User talk:Salgo60

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Salgo60!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikipediaAppNorraBegravningsplatsen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gunnar D Hansson exempel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 00:49, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finn 2 fel Gunnar D Hansson.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alva Myrdal Riksarkivet SVAR Wikidata SKBL.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 01:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regina data.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 01:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skärmdump som förklara SOFI.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 01:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exempel SCB kartvy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NearMe Commons.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 01:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google sökning Otto Centerwall.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Gunnar Hansson.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

grillo (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skansen 2019 19 46 27 949000.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.170.158.52 13:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Testing structured data[edit]

I saw that you tried out using other statements on Test-Commons. If you get a moment, could you please let the development team know how it went for you? Even if everything was fine and you do not have anything to say, that's good feedback to have as well. Thanks, happy editing to you. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keegan (WMF) can you give me the URL.... I did it from my phone when I last week was on a bike tour during a short break... - Salgo60 (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I found it Special:Contributions/Salgo60 I can do more tests on monday when I am back but it worked ok....
  1. One issue is the miniature pic is not showing see link I get test-commons/6/64/Harbo_klockstapel.jpeg
This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document you requested.
- Salgo60 (talk) 17:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed images themselves are not loading on to test, we've only enabled working with the structured data stuff to keep the overhead of the testing environment low. Enjoy your weekend, we can get back to this on Monday if you'd like. Thanks! Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Seth Severin Hallberg.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Seth Severin Hallberg.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Dag Alvar Strömbäck.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dag Alvar Strömbäck.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020![edit]

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gustaf Peterson.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Gustaf Peterson.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gustaf Peterson.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Jacob Beskow.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Jacob Beskow.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jacob Beskow.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Conrad Vahlquist.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Conrad Vahlquist.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Conrad Vahlquist.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gustaf Alfred Aldén.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gustaf Alfred Aldén.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sven Casper Bring.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Sven Casper Bring.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sven Casper Bring.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperspridare[edit]

Tack för ljudfiler såsom "mördare", "talesperson", "superspridare" och många andra. De används redan. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor 49 nice I have prepared also adding other people do Gutnish see T271639 if you are skilled on Lexeme please have a look and comment - Salgo60 (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gotlands_runinskrifter_68[edit]

I do not think making a category for a single file is a good idea. Generally, if there are less then 200 stone images in a category - they are all in same page - leave them alone. If there are more than 200, they spread over few pages and become difficult to track, then create subcategories, but for multiple images for one stone at once. Macuser (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Macuser Thanks for the feedback but I dont agree the benefits I see
I understand your point with 200 but for me its more of getting things sorted...
- Salgo60 (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are wrong: easier to navigate is when you see the pictures on one page. With multiple shots of popular stones it is impossible, so they got hidden in the subfolders, but they are famous anyway. uploading is easier even you couldn't sort your folders correctly, I had to add flags, creating a folder is an extra step. Your links are wrong, here is one of your bildsenar. Wikidata property can so long point to a single file, as long as there are no more images. Adding Wikidata Infobox is unnecessary embellishment, one would rather have {{Fornminne|}} template. I also strongly advise against any massactions - they will lead only to disasters, like KMB images mass uploaded by Alicia Fagerving (WMSE). Macuser (talk) 16:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • links are wrong It was example what the Gotlands museum search engine retrieved.... I guess we could identify some of the pictures as a stone and link them...
the mass actions I do is add Litteraturbanken to WD objects see map - Salgo60 (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, WD is Ok, I mean mass actions in commons. Macuser (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nu är det snart dags: Wiki Loves Earth 2021![edit]

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Earth. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker i tävlingen – samt förra årets uppdateringar med biosfärområden och naturminnen! Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. På grund av Covid-19 kan inga gemensamma evenemang anordnas i år heller, så passa på att fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 14:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Axel Pettersson (WMSE): jag importerade nyss 2600 svenska badplatser i Wikidata så nu kan ni köra Wiki loves beachlife with a beer and some nice chicks
- Salgo60 (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

