User talk:RicHard-59

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RicHard-59!

sep 5th 2009:Uploaded my first image to Commons. Mistakes possible. Tarzan-Africa.gif

TUSC token 01f0c441f8a24491665fa3d8cea3286e[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token fb91ee9f996a087b5327bdb8d0f965ab[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 7f9a19f75f914a48f01a75e67e973d8b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


TUSC token b434cb1768b8bdda439518d05e5c0857[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! June 17th 2012


Ongelma[edit]

Lataisitko tästä SVG-version: File:MSJ.fin.svg.png , mielellään mahdollisimman vähän png-kuvia yms. kun kerran mahdollista svg. --Olli (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den_Shī_shì_shí_shī_shǐ_.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sysywjel (talk) 03:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, RicHard-59!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Do you mind taking a look at this image you uploaded? Did you mean calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate at the extreme left? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 03:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I'll change that. Thanks.--RicHard-59 (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now it is fixed. Any knowledge of "calcium morphenate" structure how it looks like?--RicHard-59 (talk) 18:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back. Don't know about calcium morphenate, sorry. I don't check Commons often. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added information to the talk page of your image since ammonium chloride does not create morphine hydrochloride. Adding ammonium chloride until the pH reaches 8-9 causes the the morphine to precipitate out of solution, which is in freebase (i.e. pure, non soluble) form. The remaining opium solution is filtered off and the relatively pure morphine is dissolved in hydrochloric acid solution to produce the water soluble salt morphine hydrochloride.
By the way, all that needs correcting is to simply remove the word 'hydrochloride' (HCl) from after the word morphine, since this step (adding hcl acid to create morphine hcl) is not essential in production. After ammonium chloride is added the morphine (pure freebase form, not hydrochloride) precipitates and can be added directly to acetic anhydride to form diacetylmorphine. D Dinneen (At Wikipedia) 9 November 2011.

Fixed. I added also possible img of calcium morphenate. Pls report if problem.--RicHard-59 (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Good job on correcting things! Now, I don't want to be too fussy but because I really like your image, finding the way it simplifies the procedure for refining opium so well really neat - I believe there are a few more improvements that could help to make the image even more accurate. I will point these suggestions out below;

  • 1. Calcium hydroxide is an ionic compound, whereas your structure appears to show covalent bonds (there shouldn't be any lines between the calcium & OH molecules). It should look more like your structure of ammonium chloride, except of course the calcium ion should have a 2+ charge (perhaps in a blue circle to resemble the charge on ammonium). The two hydroxide molecules (OH) should each have a single - charge. This link provides a good example of how the OH's could appear - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hydroxide_lone_pairs-2D.svg, but you should probably leave out the lone pairs (the six black dots around the O) and could put the charge in a blue circle as with ammoinum chloride. Optionally, both the calcium and the two hydroxide ions can be drawn within square brackets. Also, the molecular structure of CaOH2 should have the '2' following OH written outside the brackets - as Ca(OH)2 rather than Ca(OH2) as it is currently written!
  • 2. I am not really sure what the structure of calcium morphinate should look like as there don't appear to be any examples online. However, one thing I would suggest, is that the 3-OH group (the top one) is more likely to dissociate than the 6-OH (the bottom one) because it is a phenol which is quite a bit more acidic than a standard hydroxyl group (which the bottom one is). Therefore perhaps you could consider giving the top group the negative charge instead - or even showing both groups dissociated and negatively charged, therefore having a single morphine ion bonding to a single calcium (instead of 1 Ca ion to 2 Morphinate ions as is shown currently). It might also be neater to leave out the square brackets surrounding the morphenate ion, similar to what you have done with ammonium chloride (would probably be neater!).
  • 3. Finally, to make it more obvious that morphine is in freebase form rather than a salt you could consider writing the word freebase in brackets following the word morphine, perhaps in italics (this is obviously not essential, and it may actually be neater and look more condensed without including it!).


D Dinneen 10 November 2011.

Thanks for corrections. Uploaded new img with changes.--RicHard-59 (talk) 22:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sodium thiopental.svg[edit]

Hi, "Sodium thiopental.svg" has errors in valency and charge. Please correct it (PNG version is OK) or revert your changes in all wikis - I already did it in en and pl:wikis. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded new version. Better?--RicHard-59 (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The chemical structure is still incorrect. There should be a single bond between sulfur and carbon, not a double bond. Ed (Edgar181) 13:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, it's exact look-a-like-copy of File:Tiopental.png, Ill fix the error on this one. Thanks for info.--RicHard-59 (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Funny thing. this img and this and this are also incorrect?--RicHard-59 (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk continues in File talk:Sodium thiopental.svg

