User talk:Spurzem/Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinkel Kabine, Bj. 1957, offen (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 912 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 124 Spider, 1,4 l, Bj. 1970 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG TF, Bj. 1954, in Fahrt (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinkel Kabine, Bj. 1957 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera RS, Bj. 1972-73, Front (2016-07-02 02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Congrats to your beautiful car. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC) Indeed I would like to own it. -- Spurzem 14:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zündapp KS 80 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The quality of the disc seems a bit less.--Famberhorst 15:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG B 1800, Bj. 1979 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)  Comment The clause "Dieses Bild bitte nicht ohne Einwilligung des Autors ändern" means "Please do not modify this picture without permission by the author" and is somewhat in contrary with a CC-BY-SA license. --A.Savin 11:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC) I have often seen requests like this. In my opinion it is a question of esteem to ask before modifying others work. -- Spurzem 13:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riley Adelphi, Bj. 1935 (2016-07-02 01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 19:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG A Mk 1, Bj. 1960, Fahrt (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 595, Bj. 1972, in Fahrt (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koblenz, Schlossgarten (2015-08-12 12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 14:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Rekord P2, Bj. 1962 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mini Cabriolet, Bauzeit 2009–2015 (2016-07-09 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 190 SL, Bj. 1959 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Neuenahr, Rosenkranzkirche (2016-07-09 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:07, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Spurzem,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfa Romeo Spider Veloce 2000, Bj. 1983 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpine A 110 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Magdalena in St. Mauritius Kärlich (um 1730 - Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Opel Rekord P1, Bj. 1958 (Foto Sp 2016-06-05).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opel Rekord P1, Bj. 1958 (Foto Sp 2016-06-05).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenblume 2015-07-03 2117.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Trabant P 601 S, Bj. 1986 (Foto Sp 2016-06-05).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trabant P 601 S, Bj. 1986 (Foto Sp 2016-06-05).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Healey Silverstone (17.06.2007).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Healey Silverstone (17.06.2007).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

FPC, KEB und so weiter

Hallo Spurzem,

ich habe irgendwie das Bedürfnis, hier mal eine Sache offen anzusprechen: Deine Vorstellungen davon, wodurch sich ein gutes Bild auszeichnet, sind sicherlich andere als beispielsweise meine. Das ist nicht schlimm, damit können und müssen wir beide sicherlich leben und das ist auch gar kein Problem. Problematisch finde ich aber zwei Dinge: (1) Einerseits finde ich, dass Deine Kritiken fremder Bilder nicht immer ganz fair sind. (2) Andererseits finde ich, dass Du ein unfassbar dünnes Fell hast, was Kritik an Deinen Bildern anbelangt. Das passt nicht gut zusammen.

Zu (1): Du neigst nach meiner Beobachtung insbesondere bei Fotos, die mit hohem Aufwand und teurer Ausrüstung gemacht wurden, gerne zu Kritik. Das betrifft unter anderem Fotos von mir und von Diliff.

Ich habe nichts gegen Kritik, im Gegenteil. Viele meiner Bilder sind erst durch die Kritik anderer gut geworden (siehe z.B. hier) und ohne die fachlich hervorragenden Kritiken anderer Nutzer auf Commons wäre ich längst nicht da, wo ich heute stehe. Ich habe mit einer EOS 500D angefangen, meine ersten Bilder waren fürchterlich (Bsp.: 1, 2). Nach und nach wurde ich besser und als ich merkte, das meine Ausrüstung nicht mithalten kann, habe ich ein Jahr lang gespart und mir eine neue Kamera gekauft. Mit der werden sind meine Bilder durchaus besser geworden. Anderen Nutzern ging das genauso. Wenn Du z.B. auf KEB kritisierst, dass man nur mit teurer Ausrüstung zu Auszeichnungen dort oder hier bei FPC kommen kann, verwechselst Du meiner Meinung nach Ursache und Wirkung bzw. Henne und Ei. Die Leute, die gute Fotos machen, haben sich halt irgendwann gute Kameras zugelegt, nicht umgekehrt. Ausnahmen gibt es natürlich in beide Richtungen.

