User talk:Rebecca Bird

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Photograph needed[edit]

Thanks for your edits and help on the Christ myth theory. I need a photograph of Herbert Cutner. If you could help that would be great. I have a big foot (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment it is unlikely I can upload a photograph of Cutner, there is one photograph of him but it was taken in London in 1963 so it is under copyright. I will however upload a photograph of Homer Smith, I noticed you were working on that article Rebecca Bird (talk) 00:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help with photographs. At the moment I am working on a bunch of Christian Science biographers and critics. I will let you know if I need anything. I have a big foot (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I found a photograph of John V. Dittemore, if you are interested. Rebecca Bird (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Uploading more photographs you might find useful. Rebecca Bird (talk) 00:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you! I will use all of these. We make a good team :) I have a big foot (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also see if you can find any of Fleta Campbell Springer? Once again thanks for all your hard work. I will send you an email. I have a big foot (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Raynham Hall ghost photograph.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]