User talk:Slaunger/Archives/2007/7

Categories and article galleries

Hi and thanks for your note on my page. You are right about putting photos in galleries and categories, however as you surmised and I have been scolded a few times LOL Taxanomically it is better to have species in a article gallery and the name of the article in the Category to avoid double photos. I have to change my wording as these are not duplicates really, but double placements. I hope there is a wiki program that will correct everything but we will have to wait. I suggest creating an article gallery if there is none and not putting the same image in a category, if you cannot find or create an article then put it in the Category, of course. Sorry for any confusion WayneRay 22:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)WayneRay

I just read the wiki category creation pages you mentioned and I believe in siimplification in the Botanical categories. I will try and be less vigilant though, Thanks again, WayneRay 22:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)WayneRay

Vaccinium

I added your photo and created 8 new species galleries. Thanks for your support http://wayneray.ca WayneRay 21:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)WayneRay

Vaccinium uliginosum pic

Thank you for the nice note; your flower pictures are all lovely too. The edit is much better. I am suprised how much detail you were able to bring out, but I think that it probably won't pass QI because of the standard set by instances like this where people are quick to cry out "overexposure" in the case of lost detail. It really is very pretty, though. Thegreenj 22:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

NOte on my Talk page

answered you on my page WayneRay 12:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)WayneRay