Um wieder zum Punkt zurückzukommen: Gegen Kritik ist nicht das Geringste einzuwenden. Wenn sie aber einseitig und unfundiert wird, ist sie unfair. So beschwertest Du Dich beispielsweise bei einem 8mm-Foto von Diliff hier über eine angebliche Verzerrung, während Du einem 10mm-Bild von Ralf ohne zu zögern ein Pro gabst. Die "Verzerrung" ist in beiden Bildern praktisch die gleiche, was auch Ralf selbst eingeräumt hat. Der Unterschied zwischen beiden Bildern ist (technisch gesehen), dass das von Diliff ein HDR-Stitching aus einer ziemlich teuren Vollformatkamera ist, das von Ralf demgegenüber mit einfacheren technischen Mitteln entstanden ist (ich sage das ganz wertfrei, Ralf macht tolle Bilder). Ein ähnlicher Fall ist Deine Kommentierung zu meinem 360°-Panorama. Erst beschwerst Du Dich darüber, dass das Bild angeblich unrealistisch sei. Das lag wohl aber daran, dass Du nicht wahrgenommen hattest, dass man das Bild zur korrekten Darstellung im Panellum-Viewer anschauen muss. Nachdem ich Dich darauf hinwies, meintest Du, die Gebäude seien immer noch "tilted", also "schief". Ohne jetzt allzu tief in das Thema Bildkritiken einsteigen zu wollen, aber das ist mit Verlaub einfach nicht wahr. Bei einem 360°-Panorama gibt es keine "schiefen" Gebäude, weil die Frage, was schief ist oder nicht, einzig und alleine davon abhängt, wie man sich unter Zuhilfenahme des Mauszeigers im Bild bewegt. Insofern finde ich Deine Kritik nicht nur falsch, sondern auch unfair. Du warst - so sehe ich das - einfach nicht gewillt, von Deinem ersten Kommentar wieder abzurücken, auch nachdem ich Dich auf Deinen Irrtum hingewiesen habe. Ich habe ein wenig den Verdacht, dass Du einfach grundsätzlich skeptisch gegenüber Bildern bist, die mit großem technischen Aufwand und teurem Equipment entstanden sind. Schön und gut, das bleibt Dir unbenommen. Aber dann sei doch bitte einfach so ehrlich und schreib, dass Dir das Bild nicht gefällt, es für Dich keinen "WOW" hat oder was auch immer, aber tu nicht so, als habe das Bild Fehler, die es einfach nicht hat. Das ist einfach nicht fair. Und bitte denk dran: Ich habe lange auf meine Ausrüstung gespart und einen langen Lernprozess hinter mich gebracht, bevor ich soweit war, solche Bilder machen zu können. Willst Du mir das zum Vorwurf machen?

Zu (2): Umgekehrt finde ich, dass Du ein echt dünnes Fell hast, was Kritik an Deinen Bildern betrifft. Zwei kritische Kommentare und Du ziehst die Nominierung zurück. Was soll das? Erwartest Du, dass Deine Fotos einfach durchgewunken werden? Wenn Du Kritik nicht verträgst, dann stell halt keine Bilder vor. Ich persönlich finde nicht jedes Deiner Auto-Fotos toll, aber z.B. für das Bild von der Isetta hätte ich mit Pro gestimmt, wenn Du es nicht zurückgezogen hättest. Gerade den verwischten Hintergrund mit dem knackscharfen Auto finde ich sehr gelungen und ich weiß, dass solche Bilder nicht einfach sind. Ikan hat da eine andere Meinung, schön und gut. Lass ihm doch seine Meinung. Nicht jeder findet Deine Bilder toll. Es findet auch nicht jeder meine Bilder toll. Manchmal wundere ich mich, dass in meinen Augen echt schrottige Bilder einfach durchgewunken werden, während andere, die ich für super halte, beim Publikum durchfallen. Damit muss ich leben.

