User talk:ShustovVal

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ShustovVal!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Spring_ability[edit]

Category:Spring_ability has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Animalparty (talk) 08:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seismic Sustainability through Earthquake Protector.gif[edit]

File:Seismic Sustainability through Earthquake Protector.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Large High Performance Outdoor Shake Table at --wikipedia-en-University of California, San Diego-UCSD--.jpeg[edit]

File:Large High Performance Outdoor Shake Table at --wikipedia-en-University of California, San Diego-UCSD--.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blast animation.gif[edit]

File:Blast animation.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muscle Man from Hollywood.jpg[edit]

File:Muscle Man from Hollywood.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bodybuilders.png[edit]

File:Bodybuilders.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jumping with overload.gif[edit]

File:Jumping with overload.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Squats with 600 lbs load.gif[edit]

File:Squats with 600 lbs load.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rotate with overload.gif[edit]

File:Rotate with overload.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 05:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kids training.gif[edit]

File:Kids training.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 04:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preparation for testing Earthquake protector.jpeg[edit]

File:Preparation for testing Earthquake protector.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 04:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:EBF.jpg[edit]

File:EBF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 15:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the arguments supporting the proposed deletion, please?ShustovVal (talk) 04:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:A senior jumping up on a pile of steps.gif[edit]

File:A senior jumping up on a pile of steps.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Getting BIG.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop slandering me!![edit]

Stop slandering me with your massive false allegations (see above) that my generous uploads to the Commons are unlikely to be (my) own work mostly due to the imgflip.com watermarks on them. Those watermarks, by the way, are routine technical marks of my using the company software called Animated GIF Generator for transforming my original videos into the format acceptable in the Commons. Due to the foregoing, I request your immediate removing of all your fraudulent Deletion requests with the apology for misrepresenting my generous uploads to the Commons as unlikely to be (my) own work.ShustovVal (talk) 09:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Combat vandalism: reason for deletion - "he works as a professor" (?!)[edit]

On 12 January 2015, Diego Grez posted requests for deletion on the following files uploaded by me:

with the reason "he works as a professor"(?!) What do you think about it?ShustovVal (talk) 02:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

For documents published outside Wikimedia before being uploaded here without a free license, we required a formal written permission. That concerns your files made from videos from YouTube. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Another solution is too change the license on YouTube. The files could be restored once this is done. And I think it would be much more useful to import the videos, rather than making poor quality GIFs. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: There are a few questions to you:

1) Do you approve the Diego Grez reason for deletion "he works as a professor" as a legitimate one?

I won't comment about that. My actions are based only on evidence: information in the description, license, source, author, copies on the web, etc. Yann (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about the evidence too, namely, about starting deletion process of my files on false pretense. Anyway, if you comment me, why shouldn't you comment Diego Grez too?ShustovVal (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2) Why should I "import the videos, rather than making poor quality GIFs"? Are the videos also good for the Commons?

Yes, videos are also good for Commons. Yann (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A few minutes ago, I tried to upload the original video of File:Squats with 600 lbs load.gif (deleted by you) but failed. Apparently, videos are not permitted in Commons.ShustovVal (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3) What I need to do to "change the license on YouTube"?

You need to check with YouTube. Sorry, I don't know myself, as I have never uploaded anything there. I upload everything here directly. Yann (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I go to YouTube if the work is mine and I have the originals?ShustovVal (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC) Thanks, ShustovVal (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regards, Yann (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My best, ShustovVal (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about DISCUSSION ???[edit]

As I mentioned above, on 12 January 2015 Diego Grez posted requests for deletion on the following files uploaded by me:

On 15 January 2015, I responded with the question whether the reason for request "he works as a professor" is a legitimate one. On 18 and 20 January 2015, Yann deleted the files "per deletion requests" without answering my questions. And what about DISCUSSION??? ShustovVal (talk) 21:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- @Yann: Please, see the discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ShustovVal ShustovVal (talk) 10:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and permission[edit]

Hi, If a picture is published before being uploaded to Commons, a permission is needed, and it is YOUR responsibility to show that it is yours, not us. And as I already said, you better upload videos than poor quality GIFs. See Commons:Videos for help. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- We all should play by the rule: fist ask, then shoot. However, Yann prefers the opposite: to delete first (without any discussion) and then to give recommendations. By the way, whose permission is needed for the following files:
File:Jumping with overload.gif
File:Squats with 600 lbs load.gif
File:Rotate with overload.gif.

