User talk:Ras67/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks...

... for cropping the pictures of the Pen Duick sailboats. Badzil (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. I've taken the tiny higher resolution version from flickr. --Ras67 (talk) 15:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sierra_kusterbeck_and_blake_harnage.JPG 45°

Hi Ras67, I am not that sure if we should overwrite such images. The previous version wasn't wrong - in fact it is better to view since it will be bigger with the same width. ;-) Depends on what is more suitable. Also the skewed image gives you a sense of dynamics. I did a similar rotation some days ago: File:Aoste hôtel de ville - rot.jpg. Thanks for your comments. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, a new version is probably better. --Ras67 (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Admin?

Hallo Ras67. Hast du eigentlich schon mal drüber nachgedacht, Admin zu werden? Ich denke, du erfüllst die Voraussetzungen und hättest gute Chancen auf eine erfolgreiche Wahl. --Leyo 15:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Darüber nachgedacht habe ich schon, aber meine derzeitigen Rechte reichen mir völlig. Neben den Grafiksachen gehen auch viele Wartungsaufgaben so schon und mich dann wegen evtl. falschen Löschens usw. unflätig beschimpfen zu lassen, liegt mir nicht so. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Wie du meinst… Wenn man sich nicht gerade in den am meisten konfliktträchtigen Bereichen bewegt oder sonstwo willkürliche Entscheidungen trifft, hält sich das Beschimpft-Werden eigentlich in Grenzen. Falls du es dir mal anders überlegen solltest, kannst du dich ja melden. --Leyo 17:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Karte kongresspolen.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Lossless level increase (jpeg)

You just leveled a file losslessly. How did you do this? --McZusatz (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

http://www.betterjpeg.com/
I think level and color correction can not be completely lossless. But this tool doesn't introduce new visible artifacts. Even with high magnification, I could not discover new JPEG artifacts. --Ras67 (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, I was about to ask the same for File:Pedro_Rodriguez_Lomeli.jpg ("losslessly cropped and leveled"). Lossless operations can only be cropping, rotating, maybe mirroring or maybe moving around jpeg blocks. But nearly surely not color changes. Please do not name that "lossless" then. :-D --Saibo (Δ) 17:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Maybe the betterjpeg developers are very intelligent and figured out how to do simple color changes (ie. brightness) losslessly?... I actually have no clue cause I never tested this program. --McZusatz (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
That's just splitting hairs. Every processing of a picture causes a loss of information. BetterJPEG claims, that correction of brightness and correction of color is lossless. Even in the highest magnification in direct comparison there are no new artifacts. IMHO the tool works losslessly or almost losslessly. --Ras67 (talk) 20:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
You usually cannot see new artifacts with jpeg's best quality. But you can see them when you compare the pixel RGB values. That (comparision) is not possible here as the brightness is changed. However, nothing wrong with that, but I strongly think that is just near lossless (which is more than fine(!)). --Saibo (Δ) 01:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Alles klar soweit, ich brech mir hier fast einen ab auf Englisch, dabei sind wir hier alles Deutsche :-) Na ja, so kann es wenigstens jeder Interessierte verstehen, hoffe ich jedenfalls. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, war mir jetzt bei dir gar nicht so bewusst. :-D Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Dann hast Du die renitenten PDFs vom Okt./Nov. 2011 wahrscheinlich schon verdrängt:-) --Ras67 (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Ein kleiner Test ergab, dass das Programm allen Anschein nach verlustlos arbeitet. Ich habe eine Datei um "100%" heller gemacht und neu gespeichert und dann wieder um "100%" dunkler gemacht und neu gespeichert. Der Vergleich der ersten und letzten Datei ergab eine digitale 1:1 Kopie! Weiterhin lässt die Einschränkung in den Möglichkeiten der Verfärbung (Heller/Dunkler, Rot/Cyan und Gelb/Blau) auf einen verlustlosen Algorithmus schließen. --McZusatz (talk) 12:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Spannend, spanned (aber ein böses, weil kein Open Source, Programm)... ich habe kurz gegooglet, aber keine Infos darüber gefunden - vielleicht hat ja jemand mehr Muße, als ich gerade. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Deprecated License