Ich hoffe, Du fühlst Dich jetzt nicht angegriffen. Ich finde bloß, dass es manchmal gut ist, die Dinge offen anzusprechen. Ich hoffe, Du siehst das auch so. Mir ist an einem guten Miteinander hier auf Commons sehr gelegen, auch mit Dir. --Code (talk) 09:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Code,

ich fühle mich von Dir nicht angegriffen, sondern habe verstanden, dass Fotos, die mit extrem teuren Kameras und aufwendiger Bildbearbeitung zustande kamen, über jede Kritik erhaben sind. Ich werde deshalb künftig darauf verzichten, auf unnatürliche Verzerrungen und umstürzende Hauser auch nur im Ansatz hinzuweisen. Mit „Kontra“ gestimmt habe ich ohnehin nicht. Im Übrigen war auch ein mir fehlendes „Wow“ noch kein Grund, gegen ein Bild zu stimmen. Wenn mich ein technisch einwandfreies Bild nicht anspricht, sage ich einfach nichts.

Was mein „echt dünnes Fell“ betrifft: Wenn ich erlebe, dass ein Bild negativ bewertet wird, weil es einen ähnlichen Hintergrund schon einmal gab, oder weil das „Wow“ nicht empfunden wird, oder weil jemand meint, ein fahrendes Auto dürfe zwar unscharf abgebildet werden, aber die Grasnarbe im Vordergrund müsse scharf sein, dann ärgere ich mich und mache meinem Ärger Luft. Insbesondere bei Ikan's negativer Bewertung der BMW Isetta frage ich mich, ob so etwas Boshaftigkeit oder die Folge von Unfähigkeit ist, Fotos zu bewerten.

Inzwischen frage ich mich außerdem, welchen Sinn es für mich hat, bei FPC noch mitzumachen, zumal ich mich bei einigen Leuten mit meiner Offenheit unbeliebt gemacht habe und von daher von vornherein etliche Kontras erwarten kann.

Freundliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 10:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benelli 750 Sei (2016-09-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Citroën 2 CV Charleston (2015-08-29 3174 b).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Citroën 2 CV Charleston (2015-08-29 3174 b).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Spurzem!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monstranz (neugotisch) Detail Maria Magdalena - Pfarrkirche Kärlich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 00:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monstranz (neugotisch) - Pfarrkirche Kärlich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelch - Pfarrkirche Kärlich, 1908.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monstranz (neugotisch) Detail Mondsichelmadonna - Pfarrkirche Kärlich (Ausschnitt).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Mülheim-Kärlich, Glockenturm 1903, Kirchstr. (Foto Sp).jpg

Hallo, schau mal, da ist links noch ein weißer Keil. Anscheinend vom entstürzen. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Berthold, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich kann's allerdings im Moment nicht ändern, weil ich meinen Rechner mit den Fotos und dem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm heute Mittag zur Generalüberholung weggeben habe. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 12:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Glockenturm 1903, Kirchstr. (Foto Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kolumba madonna in den truemmern 2009.jpg
• File:Kolumbakapelle, Köln (2010-12-04 31).JPG
• File:Maria in den Truemmern.jpg
• File:St-Koluma Köln Kapelle Madonna in den Trümmern.jpg
• File:St-Kolumba-Köln-076.JPG
• File:Köln-St.Kolumba854.JPG
• File:Köln-St.Kolumba856.JPG
• File:Köln-St.Kolumba857.JPG
• File:Köln-St.Kolumba859.JPG

Code (talk) 03:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mini Cooper (1. Generation).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Wasserrad, Kneippstraße (2016-10-10 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz D 5006 (2009 in Ahrweiler).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Rekord E (2014-06-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Danke gleichfalls! -- Spurzem (talk) 19:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:2007-06-17 06 Veritas RS, Bj. 1948.jpg

Moin! Sag mal, was sind denn das für kuriose Halterungen für die Rückspiegel? Soll das so? Das mit dem Schaumgummi zwecks Vibrationsdämpfung ist doch nicht etwa im Original so vorgesehen? --smial 11:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Ps.: Ansonsten finde ich klasse, daß du immer noch nützliche Bilder in deinen Archiven findest ;-) - Qualitätsansprüche mancher commoners hin, Qualitätsansprüche her, für mich sind das alles wichtige Dokumente.

