User talk:Rhododendrites/2018b

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oculus (41331p)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 01:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oculus (41323p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 01:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oculus (41319p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 01:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oculus (41285p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 01:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great blue heron on torii (70296).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National School Walkout Rally (42502).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oak apple (01839).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Women's March NYC (00360).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Both these images are fine, but I think it fairly obvious that there should be a personality rights warning attached.--Peulle 16:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)  Done Rhododendrites 16:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)OK--Peulle 21:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Women's March NYC (00627).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Both these images are fine, but I think it fairly obvious that there should be a personality rights warning attached.--Peulle 16:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)  Done Rhododendrites 16:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC) OK. --Peulle 21:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40571s).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden eagle at ACES (11805).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oculus (41393p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 04:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parrots by a nest in the Green-Wood Cemetery gate (61839)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 04:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great blue heron on torii (70295)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parrot and starling flying around a nest in the Green-Wood Cemetery gate (61815).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prow on Roosevelt Island (41690).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roosevelt Island Bridge, south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blackwell Island Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ravenswood Generating Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Westminster Arcade, Providence, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jennifer Fox.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cynthia Erivo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westminster Arcade (62464).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70336).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viburnum × bodnantense dawn (70047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellebore in NYBG (70025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalanchoe laxiflora (70641).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleistocactus strausii (70386).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoya pubicalyx (70261).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mammillaria parkinsonii (70369).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medinilla magnifica (70487).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70350).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 20:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Western Wall at night (20063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough given the conditions --Daniel Case 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cavendishia grandifolia (70309).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Works because just one's in focus --Daniel Case 00:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cavendishia grandifolia (70318).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice sense of fragility --Daniel Case 00:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seward statue in Madison Square Park (00284).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thunbergia grandiflora (70181).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bank of America tower from Bryant Park (10033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70349).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleistocactus strausii (70391).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jade vine (70200).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mammillaria bombycina (70456).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phragmipedium les dirouilles (70500).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellebore in NYBG (70027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgia Clark (10686).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lesa Cline-Ransome (10744).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aechmea fasciata (70295).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthony Del Col (11568).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dean Haspiel (11560).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hank Phillippi Ryan (11606).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sally Field (11205).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steven Levenson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
William H. Seward by Randolph Rogers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  SupportJacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grady Hendrix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
B. A. Shapiro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adele Griffin (11273).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Higgins Clark (10649).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natalie C. Parker (10669).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rafael Lopez (10709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Everson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jarrett J. Krosoczka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthony Del Col.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hank Phillippi Ryan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Picte (talk) 09:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32083)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32128).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32166).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomi Adeyemi (22020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tahereh Mafi (21994).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afua Richardson (11644).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angela Halgrimson (21919).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthony Del Col (11571).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthony Del Col (11575).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kate Morton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afua Richardson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarah Beth Durst.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chuck Palahniuk (21955).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32146).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. How did you get in? -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomi Adeyemi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angela Halgrimson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wade Hudson (21910).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turkey vultures (01745)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thunbergia grandiflora (70184).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chuck Palahniuk (21943).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chuck Palahniuk (21946).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doris Kearns Goodwin (11126).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tahereh Mafi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest a left crop.--Peulle (talk) 19:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

• I have a hard time making up my mind whether to include part of the person the subject is looking at. In this case it is perhaps too slim in the frame. Could someone else confirm a crop would be a good idea in this case (it's already a QI, so would prefer to have an additional opinion before doing so). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
• I will be very much in favor of reframing the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
• the rule of thirds gives you reason . but I think you have to imagine it in the template information, and for that reason I am in favor of reframing.--Picte (talk) 10:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
• Just to clarify, the reason for the crop suggestion is the distracting object on the left - a blurred person, I believe, visible even at thumbnail size.--Peulle (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  New version uploaded — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Picte (talk) 15:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 17:30, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monarda didyma, seed head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, used and IMO best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chuck Palahniuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yerba Buena Island (91710).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Manis temminckii (29600162001).jpg

File:Manis temminckii (29600162001).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 17:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viburnum × bodnantense buds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Emmanuel Dissais (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kate Morton (11535).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 16:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ships in the San Francisco Bay (91661).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit on the dark side. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Women's March NYC (00747).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 16:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angela Halgrimson (21922).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 16:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70338).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 16:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adventure Playground (Berkeley).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crimetown.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --

• It's in a subcategory for an event that is not itself notable. The image in this case is not used to depict the event as much as the podcast -- it just happens to be taken at one of the events. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment There is confusion, we must not change the meaning of the scope which is very good; it is only necessary to make a link with the subcategory so that in one click we see the image. This is a purely practical aspect, it does not change the meaning of scope that remains the same. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

• I think I understand. Like this? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House Collector’s Office, ceiling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32104)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nicely handled composition and perspective --Podzemnik 00:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall Station (32155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60132).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice beard --Podzemnik 00:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61163)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60993).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60976).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 11:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60278).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60518).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60707).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)<br? Comment - Great! Do you have any photos of him with uncropped elbows? I could see people objecting to those crops on FPC. Might be worth nominating, anyway, though, if you don't have any similar images with uncropped elbows. -- Ikan Kekek 09:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 11:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60841).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60777).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60711).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 05:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)