User talk:Spurzem/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image Tagging Image:1986-08-02 Pierre Brice in Elspe.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1986-08-02 Pierre Brice in Elspe.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 13:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

The photo of Pierre Brice at Elspe is my own work! Spurzem 09:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:2006-07_Russland_4,1.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2006-07_Russland_4,1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Please delete the image 2006-07_Russland_4,1.jpg. Uploading was a mistake. Excuse me. Spurzem 12:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:1986-08-02 Elspe mit Pierre Brice-2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1986-08-02 Elspe mit Pierre Brice-2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 14:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Ich verstehe nicht, was Ihr mit „meinem“ Pierre Brice habt? Ich habe ihn selbst bei einer Freilichtaufführung in Elspe fotografiert. Brauche ich die Genehmigung des Veranstalters, um das Bild veröffentlichen zu dürfen? Antwortet mir bitte auf meiner Benutzerseite in Wikipedia. Vielen Dank! Spurzem 09:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hallo Spurzem, schade, jetzt wird es doch nichts mit den Espe-Bildern, trotz Genehmigung der Veranstalter: Kommerzielle Verwendung ist ausgeschlossen. Sie muss aber ausdrücklich gestattet sein, damit die Bilder in den Wikimedia-Projekten genutzt werden können. Ich habe deshalb Löschantrag gestellt. Viele Grüße, Wikipeder 09:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Noch eine Ergänzung nach deiner Mail: An den Winnetou-Bildern haben zwei Personen(kreise) Rechte: Die Rechteinhaber der Theateraufführung für ihr Werk, und du für die Art und Weise, wie du deren Werk fotografiert hast. Deinen Anteil hast du unter CC-Lizenz gestellt, aber die Rechteinhaber der Aufführung haben mit ihrem Anteil der Rechte untersagt, dass das Bild kommerziell verwendet wird. Unter dem Strich bedeutet das, dass das Bild insgesamt nicht kommerziell verwendet werden darf. Alles, was auf den Wikimedia-Projekten verwendet wird, muss aber kommerziell verwendbar sein. Hier steht's genauer. Die Bilder dürfen also hier nicht verwendet werden und müssen deshalb entfernt werden. Gruß, Wikipeder 10:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hallo Wikipeder, diese Bedingung der absolut freien Lizenz gehört zu den Punkten, die ich in (oder an) Wikipedia nicht verstehe. Sie ist wahrscheinlich der Grund dafür, dass es so gut wie keine Fotos von Bühnenwerken (siehe Wagner-Festspiele, Salzburger Festspiele usw.), von darstellenden Künstlern oder von modernen Kunstwerken gibt. Oder anders gesagt: Tausenden Benutzern, die sich in Wikipedia informieren wollen, bleiben Abbildungen vorenthalten, weil es vielleicht einem oder zweien von ihnen untersagt wäre, ein solches Foto kommerziell zu nutzen. Denkt doch mal darüber nach, ob diese Vorschrift nicht geändert werden kann. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem 10:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:ClarkJim1965mitMechaniker.jpg