Hallo Smial, über die Spiegelhalterungen hatte ich mich auch schon gewundert. Original Veritas sind sie vermutlich nicht, obwohl gerade bei diesen Autos damals vieles improvisiert gewesen sein dürfte. Ansonsten vielen Dank für die anerkennenden Worte zu meinen alten Rennsportbildern. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 17:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Schmincke - Aquarellfarbkasten um 1935 (2).JPG

Mo!oin, wo hast Du denn das Exponat gefunden + was ist die Grundlage der Datierung? Ein sehr schöner Beitrag. -- Grüße von Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.63.169 (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, es ist einer der Farbkästen meines Vaters (Jahrgang 1907), den er schon hatte, seit ich (* 1942) mich erinnern kann. Vermutlich kaufte er ihn schon vor dem Krieg, und deshalb dieses „um 1935“. Gruß -- Spurzem (talk) 06:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, danke für die Beantwortung meiner Frage. Nachgehakt: Und wieso könnte der Farbkasten nicht aus der Nachkriesgzeit stammen? Stell Dir vor, Du hast ihn erstmalig beim Herrn Papa im Alter von 3 bis 4 Jahren wahr_genommen. Also, bitte verstehe mich nicht falsch, aber "um 1935" (Vorkriegszeit) halte ich für äußerst gewagt - unkommentiert - als Bildunterschrift. "Undatiert" als Angabe wäre m.E. seriöser für eine Enzyklopädie. -- Grüße v. Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.53.192 (talk) 11:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Ich behaupte nicht, dass der Farbkasten von 1935 ist; er kann wenig älter oder auch jünger sein. Dass er viel jünger ist, glaube ich nicht. Im Krieg wurde er mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht gekauft, und an einen anderen Farbkasten meines Vaters erinnere ich mich nicht - außer einem größeren, ebenfalls von Schmincke, aus den 1950er-Jahren. Und was die Seriosität betrifft: Da glaube ich, dass wir in Wikipedia weniger seriöse Behauptungen haben. Meinst Du nicht auch? Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 11:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Ein Datierung "um 1935" anzugeben in einer Bildunterschrift auf Basis von "seit ich mich erinnern kann", "geboren 1942", "glaube", "an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit", "erinnere ich mich nicht" und "dass wir in WP weniger seriöse Behauptungen haben", halte ich für nicht sauber gearbeitet. Hoffe Dir den Floh ins Ohr gesetzt zu haben, eventuell mal bei Schmincke oder in Kunstakademien nachzuhaken wegen Deinem Erbstück. Am Beispiel von https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Wanderer_%C3%BCber_dem_Nebelmeer#Datierungsgeschichte kannst Du sehen, wie ein m.E. akzeptables und belegtes um-Zeitfenster aussehen sollte für Exponate aus dem 19./20. Jahrhundert. (also plus minus 2 bis 3 Jahre). Genau genommen kannst Du derzeit nicht belegen, ob der Kasten aus der Zeit vor oder nach 1945 stammt. -- Grüße v. Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.53.192 (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Bist Du so was wie ein offizieller Revisor der Wikimedia? Wenn nicht, interessieren mich Deine Belehrungen nur wenig. An Schmincke habe ich übrigens schon geschrieben, bevor ich Deine Aufforderung dazu erhielt. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Freut mich wirklich, dass Du nachhakst bei Schmincke. Bin gespannt auf die Reaktion und wie bereits weiter oben geäußert: bitte verstehe mich nicht falsch. -- Grüße v. Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.53.192 (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Ich verstehe Dich durchaus richtig. Verstehe aber bitte auch, dass ich gegen Belehrungen hinsichtlich sauberer oder nicht sauberer Arbeit allergisch bin. Sollte Schmincke mir sagen, dass ich um zehn Jahre entweder in der einen oder der anderen Richtung danebenliege, werde ich „um 1935“ ändern. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Klasse! -- Grüße v. Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.53.192 (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Im Folgenden ein Auszug aus der E-Mail von Schmincke, 18. Januar 2017, 09:05 Uhr: „Es freut uns sehr zu hören, dass Ihr Vater im Besitz von Aquarellkästen unseres Unternehmens war, bzw. ist und die Anzweifelung im Hinblick auf das Alter des Malkastens verstehen wir nicht. Nach Recherche konnten wir feststellen, dass der Kasten um 1935 von unserem Unternehmen an den Fachhandel geliefert wurde. Ein Hinweis ist das Schmincke Logo im Kasten mit ‚zwei‘ Balken. Dieses Logo wurde um 1935 benutzt.“ Genügt diese Bestätigung dem Revisor? -- Spurzem (talk) 10:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Auf Basis des neusten Kenntnisstandes: selbstverständlich. Obwohl genau genommen müsste noch mal beim Unternehmen angefragt werden, ob dieses Modell auch nach '45 an den Fachhandel geliefert wurde. Wäre schon interessant zu erfahren, von wann bis wann, also in welchem Zeitfenster dieser Kasten ausgeliefert wurde. Aber lassen wir's dabei. Ein Exponat aus der Vorkriegszeit, das ist eben etwas ganz besonderes und da möchte ich dann auch nicht weiter bohren. -- Grüße v. Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.205.38 (talk) 13:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Werter Revisor, Sie sind fast schon zu großzügig. ;-) Andererseits rate ich Ihnen, sich künftig über andere Fotos oder auch Wikipedia-Artikel herzumachen und Zweifel anzumelden, die möglicherweise eher berechtigt sind. Ich habe Ihnen dargelegt, dass ich mich seit meiner frühesten Kindheit an diesen Farbkasten erinnere, dass mein Vater während der Kriegsjahre mit Sicherheit keinen kaufte und erst in den 1950er-Jahren ein weiterer, größerer dazukam. Soll ich vielleicht noch eine eidesstattliche Erklärung abgeben oder das Teil von einem Sachverständigen untersuchen lassen? Was soll also diese Besserwisserei Ihrerseits oder dieses Madig-machen-Wollen? Und noch einmal: Ich schrieb „um 1935“, schließe also nicht aus, dass es schon 1934 oder eventuell erst 1937 war. -- Spurzem (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Nachhaken ist doch kein madig machen von dem schönen Bild und natürlich hake ich aus Interesse nach, wo mir Datierungen - zunächst - zweifelhaft vorkommen. Gerne können Sie mein Interesse auch an Schmincke weiterreichen, ob dieses Modell auch nach '45 in den Fachhandel kam. -- Grüße v. Kunstliebhaber mit IP — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.240.220.3 (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schmincke - Aquarellfarbkasten um 1935 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 250 GTO, CMC-Modell (Tür offen 2017-02-14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be better with more contrast, foregroud a little bit grey, IMO tires should be (nearly) black. --XRay 17:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 250 GTO, CMC-Modell (Seite 2017-02-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Focus stacking?

