User talk:Ta-tea-two-te-to

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ta-tea-two-te-to!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t even use AI[edit]

Do you have proof I used AI? I based it off of a photo I found online. You sure seem obsessed with my page. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, could you please tell me what photo you based it on and send me a link to it? Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sure SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Put the link in w:Talk:Cretalepisma instead. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean I know the website says not secure, but it looks pretty much how a bristletail or silverfish should look like. http://www.fossilmall.com/fossils/mya07/cetalepisma-cretaceous-fossil-amber-bristletail.htm I tried to make it look more life like SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Put that comment to Cretalepisma talk page, maybe better place to continue discussing about that with other users. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well I can’t until tomorrow because for some reason I got auto blocked. Also I think it’s kind of rude you automatically accused me of using AI. I don’t even use AI I make digital art by drawing and coloring. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So why did it look like this? Silverfish has 6 legs and 3 cerci at the end of the absdomen, but everything is different in your illustration. Even through with such clear inaccuracy, the realistic nature of the textures reminded me quite a bit of the characteristics of AI art. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I would like to show you a drawing I made. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A drawing I made of Cretalepisma.
SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh maybe this is, at least better than previous one. (still bit unclear though.) Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well this one is hand drawn so it is better. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also I am sorry if I got mad at you earlier I am really sorry for that I have autism so sometimes it’s hard for me to read social cues. My apologies SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just find it funny how you guys are all mad about AI art which it wasn’t I used DeviantArt on those images. but half of the images used in reconstructions for images are digital art, AI art, or computer-generated art, which doesn’t that also sound not original or creative? I can give examples of this but ok. @Ta-tea-two-te-to SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Several things: One, what do you mean, you "used DeviantArt on those images"? DeviantArt is an art sharing platform, the only part of it that directly contributes to imagery creation is DreamUp, which is an AI art generator. Secondly, you're equating digital art or CGI art with AI art, when they're not at all equatable. Digital art is art made using computer programs as an analogue to physical tools (a digital brush for a physical brush, etc.). CGI is the same thing just with 3D models. These are common and completely valid means of expression, the software doesn't intentionally emulate any pre-existing work and every aspect of art creation is completely in the artist's hands. If you were actually making the digital Cretalepisma images yourself, you could decide to simply not give it more than six legs. "AI art", on the other hand, is a buzzword for various services which generate images by interpreting text and then producing a collection of pixels designed to copy human art labelled with similar text. There's a very important debate over the usage of AI art on Wikipedia, but at the absolute minimum all AI art must be clearly labelled. The images you posted were not labelled. If you continue to act this immature and deceptive, you will be banned. Your choice. NGPezz (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair I am a minor (15) so I didn’t know AI art or digital art isn’t allowed (I used the latter) so I am not that good ar it. Sorry SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad you apologized, but you still don't understand. Digital art is allowed, AI art is not. And you still claim you're not using AI. Please honestly tell us which features of DeviantArt you specifically used to create the two deleted illustrations. If you admit your mistake, you can try again. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 01:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright fine I used AI but I was scared you’d be mad at me. I shouldn’t have lied and that was my apology. The third art I drew hand written, and I promise I won’t use AI anymore again. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST (talk) 03:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Please be careful next time. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]