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Tour de France - de Waele.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 18:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Vincent van Gogh 1889 The reaper (after Millet).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Antarctica

Hello, Ras67! I think you uploaded and/or edited these images File:Antarctic_Region.png & File:Antarctica.CIA.svg. On the enlarged section on the maps, exactly where it says "Arturo Prat (Chile)" on Livingston Island, would you be able to please add a note that the following countries also have scientific bases there : Bulgaria, Spain, USA/Chile, and Argentina (wikipedia:Livingston_Island#Scientific_bases). And, if possible, move the dot for Arturo Prat up to the small island just above, i.e. Greenwich island wikipedia:File:Greenwich-Island-location-map.png) If you cannot, don't worry! Thank you, you do a great job! BigSteve

First off, thanks for the compliments. But seriously, at first I've made a proposal with the SVG version. After your feedback I will also process the raster version. Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Seal of Meghalaya.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Just use the manual move-function, please and type .png (not jpg) as the extension. Thanks. -- RE rillke questions? 00:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp, hat geklappt. Hast Du meine vergeblichen Versuche, die Datei nach *.png umzubenennen irgendwie gesehen? Jedenfalls herzlichen Dank für die prompte Hilfe:-) --Ras67 (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Dad and Son..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Lossless crop

Can you do a lossless crop and nothing else for these images File:Albert Kunuiakea lying in state.jpg, File:View near the Town of Honoruru, Sandwich Islands from the Taro Patches.jpg, File:View near the Town of Honoruru, Sandwich Islands, 1826.jpg, File:Kaohimaunu, photograph by Christian Hedemann.jpg, File:Henry Obookiah, memoir illustration.jpg, File:Persis Goodale Thurston Taylor2.jpg, File:Theodore Dwight, by Trumbull.jpg, File:Photograph of Queen Kalama by Henry L. Chase.jpg, File:Photo of Kamehameha III (PP-97-7-003).jpg, File:Moemoe, the niece of the King of Rurutu.jpg.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi thanks for extracting the larger version on the images with Ratu Abel and Ratu Timothy. Could you upload these four images too, two here and two here.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Ras67 (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Can you help me extract the largest version of File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu.jpg from this copy of this book uploaded onto File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu (color).jpg? I haven't uploaded book images in while because my method usually is zooming into the highest resolution and copying my computer screen onto a word document and then clicking the image and saving it onto my desktop and I can't use this anymore because of my new computer won't let me extract a picture from microsoft. So I was wonder if you could extract the larger pdf version of the book, which has a link on the side, and download the larger image there? Please upload the original first, though, page numbers/outline and all onto File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu (color).jpg. And then afterward, could you crop File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu.jpg and File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu (color).jpg to there page margins only, retaining the margins which are vital for lithographs like these. Thank you, you have been a big help.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
How did you extract the larger original from File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu.jpg? I didn't even know it got any bigger.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
All Files: HTTP, download of vitiaccountofgov00seemrich_raw_jp2.zip and extraction of vitiaccountofgov00seemrich_raw_0010.jp2, best regards --Ras67 (talk) 03:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
How did you know which one to extract? And could you extract the largest version from File:Taufa'ahau Tupou I, King of Tonga, outside his palace in Neiafu, 1884.jpg and upload it, then extract these four version too 1, 2, 3, 4 (upload them all, for record keeping), and pick the best version to keep. Thank you, hope it isn't too complicated.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 10:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Could you extract the larger versions from File:Semi-formal outdoor portrait in front of the Tongan palace, 1884.jpg ‎ and File:Semi-formal outdoor portrait in front of the Tongan palace, 1884.jpg--KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Could you upload the cropped versions of File:Governor Tungi, during the Challenger Voyage, 1874.jpg, File:Amatabaulay, during the Challenger Voyage, 1874.jpg and File:Tongan seaman, during the Challenger Voyage, 1874.jpg from this without uploading the three portrait original. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Could you crop File:La reine Pomaré jouant aux cartes avec son mari. Engraving by Pierre Loti from the newspaper Le Monde illustré, 1877.jpg without taking away too much of the image? And do you know which is the best version on File:La Famille Royale de Tahiti, 1906.jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Barceloneta Girl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blue Fox xyz (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey Ras, you are still my favorite cropper :) Have you seen this Wikipedia category for images needing cropping? Things are going slow over there, your help would be appreciated! Thanks, jonkerz 13:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Liberty Launch Vehicle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uwe W. (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for cropping images