Focus stacking bedeutet, ich mache mehrere Bilde des Objetes in nterschiedlichen Schärfeebenen (natürlich mit Stativ). D.h. die erste Aufnahme wird so eingestelle, dass der vorderste Bereich scharf ist, dann verstelle ich die Schärfeebene etwas, mache wieder ein Bild usw. bis ich hinten angelangt bin. Mit der geeigneten Software (z.B. Helicon Focus; es gibt aber auch Gratissoftware wie z.B. Combine ZP - such das mal mit Google) werden dann die Bilder übereinandergelegt und von jedem die scharfen Bereiche übernommen. So erhält man ein Bild, das von vor bis hinten komplett scharf ist. Meine Schneckenbilder mache ich z.B, alle so, Du kanst Dir das Ergebnis dort anschauen. Weitere Informatonen findest Du auch, wenn Du in der deutschen Wikipedia "Focus stacking" eingibst, dort ist es gut erklärt. Vieleicht probierst Du es mal aus, in diesem Fall viel Erfolg. Viele Grüße --Llez (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

@Llez: Danke. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, habe ich es bei dem Foto von der Lok so gemacht. Das Bild des Ferrari 250 GTO, das ich gestern vorstellte, ist auf jeden Fall aus vier Einzelbildern zusammengesetzt; hat auch ohne spezielles Programm gut geklappt. Ich schaue aber mal nach der Software, die Du empfiehlst. Danke auch dafür und noch mal herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Märklin-Schlafwagen, Spur 0, etwa 1952.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schuco Examico - mit Schlüssel (Original um 1948).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coventry-Eagle, Bj. 1920 - Motor und Schaltung (2016-09-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 22:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 250 GTO, CMC-Model 1-18 (vorn links 2017-03-23).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella Coupé, Cockpit (2016-09-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kapitän (Modell 1939-40) b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW K 70, Bj. 1972 (2016-09-04 Neuwied r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distler-Lokomotive, um 1950 (Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although I would have preferred focus stacking in this case, nevertheless good quality --Llez 13:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Polo Allstar, Bj. 2016, innen (2017-03-21).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The overall sharpness could be better but it's OK for me. However, could you remove the CAs, please? --Basotxerri 16:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)  Done. Thank you, Basotxerri O.K. now? -- Spurzem 16:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment Could you please try again? Sorry for insisting but I can still see the CAs. I've left you a note on the image. --Basotxerri 18:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)  Done. Please, Basotxerri, look once more. -- Spurzem 18:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC) I think that it's good enough for QI now but I would be happier if you could get the handbrake lever better. --Basotxerri 09:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mondsichelmadonna um 1750, Pfarrkirche Kärlich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 904 GTS Minichamps 1-18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Upper part of the picture on the light side, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Done. I think it is far better now. I should have corrected it at once. -- Spurzem 10:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Better now. Thank you.--Famberhorst 15:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 14 days

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 14 days for the following reason: Repeated trolling on COM:QIC page, accusations of revenge votes, violations of promotion rules. Difflinks on demand.. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Irgendwann ist das Maß voll. "Laughable revenge" (gleich 2mal), "von A.Savin nix anderes zu erwarten", "Basotxerri ich weiß Bescheid". Und das nur die gerade erst abegegebenen Kommentare. Für den Fall einer Adminbeschwerde betrachte mich bitte als informiert. --A.Savin 20:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@A.Savin: So wird man unliebsame Kritiker los. Benutzersperre in eigener Sache; es darf doch wohl nicht wahr sein, ist es aber anscheinend. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Primitivstes Schwarzweißdenken. --A.Savin 21:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Von einem Admin erwarte ich ein ruhiges, ausgleichendes Verhalten. Sie aber reagieren überzogen, werden unsachlich und vergreifen sich jetzt sogar im Ton. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Ja, ich habe mich erdreistet bei einer deiner Nominationen ein  Oppose abzugeben und das ist natürlich eine Todsünde für einen Admin. --A.Savin 21:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Lenken Sie nicht ab. Abgesehen davon, dass Ihre  Oppose auffällig sind und aus dem normalen Rahmen fallen. -- Spurzem (talk) 22:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

You're free to request an unblock, to complain at COM:ANU (after 14 days) or en:User talk:Jimbo Wales or wherever you want. I'm not willing to discuss here anything else than YOUR recent behaviour. See also de:Whataboutism. --A.Savin 22:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Ich habe ebenfalls kein Interesse mit Ihnen über die Sperre weiter zu diskutieren und mich Ihrem Spott auszusetzen. Ihr Verhalten ist nicht das, was von einem Admin erwartet werden darf. -- Spurzem (talk) 22:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC) --

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2017-03-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not quite in perspective but you couldn't do anymore without having to crop the corner; I like the abstract overlays of grids --Daniel Case 00:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW 1600 (2017-03-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2016-01-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Agradeciendole de Ivan2010

