User talk:Rokambolexko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rokambolexko!


Pay attention to copyright
File:Edificio_santo_domingo.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Justass (talk) 21:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, this page will be deleted because, the users galeries shouldn't be on the main. You could create a subpage instead as User:Rokambolexko/Fotos but You have also this tool: [1], Regards, Otourly (talk) 10:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Rokambolexko!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Rokambolexko, who is shown in File:IMG 1807ella.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:La_chica_rusa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Un_dia_de_furia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 05:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:IMG_1807ella.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot grab images from Google Maps, Bing, etc. and upload them to Commons. These images are copyrighted. - Jmabel ! talk 18:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

estoy cansado de subir fotos[edit]

estoy cansado de subir fotos y que me las borreis que hay que hacer para que se validen en vuestro commons

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ella.jpg. Te agradecemos que expliques el origen de la imagen, pues podría ser borrada. Un cordial saludo--Miguel Bugallo 15:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no la tiene efectivamente, pero es la primera noticia de que solo tiene que haber imágenes vinculadas a algún acceso de la biblioteca, un saludo--Rokambolexko (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Te respondo al final de la página bajo el título Continuación de los comentarios realizados en File:Ella.jpg--Miguel Bugallo 17:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yo en alemania.jpg]. Te agradecemos que expliques el sentido que esta imagen tiene, cómo puede ser utilizada en una enciclopedia: ¿Que sentido tiene en este proyecto?. Un cordial saludo--Miguel Bugallo 15:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

También:

bueno, no la tiene efectivamente, pero solo estaba probando como funciona el sistema, --Rokambolexko (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Te ofrezco mi ayuda[edit]

Te ofrezco mi ayuda para aclararte en Commons. Si deseas que te explique los problemas de tus imágenes y te aclare cuales son las imágenes que se pueden subir y cuales no, házmelo saber.

Por el momento, decirte que me he puesto en contacto con un administrador aquí en espera de que revise todas o gran parte de tus imágenes. Pienso que lo normal es que fuesen borradas todas, pero es una opinión personal. Que opine eso no quita que puedas tenerme a tu servicio.

Un cordial saludo--Miguel Bugallo 16:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto, una imagen como File:Yo en alemania.jpg, podría tener cabida en Commons si estuviese bien categorizada, incluída en Category:Wikipedians in Spain, siempre que tú así lo deseases y siempre que la usases en tu página de usuario. Un cordial saludo--Miguel Bugallo 16:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Continuación de los comentarios realizados en File:Ella.jpg[edit]

No entiendo lo que dices ("no la tiene efectivamente, pero es la primera noticia de que solo tiene que haber imágenes vinculadas a algún acceso de la biblioteca").

A Commons solamente se pueden subir obras propias u obras que permitan el uso comercial y la realización de obras derivadas. Si alguna página web no pone expresamente que permite esas condiciones, las imágenes de esa página web no se pueden subir a Commons. Es obligación del que sube las imágenes indicar el origen (autoría propia, de donde las sube,...). Si el origen que expresas no permite comprobar la licencia (permiso de uso comercial y obras derivadas), la imagen debe ser borrada. A eso me refería, (disculpa) no sé a qué te refieres tú--Miguel Bugallo 17:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto, para responder un comentario hecho en esta página debes de ir a la página de discusión del usuario que hizo ese comentario. Me explico: Para responderme a mí, debes de hacer click en mi apellido "bugallo", irás a la página de discusión User talk:Lmbuga. Editas esa página y escribes lo que quieras al final.
Si escribes aquí, en tu página de discusión, yo no me voy a enterar de que lo has hecho. Por favor, escribe en mi página de discusión haciendo la adecuada referencia al tema en cuestión--Miguel Bugallo 17:16, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Supongo que sabes firmar un comentario con tu nombre. Si no sabes hacerlo, no pasa nada, yo puedo saber quien ha hecho un comentario siempre que el que lo haya haya hecho esté registrado en ese momento en Commons. Si no sabes, te lo explicaré la próxima vez que me dirija a ti--Miguel Bugallo 17:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


No se trata de borrar o no borrar. Para mi no se trata de eso. Se trata de tener un usuario que colabore (tú) o no tenerlo.