Thanks, ShustovVal (talk) 22:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- @Yann: I hope you had a chance to see this:

"Re: Imgflip Feedback Dylan Wenzlau <dylanwenzlau@imgflip.com> Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:12 PM To: valentin.shustov@my.csun.edu

Hey Valentin, You can use the gifs for anything you want. Imgflip will never claim ownership of images you create. If you need to get rid of the watermark though, you can always use Imgflip Pro. -- Dylan Wenzlau Founder, Imgflip.com"

ShustovVal (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: all my files are watermarks free[edit]

All my files mentioned in the "Notification about possible deletion" that was issued on 21:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC) due to the imgflip.com watermarks on them are now watermarks free. What shall we do next? ShustovVal (talk) 19:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Russavia: @Lambtron: @Jameslwoodward: The DRs have been open for almost three weeks now. Taking into account that the only reason for discussion has gone (see above), will you close it at last and delete them all? Thanks! ShustovVal (talk) 04:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are indeed the copyright holder or have permission to publish and distribute the files under a free license, please email COM:OTRS to get the files restored. -FASTILY 06:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Jumping-up exercise.gif

And also:

File:Jumping on step platforms.gif

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 15:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Elcobbola: Will you specify what, you believe, is wrong in the above files, please? The tags to those files, by the way, are misleading. There is no reuploading. These files are absolutely different from the deleted, by the way, illegitimately (see [1]) File:A senior jumping up on a pile of steps.gif. Just compare them. Thanks. ShustovVal (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A snicky tag by User:Fastily on my file. Why?[edit]

My file File:Pull-up on one and another.gif is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. All of a sudden, without receiving any notice, I found out the "no permission" tag on it saying: "there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license". Sorry, but it's beyond my understanding. What is wrong with my file? ShustovVal (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop manipulating with my Talk page[edit]

My current Talk page at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ShustovVal has received its new version at (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shustov) where all the first 26 Content item are not the items which were discussed lately. Who did it and why? ShustovVal (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pool jumping.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for this DR was stated by Jameslwoodward as follows: "The uploader is the subject of these images and therefore cannot be the photographer. The claim of "own work" is clearly not correct."

No way! There is a device invented about a century ago. Its name is "self-timer". According to Wikipedia, "A self-timer is a device on a camera that gives a delay between pressing the shutter release and the shutter's firing. It is most commonly used to let photographers to take a photo of themselves".

Due to foregoing, will you remove your DR, please? Thanks. ShustovVal (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Watch the dates!!![edit]

On 10:29, 6 February 2015,‎ Jameslwoodward started mass deletion request for the files listed above and immediately (see [2]) announced: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive."

Simple question: WHAT ABOUT DISCUSSION ? ShustovVal (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is a suspected sockpuppet of Shustov and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to logs and contribs for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

UNBLOCKING REQUEST[edit]

In my above topic "Stop manipulating with my Talk page" I maid a complain that my current Talk page at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ShustovVal had received its new version at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shustov where all the first 26 Content items were not the items been discussed lately. By asking "Who did it and why?" I, practically, requested your investigation of this illegal activity. On the other hand, to avoid any possible accusations of sockpuppetting when, a few years ago, I had to change my user name from User:Shustov to User:ShustovVal (I was unable to log in under my initial user name then), I made a visible transfer: thus, if you click on User:ShustovVal, you will find out:

See: User:Shustov File:Senior Defence-7.gif

which means that both Users are the same person.

Due these facts, I request unblocking me. Thanks. ShustovVal (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand your first sentence above. Nothing has been done to manipulate your talk page. The new DR notice was placed at User talk:Shustov by the script because User:Shustov had made the uploads.

It is clear that you have been using three accounts. That is permitted, with disclosure, for limited purposes. What is not permitted is for you to use one account to comment about the other accounts. It is clear that you yourself are mixing them up, as I mentioned at User_talk:Shustov#A_snicky_tag_on_my_file._Why.3F -- if you had been using only one account, that would not have happened. That is why I blocked your two later accounts. I see no reason to reverse that.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: It was really misleading situation that I created, you are right! I will be much happier with my initial account of User:Shustov which gives me some hope of our better mutual understanding in the future. My best!

P.S. When I'll be able to act on behalf of User:Shustov, by the way? At this time, I am still blocked on all my accounts and cannot respond to any comments. ShustovVal (talk) 20:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My question to Jim[edit]

@Jameslwoodward: Is it true that, according to your response of 11:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC), you blocked my two later accounts only and left my initial User:Shustov account unblocked? Thanks. ShustovVal (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. In the case of problems with multiple accounts, we generally leave the earliest one unblocked, so I did not block User:Shustov. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: I tried to log in User:Shustov but received "Your user name or IP address has been blocked." What's wrong? ShustovVal (talk) 06:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Try logging into your Shustov account now. I've applied an IP block exemption to the account, as your IP is likely still blocked because of this account's block. INeverCry 05:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to log in again but failed despite of my IP block exemption. The message was: "Your IP address or user name has been automatically blocked. ... The autoblock expires in 16:50, 15 February 2015." According to my previous experiance, I do not believe the promissed expiration will come true. ShustovVal (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I did nothing prohibited in Commons (see above). Nevertheless: 1) My ShustovVal account is blocked indefinitely for, allegedly, "Abusing multiple accounts" (?!).

