User talk:Rowanwindwhistler/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Austria-Hungría

En el mapa étnico del Imperio Austrohúngaro has puesto "linguístico" en lugar de "lingüístico". Es una falta de ortografía muy grave, porque además hace que no se lea igual. Un saludo.

Pay attention to copyright
File:Argeseanu_Gheorghe2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

IngerAlHaosului (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Dises egipcios

Hola Rowanwindwhistler. Son muy buenas tus imágenes del MAN. Verás que he renombrado algunos dioses. Ahora están mejor. Es un tema bastante complejo, pues hay cientos y muy parecidos, pero afortunadamente casi todos tienen escrito su nombre en jeroglíficos. Tal vez haya que renombrar algún archivo, pues no coincide el texto con la imagen. Un cordial saludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 12:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC) PD: El "carnero" no se a quien representa (por ahora), tiene un nombre muy raro.

Hola, gracias por el cumplido pero me temo que la iluminación y mi poca pericia no han ayudado mucho. De todas formas pensé que podían ser interesantes para la wikipedia (que tiene menos de las que yo esperaba...). La verdad es que no tenía mucho tiempo y ya he visto que cometí muchos errores en las identificaciones pero me alegro de que hayas podido corregirlos, que es lo importante. No sé si se puede cambiar el nombre de los archivos en Commons (nunca lo he probado) pero, si ves algunos que estén mal, adelante, sin problemas.--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 05:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. –Krinkletalk 01:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Your map

