User talk:Spaceworker2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Spaceworker2!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Temporary reversion"[edit]

What is this made up thing you do? What's the point? Other than messing up the history for no reason. Enlighten me. TFerenczy (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "false accusations of sockpuppetry. By accessing this link, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sockpuppets_of_Spaceworker2, it shows ten accounts that are accused of being sockpuppets of my main account. However, I never created any of these accounts and as such was unable to abuse any of these accounts, have no access to these accounts, and it seems that this was either a mistaken identity case or something else. Since I never created any of these sockpuppet accounts, it seems to be a mistake. What next steps can I take Spaceworker2 (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "Technical evidence is Inconclusive. Even if we accept, however, that an entirely unrelated user just so happened to engage, solely and repeatedly, in the identical sort of inane reversions on flag files, we would still be left with a user whose sole contributions are effectively indistinguishable from vandalism--or Jurisdrew, for that matter. This block indeed appears to be preventing disruption and no evidence that the issue(s) is/are understood and credibly will discontinue are on offer. Эlcobbola talk 02:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−


 Oppose. Your edits are very similar to your sockpuppets' edits. And they are not constructive. Community decided in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 108, that this kind of behavior is unacceptable. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your feedback, it seems like there is nothing that I can do, even if I never created any of these sockpuppet accounts, have access to them at any point, or revive sleeper accounts at all. It's just frustrating that it comes to this, but I still appreciate you reaching out. Spaceworker2 (talk) 19:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Elcobbola: Most of these are non-stale, perhaps a check could prove/disprove the assertion in the unblock request? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The thing is that I never created any of these sockpuppet accounts, but I think a check can prove/disprove Spaceworker2 (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]