Ausbelichtungsmaske? (Ausschnitt 200%, optisch etwas verstärkt

Hallo, ich war mal so frei, das Bild von 1965 in einer überarbeiteten Version hochzuladen: Image:ClarkJim1965mitMechaniker-2.jpg. Interessante wäre jedoch für mich zu erfahren, was die Fotomontage notwendig werden lassen hat? Standen Clark und sein Mechaniker dort an einem "halben" Auto ohne Motor? ---jha- 10:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Ich denke, es ist eine Nachbelichtung mit einer etwas eckig zugeschnittenen und fest aufgelegten, nicht verwedelten Maske. -- smial 11:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Das klare Schwarz-Weiß statt der Originaltönung des alten Fotos gefällt mir. Die Frage nach der Fotomontage verstehe ich allerdings nicht. Wieso sollen Clark und sein Mechaniker an einem „halben“ Auto gestanden haben? Wenn der Wagen relativ kurz erscheint, mag das daran liegen, dass das Foto mit einem 85-mm-Objektiv gemacht ist. Geändert wurde nichts. Gruß -- Lothar Spurzem 12:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Ich meinte die Schnittlinien um den Motorblock, Überrollbügel und das rechte Hinterrad herum. Aber wie Smial schon schrieb: Vermutlich eine nicht abgewedelte Maske beim Belichten des Abzugs. ---jha- 13:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Das Bild wurde zwar als Ausschnitt vom 6x6-Negativ in einem professionellen Labor kopiert; ich glaube aber nicht, dass mithilfe einer Maske nachbelichtet wurde — das wäre auch damals (vor über 40 Jahren) im normalen Preis von 45 Pfennig nicht drin gewesen. Ich schließe aber nicht aus, dass ich nach dem Scannen stellenweise die Helligkeit verändert habe, weiß es aber nicht mehr. -- Lothar Spurzem 13:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:2007-09-08 2581 Borgward Hansa 1800 Heck, Bauzeit 1952-1954 (ret).jpg

Image deletion warning Image:2007-09-08 2581 Borgward Hansa 1800 Heck, Bauzeit 1952-1954 (ret).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Wikipeder 14:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Wikipeder, wahrscheinlich erscheint obige "Warning" routinemäßig. Aber in diesem Fall muss nicht über die Löschung des Bildes abgestimmt werden. Ich sah als Autor des Fotos, dass es zu dunkel ist und einen Fehler im Dateinamen enthält. Deshalb bat ich, es zu löschen. Der „Ersatz“ (gleiches Bild mit korrigierter Helligkeit) ist bereits hochgeladen. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem 16:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vulkan-Express am 1999-06-06.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.48.6.116 21:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:2006-06-09 D Lok 996101, Bj. 1914 (ret).jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.49.190.240 05:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:2006-06-09 C Lok 996101 Wasseraufnahme (ret).jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.49.190.240 05:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lok 24 009 um 1974 in Mayen.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.49.190.240 05:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:2006-05-20 05 ca. 9.00 Uhr 052 740-8 in Mayen - kl Datei.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.49.190.240 05:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:2006-05-20 06 ca. 9.00 Uhr 052 740-8 in Mayen (kl).jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.49.190.240 05:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-09-08 2581 Borgward Hansa 1800 Front, Bauzeit 1952-1954 (ret2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Thank you! -- Lothar Spurzem 19:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I need to contact you about your Paul Hawkins photo can you pease e-mail me on LolCoffey@aol.com. Thanks. Lorie


Image:1965-05-23_07b_John_Surtees,_Ferrari_330P2.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:1965-05-23_07b_John_Surtees,_Ferrari_330P2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sterkebak 10:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Was fehlt dem Bild?! Oder traut man mir nicht mehr zu, dass ich als 23-Jähriger in der Lage war, ein fahrendes Auto zu fotografieren? Und wenn es etwas anderes ist, muss ich wohl damit rechnen, dass demnächst alle Bilder gelöscht werden, die ich bisher in die Commons eingestellt habe. Oder? -- Lothar Spurzem 13:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ein Übereifriger... Mach dir nix draus, ist ja schon erledigt. ;-) -- smial 16:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
mehr davon!
Vielleicht sollen wir nur noch Bilder aus dem aktuellen Jahr zulassen, aufgenommen aus dritter Reihe mit reichlich Hinterköpfen im Vordergrund, mit "Camera"-Hersteller im Exif "Nokia" oder "MOTORAZR". ---jha- 16:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Danke Euch beiden! Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem 18:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Velocette KTT Mk8, 350 cm³, Bj. 1939.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I would like to get a decleration in German. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Oben haben solche Bot-Einträge eine Sprachleiste, wo es auch einen deutsche Erklärung gibt. Anders ist das Problem mit der Mehrsprachigkeit momentan auf Commons leider nicht lösbar. --Kolossos (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Danke und Bitte um Entschuldigung, dass ich ein wenig überreagierte. Wahrscheinlich war ein technisches Problem die Ursache für die Bot-Mahnung, oder – das schließe ich inzwischen auch nicht mehr aus – ich hatte die Vorlage mit der Lizenzangabe nicht vollständig kopiert. Nächstens werde ich genauer nach der Ursache schauen, bevor ich mich aufrege. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:1964-05 Training Porsche 904 8-Zyl. wahrscheinl. E. Barth.jpg