I replied there. Ed (Edgar181) 16:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can U help me also with Calcium morphenate-image I loaded to Fi-wiki before loading it to commons. Hard-to-find img. Check en:Talk:Calcium morphenate. --RicHard-59 (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The name "calcium morphenate" generally does not refer to a single chemical compound, but rather to the complex mixture obtained by treating opium (itself a complex mixture) with calcium carbonate. I don't think it is useful to try to depict it as a chemical structure diagram. Ed (Edgar181) 16:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--RicHard-59 (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:FI-SALLITTU.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jafeluv (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calcium_bromide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChemNerd (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calcium_fluoride.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChemNerd (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:1-nitroaknadinine.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:1-nitroaknadinine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Looks fine now. DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Sinococuline.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Sinococuline.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tannagine.svg and File:Stephodeline.svg have the same situation. DMacks (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are untangled now, but those bonds should not be bold. A bold line has a specific chemical meaning, which is exactly contradictory to "at wide end of hashed wedge". These are certainly technical issues, but it's important to understand and convey them clearly (that's the whole point of having the structure diagrams). DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Pseudoakuammigine.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Pseudoakuammigine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Good job with a difficult structure! DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure File:Nepenthone.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Nepenthone.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


That side-chain still has weird geometry. Why is the ring->chain bond not straight to the right, the bonds at the carbonyl not 120°, and the bond-junction along the way to the benzene ring not 120°? DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thienorphine skeletal.svg also has a bunch of weird geometries. It looks like these are all hand-drawn; you might want to "invest" in any of the free chemical-drawing software packages that are available--they standardize many structure parameters automatically. See en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing or de:Wikipedia:Wie erstelle ich Strukturformeln? for details. DMacks (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thienorphine skeletal.svg geometries look fine now. Is "outlined yellow S" a standard style? DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:SAHTM-skeletal.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:SAHTM-skeletal.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 15:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Calcium Phosphide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 13:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RicHard-59. Please do not overwrite images created by other users, unless they contain errors or the quality (e.g. resolution) is low and you improve it without changing the layout. Further more, structural formulae are generally preferably drawn in black only. --Leyo 16:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token acca5491a68e39bd25d044e0de77dd54[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File source is not properly indicated: File:1860shairnet.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1860shairnet.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:1860shairnet.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 18:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chatterjee-dia-sm.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chatterjee-dia-sm.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Psychonaut (talk) 17:25, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

There's a typo in this image. Tryptophan is mispelled in the bottom left hand corner. Could you fix it? Thanks. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 01:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--RicHard-59 (talk) 12:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fenfangjine G.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 17:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Img fixed. Ok now?--RicHard-59 (talk) 19:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Popshoveit.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Popshoveit.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Popshoveit.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Birds Toons[edit]

This logo does not seem to qualify for the "below the threshold of originality" criterion. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 12:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nudity n.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

89.249.2.53 10:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Stanley postcard.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stanley postcard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Troll face.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 21:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 13:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Rosetta 111106.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PEGI icons[edit]

Hello. I’ve uploaded new versions for some of the annotated PEGI labels (File:Online n.svg, File:PEGI bad language.svg, File:PEGI Violence 2.svg) and also added the missing ones (File:PEGI Fear annotated.svg File:PEGI Drugs annotated.svg File:PEGI Gambling annotated.svg File:PEGI Discrimination annotated.svg).

If you can, please have a look and see whether everything’s fine with the new SVG files and that they’re not being rendered incorrectly on your devices and platforms. There was a problem with background pattern not showing, but I guess that was because I clipped it to fit the box. In current files the pattern slightly exceeds the dimension of the box, but since viewers (e.g. browsers) render only anything inside the declared dimensions, it seems to not be a problem.

If you have time, could you please also answer this two questions?

  • How did you stretch the Dejavu font? — The question is mainly about vertical stretching. I tried all text-formatting options that Inkscape provides, but couldn’t match a writing in Dejavu Sans to that of your version. You can see a comparison here. The upper one is my version, with all text settings identical to the lower (your) version that was found in the old file, but still there are significant differences.
  • How did you make the background PEGI-word pattern match the original so precisely? — I used these two “scans” to match the digital copies with the originals as much as I could, and your background pattern for the repeating “PEGI” was very closely matching with those in original images in both cases.

