User talk:Spurzem/Archive 16

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW Isetta from 1955, Cockpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853, Bj. 1936, Heck (2013-05-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor, Südportal (2020-02-07 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Porsche 904 GTS Minichamps (Seite).JPG

And also:

• File:Porsche 904 GTS Minichamps 1-18.JPG
• File:VW 1600 by minichamps (Seite).JPG

Yours sincerely, Arosio Stefano (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

@Arosio Stefano: The manufacturer's approval is available for the photos of Minichamps models I have uploaded. I therefore ask you to withdraw your request for deletion immediately. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you to have immediately notified me. I think to have ripristinated everything. Excuse me. --Arosio Stefano (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

@Arosio Stefano: It would be interesting to find out what reason you have to make such requests for deletion. It is allowed to take pictures of real cars and to publish them. Why should it be prohibited for scale models? -- Spurzem (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't agree with but it's the offical WMF policy/guideline: Commons:TOYS or more in detail, User:Elcobbola/Models which in turn are a direct consequence of American laws (legal cases). If the USA start to consider toys to be utilitarian objects, I'd be happy and start uploading toy pictures myself. But unfortunately it won't happen .... --Arosio Stefano (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Model cars are not toys. And also: Do we have to pay willingly attention to everything that comes to mind of the Americans? -- Spurzem (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Models that are not even a toy are even less useful than a toy, they are like a sculpture, they are a work of art to admire. The WMF servers are in the USA and must follow USA laws: we have to hope that they move servers to Japan....

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urmitz-Bahnhof, Kirche, Orgel Gesamtansicht (2020-02-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach -Hochgrab Heinrich II., Detail (2019-05-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach - Hochgrab Pfalzgraf Heinrich II. von Laach (2019-05-14 Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfa Romeo Giulia GT 1300 Junior (2008-06-28 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veritas RS, Bj. 1948, Nürburgring Brünnchen (2007-06-16 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 750 (2013-09-15 Spu r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 750, Bj. 1959, Heck (2013-09-15 Spu r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Contrast could be improved. --XRay 18:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zündapp DB 201, Bj. 1951, Metzeler-Reifen (2007-06-16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 18:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche Carrera 6, Bj. 1966, Paddock (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Isetta, Bj 1955 (2015-08-28 3092 Ausschnitt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autobianchi Bianchina special (2015-08-28 innen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Sport-Prinz (2014-09-13 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Healey Silverstone, Vorradaufhängung (2008-06-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 C, Bj. 1949, Armaturenbrett (2007-07-08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Isetta, Heck (2015-08-24 2882 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stay polite and to the point