Ist dies Foto repariert worden? Sieht mehr nach "Auto auf Rennstrecke-Montage" aus.--MacRudi (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Ich weiß nicht, was Du mit „repariert“ meinst. Das über 40 Jahre alte Foto (eine Repro aus einem meiner Nürburgring-Alben) ist bearbeitet, um die Schärfe des Wagens zu verbessern, aber keine Montage. Im Übrigen verstehe ich nicht, worauf die Frage hinauslaufen soll. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Dähne or Däne

File:1976-08-28, Dähne, Helmut, Yamaha TZ 350 ccm.jpg or File:1976-08-28, Däne, Helmut, Yamaha TZ 350 ccm.jpg? Place {{Bad name}} on the wrong one. Platonides (talk) 23:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Dähne with h is correct. -- Spurzem (talk) 23:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Formula 2

Just to let you know that the FIA are using some of your photos on their Formula Two website - here. They haven't attributed you or included the creative commons license so you might want to contact them about it. Readro (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Wen sollte ich sonst fragen in der WP?

Kein BMW jedenfalls

Ich wurde gefragt, was für ein Auto das wohl sei. Zwar gibt es eine leichte Ähnlichkeit zum BMW 501, aber der isses natürlich nicht. Hast Du eine Idee? Skoda? Was englisches? -- smial (talk) 20:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Smial, da stellst Du mir eine schwere Frage. Ein BMW (oder EMW) ist das abgebildete Auto sicher nicht. Von der Form her könnte es was „Englisches“ sein – aber was, weiß ich nicht. Ein Skoda scheint mir eher unwahrscheinlich. Tut mir leid, dass ich nicht weiterhelfen kann. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Sieht dem IFA F9 verdammt ähnlich, der hatte aber die Türen in der Mitte angeschlagen. Vielleicht eine Sonderform? Gruß. -- Erika39 (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Erika, ich glaube nicht, dass es ein IFA ist – da war die Kühlermaske schräger und rundlicher, wie bei der Meisterklasse von DKW. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 17:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Austin A40 1953 - 1954 (Oder vielleicht Austin A70 Hereford 1950 - 54 der sehr ahnlich war). Das bedeutet, doch, was „Englisches“! Mfg Charles01 (talk) 20:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File:1964-05-31 Scarfiotti, Ludovico - Ferrari.jpg

I would very much like to use your image, but I would like to confirm it is okay with you before I do so. It would be used as a mosaic on a wall in a new restaurant. I have read the licenses and it seems like this would be okay, but I'd love to have your feedback.

Thanks very much.

I agree and I would like to see a photo when the mosaic is finished. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 07:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Spurzem!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Inzwischen erledigt. Ein Schreibfehler war die Ursache für die fehlende Kategorisierung. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Audi 100 C1 Coupé Front (2008-07-12) ret.JPG benutzen?

