User talk:Rowanwindwhistler/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File source is not properly indicated: File:SDKMars.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SDKMars.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:SDKMars.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 07:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Map change

There is one mistake in this map. Region of Medjimurje was not in croatia in that time. You can see some sources about that: [1] , [2], [3]. You should correct your map in the same way as I corrected file that you used as source: [4]. 123iti (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:FirmaBúlgaraDelPactoTripartito.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.184.58.12 10:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Pilsudski1921-2.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 02:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

File:DiscursoDePilsudski1932.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 02:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:KarlBureschf1.highres.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Photo by Georg Fayer, died 1950. See Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Inventory Pb 580.555-F 2. File will be in the PD in 2021. --Polarlys (talk) 11:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
File:WilhelmCuno1933.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 23:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

There is much wrong with your uploads to Robert Sennecke now. Most photos are not created by him but distributed by his company. Another big problem is that the date is often wrong. That french agency is also an redistributor only, for example File:EduardBernstein1932.jpeg was published in 1932 (at Bernsteins death most likely), but not taken in 1932. It circulated in 1929 already. --Martin H. (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

in short: I just looked again. Category:Photographs by Robert Sennecke is 90% wrong in author and date. Certainly Sennecke not made a photo of Chiang Kai-shek in 1933, thats plain nonsense. I dont know where to start with this uploads, its horrible. --Martin H. (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

re: Perekop-Chongar

Hello. Would this be satisfactory? Hoodinski (talk) 10:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

My pleasure;). Cheerio. Hoodinski (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PactoDeNoAgresiónSoviéticoPolaco23121932.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 03:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JozefBeckEnParís08101936.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 03:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Kingdom of Prilep

Hi, I just uploaded new improved version of this file: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kingdom_of_Prilep.png

Perhaps you can upload improved version of your derivative file as well: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ReinoDePrilepSigloXIV.svg

That file is derivative version of older version of this map that was created by me: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Central_balkans_1373_1395.png However, the old version was not of very good quality and I think that derivative versions of this file should match the current quality of original image. PANONIAN (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

OK, good job. I can easily translate map into Spanish, but I am not good with SVG maps drawing. PANONIAN (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi again. Well, I have Inkscape installed, but I do not find it easy to use. I guess if someone uses Photoshop for so long like me, it is hard to work with Inkscape because controls there are not even similar to those in Photoshop. Anyway, I just uploaded an improved version of this map as well: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Serbia1817.png Perhaps you can upload improved svg version too: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Serbia1817.svg&page=1 PANONIAN (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

new message for you

at the graphics lab Penyulap 15:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


File:Петрограде.png
some labels can be added
the green arrow is not in the image
this text has a white background
text with no background, they went that a way
some labels for a legend
can go in the space here, they are text and easy
to change just need the setup for the first map,
and then it's easy for every language to be done
with just the wikipedia edit window alone.
oh and you can add links too,
click here to view the code
stuff that looks like guns
lots of arrows
a translation to the
local language goes here

this is the kind of thing that I mean, if we ask for help at the help desk or someone who knows lots about overlay, it's possible to finish the setting up of this one image, then to change the text you just edit and search and replace the code here on the actual page, not in the image which stays the same. So the one image is good on all wikipedias and the text is just search and replace. Plus, it's easy to add little animations over the top of it, flames, tanks, galloping horses, whatever, they can be added later or those factory symbols could be changed if you like, that kind of thing.

the alternative, adding text to every version of the svg would make it harsh to let people edit the text in their local language or fix incorrect wording. Penyulap 13:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

I'd like to help on this one, would you like to ask about on the helpdesk for help translating the labels if I do the placement on the map ? Penyulap 06:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Graphics Lab / watermark

Hello, Rowanwindwhistler. You have new messages at Commons_Talk:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JorgeIIDeGreciaYDEsfileDeEON25031941--006826.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 15:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

The picture is in the public domain, please check its source at [5].--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 20:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Improved map version

Hi again. I just uploaded improved version of this map: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uzicka_republika2.png

Perhaps you can also upload improved version of this map which you created from that file: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TerritoriosPartisanosOtoñoDe1941.svg PANONIAN (talk) 14:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Done, I added the new towns in the map.--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 06:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
File:DiscursoDePilsudski1932.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 06:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Por tu gran aportación en cuanto a fotos de localidades burgalesas, fundamentales para ilustrar sus respectivos artículos. --HCPUNXKID (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Pues, ¡muchas gracias!--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:EntradaPedraza-rectangular.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorted out, thank you for the tip!--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 05:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

TímpanoDeLaPuertaDelObispoCatedralDePalencia.jpg

I have fixed this image as requested in the English Graphics Workshop Here. Please advise if this is what you wanted. Centpacrr (talk) 00:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Centpacrr, I have added my point of view in the request site. Many thanks for your version!--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 16:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I have "recut" the image and done a little bit (but not too much) to fix the perspective without (I hope) diminishing how the detail looks at 100%. If you like any of the earlier versions better, however, feel free to revert to them. Centpacrr (talk) 01:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
I have set the link back to the one but last version as the last one was a bit too burnt from my point of view and this one looks better (just my personal opinion of course). Thanks again.--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)