Hi Spurzem, I noticed that sometimes you tend to comment reviewers instead of the photos. Please avoid comments like this, it doesn't help anyone. Also, sarcasm like this is not welcome at the QIC. If you don't agree with our guideliness where it clearly says that images should have at least 2 megapixels (and with easy to take shots like a flat sign, users often requite higher resolution than that), perhaps it'd be a better idea to try to suggest a change of the guidelines rather than have cheeky comments on your wiki colleagues. Consider this as friendly advice on how to contribute to our community in a healthy and constructive way. All the bestl, --Podzemnik (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-02-10 7827 Fastnachtszug Mülheim-Kärlich, Burgstr. (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-02-10 7791 Fastnachtszug Mülheim-Kärlich (Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-02-15 9426 Fastnachtszug Mülheim-Kärlich - KaJu Mülheim (Foto Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 500 Replica (2019-09-08 Sp 1r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AU 1000 SP Armaturenbrett (2008-07-12 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Alte Kapelle (4), Bodenfliesen (2017-09-10 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Alte Kapelle (6), Sakrarium (2017-09-10 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Healey Silverstone from 1949, front suspension.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volkswagen 1302 at Nürburgring in 1973.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 200-3, Bj. 1956 (2018-06-30 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 695 (Replica im Bau 2012-08-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EMW R 35-3, Bj. 1954, rear (2016-05-01 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kapitän '51 (1951-53), Heck (2009-10-13 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 19:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goggomobil 250 (2008-07-12 in Vallendar Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 18:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-06-05 7446b AC MüK - Lenkrad Mercedes-Benz 190 SL (Foto Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 00:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford 17M P3, 1961, Lenkrad (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miele-Logo (2018-06-03 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --T.Bednarz 20:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 (2008-06-28 01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 (2008-06-28 02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 19:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 (2008-06-28 Sp) Motor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture for me as an ex auto mechanic.--Famberhorst 19:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Healey Silverstone (17.06.2007).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 P. u. U. Trunk (2007-06-16 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trademark of Miele motorcycles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Scope Spurzem should indicate that this is mounted on the vehicle as a mascot or ornament. Strictly speaking it's not a trademark in English. Charles (talk) 11:44, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I was surprised that there had been no complaints about my nominations for a long time. What I show in my photo is neither a mascot nor only an ornament; it is - as we say in German - a „Markenzeichen“ (trademark). Perhaps it may be called an ornament too. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cockpit of Lotus Seven.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Question More details of model possible in scope? Charles (talk) 11:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: In the meantime, I no longer understand the grumbling. At first my scopes were too detailed, now I am suddenly supposed to provide a description of the whole car. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huflattich (2020-03-08 5 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020-02-07 1 Karden, Hochwasser - Frachtschiff.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition. Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-06-14 36 72 Stunden in Mülheim-Kärlich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Intake side of a Lotus Twin Cam engine from 1969 (two overhead camshafts), approx. 1600 cm³, 115–125 HP, installed in a Lotus Seven.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Double wishbone suspension with stabilizer bar, coil spring and integrated shock absorber of a Lotus Seven from 1969.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroën 2 CV, Bj. 1956 (2014-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfa Romeo 8C 2300 from 1932, front and left side, at Nürburgring Oldtimer Grand Prix 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:55, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment You could lighten up these old photos. Charles (talk) 09:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of Alfa Romeo 8C 2300 from 1932 with Rootes-type blower, right side, at Nürburgring Oldtimer Grand Prix 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Castorbrunnen (2018-10-05 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 19:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Dahlien am Denkmalplatz (2016-10-06 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kurpark - Eiche (2013-08-29).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph Spitfire IV (2014-09-13 7038) Armaturen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Hotel Adler, Erker (2016-10-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW Junior (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 550 Replica, Bj. Basis 1962 (2013-05-04 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 T, Bj. 1972, front (2013-05-04 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Wiking-Modell VW 1303 (um 1975).JPG

File:Wiking-Modell VW 1303 (um 1975).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arosio Stefano (talk) 07:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Eingang Kurtheater (2013-09-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 21:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Obstinsel, Kathreinerstr. (2016-10-10 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horex Regina Sport (2011-09-24 Freisteller).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roter Weinbergpfirsich, Blüte (2020-03-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 21:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gänseblümchen in Karden (2020-03-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz F1M 414-46, Bj. 1949 (2006-07-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanz, 10266 cm³, 35 PS, Bj. 1936 (2008-06-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz C 123 (2014-06-15 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glas 1700 (2007-07-08 Sp r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanz Bulldog D 8506, Bj. 1943 (2007-07-08 Sp r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziege frisst, Alken (2011-10-09 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Thurant, Alken (2011-10-09 15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 22:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montabaur, Hinterer Rebstock 6 - Relief Johannes und Jakobus (2013-09-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 16:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florinskirche Koblenz, Türme Südost (2014-03-08 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gute Qualität, würde aber fast sagen, dass man das Gebäum und die dreckige Lampe rausretuschieren könnte :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koblenz, Historiensäule - Boot mit Weinfässern (2007-04-21 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 22:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Z8 (2009-05-20).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kapitän P 2,6 Bj. 1962 (2009-10-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schmetterlingsgarten, Mini-Schildkröten (2007-04-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koblenz, Historiensäule (2007-04-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of Saint John and Saint James in Montabaur, Hinterer Rebstock 6, from 1672.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

FPC

Hi, could you look at the candidates for feature pictures. I have this image.

