User talk:Sorenhk/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright
File:Jernbanebro Hadsund.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Knud Winckelmann (talk) 14:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Sorenhk!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hadsund_by.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hadsund by.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pixi Uno (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel_Hadsund.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Juanm (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]

Please block this user. He has now again been blocked from da-wiki for breach of copyright. - This time for 30 days. --Pixi Uno (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hadsund Folkeblad.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--|EPO| da: 07:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 dage

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 dage for the following reason: upload af andres beskyttede værker.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

Jeg har identificeret 12 billeder fra Google Street View. Ingen af disse billeder er frie, men du har alligevel lagt dem op med angivelse af dig selv som fotograf og udgivet dem under en fri licens. Den slags er en alvorlig krænkelse af ophavsretten. --|EPO| da: 08:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel Hadsund set forfra.png var så nummer 13, jeg fandt. --|EPO| da: 08:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hej. Vil du ikke tjekke koordinaterne på dette billede? De ligger noget fra de koordinater, der i øvrigt er på da:Havnø Mølle. --MGA73 (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hadsund byskilt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 22:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

English: I take a new picture of the sign today if that is what is needed. Danish: Jeg tager et nyt billede af skiltet i dag hvis det er det er skal til. MVH --Søren1997 (talk) 10:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mågeøen ved Hadsund.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mågeøen ved Hadsund.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mågeøen ved Hadsund.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danish: Hej Martin. Jeg har skrevet mere infomation til dette billede :). Mvh --Søren1997 (talk) 10:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remains the problem that the source says nothing of a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license for this photo. --Martin H. (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Map of Mågeøen.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Map of Mågeøen.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Map of Mågeøen.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please properly attribute the authors of the two images not made by yourself or I have to delete this compilation. --Denniss (talk) 10:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC) Hello Denniss. Danish: Så har jeg levet det om :). --Søren1997 (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frie geografiske data fra Geodatastyrelsen / Open public geographic data from the Danish Geodata Agency

[edit]

Dansk: Hej Søren1997, Du har lagt en eller flere filer op, hvor det er indikeret at der er brugt frie geografiske data fra Geodatastyrelsen. I henhold til vilkår for brug af frie geografiske data, skal der angives hvilken dato, data er hentet fra Geodatastyrelsen. Du anbefales derfor at opdatere licensmærket {{DGA map}} med en datoangivelse. MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 13:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

English: Hi Søren1997, You have uploaded one or more files, which have indications of being based on open public geographic data from the Danish Geodata Agency. Conditions for use of open public geographic data stipulates that the date when the data were retrieved from the Danish Geodata Agency must be stated. You are therefore recommended to update the license tag {{DGA map}} with a date. In kind regards, Henrik/heb [T C E] 13:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Søren1997, Jeg ved ikke hvor du har kortet File:-Hadsund_1901.png fra ? - men det er ikke fra det angivne kort i Frems Amtskort over Danmark: I 26 Blade i Størrelse 1:200 000 samt 73 Byplaner hvor det kort der dækker området ser sådan ud: File:Hjoerring og Aalborg Amter.jpg, og er en anden målestok, og er fra før der blev bygget bro over Mariager Fjord. Kan du ikke rette det til den korrekte kilde. - vh. Nico-dk (talk) 10:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
jo det skal jeg gerne kikke på men jeg kan ikke sige om det bliver i dag.--Søren1997 (talk) 10:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valentinian

[edit]