Hola - Spurzem, ante todo le ruego me disculpe por escribirle en mi idioma natal, pues no domino el inglés como para poder expresarme como quisiera, ojalá pueda usted leer mi mensaje. Le hago estas letras para agradecerle enormemente su esfuerzo por defender mi imagen File:Tractor_arando_la_tierra_para_cultivo.jpg en ser calificada como QI, es algo que en verdad le agradezco, y pare explicarle porque me había mantenido callado ante los comentarios que usted y el usuario A.Savin emitían sobre el tema. Yo le he escrito también un mensaje a A.Savin para explicarle que no ha sido falta de interés mío como él piensa, sino solo falta de conocimientos, esas imágenes las tomé por azar en un viaje que hacía por el campo, y al ver que podían ser interesantes las subí a Commons y las propuse par que fuesen valoradas, pues consideré que podían ser buenas imágenes, pero desgraciadamente no poseo mucha más información que pudiera agregar, y no soy conocedor de esa materia de vehículos del campo, y por eso, al igual que usted, no comprendo bien que podía faltarnos según explica A.Savin para poder agregarlo, y fue esa la razón por la que me mantenía callado y no me atrevía a comentar nada sobre lo que ustedes hablaban. No tendré otro remedio que esperar para ver que decide A.Savin, y mientras desde acá le envío a usted un saludo afectuoso, le reitero mi agradecimiento, y por supuesto, en lo que pudiera servirle, aquí me tiene. Un saludo Ivan2010

@Ivan2010: Hallo Ivan, es tut mir sehr leid, aber ich verstehe leider kein Spanisch. I am very sorry but I don't understand Spanish. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

I have tried to translate it into English with the help of a software, let's hope that I suit someone's purposes a little.

Hello Spurzem, above all I beg you excuse me to write on my natal language, because I do not dominate the English to be able to express me as I wanted, let's hope that you can read my message. I make these letters to thank your enormously for your effort to defend my image; File:TTractor_arando_la_tierra_para_cultivo.jpg, in being qualified like QI, it is something that actually I thank him, and to explain it because the quiet elk had held the comments that you and the user A.Savin emitted topical. I have written also a message to A.Savin to explain to him that it has not been without interest my as he thinks, but only it is missing of knowledge, I took those images for chance in a journey that I did for the field, and when seeing that they could be interesting I upload on Commons, and proposed them pair that they are appraised, because I considered that the images could be good, but I do not unfortunately have a lot more information that I can add, and I am not learned in that matter of vehicles of the field, and that's why, just like you, I fail to understand well that I could be absent to us according to explain to A.Savin to be able to add it, and that one the reason why he kept quiet and did not dare went to comment nothing on what you talked. I will not have another remedy to wait to see that A.Savin decides. And I send here a greeting to you, I reiterate my gratitude to you, and of course, in what I could serve you, here it has me. A greeting and Best regards Ivan2010 19:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?

Hallo Spurzem,

vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.

Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.

Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.

Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.

Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Ich bitte Dich um Deine Meinung (QI review)

Hallo Spurzem,
ich würde mich sehr über Deine Meinung zu meinem QI-Kandidaten Peter und Paul Kirche Busbach vom 11 Juni freuen, weil ich weiß, dass Du das Korrigieren stürzender Linien nicht dogmatisch für alle Motive forderst. Schon jetzt vielen Dank für Deine Meinung und Zeit, Gruß aus Oberfranken --J. Lunau (talk) 13:54, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@J. Lunau: Hallo, entschuldige bitte, dass ich erst jetzt Deine Anfrage sehe; außerdem finde ich mit dem Link nicht zum Bild. Ich schaue nicht mehr allzu oft in die Commons-Seiten und stelle keine Bilder mehr zur Bewertung ein. Der Ärger war zu groß geworden und erreichte seinen Höhepunkt, als mich ein Admin sperrte, nachdem ich ihm einige Mal widersprochen hatte. Im Übrigen hätte es auch keinen Zweck mehr, mich zu bewerben, weil ich von einigen Leuten ziemlich sicher ein Kontra erwarten müsste, unabhängig von der Qualität des Fotos. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 22:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Ich finde es sehr unerfreulich, zu hören, dass man so gute Fotografen wie Dich aus QI vertreibt. Ich finde etliche Deiner Fotos sehr gut und sie stellen meiner Meinung nach eine echte Bereicherung der Commons und vor allem auch für die Wikipedia dar.

