User talk:Tegel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page.

If you want to leave me a message, use my talk page on Meta

About Josefin Hedström

Hi! I really wanted to get an image for this page but I don't really know how. I searched on the internet so hard and found this image Josefin Hedström.jpg that have a source so I thought that it would be possible to put it here on Wikipedia.

I need help to get an image for the model Josefin Hedström cause I think that the page without an image is not looking good. Please help me! I don't have so much experience about the Wikipedia thing and I apologies for my bad use for the image. I really want this page to have an image cause Josefin Hedström is a great swedish model so I think that she really deserve to have an image on her Wkipedia page.

I've changed something now and I hope it works. Please notify me on Discussion page of Josefin Hedström if what I done is correct.

Thanks so much and looking forward for some good news.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefan Adel (talk • contribs)

In short term you can only upload an image that either is taken by you, or has a free license. This image that you uploaded to Commons specify "Copyright, All Rights Reserved". Then this image is not allowed on Commons, where all images must be under a free license. It's not enough that you specify a source. Svenska går bra för vidare kommunikation om så önskas. -- Tegel (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upload mistakes

Thanks! Man vyi (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It has happen to users before you this week, so you're not alone. I have removed the block on mediawiki.org. -- Tegel (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello, thanks for cleaning this silly vandalism. Anyway, maybe you can help me with a little doubt I just have. I created this category to classify all her photos, but I stopped when I realized I don't have permission from that girl to categorize her. I mean, I always upload her photos with attribution in all titles, but I don't know if it's appropiate ask her first if she want to be categorized here. Did I do well? Thank you, Kordas (sínome!) 18:06, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Images

Hello! Sorry and thanks! Regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 13:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. As you can see above your are not the first user it happen to. -- Tegel (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman Pipia.jpg

The author gave me the rights to use this photo, can you tell me whitch license i can use?--ასლამაზიშვილი (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on your talk page User talk:ასლამაზიშვილი and I think that we should keep the discussion there. -- Tegel (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

helllowwwww

My name is jalkano I stay in kenya Guyohalkano (talk) 06:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vocation

Why do you delete our picture vocation2.jpg there is no copyright violation. We got the copyright, we have taken the picture. Please explain.

/Vocationgroup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vocationgroup (talk • contribs) 05:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't delete any picture. I mark it for deletion for Copyright violation based on the Copyright marking that you have on your web page and then an Admin here takes the decision to delete it or not. To be able to upload the image here the photographer need to release the image under a free license. Is it the same photographer for all six images? Are you aware of that by uploading the image here under a free license the Copyright marking on that image on your web page is basically useless? Anyone can basically use the image for any purpose, even commercially, without having to ask permission or pay any compensation to you in the band or to the photographer. Why don't you use the account when editing Wikipedia in Swedish? The same account name and password works over there as well. -- Tegel (talk) 06:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for info. The jpg is taken by us to use for press release. Do you mean there is meta data on the picture with copyright info? I will try with another picture. And thanks for info that I can use the same account on the .se wiki. /Vocationgroup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vocationgroup (talk • contribs) 07:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hej. Bilderna finns på er hemsida och er hemsida hävdar Copyright på sitt innehåll. Det innebär att bilderna på er hemsida är upphovsrättsskyddade och får inte laddas upp här.
Det är bara fotografen som kan släppa en bild under en fri licens. På den senaste bilden som du laddat upp så är alla i gruppen på scenen. Det är då inte så troligt att det är någon i gruppen som har tagit bilden. Trots att er hemsida hävdar upphovsrätt på sitt innehåll, inklusive bilderna, så kan bilderna laddas upp här. Det kräver dock skriftligt tillstånd från fotografen enligt en licenstext som vi har. -- Tegel (talk) 16:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Janaury 2018 (i don't want saw the exact title)

Why you don't monitor your talk page? Zixuan75 (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do. -- Tegel (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OneLittleMouse sysop and checkuser abuse in Russian Wikipedia

Please remove sysop and checkuser abuse here. 83.220.237.60 09:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Place request on Meta, not on my talk page here. -- Tegel (talk) 09:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: вы не можете поместить вас заблокированы, пожалуйста, разблокируйте 83.220.237.0/23, вы не заблокированы, можете разместить запрос meta wikimedia. 83.220.237.60 09:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lets keep the discussion in one wiki. -- Tegel (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haters

Hi. Are there multiple haters, or is it just one who keeps changing IP and hates signatures?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this is only one user. The user vandalised on Meta and got blocked there and is coming here or to the Mediawiki wiki instead. -- Tegel (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I still hate you

Guess why. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.40.248.29 (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I block you when you have been bad? -- Tegel (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tack!

For prompt rollback of the attack in the MediaWiki space on Commons.

Tegel is an anti-vandal ninja steward!

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That vandal

...I keep forgetting, it's one of a batch of regulars. They're all the same. Anyway, I saw that on en-wiki it's a whole range that's blocked, 45.33.0.0/17, and maybe you consider the same here. Similar with the other, 69.164.192.0/19 . Thanks! (Ha I wish I had rollback on Commons.) Drmies (talk) 18:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I can't block anyone here since I'm not an admin here, but since the user normally shows up on multiple wikis I can take global actions. You might want to report it on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections for local actions here on Commons. -- Tegel (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hälsningar...