Hallo Spurzem, in einem Online-Game für den DAAD würden wir gerne Ihr Bild vom Audi 100 in einer Art Auto-Quartett verwenden. Dazu haben wir verschiedene Autos freigestellt und die Fotos so angepasst, dass sie ein einheitlichen Look bekommen. Ist es ok, wenn wir Ihr Bild so nutzen? Wäre es außerdem in Ordnung, wenn wir Ihren Namen nicht direkt auf bzw. neben dem Bild nennen, sondern dies in den "Credits" des Spiels tun? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.112.6 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 20. Feb. 2011 (UTC)

Einverstanden. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

BMW Z8

Hallo, wir von motortalk.de möchten gern das Foto vom Z8 auf unserer Website nutzen. Hier diskutieren User dann über das Auto. Wir würden es vom JHintergrund freistellen und auf neuen (weiß/grau) Hintergrund setzen. Wir bitten hierfür um Ihre Genehmigung.

MfG i.A. Frederike Ziesche Motortalk GmbH www.motor-talk.de

Ich bin einverstanden, bitte aber, meinen Namen beim Bild zu nennen. Viele Grüße -- 80.138.82.14 15:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Wir können den Namen nur in die Datei reinschreiben aber nicht direkt auf dem Bild nennen. Ist das OK? Geht nur drum, dass alle Bilder gleich aussehen sollen. Grüße

Der Name soll nicht in das Bild geschrieben werden, sondern darunter. Eventuell könnte das in einigem Abstand als Bildnachweis geschehen, wie es in Zeitschriften und Büchern mitunter auch gemacht wird. -- 80.138.82.14 15:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Das geht leider auch nicht. Schade, dann müssen wir verzichten.

Wenn's nicht geht, bringen Sie das Bild trotzdem und ergänzen Sie den Dateinamen, wie Sie es vorgeschlagen haben. Schön wäre es, wenn Sie mich darauf aufmerksam machen würden, wenn Sie es in die Website eingestellt haben. Gruß -- Spurzem (talk) 16:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi Lothar,

Der hier ist für Dich! Tom Knox (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! -- Spurzem (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Spurzem,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Jack brabham

As you can see here, http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Brabham, we've made a quite good article about Jack Brabham. I wanted to thank you for your vintage pictures. cobra bubbles (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I am glad that you could use my photos for your article. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 1000 TC, 982 cm³, Bj. 1970 (2007-06-17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks and kindest regards! -- Lothar Spurzem 80.138.84.75 12:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Eurobrun

Hallo, dear Lothar, maybe have you taken some pictures of Eurobrun's cars in 1988/1989/1989... cobra bubbles (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, I did not. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, never mind. cobra bubbles (talk) 16:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:MG PA 6 Race, 1300 cm³, Bj. 1936 (2008-06-28 Sp).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MG PA 6 Race, 1300 cm³, Bj. 1936 (2008-06-28 Sp).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, die Meldung vom FPCBot kam bei mir an. Ist es nicht schön wie unaufregt eine Abstimmung verlaufen kann! --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Ja, so kann es auch ablaufen. Dir vielen Dank für die Nominierung und herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:1997Kötzting07.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

I have seen. Please excuse me! -- Spurzem (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Fiat 850 Spider (16.06.2007).jpg

File:Fiat 850 Spider (16.06.2007).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

109.76.88.186 17:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Spurzem. You uploaded an image of a Fiat 850 some years ago. Did you know that the image was a photoshopped and altered image ? And that the vandalized image now bears a numberplate that now subtly advertises a British Fiat car event called the 3:MA. Would you please delete this image or upload the unaltered image with the correct numberplate in it's place, please ?

Link to image: As you can see, that is NOT a german number plate.... http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Fiat_850_Spider_%2816.06.2007%29.jpg

Verehrter Anonymus, wo liegt Dein großes Problem? Ich hatte das Kennzeichen verändert, damit niemand erkennen kann, wem das Fahrzeug gehört. Gefällt Dir die neue Fassung besser? -- Spurzem (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Using one of your pictures in a textbook

I am thinking of using your Sayner Hütte picture (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sayner_Hütte_-_Gießhalle_(2006-05-07).jpg) in a textbook. It would show at about 5 cm high and be credited in the legend immediately below, initially to 'Lothar Spurzem'. Since I can't put a hyperlink to your page, let me know if you would like me to add any other information (like city, URL, whatever). Just in case, I can be contacted at thechabon a a t ho tmail d o o t com.

