User talk:Sokoljan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dear Sokoljan, thank you for uploading this image of a statue of St. Benedict. Unfortunately, your description of that picture and your categorization are incorrect. Please note that cloister is (as pointed out by the describing text for the category Cloisters) is not the English translation for the German term Kloster but the inner court of a monastery. Hence, your image is in no way related to a cloister. I've therefore removed this image from the Cloisters category and fixed the English description. Regards, AFBorchert 16:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've meanwhile fixed a couple of additional images that were likewise misplaced in the Cloisters category. --AFBorchert 17:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Falls Deutsch verständlicher sein sollte (Tschechisch kann ich leider nicht), ist hier noch eine Übersetzung: Vielen Dank für die schönen Bilder des Prager Benediktinerklosters. Unglücklicherweise sind diese in der Kategorie Cloisters gelandet, die für Klostergänge und Kreuzgänge steht, jedoch nicht für Klöster. Cloister ist nicht die englische Übersetzung für das deutsche Wort Kloster. Ich war deswegen so frei, all die Bilder aus der Kategorie Cloister herauszunehmen. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert 17:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Borchert, danke für die Korrekturen und die Belehrung! Mein Englisch ist halt lückenhaft. --Sokoljan 21:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kein Problem. Und falls ich sonst noch helfen kann, tue ich es gerne. Nachdem Du so schöne Bilder von Klöstern aus Tschechien hier zur Verfügung stellst, darf ich vielleicht auch fragen, ob Du bereits auch Bilder von der Zisterzienserabtei in Osek hast? U.a. gibt es in dieser Abtei auch ein Gemälde, auf denen Bernhard von Clairvaux, der Apostel Andreas und Malachias abgebildet sind. Von Bernhard und Andreas gibt es viele Abbildungen, aber von Malachias leider nur sehr wenige. Von daher würde ich mich über ein Bild besonders freuen. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert 00:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Von Osek habe ich leider nichts. Sorry! Sollte sich eine Gelegenheit bieten, werde ich auf Dich denken. --Sokoljan 18:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 21:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for forgetting the licensing! Thanks for your vigilance. --Sokoljan 21:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallöle, auch in dem am selben Tag hochgeladenen Bild Image:Praha Charels bridge from Kampa DSCN1151.JPG fehlte bis eben die Lizenz -- habe das gerade ganz unbürokratisch in der Form {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0|author=I, [[User:Sokoljan|Sokoljan]]}} nachgeholt. Ist das in Ordnung so? Grüße --Interpretix 22:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VisionBrigitteOfSwedenDetail.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Code·is·poetry 14:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Sokoljan!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Vitry Musée DSCN1780.JPG have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hrad aérienne.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Art-top (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latin philo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

46.135.29.234 11:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for vigilance, mistake is corrected, thus no reason more to delete the file. --Sokoljan (talk) 10:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pls upload your Version with a NEW Name! --Bobo11 (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foto von Pierre Teilhard de Chardin[edit]

Hallo Sokoljan. Da wurde eine Foto von Teilhard, die ihn als Seminarist zeigt, entfernt wegen fehlenden Rechten. Verstehe ich nicht, muss ja über 100 Jahre alt sein. Ist sie vielleicht von Dir? Dank und Gruss --Knickbass (talk) 07:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Knickbass! Nein, dieses Bild stammt nicht von mir. Beste Grüsse und gesegnete Weihnachten! --Sokoljan (talk) 11:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:P Canisius 1546.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:P Canisius 1546.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jonnymoon96 (talk) 03:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It wasn't me who uploaded the picture originally. Now, I added PD-Old-100, which obviously fits to a 16th century painting. Is it OK? Best, --Sokoljan (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may upload your version as new. --Rabanus Flavus (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear Sokoljan,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Image of Bf 109 G-5[edit]

Could you please explain to me, why you literally deleted my image of the Bf 109 G-5?

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_109#/media/Datei:Bf109G_3Seiten_neu.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by B. Huber (talk • contribs) 08:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrter Herr Kollege, ich muss mich bei Ihnen entschuldigen fuer diesen auch fuer mich unverstaendlichen Fehler. Ich wollte dem dreiseitigen Aufriss der Bf 109 V1 () etwas mehr an Kontrast geben, kann mir aber gar nicht erklaeren, wie der Andere (Datei:Bf109G_3Seiten_neu.jpg) vollstaendig aufgeloest wurde. Solche Kontrast- u. Helligkeitskorrekturen mache ich verhaeltnismaesig oft ohne je so einen Fehler zu bewirken. Nun aber habe ich versucht den Fehler durch Rueckkehr zu beseitigen, was aber auch nicht gelang. Ich vermute, dass da wohl ein Softwarefehler auftrat. Damit bin ich mit meinen Faehigkeiten leider am Ende und kann bloss Sie und die Leser um Entschuldigung bitten. Mit herzlichen Gruessen Ihr Prof. Jan Sokol (an Wikipedien seit 13 Jahren taetig, mit etwa 30 Tausend Edits).

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020![edit]

Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments![edit]

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

  1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
  2. Go to your preferences
  3. Scroll down to Email Options
  4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
  5. Click Save
File:Solomon R. Guggenheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GZWDer (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Rudolf Dvořák kom.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rudolf Dvořák kom.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 08:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skin numbers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HynekJanac (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]