Although this may not be the appropriate time to do this, but we would like to know if there's anything you can do about our IPs. They've been abused by LTA, and for years now, many have hacked into our IP addresses. So our IP range is basically compromised and we don't know what to do about this. (And we apologize for any disruption our IPs have caused.) Many trolls (mainly T-Mobile users) hack into our IPs because a very broad range (2607:fb90::/32) outside our range is hardblocked. That's mainly because of the dog and rapper vandal (see here for the numerous IP address used by him), and recently, the "baseball vandal" from the NYC area. Someone from our range knows the latter user and to reclarify, he did not cause any serious disruption. 192.160.131.59 17:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You could report it to your ISP and have them contact us at stewards(at)wikimedia.org. Then we can work together and have the vandals service terminated. -- Tegel (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. We've terminated the vandal service from John Kwiecinski (aka "dog and rapper vandal")! 192.100.55.15 18:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Did you have your ISP to contact us? -- Tegel (talk) 18:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Someone from WMF (who presumably works there) got in contact with our IT. They did some vandal tracking and (probably) found the culprit. Hopefully, we got the problem solved. Additionally, both our networks are blocked across Wikipedia, so you won't be seeing any more trouble fron that vandal. (That guy is really somethin'.) 192.160.130.105 15:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LTA sock

I need to request to lock these accounts globally because they are a soockpuppets of a serial vandal, probably Hunnas334 abusing from different wikis. I was going to request this from meta wiki but I got prevented from editing. So do globally lock these nine accounts. Thanks. 117.97.172.227 10:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you lock those nine accounts mentioned above? Do so. 117.97.151.63 16:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They haven't been editing for years, so I don't see the meaning with any action. How did you come in contact with these accounts, and what is your account?

They are probably socks of either Hunnas334 (talk · contribs · logs · block log) or Hdhddhdhdhdhsgddgsgsftsgsg (talk · contribs · logs · block log) abusing and vandalizing cross wiki. So please lock those all of those nine accounts. Thanks. 117.97.151.63 14:09, 27 February 2020 (UTC

Do lock those nine accounts globally. 182.68.61.133 11:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you lock those nine accounts? Please do so. 182.68.61.133 15:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You got my reply above. You haven't answered my questions yet. -- Tegel (talk) 16:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't use any account but do lock those nine accounts. 106.212.153.252 07:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply very soon and do lock those nine accounts. 106.212.153.252 17:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am waiting for your reply and lock those nine accounts globally. 106.212.153.252 15:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. We are waiting for your reply. 106.212.153.252 14:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"?
You have my reply above. There is no need to create new sections over and over again. -- Tegel (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are socks of either Hunnas334 (talk · contribs · logs · block log) or Hdhddhdhdhdhsgddgsgsftsgsg (talk · contribs · logs · block log) abusing from cross wiki so do lock those nine accounts without any further delay. 106.212.153.252 14:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please lock those nine accounts without further delay. 106.212.153.252 08:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2409:4050:E85:4432:0:0:DCCA:7E13 (talk) 04:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are waiting for your reply. Do lock those nine accounts globally without further delay. 2409:4050:E85:4432:0:0:DCCA:7E13 04:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.97.137.214 (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are waiting for your reply. Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. 106.210.42.120 07:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are waiting for your reply. Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. 117.97.137.214 07:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are really waiting for your reply. When will you reply? When will you globally lock those nine accounts? We are requesting you so many times. We are really waiting for your reply. We are also waiting for you to lock those nine accounts globally. Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. 117.97.137.214 06:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have still not informed us who "we" is in your statement. Is it you and your friend? Is it you and your mother? Who is included in "we"? -- Tegel (talk) 07:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"We" means "I" only. Do not waste more time in these trivial details. Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. 117.97.137.214 15:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.97.130.166 (talk) 06:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do lock those nine accounts globally without any further delay. 117.97.130.166 06:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These accounts is so old that I can't verify your information so no, these accounts will not be locked as of now. -- Tegel (talk) 07:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then when will you lock those nine accounts globally? 117.97.130.166 13:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, never. But that may change in the future.
I notice that you have placed similar requests on other users talk page in the past. Should we consider this some kind of abuse from your side so we should take some kind of actions against you? -- Tegel (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then when that will change in the future? 182.68.255.173 06:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.97.228.163 (talk) 16:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erika Selin photo

Hi, as you can see in the link you provided when you marked the shown wiki photograph as possible copyright infringement, the photo is marked as a "Pressbild" and therefore issued by the artist/management for promotional use and other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slipperyflax (talk • contribs) 16:27, 10 December 2020 (UTCCET)

The page doesn't state under what license the image is released under and the linked page claims Copyright on it's content. Just because it's marked "Pressbild" it's not enough when it comes to licensing. -- Tegel (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do have the photographers consent, how can I go about getting that on record? Never mind, I found the page from another one of your topics here! Will get the consent on record via mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

File:Jens Jonsson 2012.jpg

File:Jens Jonsson 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 154.47.103.230.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tegel&oldid=626386187"