User talk:Shkuru Afshar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@~riley: Hi
Thank you. I will give my best to Wikimedia Commons Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:1953 iran coup de ta - writing motto against shah on wall.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hanooz 00:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - Farah Diba - Engagement Period.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanooz 03:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanooz: Hi

Farah Pahlavi's website didn't mention that this image is copyright and from Getty Images. That is the reason that I uploaded it.

At this link: https://farahpahlavi.org/copyrights it says "Any copyright material is used pursuant to the "fair use" doctrine".

Regards Shkuru Afshar (talk) 09:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't allow Fair Use here. What other files did you upload from sites that follow the fair use doctrine or BBC Persian?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Iranian Government staff during negotiations with Iranian Kurds - March 1979 - Second sitting from right Abolhassan Banisadr , Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mohammad Beheshti, and Mahmoud Taleghani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanooz 03:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanooz: No more blocks?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No. These are relatively old uploads. Hanooz 05:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanooz: Hi

On this link: https://www.bbc.com/persian/iran-features-38624369 there is no copyright tag for image. That is the reason that I uploaded it. Because if BBC Persian gets an image from Getty Images it mention "Getty Images" copyright tag.

Regards Shkuru Afshar (talk) 09:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Looks like BBC Persian is not a reliable source for finding PD images. Hanooz 15:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanooz: I think it is reliable. I reckon they just forgot to add "Getty Images" tag to the photo. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 04:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amir-Abbas Hoveyda body after execution.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanooz 15:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanooz: Some photos from that link (including Amir-Abbas Hoveyda after execution) have been published on Iranian newspapers without copyright or photographer's name tag. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 04:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are still copyrighted in Iran for 30 years after publication per COM:Iran.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: I know. My point is that they were published in early years afters 1979 revolution. That specific photo (File:Amir-Abbas Hoveyda body after execution.jpg) is a very famous photo and was published on multiple Iranian newspapers the day after he got executed. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since Abbas Attar died in 2018 per en:Abbas (photographer), his photos taken in Iran have copyright in Iran for 50 years pma, through 2018+50=2068, whether or not newspapers attributed him.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: As per COM:Iran: Photographic or cinematographic works fall into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation. It means death of the photographer doesn't reset public domain ownership of a published photo and make it copyright again. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, for any photo to qualify for {{PD-Iran}}, we need on the file description page: proof of the year of publication or public presentation over 30 years ago; or proof of death of the photographer (before 22 August 1980, for works that their copyright expired before 22 August 2010 according to the 1970 law) or (more than 50 years ago).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Authorities of Iran in a demostration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculptures in Cultural Center & Garden of Niavaran, Tehran, Iran (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4nn1l2 (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Poorhssieni.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Poorhssieni.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Poorhssieni.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre, ~riley, Hanooz, and 4nn1l2: This is the user's "best"? They refused to even try to answer my question of 13:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC) above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Autopatroller revoked; contributions need to be reviewed moving forward per upload history. ~riley (talk) 04:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@~riley: Thanks!   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@~riley: Hi. I moved the image because Persian Wikipedia let me do that. If it was a copyright photo or copyright tag was inappropriate, Persian Wikipedia wouldn't let me do that automatcally. Also, it seems Jeff G. is chasing me which is harassment.

@Magog the Ogre, ~riley, Hanooz, and 4nn1l2: What was the problem with my movement? Was it because it had a Persian tag "خود" was in {{خود|cc-by-sa-4.0}} copyright tag and Wikimedia Commons couldn't read it?

Again, I did it because Persian Wikipedia made it available.