Jeg, tror ikke du får et svar (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Valentinian) fra ham. Han, forlod wikimedia for lang tid siden. --89.249.2.53 10:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Det gør ikke noget, jeg har fundet ud af noget andet :). Mvh--Søren1997 (talk) 11:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hej Søren. Det er fuldstændig korrekt, at jeg stoppede på Wikipedia for længe siden, men jeg faldt ved et tilfælde over din besked. Jeg har skrevet et svar på min gamle "talk page". Mvh Valentinian T / C 20:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:-Hadsund 1901.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:-Hadsund 1901.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

heb [T C E] 11:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Da: Er nu gjort. --Søren1997 (talk) 22:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Såfremt der rent faktisk er tale om kort-materiale fra frie kort skal {{DGA map}} påføres både dato for hvornår data er hentet fra geodatastyrelsen, samt hvilket datasæt der er brugt jf. Geodatastyrelsens vilkår. Såfremt der ikke er tale om frie kort, skal {{DGA map}} fjernes og der skal påsættes et andet gyldigt licensmærke ({{PD-1923}} må ikke stå alene). Jeg har derfor genindsat {{No source since}} :) MVH heb [T C E] 11:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hvad så nu? --Søren1997 (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lige nu står {{PD-1923}} alene - det må det ikke (det står der faktisk også på den), så du skal tillige sætte et et af de andre licensmærker på - selvfølgelig det der er korrekt for mediet :). MVH heb [T C E] 08:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kan du ikke hjælpe med at finde en der passer til billedet??. --Søren1997 (talk) 12:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg kan prøve :)
Men for at jeg kan gøre det, skal du forklare præcis hvor du har fået kortet fra ([1] er ikke præcist nok), hvordan og hvornår du har downloadet dem. MVH heb [T C E] 15:11, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Det skal jeg fortælle dig her: Jeg klikker på knappen PrintScr på computeren og så ligger jeg billedet ind i Microsoft Office Publisher hvor jeg så ligger dem sammen til et kort, og så gemmer jeg kortet på computeren og lægger det op på Wikipedia. Håber det var forklaring nok :). MVH.--Søren1997 (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg fik nok ikke udtrykt mig selv klart nok: Du går ind på historiske kort og hvad gør du så? Hvilket historisk kort vælger du? Og hvornår har du gjort det? MVH 17:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Jeg klikker på "Målebordsblade 1928-1940" og så finder jeg det kort jeg vil kopier og sætter det ind i Microsoft Office Publisher hvor jeg så ligger alle kortene sammen til et stort kort. Håber du forstod det. --Søren1997 (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Og jeg gentager lige med begge formuleringer: "[H]vornår har du gjort det?" - "[H]vornår du har downloadet dem" :) MVH heb [T C E] 09:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Det er hentet den 10. januar 2013 og lagt det op samme dag. Jeg har lagt kortet op fordi der manglede et gammelt kort over Hadsund på flere artikler på svensk, norsk, dansk og tysk wikipedia. Vh --Søren1997 (talk) 10:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Godt. Det du så gør, er at du fjerner den nuværende {{DGA map}} og indsætter {{DGA map|1=2013-01-10|2=Målebordsblade 1928-1940 (M20L_628_56)}} under licens-overskriften. Må jeg ved samme lejlighed anbefale, at du bruger de frie kort som de er tiltænkt anvendt og ikke selv "finder på". Det har været lidt af et detektiv-arbejde at finde ud af hvilket datasæt der rent faktisk ligger til grund for kortet, sammeholdt med at du kunne have fået det "af dig selv", hvis du havde sat dig lidt ind i den distributionsmodel der ligger for frie kort... MVH heb [T C E] 13:04, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Det er nu gjort. Vh--Søren1997 (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dårligt nyt

[edit]

