User talk:Thegunkid

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Thegunkid!

Your upload didn't work quite right. I've reverted it to the old version for now, just so there's a working version. Octane 08.01.10 0253 (UTC)

Here is the construction sheet I had used. You think there is anything wrong with it? And the angle of an equilateral 5-pointed star is 36°, not 38°.

Вот чертеж, который я использовал. Вы считаете, что что-то в нем неверно? И угол у равносторонней 5-конечной звезды 36°, а не 38°.

Hellerick (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Know, But Official Design attached to the March 4th degree is NOT a equilateral 5-pointed star which is why I told you it isn't 36° after I checked the Image and the bands Appear to be thicker.

Here's the Attached Image I extracted from the Official .doc file (Please note it is slightly misaligned) --Thegunkid (talk) 15:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Officalnewrussianroundel.png

The star on this picture indeed looks a bit not equilateral, but since I cannot tell how much this picture can be trusted (maybe it was drown in five minutes by somebody's secretary in MS PowerPoint?) I won't change the file unless I'll see an official text or consrtuction sheet where it's explicitly said that the star is not equilateral. I already met such cases, when the official description of a symbol did not match the picture attached to a law (e.g. the flag of Krasnoyarsk Kray), and I preferred to follow the text, since it's more explicitly defined. Hellerick (talk) 03:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still regardless of angles, the white and blue bands still appear to be too thin. --Thegunkid (talk) 17:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also if it wouldn't be to much to ask, could you do me a favor and vector the Abkhazian Roundel I made since I have no Idea how to make .svgs.

File:Officalnewrussianroundel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 00:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was a one-off unofficial flag, so I'm not entirely sure what the purpose of such standardization would be. AnonMoos (talk) 23:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's only logical to assume it used the green from the flag of Mexico. --Thegunkid (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your ideas about how standardized flags were in 1830s Mexico/Texas would appear to be somewhat historically anachronistic -- and that's assuming that 1836 Mexican flag green was automatically the same as 2016 Mexican flag green (not necessarily true). A few years back, User talk:Flad tried to standardize all Arab-related flags and emblems with green in them to use a single shade of Pan-Arab green, with results that were not entirely fortunate... AnonMoos (talk) 23:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That may be true, but the Green is far brighter than any other complementary flag in either Mexico's or Texas' State Archives, and appears to have been randomly chosen. --Thegunkid (talk) 06:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Liberty city license plate.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 12:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Open Carry County Map[edit]

Thanks for adding the open carry county map! It's a great modification.

There a few additions I think could be made to build upon what you've done.

Colorado - Show Denver County as red, and the rest of the state as dark green.

Nebraska - Show Douglas County (where Omaha is located) as light green, and the rest of the state as dark green.

Oregon - Show Multnomah County as yellow; Show Washington County (where Beavorton, Tigard & part of Portland are located) as light green; Show Clackamas County (where Oregon City and part of Portland are located) as light green; Show Marion County (where part of Salem is located) as light green; Show Polk County (where Independence and part of Salem are located) as light green; Show the rest of the state as dark green.

Missouri - remain light green (as its Wikipedia page doesn't have details on which localities restrict open carry).

Pennsylvania - show Philadelphia County as yellow, the rest of the state as dark green.

I could take a stab at it. But, not sure what software would need to be used. Thanks again. LonghornBob (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a map that expands on the work you did. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_carry_across_USA_by_county-04-22-22.png LonghornBob (talk) 22:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why I got this notification now, but the reason I didn't is Philly and Denver is so small it's very hard to see. Thegunkid (talk) 19:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]