User talk:Samwalton9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Samwalton9!

-- 02:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Foo Show Episode 0 Firewatch Mug.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sam! The aforementioned image, which is taken from The Foo Show and which was posted on Flickr under an appropriate license, consists entirely of graphics from Firewatch which as far as I can tell is an all rights reserved production. You'd need to get permission from the folks who created Firewatch in order to keep the image here on Commons. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks for understanding! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 18:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: Ah, good point, this hadn't occurred to me. I've emailed Will to see he has any reasons that this wouldn't be the case (perhaps in his licensing agreement with the Firewatch developers), but it seems like you're right otherwise. Thanks for explaining! Sam Walton (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Samwalton9: Thanks for understanding! Best of luck with the hunt for permission! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 23:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: The response I received was that The Foo Show has a license to use the Firewatch assets in the show, but he wasn't sure whether that gives them the right to redistribute them onwards under a different license (I suspect the answer is no). Sam Walton (talk) 09:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Foo Show Episode 0 Firewatch Mug.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 22:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Foo Show Will Smith Side by Side.gif[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Foo Show Will Smith Side by Side.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autumn in Proteus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorial in Proteus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 11:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the incorrect deletion request[edit]

Hello! I haven't noticed the license information on the source and nominated these files for deletion. Sorry about that. Currently there are no deletion templates (I have removed them) and files should be kept. Thank you for your contributions to Wikimedia Commons! ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia: No problem - thanks for the clarification :) Sam Walton (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing structured data[edit]

How are you able to edit the structured data like "depicts"? I only see those fields when load an image. Do I need to turn on something in my preferences? RAN (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Right below any image you should see two tabs - File information and Structured data. In the Structured Data tab the default entry is to enter a 'depicts' item, and you can then add further Wikidata statements via a button. Commons:Depicts and Commons:Structured data might be helpful :) Sam Walton (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Now I see it! RAN (talk) 17:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Yayoi Kusama signing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

YGP2001KY (talk) 07:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Half-Life 3 Poster Gamescom 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Halo Wars 2 Gamescom 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yayoi Kusama wax model at Louis Vitton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]