Mein Foto steht noch mal zur Diskussion und würde mich über Deine Meinung freuen: Church St. Peter und Paul (Busbach, Germany)

@J. Lunau: Ich habe mir das Bild angeschaut. Es ist zwar ein bisschen dunkel, aber die Komposition gefällt mir. Ich bin gespannt, was die anderen sagen. Es scheint sogar so zu sein, dass bestimmte Leute dagegenstimmen, wenn ich ein Foto gut finde, und umgekehrt. Ich lade übrigens nach wie vor Bilder in die Commons hoch, wenn sie mir brauchbar und nützlich erscheinen, aber dem "Theater" hier, bei den Featured pictures oder Wikipedia KEB setze ich mich nicht mehr aus. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Das ging ja fix, ich danke Dir! Das Foto wurde bei komplett bedecktem Himmel gemacht, vielleicht wirkt es deshalb dunkel. Auch ich bin gespannt, ob sich andere von Deiner Bewertung angezogen fühlen - beim letzten Durchgang hat niemand das Foto abschließend bewertet. Gruß --J. Lunau (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadillac Eldorado, Cabriolet, Bj. 1975 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @Spurzem: Your signature is missing... Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plymouth Belvedere, Bj. 1959 (Foto Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Lovely car. Please fix the description page. --XRay 18:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar XK 150 Roadster (2017-07-02 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 502, Bj. 1957, vorn (2017-07-02 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 356 B 1600 Super, Bj. 1959-60 (Sp r2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo PV 544 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadillac Eldorado Special, Bj. 1955, Heck (2017-07-02 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. no need for f/10 --PetarM 10:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 944 (2017-07-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Please add signature, good quality anyway. --Palauenc05 09:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type, Serie II (2017-07-05 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG TD, Bj. 1951, hinten (2017-07-01 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 190 SL Roadster (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo PV 544, Front (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 500 Replica, Bj. 1970 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intermeccanica Torino, Bj. 1967, Cockpit (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 09:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Ro 80, Bj. 76, Armaturenbrett (Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph Spitfire 1500, Front (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Photoshop

Maybe this? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Hallo LivioAndronico, what should be better now? I see no considerable difference. Poco a Poco complains that the yellow car in the foreground hides a small part of the main subject. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes but said also: "and the red one is not helping either". Was only for help...nothing more. Good night --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you and good night -- Spurzem (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ralt RT 3-82 Alfa Romeo (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Rekord D GS Coupé (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chevrolet Corvette, Bj. 1963 (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Messerschmitt KR 200 Cabrio-Limousine (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 T, Bj. 1973, 130 PS (2017-06-17 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 220 Cabriolet, Cockpit, 1951-55 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hansa 1100, Baujahr 1961, Front (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hansa 1100, Bj. 1961, Heck (Sp 2017-07-02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford T, Bj. 1912 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 12:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford T, Bj. 1912, Petroleumlampe u. Hupe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 12:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 502, Bj. 1957, Seite (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 502, Bj. 1957, Heck (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 502, Bj. 1957, Motorraum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysler 300 L, 1965 (2017-07-02 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroën ID 19, Bj. 1967 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroën ID 19, Bj. 1967, Heck (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 15:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG B, Bj. 1979 (2017-07-01 Sp r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG B, Bj. 1979, Motor (2017-07-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Wieso ist der Motorraum nicht so überfüllt wie bei meinem Auto? ;-) ) --XRay 13:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Guzzi V 7, Bj. 1973, Motor links (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Guzzi V 7, Bj. 1973, Motor rechts (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Tomaso Pantera (2017-06-11 Foto Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 F (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Rallye Kadett B, Coupé F (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nimbus, Bj. 1950 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph TR 6 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 23:11, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Capri RS, Bj. 1976 (2017-07-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG TD, Bj. 1951, teilw. offen (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier - Dom, Kreuzgang, Glocke von 1682 (2017-05-30 Sp 1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 18:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier - Dom, Kreuzgang - Engel von Ernst Steinacker (2017-05-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Wegkreuz Reihe Bäume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Olympia, Bj. 1950 (2017-07-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, shame about the weather. --Peulle 15:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Seven 3S mit Twin Cam (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Twin Cam (im Lotus Seven), Einlassseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich Christophorusschule - Nordost (2017-06-24 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 19:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach, Löwenbrunnen (2017-06-06 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Ro 80, Bj. 1976 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW 1302 (2017-06-11 Sp r2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)