Yo no soy nadie, pero puedo ayudar a entender: Por desgracia, Commons es muy complejo y mucha gente se desanima o se siente agredida por no comprender. Puedo ayudar a que comprendas, pero no hoy (31 de diciembre). Mañana te envío un mensaje explicativo. A partir de ahora voy a estar ocupado. Feliz año--Miguel Bugallo 19:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Espero que diciéndote que he acabado el plato que me correspondía hacer para fin de año y que, por haber acabado, he visto tu comentario, puedas entender que Commons no es un espacio web normal. Aquí, los administradores no cobran (yo he sido administrador pero hace tiempon que lo he dejado). Los usuarios trabajamos en el proyecto porque nos da la gana, al igual que los administradores. Nadie cobra, nadie debe nada, nadie promueve nada por interés personal. Pero hay normas, normas de la comunidad, normas hechas por todos y otras normas ineludibles, que tienen que ver con las características del proyecto, que no son discutibles, o las aceptas o lo dejas.
Entre esas normas ineludibles está el hecho de que las imágenes tienen que permitir la realización de obras derivadas y el uso comercial. Lo malo es que hay cosas que casi nadie sabe: Por causa de la legislación internacional -covenio internacional de Berna que España firmó- cualquier espacio (página web, libro,...) que no indique las condiciones de uso de una imagen publicada, tiene, por defecto, todos los derechos reservados y, por lo tanto, esas imágenes no pueden ser subidas a Commons, pues no permiten el uso comercial expresamente, ni las obras derivadas.
No actuar conforme a las normas, no borrar las imágenes que no respeten esas normas, es poner en peligro el proyecto. Intenta ver nuestra realidad desde dentro: ¿Crees que los poderes económicos están interesados en que las Wikipedias existan? ¿Existiría Commons si no nos preocupásemos por respetar los derechos de autoría? Con los intereses que hay (el conocimiento es poder), si en Commons no nos preocupamos por respetar la legislación, nuestra comunidad desaparece.
A mí me parece mentira que no haya habido múlgiples denuncias dirigidas a Commons por... Si no las ha habido es porque se están haciendo las cosas bastante bien, estamos defendiendo un espacio que promueve el dominio público y que además tiene futuro.
En concreto, no puedes subir una imagen de una página web cualquiera y subirla a Commons como si no pasase nada. Pasa mucho, estás atentando contra nuestro futuro si en esa página no se dice expresamente que se permiten las obras derivadas y el uso comercial. Solamente puedes subir imágenes hechas por ti o imágenes en quye se permitan espresamente esas condiciones (cosa muy rara).
Decir que una imagen es tuya cuando no lo es, es motivo de bloqueo de por vida, es motivo para no permitirte subir jamás una imagen. Desde fuera puede parecer excesivo, desde dentro, es normal.
Sigo pensando en ofrecerte más información. Mañana (en caso de que no tome unas copas de más hoy) o pasado, me pongo en contacto contigo
solo te ruego que leas lo más detenidamente posible mis mensajes --Miguel Bugallo 20:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Rokambolexko, como bien te ha explicado Miguel en este proyecto solo se admiten imágenes de propia autoría y de fuentes con licencias compatibles (GFDL o cc-by-sa) o en dominio público. El fotografiar una foto tomada por otra persona o subir a tu ordenador material recogido de Internet no convierte el trabajo en propio, estas obras tienen copyright y el poner "mío" en el origen no es válido, como es el caso de las imágenes que he borrado y las marcadas con "no source" como puedes ver en tu galería, las cuales serán borradas también al cabo de 7 días si no aclaras el origen de forma comprobable. Tienes toda la información necesaria sobre el tipo de imágenes válidas y sus licencias en Commons:Sobre las licencias y cualquier otra duda que tengas puedes ponerte en contacto conmigo o con Miguel. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:LogoZEL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miguel Bugallo 23:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imagen_de_un_tonto_en_apuros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.158.207.2 23:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Alvaro gil varela 1930 arturo souto.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dereitos da propiedade intelectual[edit]

Ola Rokambolexko.

¿Es ti o titular da propiedade intelectual destas obras?: File:Carlos varela veiga.jpg, File:Antonio fernandez lopez.jpg, File:Alvaro-gil-varela-en-1930.png ...

Agardo a túa resposta. Graciñas--. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antonio fernandez lopez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:29, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos varela veiga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antibioticos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]