U, Sö, etc. stenar tillhör inte hit. Bara Ög. Macuser (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Macuser Var? Jag har laddat upp 340 bilder av Bautil så du måste vara tydligare om jag skall förstå...
- Salgo60 (talk) 12:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I checked your edits you would like to sort them on the Samnordisk ID... I understand that you dont like create "small" folders I still think that is better as we get a map when we use Template:Wikidata_Infobox - Salgo60 (talk) 13:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ursäkta, jag glömde semikolon. Du ska inte checka upp mina redigeringar, checka upp dina egna! Du laddade några U och Sö stenar i Ög, och många av dina Bautilstenar är redan i commons, så att nu har vi två liknande bilder.Macuser (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Macuser ok fattar fortfarande inte vilken redigering det var som var fel men strunt i det....
  • Japp det blir dubbletter men jag vill ha dom från Uppsala Alvin dom bilderna är snyggare. Jag startade med Umeå men dom är dåligt scannade...
  • Detta är en community så man måste förstå vad andra vill göra och eftersom du inte förklarar vad som är bra eller dåligt så kan jag inte gissa utan att kolla....
    • först var det fel med att skapa folder med få bilder
    • nu störs du på att massa Bautil bilder dyker upp och lägger på sorterning.... Om jag skall lägga till ytterliggare 600 bilder från Bautil så kan jag lägga till sortering så slipper du göra om allt...
    • som sagt jag föredrar egna foldrar som man kopplar till Wikidata så att det i WIkipedia artikeln finns en direkt länk till den folder. Om mallen Template:Wikidata_Infobox finns så kan användaren med ett knapptryck ladda upp bilder som får rätt Kategori. Annan fördel om det är enskilda foldrar är att då jag sätter metadata på bilden så finns det verktyg som snabbt kan sätta avbildar Runsten xxx för alla bilder i en folder... men men ... är du övertygad att stora foldrar är bra för få bilder så kör vi så plus att jag försöker lägga på sortering....
- Salgo60 (talk) 13:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
förstå vad andra vill göra - jag vill kunna hitta OCH se bilder av runstenar. T.ex. ✨din U 15 kan jag inte hitta p.g.a. den ligger i Runestones in Östergötland. ✨din Ög_229 kan man inte se för att den är inte mellan Ög 225 och Ög 237. Angående mappar är jag emot att skrolla ner förbi oändliga rader av identiska bilder, som Sö 166 eller din Bautil Ög 41. Jag tror faktiskt att du skulle kunna ✨ladda finare Ög 41 som nyare version av den gammal Ög 41. Vidare, ✨mappar med en bild ska inte skapats för att då kan man inte hitta bilden visuellt, bara efter nummer. Först trodde jag att man kunde lämna en bild ute även för mappar med många bilder, men den skapar bara kaos. Om bilderna är många, då är det förmodligen en känd sten och är lätt att hitta ändå.
tackar Macuser för feedback.
  1. att leta bilder i Wikicommons är enormt primitivt jag har hittat ungefär 8000 runstensbilder see github Litteraturbanken_wd_runes det jag gör nu är att lägga på metadata vad bilden föreställer dvs Q28372876 lägger jag in på bilden. --> den kan hittas med haswbstatement:P180=Q28372876 dvs. bilden kan ligga i vilka kategorier som helst....
  2. din U 15 eftersom Uppland Runic Inscription 15 (Q7899109) hittas med haswbstatement:P180=Q28372876 - har vi en folder med mall Template:Wikidata_Infobox så finns detta som ett snabbval längst ned
  3. "din Ög_229 kan man inte se för att den är inte mellan Ög 225 och Ög 237" ok jag tror mer på söka med metadata... -> Q105682795 -> haswbstatement:P180=Q105682795
    1. jag har ingen runstenskunskap men använder runinskrifter.net för att översätta Bautil till Scandinavian Runic-text Database ID (P1261) och Swedish Runic Inscriptions (Q1749631) - ibland är det olika dock
  4. "ladda finare Ög 41 som nyare version av den gammal Ög 41" japp men tycker det finns kanske någon som vill se skillnad på vad Uppsala Alvin har och Umeå Universitetsbibliotek
Tycker tanken är good med SDC video men användargränssnittet skulle kunna vara bättre. Det jag vill se är att vi börjar använda RAÄ och deras kunskap att klassificera bilderna men dom är lite "trötta" ;-) Gissar att bilder borde beskrivas bättre se tweet fråga
- Salgo60 (talk) 12:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Om den är så primitivt, hitta bilden eller signum av den senen och den File:Sö_xxx,_unidentified_runestone.jpg och dem två File:Lids_kyrka_-_KMB_-_16000200096982.jpg(*). Och lägga till {{DEFAULTSORT:}} till alla dina Bautils.

(*) enormt primitivt är at leta runstensbilder på kmb.raa.se och använda dem med KULTURMILJÖBILD. Men sedan User:Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) laddade alla dessa i commons, utan att ange att bilderna är av runstenar, hamnade dem i mappar med kyrkor. Det är bara en exempel. Jag vill inte hitta alla runstensbilder, jag är ofta intresserad an en bild av sten, och det är bara ibland jag vet signum, men ibland plats, eller bara form.