Thank you for cropping the EVA images I uploaded yesterday. I am always appreciative when someone makes the things I add to Commons even more useful. Thanks again!  :) Gildir (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:SpaceX Dragon splashdown west of Baja California, Mexico.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 10:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

La cour de la Reine Moé

Can you extract File:La cour de la Reine Moé. Une photographie presque centenaire1.jpg and File:La cour de la Reine Moé. Une photographie presque centenaire2.jpg from this source (the pdf file link is on the left)? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

PDF rotation

Hi Ras67, danke fürs Rotieren von File:Vista_terrazza_Hotel_Laurus.pdf - allerdings halte ich es für recht nutzlos. Das Bild sollte extrahiert werden und als jpg (mit höchster Q.) hochgeladen werden. PDF ist nicht erwünscht für Fotos. Mache ich, wenn da permission kommen sollte. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Ja, schon klar, aber da noch zwei ähnliche Bilder vorliegen wie Hotel Laurus view on duomo.jpg und Terrazza Hotel Laurus al Duomo.jpg wollte ich mir die Arbeit nicht machen. Die Bilddaten liegen leider im CMYK-Farbraum vor, die Konvertierung nach sRGB hat mich nicht überzeugt, man könnte es aber auch als (schrecklich aussehendes) CMYK-JPG hochladen. So long --Ras67 (talk) 23:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Danke für die Erklärung, na dann schaun wir mal, was überhaupt mit den Bildern passiert. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Dream Chaser and the International Space Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MilborneOne (talk) 18:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Jpegcrop auf Ubuntu

Danke erstmal für den crop. Jpegcrop läuft leider nur unter Windows und so oft bin ich da nicht mehr unterwegs, deshalb ist es für mich einfacher das Template zu setzen. Oder weißt du zufällig, ob es so etwas ähnliches auch für Ubuntu gibt? --McZusatz (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Hm, das ganze beruht ja auf Jpegtran bzw. libjpeg was an sich plattformunabhängig ist. Es scheint tatsächlich keine GUI für Jpegtran unter Linux zu geben, das einzige was ich gefunden habe, ist ein Pythonscript. Das heißt, du brauchst Python, Tkinter, python-imaging, python-imaging-tk und libjpeg. Ob das alles so mit Ubuntu funktioniert, weiß ich allerdings nicht. Wahrscheinlich ist es einfacher, Jpegcrop unter Wine laufen zu lassen. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Sry, hat sich erledigt. Eigentlich habe ich mir schon längst einen TUSC account gemacht und kann den Cropbot benutzen. Dass man sowas vergessen kann... --McZusatz (talk) 07:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Did you contact Sierra Nevada?