[I can read German, with some effort. But I can't really write it. So you can reply in German if you prefer.]

Thanks very much for uploading that great picture. Iiiiaaaa (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Iiiiaaaa, es freut mich, dass Ihnen mein Foto von der Sayner Hütte gefällt, und ich bin einverstanden, wenn Sie es in Ihrem Buch mit den dazugehörigen Angaben verwenden. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Spurzem (talk) 11:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

QI comment

Your comment — Das Bild sagt zu wenig aus; es ist kein Bezug der Personen zueinander oder zu einem Redner erkennbar. Die Farben wirken unnatürlich — is not understandable. Please write in Russian.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I can not write in Russian. I will say: In the photo you can not see, to whom people is speaking or listening. They all look a little bit to be bored. Furthermore the colours in my opinion are unnatural. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
You are right, the one speaking is near the camera. What about bored, do you mean their faces and overall emotion? Thanks. Why do you call the colours innatural? If you tell me the right way I may improve the colours. Thanks a lot!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
The colours so I see are not true. But I don't know how it to do better. And the people look without any emotion. Please excuse my bad English. Kindest regards -- Spurzem (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renault Alpine A 110 (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much! -- Spurzem (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW 328 (16.06.2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments NIce photo.--Danesman1 11:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar XK 120, Bj. 1953, Nürb'ring Südschleife (2008-06-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Remind that the object is in motion --Taxiarchos228 20:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-04-28 (1) Fiat, Bj. 1997 (bearb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok with me. --Iifar 14:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Healey Silverstone (17.06.2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and interesting. I like your old cars series very much. Maybe the little blue thing in the left corner below could be removed by cloning out ?--Jebulon 13:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen – Flusspferde von Poss (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Florstein 07:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renault R5 GT, Baujahr 1985 (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanomag Kommissbrot (05), 500 cm³, Bj. 1927 (2007-06-17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 20:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-06-16 Veritas RS (05b), Bj. 1948, Start-Nr. 97 (ausgangs Brünnchen) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 05:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud III, Bj. 1964 (ret).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi TT Coupé, Bj. 2011 (2011-08-13 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Prenn 06:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NSU TT, Baujahr 1970 (2009-08-07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lok VI, Chrzanow, Bj. 1952, Nr. 2248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MB 230 SL, Bj. 1964, Front (2009-05-01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great! M 93 09:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumph Speed Twin, Bj. 1939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Kapitän '51 (1951-53) am 2009-10-13 ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel P4, Baujahr 1936 (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI M 93 21:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel P4, Baujahr 1936, rechte Seite (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI M 93 21:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel P4, Baujahr 1936, Heck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments cars are also important from back! --Ralf Roletschek 21:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurfürstl Palais Trier (Sp 2009-3b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peugeot 203 (2012-08-19 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI M 93 18:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford GT 40 (2008-06-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI M 93 18:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amilcar CS, Bj. 1923 (2008-06-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 08:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Admiral Cabriolet, Bauzeit 1937-1939 (08.07.2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McCormick D324 Standard (2007-07-08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