Hur går det med "enormt primitivt" uppdraget? Category:Runestones_in_Uppland är fortfarande kloggat med dina osorterade bautil-stenarna.Macuser (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bautil 2 - U 343.png tillhör inte dit, den ska i Category:Runestones_in_Uppland. Lägg till {{DEFAULTSORT:}} eller namnge bilderna så att de ligger i ordning. Macuser (talk) 11:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Macuser Jag lägger dom bara i Category:Bautil med SDC satt till Wikidata objektet så slipper vi problem med sortering etc... - Salgo60 (talk) 13:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:IPhone Siri sökning.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Salgo60, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Salgo60/spa2commons2.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 49 character 77: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: html: "<p><img src='" + uploadParams.mediumUrl + "' /><\p>" +
  2. ISSUE: line 83 character 18: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: ${uploadParams.category}
  3. ISSUE: line 101 character 25: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  4. ISSUE: line 101 character 26: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  5. ISSUE: line 101 character 38: Expected an identifier and instead saw '?'. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  6. ISSUE: line 101 character 39: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  7. ISSUE: line 101 character 60: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  8. ISSUE: line 101 character 89: Expected an identifier and instead saw '&'. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  9. ISSUE: line 101 character 90: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  10. ISSUE: line 101 character 101: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  11. ISSUE: line 101 character 110: Expected an identifier and instead saw '&'. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  12. ISSUE: line 101 character 111: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  13. ISSUE: line 101 character 123: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  14. ISSUE: line 101 character 135: Expected an identifier and instead saw '&'. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  15. ISSUE: line 101 character 136: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  16. ISSUE: line 101 character 168: Bad assignment. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  17. ISSUE: line 101 character 169: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  18. ISSUE: line 101 character 170: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  19. ISSUE: line 101 character 180: Unclosed template literal. - Evidence: var href = `${uploadPage}?wpUploadDescription=${encodeURIComponent(summary)}&wpLicense=${license}&wpDestFile=${targetName}&wpSourceType=url&wpUploadFileURL=${original}`;
  20. ISSUE: line 271 character 12: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
  21. ISSUE: line 74 character 52: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: launchUpload: function( uploadParams ) {
  22. ISSUE: line 26 character 23: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: spa2commons = {
  23. ISSUE: line 271 character 12: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
  24. ISSUE: line 24 character 107: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: mw.loader.using( ['mediawiki.user', 'mediawiki.api', 'mediawiki.ForeignApi', 'jquery.ui'], function() {
  25. ISSUE: line 271 character 1: Expected ')' and instead saw ''. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
  26. ISSUE: line 271 character 12: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: //</nowiki>
  27. ISSUE: line 13 character 144: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: if ( ( mw.config.get( 'wgNamespaceNumber' ) === 0 || mw.config.get( 'wgNamespaceNumber' ) === 14 ) && mw.config.get( 'wgAction' ) === 'view' ) {

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 01:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Please add descriptive filenames[edit]

Could you please add descriptive filename rather than i.e. [[:File:WbbNj8LLWMAAAAAAAABhyA (cropped).jpg]. --Hjart (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Please see Commons:Filnamn.--Hjart (talk) 08:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Salgo60, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Salgo60/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 4 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 4 character 98: Unclosed string. - Evidence: mw.loader.load( 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lucas_Werkmeister/wd-image-
  2. ISSUE: line 4 character 17: Unclosed string. - Evidence: mw.loader.load( 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lucas_Werkmeister/wd-image-
  3. ISSUE: line 4 character 17: Expected ')' and instead saw ''. - Evidence: mw.loader.load( 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lucas_Werkmeister/wd-image-
  4. ISSUE: line 4 character 98: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: mw.loader.load( 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lucas_Werkmeister/wd-image-

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]


Hi Salgo60, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Salgo60/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 4 column 98: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Hard to understand why you created this duplicate. Please be more careful! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SergeWoodzing added value can be that the source is different see Swedish Portrait Archive ID (P4819) - Salgo60 (talk) 19:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not create duplicate categories! More that one category for the same person. Is that not clear? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SergeWoodzing Ok didnt understand you spoke about categories... I have added 5000 pictures the last week so one mistake is easy happening... sorry - Salgo60 (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Iwar Andersson SPA2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : PawełMM.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Erik Söderhielm 1871 SPA5.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Fuger (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adolf Adelswärd SPA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abbe98 (talk) 16:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astrid Lindgren SPA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discostu (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bautil 6 - c.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Macuser (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bautil 14 15 16 - U 327 U326 U 325.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Macuser (talk) 21:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bautil 18 - U 373.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Macuser (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hög tid att ladda upp: Wiki Loves Earth 2022![edit]

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Otto_Daniel_Winge has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 12:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Petter_Nobelius has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 11:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorier på Svenska[edit]

