Thiotrix. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create one category below when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Six categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create or give taxanomic data for these categories below if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WBR[edit]

Hello my friend, a new version of WBR is available here.
It corrects IUCN for example.

Do you know Category:Pages with biology property incorrect on Wikidata ?
It is filled with categories which wikidata item is problematic.
I already called for help on Wikidata but I can't remember who helped me. Was it you?
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 21:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend Liné1, thank you for your info about WBR. I always try to get the newest version, watching your French WBR userpage for this reason. It is such a helpful tool for my categorizing edits! This maintenance category with more than 8000 problematic items will be really a lot of work... but I don't know which Wikidata editor helped you here. When I create new categories, I always do the needed edits at Wikidata; or I correct them, if I get a "red notice" from VN, but that helps just for single pages and categories. For corrections on thousands of Wikidata pages, the support of a bot will be needed. Cheers, --Thiotrix (talk) 13:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, there is a magic wikidata query language. It even allows to modify the items.
Someone did once a run for me that solved all my problems.
But I don't know who ;-(
Booooo
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 13:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please feel free to create or give taxanomic data for this categories--with high quality images.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

The first category is a strange case. MycoBank has a classification for it but Species Fungorum has nothing.

The image is very high quality.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Thank You Thiotrix for your help. It is good that you food the Index Fungorum link for 'Phaeophyscia hirtella' as I was unable to find it while searching its web site. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Adding wrong categories[edit]

Please, don't add wrong categories. This is completely usseless. This can be regarded as vandalism! Citrina (talk) 11:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Citrina: , this is a wiki. Everybody does his or her best here. If an image is categorized like the taxon name stated in the file name, this is not all all completely useless. If you know the correct species name, please just correct the error. That is like a wiki works. Regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 11:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Don't expect a pat on the back if you use 'Hotcat' the wrong way! There is no justification to add wrong categories if a file is uploaded under a wrong name. There is a big problem with wronlgy categorised and wrongly named images of plants here. The most striking example was Passiflora coccinea. Until I cleaned up the mess, not a single wiki about this plant had a correct picture. I saw Passiflora vitifolia and Passiflora miniata labeled as Passiflora coccinea. Even a picture that was clearly not Passiflora coccinea was regarded a best-quality image within the scope Passiflora coccinea. I raise my eyebrows when I see that. A pity, because there are a lot of good pictures. But they should be categorised in a correct way. Citrina (talk) 11:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I mostly do passion flowers and plants with edible fruits. I see a lot of errors with pictures of these plants. I don't expect it to be less worse with pictures of other plants I don't have knowledge and literature about. People have to be more careful with this subject. Citrina (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please, reply to my remarks in stead of complaining about rudeness. You are the one who was completely wrong by adding wrong categories. Don't walk away from your responsibility. Citrina (talk) 14:09, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I clean up your mistakes and I only get ungratefulnesss. That is not a constructive way to treat people. Don't come to my talk page if you have nothing useful to say. The way you behave is only a waste of time. Go into the appropiate points I make or be silent. Citrina (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You could have stayed away from my talk page in stead of being offended by this edit. Just shrug and go on with making appropriate edits. Citrina (talk) 14:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw your edit was only a few days ago. You have to realise that I correct this kind of mistakes a lot. I am not going to look who made the edit and who can be offended by the way I correct mistakes. You might consider throwing this kind of pages away from your watchlist, if you have these pages on your watchlist. Citrina (talk) 14:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I told you on your talk page, that the "undo" is not the usual way to correct errorneous categorization. This is for undoing disruptive, vandalizing or complete nonsense edits. So every good-willing editor will be offended by this. With 174 edits, you are not very experienced with Commons. So please follow the Commons behavioural guidelines, this tipp is meant seriously! I have made nearly 250.000 categorizations here, and was never attacked by anyone before. If you should go on with your harassing, you risk to be blocked here. Please continue with your useful sorting of Passiflora and let other editors do their work. --Thiotrix (talk) 14:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you have already made more than 250.000 edits and stil make this kind of mistakes, I would like to ask you to stay away from the categorisation of plants. There are a lot of wrongly named and categorised plants. It takes a lot of time to clean that up and the only thing you do is complaining about the 'tone of voice'. Take your responsibility, admit that you are wrong and then we can work together to improve Commons. Blocks are not going to solve anything. I could go to the block page too, but I want you to have insight in your mistakes. Citrina (talk) 16:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The picture of the plant is correctly named and categorised now. With my efforts I can get things done. You could have done this as well. It is the quality of the edits that counts, not the quantity. Citrina (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Citrina:
Let me interrupt here.
Point 1: When you discuss someone's modifications, you should provide a link to that modification. It is easier for everyone.
Point 2: You should be aware that Thiotrix is a well known, well respected contributor.
So you are expected more calm and respect when you address him ;-)
Point 3: About what I understoud from your discussion: this change is a classical modification. It seems that the image was misnamed, and putting it in the species category will allow other contributor to detect the misnaming.
Sadly we don't have enough specialist in each taxon group to verify the identifications. So if you are a specialist, you are welcome. But wikipedia contribution means working with other contributors. Which is difficult.
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 15:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please know that I have complete faith and trust in your abilities. All the Admins on Commons recommend you as the best cataloguer of plants and fungi. With this being said, if you have the time, please consider giving some taxanomic data for this 3 obscure categories below.

Thank You Thiotrix and may you enjoy some sunny days in Germany this December 2018. It is raining a lot in Vancouver, Canada, right now. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. December days are grey and wet here too, but this year we are glad about the rain, because vegetation suffered from an unusual dry. long, and hot summer. Have a good time, best regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have some time, please give some taxanomic data for this category below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish[edit]

Hello. Help [2]. Thanks you.125.214.49.198 08:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only categorize images of plants, animals and other organisms. --Thiotrix (talk) 08:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please give taxanomic data for this category when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


1 category[edit]

Please give taxanomic data for this category below when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix, Please create this category when you can.

Thank You for your help, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. A strange insect-eating fungus. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please give some taxanomic data for this category when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 new category[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create this rare category when you can.

This species is confirmed by the uploader by DNA test. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 categories[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create these categories or give taxanomic data below if you can.

Thank You and may you and your family have a Merry Christmas and a Happy 2019. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv, categories are done. Thank you for your kind seasons greetings. I too like to wish you a happy and peaceful new year 2019. Best, --Thiotrix (talk) 09:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Thiotrix,

When you can, please create this single rare category below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 last categories of 2018[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

Please create a category for this image below when you can.

It is mentioned in this Google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=Cladonia+hypoxantha+mycobank&rlz=1C1GCEA_enCA828CA828&oq=Cladonia+hypoxantha+mycobank&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.4079j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

And this also:

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thiotrix/Archive_3_(2018)&oldid=333214927"