User talk:Saftgurka

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Saftgurka!

-- 01:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Visby[edit]

Thank you for helping! Dmitry G (talk) 08:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrullering[edit]

Jag har anmält dig som potentiell autopatrullerare på Requests_for_rights#Saftgurka. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vad betyder det? Saftgurka (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Det innebär att det finns ett förtroende för dina redigeringar, så att de inte märks med ett rött utropstecken. Admins och patrullerare går hela tiden igenom redigeringar, och i synnerhet de som är flaggade med rött utropstecken, vilka är redigeringar gjorda av inte autopatrullerade användare. Blir du detta, så minskas sas jobbet för dessa, det innebär ingen skillnad för dig, annat än att du fått ett kvitto på förtroendet för dig. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grattis, nu är nu autopatrullerad, och får använda den här boxen på din användarsida genom att klistra in följande kod: {{User autopatrolled}}

Dan Koehl (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Svenska Wikivoyage[edit]

Jag ser att du lägger upp bilder från Gotland, fina också. Kanske har du lust att kika på sidorna om GotlandSvenska Wikivoyage, och lägga in bilder du tycker passar, samt även bidra med text t.o.m. Jag är ensam där, vore kul om fler bidrog.

mvh Dan Koehl (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diligence
Tack snälla för alla rättelser och fixningar du gjort på mina (och andras) bidrag, här och på Wikipedia. Du ser till att bilder hamnar i rätt kategori och att allt blir strukturerat och snyggt. Jag tittar på hur du sorterar och försöker lära mig hur jag ska kunna göra mer rätt i fortsättningen. w.carter-Talk 17:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tack och bock! /Saftgurka (talk) 11:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorising[edit]

Please realise that most ships with an IMO number have the shipyard and scrapyard categorised there in the IMO category and the country of the yards in the category by shipname. Done so, because otherwise one can see it as overcategorising to mention the yards in IMO- and name-category. Regards. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Swedish_Armed_Forces_in_the_Congo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Swedish Armed Forces in ONUC has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 05:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

känns som reklam av skamsidan, helt onödig.
Ok, jag behöver inte länka till den. Men varför är det en skamsida?
jag har problem med sidans innehåll, är du ägaren, Kjell Olsson? Macuser (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jag är inte Kjell Olsson. Vad har du för problem med sidan? //Saftgurka (talk) 07:43, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kjell Olsson använde bilder från commons, helt Ok, men han satt sin © på, som på http://www.tjelvar.se/anl/foto2/74-43-9.jpg (jämför med File:Stridsvärn_på_Grogarnshuvud_fornborg.JPG). Han säger, at detta är hans foto. Macuser (talk) 09:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, jag förstår. Detta har jag sett. Han har t.o.m en bild jag har tagit som finns på Wikipedia men som han har angivit som sin egen på sin sida. Å andra sidan så har han så mycket info på sin sida som inte går att få tag i annars att jag kan tycka att låt gå (iaf gällande min bild)./Saftgurka (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Hans" information är inte heller hans egen. Det är kopia från fornsok. Macuser (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jo visst, när det gäller värn. Men tjelvar.org innehåller också mängder med biografier och tidningsutklipp m.m. /Saftgurka (talk) 12:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Överste Lars Carlson och chefen Milo S MILIF.001365.jpg[edit]

Jag tänkte hjälpa till med identifieringen av personen till höger på denna bild. Jag ser att det hos Digitalt Museum står "milochef", men det råder väl inget tvivel om att det rör sig om militärbefälhavaren för Södra militärområdet? Eller skulle det vara någon avdelningschef (motsvarande) vid militärområdesstaben? Om det handlar om militärbefälhavaren och fotografiet ska ha tagits 1982-1985 så finns det två personer att välja mellan: Carl Björeman (MB 1980-1984) och Göran Wallén (MB 1984-1988). Mannen till höger på bilden är absolut inte Björeman; det är inte det minsta likt. Wallén var stabschef medan Björeman var MB och Björeman har porträtt på honom i sin memoarbok Soldat och general under kalla kriget, sid. 294. Det ser definitivt ut som Wallén, trots att mössan, glasögonen och skuggan försvårar jämförelsen. Men om uppgiften om att det ska vara militärbefälhavaren i Södra militärområdet stämmer och likaså uppgiften om 1982-1985, ja då måste det ju vara Göran Wallén. Tänkte överlåta åt dig att ta ställning till detta och redigera det som behöver redigeras. FranzGall (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, jag blev inte klok på vem det var. 1982-85 var åren Carlson var regementschef. Under den tiden var Sven-Olof Olson, Bengt Schuback, Carl Björeman MB. Det är absolut inte Olson eller Björeman och liknar heller ej Schuback. Personen på bilden är dessutom generallöjtnant (två stjärnor) och Schuback var ju viceamiral samt hade inte glasögon vad jag vet. Då tänkte jag också på Wallén men hittade ingen bild på honom. Nu var ju dock Wallén sjöofficer och konteramiral. Hade MB:s som var sjöofficer arméuniform? /Saftgurka (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oj, jag misstog mig - Wallén var ju inte MB. Det blev ju en ordentlig kullerbytta. Och som du skriver är det ju inte likt Olson eller Schuback heller. FranzGall (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Precis, Wallén var ju inte det, men jag funderade på om texten till bilden var fel. Det kanske är stabschefen som texten syftar på. Bildtexterna på gamla bilder är onekligen ganska bristfälliga eller fel. Men bilden på Wallén som du hittade, kan de inte varit han då? Eller är mannen på bilden en helt annan MB för ett helt annat Milo..? /Saftgurka (talk) 07:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Överste Karl Rudolf Kolmodin.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Överste Karl Rudolf Kolmodin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 01:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chief of the Army Staff, Major General Helge Jung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hellbat31 (talk) 18:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You’re wrong and the source is wrong. See my answer in the discussion page. /Saftgurka (talk) 22:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Follingbomasten (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GustafSeb (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Follingbomasten (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GustafSeb (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]