. Thank you. --Adámoz (talk) 07:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Adámoz, the picture is interesting and good. But with the beetle's eggs, it doesn't look aesthetic to me. In addition, the eggs do not appear to be very sharp. So please do not resent me if I do not give a rating. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 11:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Café Wittelsbach (2017-08-01 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009-08-07 1020 Oldtimer-GP - Porsche 911 SC, Bj. 1986.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type Lightweight, Bj. 1963, Eingang Mercedes-Arena (2009-08-07 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Adámoz 12:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenblume mit Sonnenbrille (2019-07-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, quality good enough --PantheraLeo1359531 20:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Really? I looked at this more like an april fools joke. --D-Kuru 20:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC) @D-Kuru: No april joke. A child put his sunglasses on the flower and was happy that the flower was allowed to wear them. -- Spurzem 20:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Window in the Florinskirche in Koblenz with a picture of the birth of Jesus in the lower right.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. Scope slightly rephrased. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schildkröten im Garten der Schmetterlinge (Schloss Sayn).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballonblume platycodon grandiflorus (2013-07-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zoo Neuwied Rötelpelikane (2006-08-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montabaur, Zum heiligen Geist, Nasenschild (2020-04-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, GQ --Palauenc05 11:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Schachbrett (2015-09-05 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment looks not really sharp to me. Can you fix it? --Carschten 18:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC) @Carschten: Tatsächlich, die Zeitung der Frau kann man nicht lesen. Ich weiß nicht, woran es liegt. -- Spurzem 21:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Ach Mensch... weißt du wirklich nicht, was ich meine? Aber was soll’s, wenn es auch kein anderer bewerten will. Hier sind schon ganz andere Bilder (sicherlich auch von mir) durchgekommen. Wie sagt man so schön:  Weak support --Carschten 11:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz L 3500 (2008-06-14) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montabaur, Vorderer Rebstock 14, Schnitzerei (2013-09-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenblume mit Biene (2014-08-27 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice! --T.Bednarz 21:46, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Stadtmuseum - Wappen v. d. Leyen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Stadtmuseum - Wappen von Eltz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coats of arms of the founder family Waldbott von Bassenheim at the Saint Mary Chapel (Bassenheim).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The one and only! --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 13:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercedes-Benz L 3500 as flatbed truck, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 13:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel Olympia panel van from 1951, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 13:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassenheim, Walpot-Platz - Pfarrhaus, Rentamt (2019-11-21 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Fachwerkhäuser um 1600 (2012-10-09 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Liebfrauenstr., Kreuzigung (2009).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Liebfrauenstr. 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior view of Martinus-Museum, Bassenheim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Relief Lazarus Friedhofskapelle (2014-10-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 22:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis-Karden, Kreuzweg - 3. Station (nur Bild).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis-Karden, Kreuzweg - 2. Station (nur Bild).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis-Karden, Kreuzweg - 1. Station (nur Bild).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karmelenberg, Marienkapelle - hl. Wendelin (2008-05-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castor shrine in the St. Castor Church (Karden).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Morini Corsaro, Bj. 1961.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Marktkreuz und Domhotel (2009-09-21 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Kanzel (2014-10-01 848).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Kanzel, Markus (2014-10-01 876).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Kanzel, Johannes (2014-10-01 875).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A horizontal perspective correction needed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Du hast recht; danke. -- Spurzem 14:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC) Prima, danke --PantheraLeo1359531 14:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Kanzel, Lukas (2014-10-02 877).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Kanzel, Matthäus (2014-10-01 878).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zündapp DB 201, rear and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Madonna (2014-10-01 894).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Hochaltar, Petrus (2014-10-01 851).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Hochaltar, Paulus (2014-10-01 852).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Hochaltar (2014-10-01 825).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche St. Potentinus (2014-10-01 799).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Seitenaltar li., St. Norbert (2014-10-01 857).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Rote Tulpen (2020-04-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Grabkreuz (2014-10-01 837).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 15:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Barockgarten (2014-10-01 839).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me, but 1/80 sec exposure time might be better :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Perhaps -- Spurzem 14:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of St. Potentinus (Wehr).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Madonna, front (2014-10-01 849c).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, 2 Bienen auf Dahlie (2014-10-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenmonstranz um 1750, Pfarrkirche Kärlich (2016-08-29 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of St. Potentinus (Wehr) and Propsteigebäude, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 175 VS, Bj. 1957 (2013-09-03 museum mobile).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer, Bj. 1914, ht. (2013-09-03 museum mobile).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer, Bj. 1914, Detail (2013-09-03 museum mobile).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenmonstranz um 1750, Pfarrkirche Kärlich, Detail (2016-08-29 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Auf den Kanten des Subjekts sind grün-pinke Reflektionen, kannst du sie minimieren? --PantheraLeo1359531 15:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)  Done @PantheraLeo1359531: Ich hatte mir das Bild nur in der realen Größe (Engel auf der Monstranz ca. 8 cm groß) angeschaut. Es sind CAs, die sich nur schwer entfernen lassen; aber jetzt ist es besser. -- Spurzem 17:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC) Danke, jetzt passt's --PantheraLeo1359531 16:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)