QI

Würdest du bitte in den QIC etwas weniger ad personam argumentieren? Ich habe nichts gegen dich persönlich, ich habe nur etwas gegen verrauschte, unscharfe Bilder, ganz egal von wem sie sind (und da bin ich nicht der einzige). Deshalb verstehe ich solche Tiefschläge wie „I did not await any other judgement from you“ überhaupt nicht, zumal ich auch schon Bilder von dir promotet habe (vergessen?). Außerdem habe ich da überhaupt kein „judgement“ ausgesprochen (das hätte dann ein Decline sein müssen), sondern einen bewertungstechnisch vollkommen neutralen Kommentar abgegeben. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Entschuldige bitte, vielleicht war meine Reaktion ein wenig zu hart. Andererseits frage ich mich, wie bei dem in Frage stehenden Foto von Unschärfe – insbesondere von Bewegungsunschärfe – gesprochen werden kann. Die Schrift „Deutsche Werke …“ ist auch am wirklichen Objekt aus dem Blickwinkel wie im Bild nur schwer lesbar. Viele Grüße und schönen Sonntag -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Entschuldigung angenommen :-) Ob es tatsächlich Bewegungsunschärfe ist, weiß ich nicht, aber es sieht in einer Richtung verwischt aus, vielleicht ist es auch ein Fehler der Optik. Die Flächen im Bild zeigen aber definitiv starkes Rauschen. Rauschfreie Kameras gibt es freilich nicht (ich selbst fotografiere mit Four Thirds, daher kenne ich das Rauschthema gut *g*), aber das geht deutlich besser. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-07-22 BMW 502 - Baur-Cabriolet in Montabaur (01a klein r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine with me. --Iifar 18:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carerra Targa, Bj. 1985 (2008-07-12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, I appreciate the very slight motion blur, not disturbing, and giving the feeling of the move.--Jebulon 15:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goggomobil (2008-07-12) ret-kl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 13:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type V12, Bj. 1972 (2008-07-12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Rekord 1700 P1 (2008-06-14) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW R 100 R (Bild 4 2008-06-14) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Saint Martin de Tours

Guten Abend Herr Lothar Spurzem.
Sorry to continue in English, but if I understand (and maybe speak) German good enough, I'm not sure I'll be able to write it correctly (shame on me !). Noch Einmal, Entschuldigung, bitte.
I'm sensitive to your picture of Saint Martin, my fellow citizen, and the saint patron of my job...
I think you've done a good job, and indeed, it is "schärfer". But still not "scharf" enough for my taste, especially the lower part (the legs of the horse...). I'm sorry. I think one can make a lot of things in order to improve a picture, except to make sharp an unsharp image, I'm afraid. The result is always disappointing.
You were right to put it in CR: let's see what the others think ! Good luck to it.
As for my picture of the "Generalife", I'm sorry you find it over exposed, and I sincerely think that you are wrong. I've seen it with three different monitors (Imac at home, PC at job, tablett everywhere, and in any case, the result is a bit different, but never overexposed. Well, it is the game, and let's wait for the final result in CR too !
Thanks for comments and review anyway, and for the time you spend on my work. Your's friendly,
Freundlich, --Jebulon (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Dear Jebulon, thank you for your words. I have to accept your opinion about "my" skulpture of Saint Martin but not your view of your photo of the Generalife. Please read the criticism of user Kreuzschnabel. Kind regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
i've read... I'm not convinced... But it would be interesting if every picture in QIC page should be reviewed with such a care...--Jebulon (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
… just as the sculpture of Saint Martin with perhaps a little bit too less sharpness at the legs of the horse. ;-) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goliath 1100 (2007-09-08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-09-08 Ford 17M, Bj. 1963 (ret).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Vermisse Rückmeldung

Hallo Lothar,

Du hattest bei diesen 2 Bildern Probleme bemangelt. Entsprechend habe ich vor ein paar Tagen Änderungen gemacht. Bitte, sag mir mal Bscheid, ob die Qualität ausreichend ist:

Viele Grüße, Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Poco a poco, das Altarbild wirkt immer noch sehr flau. Kannst Du es nicht markieren und mehr Kontrast reinbringen? Und die Säule in dem anderen Foto – um die es hauptsächlich geht – hebt sich nach wie vor nur wenig vom Hintergrund ab. Allerdings habe ich keinen Vorschlag, wie man es anders oder besser hätte machen können. Ich weiß nicht, ob mit ganz tief gehaltener Kamera dieses Hauptobjekt vielleicht vor dem Horizont erschienen wäre. – Aber Du machst so viele gute und hervorragende Fotos, dass es bestimmt nicht schlimm ist, wenn das eine oder andere die Auszeichnung nicht erhält. Ich bin ja auch nicht sehr traurig (ein bisschen schon), dass „mein“ Ferrari 312P „abgeschmettert“ wurde, weil das Bild bei extremer Vergrößerung leicht körnig wirkte. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:48, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Lothar, andere Bilder machen diese nicht wieder gut. Ich mache schlechtere und bessere Bilder, aber gerade diese 2 finde ich gelungen und treu zur Wirklichkeit. Übrigens, dein Bild war schön, aber was du "extreme Vergroßerung" nennst, ist für mich die übliche Größe (100%) die Bilder zu reviewen. Von den 2 Dateien habe ich neue Versionen hochgeladen. Es ist etwas traurig, aber die "Säule" war mal ein Turm (Torre). Ich dachte, lieber fotografiere ich es jetzt als dann wenn es nichts mehr übrig bleibt. Viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - St. Justina, innen (2012-07-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice view.--Jebulon 15:27, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Rekord 1700 P1 Heck (2008-06-14) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I suggest to remove the distracting white poles in the background, but the image is QI (and nearly noise-free! ;-)) --Kreuzschnabel 05:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Nice car --Abehn 08:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC) Comment Is it better now? -- Lothar Spurzem 16:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
– Perfect! --Kreuzschnabel 16:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier, Dom Südwestturm (2009-09-21 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier, St. Gangolf (2009-05-20 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mignon typewriters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Hallo Lothar Spurzem. I've received this notification on my talk page, because I've nominated this picture in the "Valued Image Candidates" page. It belongs to you.
I thought that, if this picture did not deserve the QI label for technical reasons, it was nevertheless the best picture in his scope (in this case, the category). As you can see, three reviewers (it is rare !) agree with me, so the picture is now promotted.
I think you can find an interest in discovering this label, more encyclopedical than QI or FP for users, and maybe you could nominate here some of your historical cars.
I may help you in case of need.
MvG, --Jebulon (talk) 10:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello Jebulon, thank you very much. I will return to your offer. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kloster (2012-07-06).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Resolution is just below of required 2 megapixels. --Iifar 10:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the direction. Now it should be better. -- Lothar Spurzem 13:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 Support QI for me, but the contrast is too harsh (very dark areas e.g. at the tree) and the sharpness could be better. --Carschten 20:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Signatur