The file "Dream Chaser and the International Space Station.jpg" was deleted but in the deletion discussion you mentioned we should contact Sierra Nevada but I'm curious if that was ever done.--Craigboy (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

No, i didn't it, this should make somebody with better english knowledge ;) The contact seems to me here: http://www.sncorp.com/snc_contact.php with that email address: mailto:generalinfo@sncorp.com For illustration you can link to NASA's version of the picture.
Best regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Email has been sent, here's hoping for good news.--Craigboy (talk) 19:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

FYI, all BSicon files' geometry are described by their name, so any rotation of these files makes them incorrect. Please do not do this again. Useddenim (talk) 01:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse 2.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse 1.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse 1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Liloa and Lonoikamakahiki

Hi, could you upload the image on page 65 this pdf file? Upload the entire page and then crop it, call it File:Liloa and Lonoikamakahiki.jpg. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 18:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

U're welcome, please check the selected licence. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Can up help me extract the pdf file page of Page 111 and Page 112 from [this book] and make then into two image File:Procès-verbal de l'établissement du Protectorat de la France sur l'île Rurutu.jpg and File:Procès-verbal de l'établissement du Protectorat de la France sur l'île Rimatara et dépendances.jpg where the image is crop to center on the treaties.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Also could you extract three image from the pdf file on the google book from Le Tour du monde, Volumes 49-50 for pages 209, 211, and 213. Either this version or this version. Thank you very much.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Naturels des Tubuai. Dessin de E. Ronjat, d'après un croquis de l'auteur et des photographies.jpg

File:Ile Rurutu, la case du roi et le temple. Dessin de Taylor, d'après une photographie.jpg

File:Jeune fille de l'ile Rimatara. Dessin de E. Ronjat, d'après une photographie.jpg

Sorry I can nothing do. Your first request (Page 111 and Page 112) lacks the source, what PDF? On your second request I see only three rows of the page and can not find a PDF. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Oh for File:Procès-verbal de l'établissement du Protectorat de la France sur l'île Rurutu.jpg and File:Procès-verbal de l'établissement du Protectorat de la France sur l'île Rimatara et dépendances.jpg , I meant Annuaire des établissements français de l'Océanie pour 1892 for the PDF files versions of the book just click the little tool box and click download PDF; it is usually better quality than the plain text version on the digitized book. Like what you did for File:Ratu Vakaruru A Chief of Viti Levu (color).jpg--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
I can nothing download, probably you need a Google account, sry I will not file an account. --Ras67 (talk) 18:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Thamzing of Tibetan woman circa 1958.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.6.163.244 12:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Lahainaluna Mission Seminary illustration

Could you take either this version or this version and clean them up and upload it over File:Lahainaluna Mission Seminary illustration.jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome! I've cropped, rotated and gray scaled losslessly the second version. Then the brightness was increased. --Ras67 (talk) 00:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks. Can you do the same for these other images from A Residence of Twenty-one Years in the Sandwich Islands and the images from "Sandwich Island Notes".--KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Ras67. Danke für die Optimierung! Nur ne Frage: Hast du unten links absichtlich ein kleines Rechteck weiss belassen? --Leyo 21:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Bitte :-) und nein, das weiße Viereck unter Mg**–ADP war auch vorher schon vorhanden nur halt nicht so gut sichtbar wie jetzt. Das Viereck ist Vollweiß (RGB 255,255,255) während der transparent gesetzte Hintergrund ein Beinaheweiß (RGB 254,253,252) ist. Da ich einen evtl. Sinn nicht einschätzen konnte und es nicht übermäßig gestört hat, habe ich es einfach so gelassen. Ich kann es aber auch genausogut entfernen. Schöne Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Danke für die Erklärung! Einen besonderen Sinn hat das Rechteck mit Sicherheit nicht, sondern ist beim Zeichnen halt irgendwie entstanden. --Leyo 22:31, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Paleogeography of North America during the late Campanian Stage of the Late Cretaceous.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Laggar Falcon in Flight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laggar Falcon in Flight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Iran area.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iran area.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 23:00, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-06420-0009, Radrennfahrer, Mannschaft aus Triest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 22:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Ras67. Du entfernst ja öfter die Hintergrundfarbe. Wäre es bei dieser Grafik möglich, dabei auch gleich die Kompressionsartefakte zu reduzieren? --Leyo 20:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Ich hab' erst jetzt bemerkt, dass du's noch am gleichen Abend gemacht hast. Vielen Dank! --Leyo 00:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Ja bitte, diese Sachen gehen mittlerweile aus dem Handgelenk. :-) Ras67 (talk) 01:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Barceloneta Girl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Interessiert dich vielleicht: Ich habe eine neue Vorlage gemacht, um Videos mit Rändern in eine separate Kategorie einzusortieren. Grüße --McZusatz (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lymantria (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of Libya (1951) large crescent.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 05:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Bildbearbeitungen

