User talk:Scriber en

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Scriber en!

-- 23:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

License terms[edit]

Re: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:DUKW_and_Space_Needle_01.jpg&curid=7469812&diff=82435575&oldid=68970489&rcid=83647231 and others, please do not change how someone else echooses to state their license terms unless there is something actively wrong with it. - Jmabel ! talk 17:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • What namely do you mean? Scriber en (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC) Please, be more attentive: I didn't change any license terms - I've just lifted into the description file table license terms had been put under it. See: isn't «GFDL, CC-BY-SA-3.0 granted by photographer; photographer must be credited and license terms complied with» synonymous with template «Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0|author=Joe Mabel»? Scriber en (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License section[edit]

Hi, what's the point of edits like this - moving license templates into {{Information}} template? It's not forbidden but in my opinion it makes no sense. Cheers. Yarl 22:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! What's the point/sense in section «Permission» of {{Information}} template? What for does it exist at all? IMHO, it permits to reduce image description size at least. Scriber en (talk) 22:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talkback[edit]


asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

File:Solders.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Пашка12 (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]