2) My User:Shustov account which is not, allegedly, blocked (see Jameslwoodward comment dated 22:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)), remains actually blocked.[reply]

3) Due to foregoing, I am unable to participate in DR discussions and my files keep disappearing under ridiculous pretexts daily. ShustovVal (talk) 04:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)"[reply]

Decline reason: "1. If you use two or more account without valid reason, it is called 'abusing'. 2. The account Shustov is currently not blocked. Probably you are affected by Autoblock. No comment on 3. I do not believe there is any valid reason to unblock this account. — regards, Revi 07:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

@Revi: I have never been using two or more accounts at a time. My changing of accounts had nothing to do with 'abusing' but was a necessary measure: I merely couldn't log into my initial account called User:Shustov and had to change it, finally, for User:ShustovVal which is a quite valid reason for such changing. Besides, if you click on User:ShustovVal, you will see User:Shustov page there with the inscription "The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Shustov". What kind of abuse you are talking about?? By the way, despite of my IP block exemptions, I am, practically, restricted from duly responding to massive deletion campaign on my files because my user names and IP address have been blocked. Isn't it a real abuse of my User group rights?? ShustovVal (talk) 08:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:One hand stand by a senior.gif[edit]

File:One hand stand by a senior.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Partial squats with 585-lbs barbel.gif[edit]

File:Partial squats with 585-lbs barbel.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kagan Yalaman demo.gif[edit]

File:Kagan Yalaman demo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jumping with 225-lbs barbel.gif[edit]

File:Jumping with 225-lbs barbel.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Getting BIG.jpg[edit]

File:Getting BIG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bodybuilding workout in a gym.jpeg[edit]

File:Bodybuilding workout in a gym.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

ShustovVal, in at least the past month you have routinely and repeatedly impugned others and failed to assume good faith; for example (with emphasis added):

"Stop slandering me with your massive false allegations" [3]
"Combat vandalism" [4]
"this illegal activity" [5]
"rediculous (sic) pretexts" [6]
"massive deletion campaign" [7]

Consider this a final warning regarding your behaviour; if you continue to create a hostile environment, you will lose the ability to edit your talk page and/or edit with your unlocked account (User:Shustov). You may wish to read COM:MELLOW. Эlcobbola _talk 16:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Elcobbola: You know well what's going on with my files which are disappearing every single day now while I cannot explain anything by participating in discussions because my user name User:Shustov and IP address (despite of my IP block exemptions!) still remain blocked. Why?! If you put yourself in my shoes, you will, probably, understand my frustration. Anyway, I will do my best to be as nice with all your friends as possible. My apology to everybody! ShustovVal (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ShustovVal

Contents

Category:Spring_ability[edit]

File:Seismic Sustainability through Earthquake Protector.gif[edit]

File:Large High Performance Outdoor Shake Table at --wikipedia-en-University of California, San Diego-UCSD--.jpeg[edit]

File:Blast animation.gif[edit]

File:Muscle Man from Hollywood.jpg[edit]

File:Bodybuilders.png[edit]

File:Jumping with overload.gif[edit]

File:Squats with 600 lbs load.gif[edit]

File:Rotate with overload.gif[edit]

File:Kids training.gif[edit]

File:Preparation for testing Earthquake protector.jpeg[edit]

File:EBF.jpg[edit]

File:A senior jumping up on a pile of steps.gif[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Stop slandering me!![edit]

Combat vandalism: reason for deletion - "he works as a professor" (?!)[edit]

What about DISCUSSION ???[edit]

Copyright and permission[edit]

FYI: all my files are watermarks free[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

A snicky tag by User:Fastily on my file. Why?[edit]

Stop manipulating with my Talk page[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Watch the dates!!![edit]

UNBLOCKING REQUEST[edit]

My question to Jim[edit]

File:One hand stand by a senior.gif[edit]

File:Partial squats with 585-lbs barbel.gif[edit]

File:Kagan Yalaman demo.gif[edit]

File:Jumping with 225-lbs barbel.gif[edit]

File:Getting BIG.jpg[edit]

File:Bodybuilding workout in a gym.jpeg[edit]

Warning[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:ShustovVal

Category:Spring_ability[edit]

File:Seismic Sustainability through Earthquake Protector.gif[edit]

File:Large High Performance Outdoor Shake Table at --wikipedia-en-University of California, San Diego-UCSD--.jpeg[edit]

File:Blast animation.gif[edit]

File:Muscle Man from Hollywood.jpg[edit]

File:Bodybuilders.png[edit]

File:Jumping with overload.gif[edit]

File:Squats with 600 lbs load.gif[edit]

File:Rotate with overload.gif[edit]

File:Kids training.gif[edit]

File:Preparation for testing Earthquake protector.jpeg[edit]

File:EBF.jpg[edit]

File:A senior jumping up on a pile of steps.gif[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Stop slandering me!![edit]

Combat vandalism: reason for deletion - "he works as a professor" (?!)[edit]

What about DISCUSSION ???[edit]

Copyright and permission[edit]

FYI: all my files are watermarks free[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

A snicky tag by User:Fastily on my file. Why?[edit]

Stop manipulating with my Talk page[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Watch the dates!!![edit]

UNBLOCKING REQUEST[edit]

My question to Jim[edit]

File:One hand stand by a senior.gif[edit]

File:Partial squats with 585-lbs barbel.gif[edit]

File:Kagan Yalaman demo.gif[edit]

File:Jumping with 225-lbs barbel.gif[edit]

File:Getting BIG.jpg[edit]

File:Bodybuilding workout in a gym.jpeg[edit]

Warning[edit]

Navigation menu

Search