@Jeff G.: In response to your question, you can see my work and notice that I reviewed my photos and applied for deletion those I found are copyright. Like: Authorities of Iran in a demostration.jpg. Also added references to some other photos to show that they are in public domain. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again: What other files did you upload from sites that follow the fair use doctrine or BBC Persian?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Aagin, I checked websites and Farah Pahlavi's website is the only website that uses fair use. Again, if there is a copyright photo on BBC Persian it adds a label to that, like Getty Images. Also if I get a photo from BBC Persian, I provide the link.Shkuru Afshar (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think something is wrong with FileImporter's handling of imports from Persian Wikipedia that it allowed this file to be exported without a matching tag for "خود".   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: For your infromation, the word "خود" in Persian exactly means "self". Hence {{خود|cc-by-sa-4.0}} exactly means {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} and you can transfer it from Persian WIkipedia. The problem is with Wikimedia Commons that can't read Persian characters. That's the reason for copyright error. If I changed copyright tag from {{خود|cc-by-sa-4.0}} to {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} it wouldn't be deleted. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Mardetanha for a fresh perspective.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @MardetanhaI am more than happy if you inform Jeff G. that "خود" in Persian exactly means "self".
@Jeff G.: Thanks to @4nn1l2: with his edit https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Extension:FileImporter/Data/fa.wikipedia&diff=4332009&oldid=3806552 now it is possible to see tag of files with {{خود|cc-by-sa-4.0}} tag.
more to learn for you, Wikimedia Commons always checks copyright tags before transferring and if it finds them incompatible doesn't let it. Hence, if it wouldn't let me do that, I wouldn't do it. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 05:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should have checked the result of your export/import to ensure that you could read the licensing on Commons.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know. It was my mistake. But somebody could let me know about the problem and not delete it immediately. I was absent for just few hours. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 05:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see. You were notified 01:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC). riley deleted the file 04:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC), just 3h43m later, whereas the notice says "Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion." I suppose the timing was partially my fault due to having pinged riley 3 minutes earlier at 04:49. I support undeletion and correction.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A review of the source showed no evidence that it was CC BY SA or otherwise available under a free license and therefore it was speedy deleted as a copyvio sooner than the one week period than if the file itself were just missing a license/lacking proper information. ~riley (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@~riley: If it hasn't been deleted after over a month from Persian Wikipedia (3 of December), it could mean the copyright is okay. As I said before, I wasn't the uploader and transferred the photo just because Persian Wikipedia checks the copyright compatibility and let me doing it.
Another issue is that Jeff. G. is always chasing me on every single edit which is a clear instance of harassment. Also, when you revoke me from autopatroller, he thanks you. That is another example of hostility. (I refer you to the history of our conversations) Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Length of time without being deleted is no indication the license is valid. If you are transferring a file, it is your responsibility to review the file and not just take the license at face value. At face value, I'd say it's rather suspicious that a file marked with the {{Self}} template is dated to 1963 and includes a linked source published in 2013? If you were the original uploader, I'd be needing OTRS permission for it being previously published without a free license.
Jeff is consistent in treating all people equally, he is not targeting you but instead monitoring your uploads like any other Commons reviewer or administrator can. If Jeff was pulling at straws and bringing up issues that weren't valid, I would be concerned about wikihounding. His request to have your autopatroller revoked and thanking me for fulfilling that request is not hostile. ~riley (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I echo what ~riley said here. The file should have been deleted and its transter to Commons was wrong from the outset regardless of the خود/self template issue. Unlike what Shkuru Afshar says, I know for a fact that fawiki is a failed project that should not be trusted at all. They almost never care about copyright or check the copyright status of files (most of its users and admins don't know anything about copyright at all). Fawiki is a regufe for copyvio. I even support blacklisting this project just like arwiki. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@~riley and 4nn1l2: Thank you both for those comments. You may want to start a task like phab:T222445.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I am amazed by the fact that you are still allowed to upload here after uploading files which violate copyrights for over six years.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Over 85% of my deleted photos are from the first 2 years. In 2020 I just uploaded 3 photos after making sure they are not copyright. That Poorhssieni.jpg was an exception. It may happen for everyone. I am speaking with other users to manage the uploads and transfers more carefully. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This may be a noisy lesson, but please take it as constructive criticism. Please check the upload before uploading here. Remember that users on other wikis are lazy and will often add bogus licenses. Smaller wikis like fa.wp often don't catch them. You can always ask for help on COM:HD Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For help on copyright matters, please consult the copyright experts via COM:VPC instead.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre and Jeff G.: Okay.

Tony Blinken[edit]

@Jeff G.: I am going to upload this photo https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/9B97/production/_115613893_11665634575_162b178277_b.jpg from this link https://www.bbc.com/persian/world-55045053. Is US gov tag appropriate for any resolution or if I get the same photo from another website with different resolution I should change the tag? (Because they are all from US gov) Shkuru Afshar (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.history.com/the-obama-years/foreign-policy.html captions this photo https://www.history.com/the-obama-years/imgs/foreign-policy-iran-deal-victory.jpg (bigger than that with 9x the detail for COM:HR) as "Deputy National Security Advisors Ben Rhodes and Tony Blinken both give thumbs up as the President talks on the phone with Secretary of State John Kerry in Geneva to discuss ongoing negotiations with Iran, on November 23, 2013. / Photo credit: Official White House Photo by Pete Souza", so {{PD-USGov-POTUS}} should do. All BBC Persian gives us for a photo credit is "US GOV", in an overlay that looks like a watermark. I would not trust BBC Persian's photo credits if I were you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Thanks. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you overwrote File:P112313PS-0216 (11665239863).jpg with that photo, but didn't mention that above. Some people might be annoyed with you for effectively cropping out the tops of the curtains and part of the ceiling in exchange for higher resolution, and for not attributing your source. Please review COM:OW.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: If you find my overwrite inappropriate feel free to delete or recrop it. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 07:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave that to others reading this page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:MohammadReza Pahlavi-Houshang Seddigh.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No proof of publication more than 30 years ago, name of the creator, creator's year of death, or applicable reason sufficient to satisfy {{PD-Iran}}.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Houshang Seddigh-Pilot.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No proof of publication more than 30 years ago, name of the creator, creator's year of death, or applicable reason sufficient to satisfy {{PD-Iran}}.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Richard Nixon shakes hands with Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (Shah of Iran).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:P112313PS-0216 (11665239863).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanooz 16:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Edward Bernays and Doris E. Fleischman.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted Getty Images at source (bottom right, cropped out)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— Racconish💬 09:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - Jimmy Carter.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Author info is wrong: The author is also the subject of the photograph. Therefore the license used is wrong.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - Jimmy Carter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 01:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:William and Ariel Durant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

howcheng {chat} 23:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Elizabeth II Island Sign Text.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

119.18.0.15 06:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kings Cross, New South Wales-Coca Cola.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

119.18.0.15 06:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kandovan Tunnel Labours 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanooz 11:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE:File:Kings Cross, New South Wales-Coca Cola.jpg[edit]

The new version was a copyiright violation too, the area was very visible Ezarateesteban 13:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, if I take another photo without those little two words of "e" ang "g", it should be okay. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Testing Fighter Jets before taking deliveries of F15 F16.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Corbis watermark and copyright notice visible
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmy Carter meets Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in White House (1978).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmy Carter meets Mohammad Reza Pahlavi for dinner in 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahram Beyzayi Wedding.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Farah Pahlavi and Andy Warhol in Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art, 1977.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HeminKurdistan (talk) 23:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

P 1 9 9   23:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]