There is one mistake in this map that you uploaded. Vojvodina had no any relation to Hungarian Soviet Republic and you can see that in this source: http://libcom.org/files/images/library/hungarianmap%5B1%5D.jpg so, there is no reason that Vojvodina is colored here. I corrected this mistake in original map that you used as source, but this mistake should be corrected in your map too. 123iti (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but if you only want to show an extra info then we still would have problem with way how that info is presented. Both, Vojvodina and Croatia were parts of serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom in that time and both were part of the Kingdom of Hungary before that, so I do not see why Vojvodina is presented with one color and Croatia with other? Both territories had same status in that time. So, if you want to present parts of former Hungarian Kingdom under Serb (Yugoslav) and French control then please paint Croatia into blue too (and yes, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom was created on December 1st 1918, so it was not territory under Serb control, but under Serb-Croat-Slovene control - it was an common state of 3 nations in that time). There is also problem with word occupation which have negative conotation - I suggest neutral description: territory under Serb-Croat-Slovene and French control. 123iti (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
The army was Yugoslav because when joint state was created in December 1st, 1918, the joint army was proclaimed as well no matter that former army of the Kingdom of Serbia was a main part of new koint army. The occupation issue: officially, parts of former Austria-Hungary were under occupation only until December 1st, 1918 when they became parts of newly created Kingdom which was internationally recognized in 1919, an year before Treaty of Trianon. The text of Trianon Treaty itself does not mention with a single word that any territory was „taken“ from Hungary. On the contrary, it treat Hungary as a newly created state and define its borders towards neighbours while all new countries that included parts of former Kingdom of Hungary are recognized as successor states of that kingdom (you can see that by yourself if you read text of the treaty: http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Trianon ). You also can see that even original uploader of a map did not used word occupation, but used neutral word control: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Nepkoztarsasag.png&oldid=21543584 And no matter that Hungary proclaimed its independece in late 1918, it was not internationally recognized as an independent country before late 1919, so it is not possible that territory controled by Yugoslavia is de jure occupied territory of an unrecognized country. Word „occupation“ is clearly your personal addition to this map and you done that without deeper knowledge of certain historical events. Please change that due to description in original map. Thank you. 123iti (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
I do not know how to change SVG maps (what program you using for that?). About occupation/recognition, please read this: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/517198/Treaty-of-Saint-Germain „Treaty of Saint-Germain, (1919), treaty concluding World War I and signed by representatives of Austria on one side and the Allied Powers on the other. It was signed at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, near Paris, on Sept. 10, 1919, and came into force on July 16, 1920. The treaty officially registered the breakup of the Habsburg empire, recognizing the independence of Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, and the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (Yugoslavia) and ceding eastern Galicia, Trento, southern Tirol, Trieste, and Istria.“ So, this is the day when, both, Yugoslavia and Hungary were recognized and text say that the breakup of the Habsburg empire was REGISTERED by this treaty, but there is no evidence that parts of Yugoslavia were regarded as an occupied Austro-Hungarian territory before this Treaty and it is also not correct that they were under Yugoslav military administration. Administration was completelly civilian in all parts of Yugoslavia that formerly belonged to Habsburg Monarchy. In fact, I have here two interesting map from 1919: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Europe_map_1919.jpg - it is published by the London Geographical Institute and it show situation before Treaty-of-Saint-Germain (or before official recognition of Yugoslavia and Hungary). Sure, borders presented in that map are rather an assumption how final borders will look than a presentation of actual state control (Hungarian-Yugoslav border in that map is in fact illustration of one of the proposals how this border should look, presented in a Paris Peace Conference), but this map illustrates that de facto existence of both Yugoslavia and Hungary was more-less recognized and more-less in those borders that they controled. Furthermore, term occupation usually refer to a case where forces of one country are occupying part of another and, due to this definition, it would not be wrong to say that Serbian forces occupied parts pf A-H in late 1918, but after creation of Yugoslavia we do not have any more an foreign country that occupy part of another. Yugoslavia was a new country that was created by the people who were citizens of A-H and therefore it was successor state of A-H, not an foreign occupying power. Finally, we discussing here an map that show Hungarian Soviet Republic which in this time had absolutelly same status as Yugoslavia and whose proclaimed independence was also violation of de jure existence of Austria-Hungary, so if Yugoslavia was an occupier on A-H soil then Hungarian Soviet Republic was occupier too (it is nothing but POV to use word occupation for Yugoslavia and not for Hungarian Soviet Republic – either both were occupiers either both were not). Also note that in Serbian historical book is usually used word liberation to designate unification of former A-H territories with Serbia, and I am not asking that this word is used in your map – I am simply asking that neutral word control is used, which was also by Hungarian author of originall map. So, thank you for changing some things due to my proposal, but you still have to change 2 things: 1. Replace term occupation with term control, and 2. Please paint map background into white because if SVG map without colored background is saved into my computer as PNG then backgroud apper completelly black and letters from map legend are not readable at all. Or you can tell me which program are you using for SVG maps so I can change file by myself. 123iti (talk) 13:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
ok, I changed some things in a map, including some colors and descriptions (seems that you did not used accurate description for Slovakia area too, since according to original map, it is an area recaptured by Hungarian Soviet Republic in May-June 1919). Please check are all Spanish descriptions there correct in my map version (google translate do not always provide accurate translations). Also, I think that I corrected problem with black color in PNG file save – you should always create an backgroud layer colored in white so that SVG image can have white background. 123iti (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Just two things: 1. Did you tried to save your SVG map as PNG to see how that file looks? It does not have black background on your computer or what? Yes, Wikipedia do adds the white to the image, but only on the web. Once saved into computer that white became black. Is it possible to create white backgroung in SVG map at all? 2. Blue color that you choose is too dark and names of Zagreb of Subotica are very hard to be read on so dark background. I just tried to improve this image, but I will not change it any more. So, would you change what I proposed is up to you. I have to do some other things, thought. 123iti (talk) 00:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Just one more comment about your SVG maps. I know that I am booring already, but I see that you uploaded many maps and I just want to suggest how you can improve them. The SVG/PNG question is relevant here because Wikimedia offer to users that they can download SVG files in 4 different sizes of PNG (notice description „This image rendered as PNG in other sizes: 200px, 500px, 1000px, 2000px.“ below your SVG maps), and by my understanding of that, SVG files should look good when downloaded in both offered image formats (SVG and PNG). Otherwise, why would Wikimedia offer downloading in PNG format at all? I also always download SVG images in PNG format because SVG images cannot be used by some popular image viewer programs such is ACDSee. If you do not use white background in your SVG maps then they do not look good in PNG format. 123iti (talk) 13:44, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Picture Kurt Schuschnigg

Hello, sry to be so late, but I detected your username only minutes ago. I would superurgently need the permission to use the picture http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KurtVonSchuschnigg1936.jpg for all editions of the publication "Wir vom Jahrgang 1932". Could you be so kind to grant me that by sending an email to der@textmaker.at? I would very much appreciate it.

Thx so much for your quick response (in fact, I would need it within hours, I´m really sorry) Best regards Helmuth Santler


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Parsecboy (talk) 12:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:CampañaDeGrecia15041941.svg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CampañaDeGrecia15041941.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Tryphon 16:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Campesinas-rusas-frente-febrero-1915--withrussianarmy101knoxuoft.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:SDKMars.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:StalinYChurchillEnYalta--EA 052860.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:StalinYChurchillEnYalta--EA 052860.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)