Also, thanks for your uploads. DaemonDice (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look. Thnks.
  • Sometimes I transfer text to path using "Object to Path" (shift-ctrl-C) and then text can be modified any way one wants. edit: If there is no accurate font, i take some simple font, transfer its edges to paths and use the original font as guide to make my font to match.
  • I rotated image so that text is horizontal, made texts fit and rotated back.--RicHard-59 (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:ADX.CELL.DESIGN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 08:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logo ei taida olla sinun tekemäsi?[edit]

File:Mtv3 new logo.svg olet merkinnyt itsesi logolle tekijäksi, ja lisensoinut sen lisenssillä cc by-sa 3.0. --Zunter (talk) 15:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Niin?--RicHard-59 (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ei ole sallittua. --Zunter (talk) 09:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Uhuru Kenyatta 10.3.2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Stemoc 16:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deep Forest logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Answered your question about a chess problem in a Russian newspaper[edit]

HolyT (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC) See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Sixday.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by HolyT (talk • contribs) 20:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Crohn's Disease vs Colitis ulcerosa.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a derivate of File:Patterns of Crohn's Disease.svg based on image search of Crohn Colitis_ulcerosa at http://superepus.com/crohn-39-s-disease/--RicHard-59 (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello RicHard-59, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Jethro Tull Ian Anderson logo.svg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your SVG files[edit]

Thank you for uploading files. Unfortunately, you seem to have still the habit to tag your files with {{Inkscape}}, which stores them in a maintenance category; the work of other users is then needed to tag them correctly. Depending your files of today, A-234 Mirzayanov.svg and A-234 Hoenig.svg, I shall do it now; but it would be preferred when you complete your work by yourself. Numerous of your files from the past are still tagged in a wrong way: the {{Inkscape}} is outdated since many years! Regards, -- sarang사랑 17:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your help. I added Igen-line to my user page for future works. Can you check File:Golden Gate Bridge jumpers by year.svg for me. i visited https://validator.w3.org/ and it found 3 errors on file and I added igen to page. Of course there is Template:Created with Inkscape I can use, yes?--RicHard-59 (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is a bit troublesome that we can use at least 3 different validators, they state sometimes different number of W3C-errors. But with all of them I found only 1 error at Golden Gate Bridge. It does not matter so much whether you declare 0, 1 or more errors - when it is just depending on a validator.
The template {{Inkscape}} is a shortcut of {{Created with Inkscape}}, there is no difference; {{Igen|Inkscape}} does the same. The needed parameters of either one of these three can be added manually (which may be rather complicated), or by invoking the script.
The best thing to tag an SVG file is to use the script; it is still under development but presents suggestions which can be used in many times without modification. Its installation is easy, just insert into your User:RicHard-59/commons.js the lines
// [[User:Perhelion|Sarang/simpleSVGcheck.js]]
if (mw.config.get('wgNamespaceNumber') === 6 && /SVG/i.test(mw.config.get('wgTitle').slice(-3)))
	mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sarang/simpleSVGcheck.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');
When you see the scripts generated output, often a lot of very cryptic parameters, you won't need to study them (except if you really want to understand) in detail, just use them. Also you need not to learn by heart Commons talk:SVG marker templates or Commons:SVG marker templates! When it makes troubles or you need help, contact me. -- sarang사랑 10:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Does text as text cause error about " SVG images with embedded raster graphics"? I've noticed text as path does scale correctly but as textfield not. Image File:Golden Gate Bridge jumpers by year.svg has hidden text visible only in svg-editor: sources of the numbers. If transform all texts to paths image size goes up from 400kb to 1400 kb.--RicHard-59 (talk) 12:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I did not see it ealier - you gave me no ping. You are talking about two different things
  1. "SVG images with embedded raster graphics" are SVG containing not only SVG code but also embedded raster images.
  2. Text that should be displayed by an SVG may be
  • embedded text, with the SVG <text> instruction,
  • "pathed" text, with the SVG <path> instruction. SVG can contain both - but that is bad style.
The Golden-Gate file has no hidden or invisible text, but SVG <id> of the year to enable an overview for you, the editor.
Invisible text is in all your files at Category:Finnish age limit symbols, such invisible watermarking is undesired/forbidden for files in Wikimedia !
If you have further questions, pleae ping me -- sarang사랑 08:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may check whether I got all the counts correctly 🌉 -- sarang사랑 18:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hertzsprungin-Russellin kaavio.GIF has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PEGI Discrimination.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 06:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:M900.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:M900.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:M900.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file was originally loaded to en.wikipedia by User:TDC. I only transferred it to Commons. I have no knowledge of original source. Image search results this image widely used in several pages around internet.
The original description page was here. All following user names refer to en.wikipedia.
  • 2007-11-10 16:45 TDC 356×542× (27410 bytes) M900 105mm APFSDS-T
--RicHard-59 (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cyprenorphine structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marbletan (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MV Joyita 1955 port.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FI-PÄIHDE.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FI-PÄIHDE.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 05:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FI-VÄKIVALTA.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FI-VÄKIVALTA.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 05:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FI-AHDISTUS.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FI-AHDISTUS.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 05:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove ASP. All three files were intended to FI-wiki. --RicHard-59 (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marbletan (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:Thevinone.svg. Marbletan (talk) 20:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarin Biological effects.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 22:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoria University of Wellington logo national crest vertical.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Rohsopht (talk) 10:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]