Hej Salgo60. Bör inte kategorinamnen skapas på engelska? Category:Skolformer i Sverige Category:Slöjdlektioner i Sverige, Category:Läroverk i Sverige I99pema (talk) 06:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I99pema kanske det blir det inte krystat med realskolor, läroverk etc... - Salgo60 (talk) 07:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hej. De svenska skolformerna har sina likheter i flera nordeuropeiska länder. Som det blir nu så pekar Volksschule till Commonskategorin "Folkskola". Jag tycker åtminstonde att det i så fall skall heta typ Läroverk in Sweden, om vi nu vill behålla det svenska namnet på skolformen. --I99pema (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok jag vill bara samla ihop bilderna.... Popperipopp har du några engelska tankar? har du lust så träffas jag gärna och snackar skolor i WD/Wikicommons d:Wikidata:WikiProject_Sweden/Schools vi springer i samma riktning jag nås på Telegram salgo60/ salgo60@msn.com / 0735152802
  • Skall vi skapa en GITHUB yta med tveksamheter typ denna ?
Annars så puttrar jag på i det som dyker upp som
Salgo60 (talk) 08:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Blir faktiskt lite smått bestört när jag ser hur befintlig fungerande standard helt ifrångåtts. Jag har under flera års tid jobbat med kategorisering utifårn de svenska kommunkategorierna utifrån en enhetlig standard. I kategorierna du skapat under Category:Grundskolor i Sverige så blandas begreppen Grundskola och Grundskolor. Det står Grundskolor Gotland, Grundskola i Huddinge Kommun, Grundskolor i Hjo Kommun. Per standard heter kategorier kopplade en kommun Municipality (se exempelvis under Category:Hjo Municipality) . Vad är anledningen till att du väljer att helt bryta mot den standard som hittills varit gällande? I99pema (talk) 10:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I99pema är mer okunskap styr gärna upp saker. Jag har mest laddat upp bilder på Riksdagsmän på Wikicommons från SPA
  • nu är fokus att få ordning på skolor och skolbyggnader där det känns väldigt rörigt på commons...
- Salgo60 (talk) 11:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, då förstår jag. Jag föreslåt att liknande kategorier i fortsättningen läggs på en landes nivå "xxx in Sweden" och om behövligt sedan på länsnivå "xxx in Västra Götaland County" ned till kommunnivå "xxx in Lidköping Municipality‎". Därmed kommer det matcha bättre med befintlig struktur. Tidigare skapade kategorier bör kunna inaktiveras och ersättas av nya --I99pema (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I99pema min magkänsla är att om vi har uthålighet kan ex. folkskolor i Sverige explodera och bli > 1500 osv.
  • tar man höjd för det eller startar man med alla i en katalog
  • vi "vet" i princip enl. denna tweet att varje församling har en folkskola --> att mer naturligt vore att inte ha kommun eftersom dom kom 1971 men man kanske skall tänka annorlunda....
- Salgo60 (talk) 13:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2022![edit]

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carolina Gravallius SPA4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 22:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billudden och Rullsand naturreservat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abbe98 (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Simon Boéthius 1850-03-06.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Simon Boéthius 1850-03-06.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Clas Odhner 1836-06-17.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Clas Odhner 1836-06-17.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Axel Swartling 1840-03-18.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Axel Swartling 1840-03-18.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Axel Swartling 1840-03-18.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Axel Swartling 1840-03-18.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader not adding PD-Sweden and PD-1996[edit]

Uploader not adding PD-Sweden and PD-1996 anymore, hence all your deletion notices. RAN (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its in structured data ex. File:Riksdagsmän 1894 Alfred Kihlberg 1843-01-23.jpg = M128137647.json Salgo60 (talk) 13:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Oskar Linus Lidén SPA.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oskar Linus Lidén SPA.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Carl Ljungberg SPA6.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Ljungberg SPA6.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Erik Lindström 1858 SPA4.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Erik Lindström 1858 SPA4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Frans Eneström SPA.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Frans Eneström SPA.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2023![edit]

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Nytt för i år är att vi utöver bästa foto även belönar fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gunnar Karl Viktor Larsson SPA.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gunnar Karl Viktor Larsson SPA.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Asilvering (talk) 22:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Utegym Botkyrka didn't make any sense as a category; I'm not sure of your intent here, but in case there was anything you cared about there, I've move it to User:Salgo60/Utegym Botkyrka. - Jmabel ! talk 21:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nya borgarråden i Stockholms stad 2022 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FFswe (talk) 20:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 17:31, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ingrid Bergman SPA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: this comes from a published work, no evidence that the initial work is out of copyright, nor the source of the image prior to its use in the publication
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ingrid Bergman SPA (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: this comes from a published work, no evidence that the initial work is out of copyright, nor the source of the image prior to its use in the publication
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Billinghurst.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 03:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2024![edit]

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Utöver bästa foto belönar vi även fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]