Dit luftfoto du fik fra den hjemmeside over mariagerfjord rensningsanlæg bliver måske slettet. Du, skriver Anja kun gav tilladelse til at det kan bruges på wikipedia. 1: Det, er både på wikipedia og på commons, og hvis det skal være på dansk wikipedia skal det også være på commons. 2: Betingelsen, er for stram. Pt. kan man kun bruge det på wikipedia, hvis ret skal være ret. Men, når et billede er på commons betyder det fx. jeg skal have lov til at bruge det gratis i en reklame for en hjemmeside, uden at spørge bare jeg krediterer fotografen eller hjemmesiden for billedet, og at andre godt må lave modificeringer af det. Enten, skal du forhandle med hende igen, om vilkårerene og samtidig forklare mere tydeligt hvad det betyder når et billede er på commons, eller også er der nok nogne der vil slette det. Vh. --109.232.72.49 15:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Har nu rettet i teksten. Jeg vil tage kontakt til hende igen :) --Søren1997 (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Husk også, at du må sende din tilladelse til OTRS, fordi du ikke har lavet billedet selv. Se Commons:E-mail-skabeloner. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kan du forklarer det ledt nærmerer? --Søren1997 (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Skriv, en anmodning evt. i din forhandling så hun er helt indforstået med vores koncept, send din mail når du får positivt svar til info-da@wikimedia.org, og vent et par dage så du er sikker på at det har modtaget den. Og, så lægbilledet op med skabelonen PermissionOTRS under licens. Ved, dog ikke hvordan man får fat på id-nummeret. Vh. --Gajolen (talk) 22:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Skal jeg bare skrive i den e-mail at de billeder du har givet lov til må vises på Wikipedia, dem må andre folk også bruge på andre sider. Er det det jeg skal skrive eller hvad Gajolen? --Søren1997 (talk) 07:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Du, skal skrive det til hende. Er, hun tilfreds med de nye betingelser sender du svaret (mailen videre til den mail jeg skrev tidligere. --89.249.2.53 11:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hvad gør jeg så hvis hun skriver at det kun må bruges på Wikipedia?--Søren1997 (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hvis hun skriver, at filen kun må bruges på Wikipedia, så vil filen blive slettet. Se Template:Permission. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok jeg har skrevet til hende. Kan billedet ikke bare lægges op på den danske wikipedia?--Søren1997 (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Måske, fordi hun ikke ved hvad det vil sige at ændre betingelserne. Send hende det her link (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.da), som fortæller hvad det vil sige i praksis for udenforstående peroner, at frigive materiale til licensen og spørg om det ville være iorden. Det, kan næppe forklares bedre. Og, filer kan kun lægges op på lokale wikier, som tillader Fair Use-lovgivningen. Da, USA gør er engelsk wikipedia en af dem hvor man kan lægge filer kun til brug på dansk wikipedia, hvilket man desværre ikke kan gøre på dansk --80.161.143.239 20:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Er det noget der kan laves så man kan lægge kan lægge billeder op på den danske wikipedia --Søren1997 (talk) 20:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Teknisk set kan man godt i forvejen, men billedet vil bare blive slettet fra wikipedia, og overflyttet til commons istedet for. Så svaret må altså i praksis være nej. --80.161.143.239 22:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I går fik jeg svar fra hende, hun sagde at billederne må godt bruges til aviser og hjemmesider men det SKAL fremgå at Mariagerfjord Rensningsanlæg ligger i Hadsund og ejes af Mariagerfjord Vand A/S samt skal der også fremgå at billederne er taget af Biodane Luftfotos. --Søren1997 (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tjaa, hvis de bruges i en avis om emnet fremgår det sandsynligvis hvem ejern erog hvor det ligger. Jeg, vil sige at betingelserne er god nok nu (: --Gajolen (talk) 20:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Det var godt så :) --Søren1997 (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hedegaard Foods logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.161.143.239 14:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sprog

[edit]

Søren, principielt er commons på alle sprog så du behøver ikke bevidst at navngive billeder engelsk eller anmode om atflytte danske billeder til engelske titler. --109.232.72.49 22:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Det skal jo være sådan at alle kan forstå hvad der er på billedet --Søren1997 (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Siger, bare det er valgfrit. Commons er lavet for at tillade alle sprog skal kunne være repræsenteret, ikke som fx. wikipedia som er inddelt i sprog. --Gajolen (talk) 08:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fint :) --Søren1997 (talk) 09:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

[edit]

Du, kan lægge ethvert foto af hadsund op uden tilladelse, hvis fotoet er uden værkshøjde og du kan bevise evt. ved en hjemmeside det erfra at fotoet er fra før 1945. Vh. --Gajolen (talk) 18:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tak for informationen ;) --Søren1997 (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Sorenhk. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]