Hallo Ras67, ich habe hier vor geraumer Weile um Nachbearbeitungen von Bildern gebeten, doch hat sich bisher keiner geregt, das ist verständlich, aber schade. Daher unterbreite ich dir die gleiche Bitte im Besonderen, weil ich weiß, dass du immer gute Arbeit leistest und hilfsbereit bist. Es geht um folgende Dateien:

Beschneiden (Rahmen entfernen)

Beschneiden (Rahmen nicht entfernen)

Vielen herzlichen Dank im Voraus und alles Gute im neuen Jahr!--Edelseider (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Danke und Bitte. Ich hab mich mal drangemacht, habe erst gar nicht den zweiten Hinweis gelesen. Beim letzten Bild muss aber der Rahmen komplett entfernt werden, da du ja wahrscheinlich nicht die Genehmigung des Fotografen hast. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 02:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Suuuper!!! --Edelseider (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Kazuo Ohno by Marco Tambara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Courcelles 01:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Londra 96 animals.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 23:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not upload over old versions

At my upload File:Wenceslas Hollar - Adrienne van Venne (State 1).jpg you uploaded a cropped version over the old version, removing some text from the original etching. Although I recognise that the cropped version is more useful for depicting van Venne, it is necessary to preserve the original version for other potential uses (e.g. for illustrating the works of Hollar). Please upload cropped versions like this under a separate filename in the future, as I have done at File:Wenceslas Hollar - Adrienne van Venne (State 1) - cropped.jpg using Special:Upload. See also the guideline Commons:Overwriting existing files. Thank you. Dcoetzee (talk) 10:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello
I see you have edited the file mentioned in the headline. There is an error on the map. The date is 1700 and the year before the Ottomans had surredered Ottoman Hungary and the Principality of Transylvania by the Treaty of Karlowitz. However, the map shows Ottoman Hungary as still controlled by the Ottomans. Could you please fix this error?
Thank you. 86.97.186.109 15:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

  • I try it, I've read the articles about it. Should the text "Hongrie ottomane" and the border to Hongrie will be deleted? And the resulting "Hongrie" painted completely yellow? Is the border between former "Hongrie ottomane" and "Empire Ottoman" correct? Is the striping of "Transylvanie" as 'sovereignty holder' correct? Regards --Ras67 (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello again
The text "Hongrie ottomane" and the border to Hongrie should be deleted. The resulting "Hongrie" should be painted completely yellow. As to the border between former "Hongrie ottomane" and "Empire Ottoman" being correct, I do not know. (It would probably be better to just leave it alone.) I am pretty sure that the striping of "Transylvanie" as 'sovereignty holder' is correct.
Note: I just created an account, so '86.97.186.109' is the same person as King Philip V of Spain (talk) 03:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for making the change. Furthermore, the border between 'Hongrie' and former 'Hongrie ottomane' should be deleted and the word 'Hongrie' should be placed in the center of the now combined lands. Also, Corsica ('Corse' on the map) was never controlled by the Habsburgs and therefore the red striping and the date should be removed from the island. The word 'Corse' would then be placed in the center of the island.
Regards, King Philip V of Spain (talk) 14:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Main pirs interior.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Main pirs interior.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dospolov dolda.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dospolov dolda.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Dospolov dolda.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

moogsi (blah) 03:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kostol svätého Juraja.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bandeira Mariana.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bandeira Mariana.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:HsinchuCity.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Akira123 (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Путешествия Марко Поло (1271-1295).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powers (talk) 22:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Almuqri.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Almuqri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Almuqri.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kmeleon59 (talk) 13:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Signatur des Fotografen