Hallo Lothar, wenn bei den QI-Kandidaten wieder der Hinweis kommt Please sign with name and date (four tildes), dann entferne ihn doch einfach bei deiner nächsten Bearbeitung. Es ist jedenfalls zwecklos, darauf zu antworten, weil er automatisch eingefügt wird, und deine Signaturen in den Kommentaren sind ja OK. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke. – Aber woran mag es bloß liegen, dass die vier Tilden überall funktionieren, nur bei den Nominations nicht? Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lagonda M45 Tourer, Bj. 1933 (2009-08-07) ret2 Sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McLaren M23-6, Ex-James-Hunt (2007-06-15 Sp) 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:28, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McLaren M23-6, Ex-James-Hunt (2007-06-15 Sp) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW 1303 Cabrio (08.07.2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 11:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera RSR, Bj. 1974 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:11, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier, Marktkreuz Südwestseite (2009-09-21 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good technical quality but the motif should be more in the centre. Can you lease crop the image accordingly? --NorbertNagel 20:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Why? The cross is placed on a high column. -- Lothar Spurzem 23:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC) I mean, horizontally centred, i.e. same distance of the cross to left and right image border. Vertically its fine. --NorbertNagel 18:10, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 Comment Sorry, Norbert, I disagree. The cross is „looking“ to the left in the picture, so it should be located right of centre for a harmonic composition. The pic is just a bit tilted to the right (see column & background windows) --Kreuzschnabel 21:24, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Now I have modified crop. -- Lothar Spurzem 11:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 10:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier, Dreikönigenhaus 2 (2009-09-21 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kloster, Nordseite (2012-07-09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Hi Lothar Spurzem, according to your request, I've deleted the note (you could do this by yourself, by the way). Congratulations for the promotion anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 21:33, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Jebulon, thank you! I tried to delete the note but I don't know how to do. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lagonda V12 Le Mans, 4480 cm³, Bj. 1938 (17.06.2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--JLPC 21:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier, Kaiserthermen 2 (Detail).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It looks tilted and there is a disturbing element in the bottom left corner Poco a poco 18:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
You are right; thank you. The disturbing element was a handrail. Vertical line should be correct now. OK? -- Lothar Spurzem 22:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Olympia, Bj. 1951 (2010-09-02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Rekord P2 Front (2012-09-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. The plate of the lawyers is a bit distracting, but OK--Jebulon 00:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
The plate is deleted. I also think that it looks better now. -- Lothar Spurzem 12:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-06-10 Opel Olympia Rekord, Bj. 1955 (retusch).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto Union Munga - Front (2008-06-14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto Union Munga - Seite (2008-06-14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Rekord C, Coupé 1900 S, Bj. 1971 (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments oh ja! im natürlichen Umfeld und mit Nummernschild :-) --Ralf Roletschek 16:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-06-17 Ferrari F355 GTS (kl).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McLaren M23-6, Ex-James-Hunt (2007-06-15 Sp) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not brilliant, but ok. Bit unsharp. --Mattbuck 12:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007-06-16 BMW 315-1 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 356 B race (2008-06-28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture--Danesman1 22:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sima-Violet, Baujahr um 1923-24 (2008-06-28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good B & W quality. --JLPC 17:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karden Stiftskirche Westturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very dark, please brighten. Mattbuck 11:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Done. Now it should be far better. -- Lothar Spurzem 19:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
There's now an overexposed spot. I have uploaded a new version. Mattbuck 11:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Lothar Spurzem 15:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Good for QI now, IMO.--Jebulon 16:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Mercedes-Benz SSKL, Bj. 1931

Hi, Lothar ! I'm very sorry about what happened with your file : "Mercedes-Benz SSKL, Bj. 1931 (2008-06-28) ret.jpg". I promoted it a bit fast, without looking carefully at small details Kreuzschnabel noticed with a very sharp eye ! It's not the first time it happens : last week it was the same with a Poco a Poco's image... and with my own pictures. -- Anyway, I'm neither a specialist nor a pro. Concerning photography, I've mong been a bathroom amateur (in the old times, although I used a Leica-M4P), and, concerning cars, I only watch Grand Prix on television and I often like your photos ! But, as I interferred in the promotion of your Mercedes, I want to to make amends : I've downloaded the photo and I've retouched it, trying to fix all the problems mentioned by Kreuzschnabel. I'm not sure everything is OK but, if you want it, I can upload it and you will use the new version just as you want. This will be a sort of compensation for my lack of jugement. -- Tell me if you agree with this possibility : I'll upload the new file this afternoon or this evening. -- Sorry for my English. -- Best regards. JLPC (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC) --P.S. : Ich bin Jahrgang 48 und fotografiere seit 1974.

Hallo JLPC, danke für Deine Nachricht. Mein Englisch ist nicht besser; deshalb antworte ich in Deutsch. Danke auch für die Bildbearbeitung. Sei bitte so nett und lade die neue Version hoch. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't speak German at all, so I've used Google translator to understand your message (as I did this afternoon for the last sentence of mine). The file is uploaded now : you can have a look at it and decide what to do. -- Regards. JLPC (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I did also a little bit especially with regard to sharpness of edge of windshield. And now let's see what colleague Kreuzschnabel says. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spurzem/Archive_1&oldid=210823405"