Hallo Ras67, leider hat dein Kollege hier beim Beschneiden vergessen, auch die Signatur des Fotografne zu entfernen. Könntest Du das bitte machen? Vielen Dank im Voraus, --Edelseider (talk) 07:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sensor1975.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sensor1975.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Progress 40P launch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Seal of the Government of Southern Sudan.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 09:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Shenzhou 9 mission patch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Shenzhou 7 mission patch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 01:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Shenzhou 6 mission patch.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 01:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Shenzhou 5 insignia.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 01:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk page archive

Please consider setting up a talk page archive, your talk page has grown to more than 120 KiB and adding notes takes an unusual long time. You'll find a quick instruction for an easy setup at User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup --Denniss (talk) 01:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vaychy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Shiela dixit with babaji.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

203.122.21.40 14:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fomalhaut planet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fomalhaut planet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Croppen und schicken

Lieber Ras67, die folgenden Dateien hast Du in der Vergangenheit bereits bearbeitet, nun habe ich aber bessere Fassungen hochgeladen, die nun wiederum beschnitten werden müssten. Vielen herzlichen Dank im Voraus, --Edelseider (talk) 10:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Und diese Dateien sollten ebenfalls gecroppt werden, wenn es geht:

Danke, danke, danke!!! --Edelseider (talk) 10:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Hab das ganze jetzt bearbeitet, leider haben die Originale doch teilweise sehr gravierende Mängel. Die Grundschärfe ist recht niedrig trotz hoher Auflösung und die Blitzreflektionen zerstören teilweise ganze Bildbereiche. Das Rauschen des Kamerasensors tut sein übriges. Allerdings trat nirgendswo die sonst typische Tonnenverzerrung auf, hat das Sonys Picture Motion Browser schon korrigiert oder liefert die Kameraoptik schon geometrisch saubere Bilder? Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Ouh, damit bin ich jetzt technisch überfragt. Das Einzige, das ich mit Gewissheit sagen kann, ist, dass ich nirgends geblitzt habe, da es in allen Museen verboten war. Hier liegt eher eine unglückliche Kombination von Scheiben, Strahlern und, in manchen Fällen, Sonnenlicht vor. Jedenfalls vielen Dank für deine großartige Arbeit, und beste Grüße. Edelseider (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Tigger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Nsk skyline new.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)



català | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | עברית | svenska | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear Ras67,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Public Art team
Wiki Loves Public Art logo

[Automatische copyvionote enfernt] Von Dir editiert ("cropped/watermark removed"), war aber geklaut. Gunnex (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you do something for File:John K. Sumner.jpg and File:John Sumner Ellis.jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Ras67 (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you help me clean and crop this image en:File:David Kalakaua Kawananakoa, 1937.jpg? I think it might needed to be minimize to fit the criteria of non-free images so could you do that after you do the initial clean up and crop on the original image? Also if you can look at en:Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop#Wilcox fair use photos. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 13:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you remove the black border around en:File:David Kalakaua Kawananakoa, 1937.jpg? Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Nevermimd,--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

cropped and watermark removed

There is nothing special with cropping of PNG images, but which software do you use for JPEG? Surely do you not repeat the blunder of user:January? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Normally I use Jpegcrop for lossless cropping if it is suitable. Due to the limitations of lossless cropping (8 or 16 pixel restriction left and above) I use Photoshop with high quality saving setting on images with valuable information within the 8 or 16 pixel lane.
By the way if you crop a PNG image with an ICC color profile other than sRGB with software which ignore this profile you change the colors of the picture since MediaWiki and the most browsers support color profiles. Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Benjamin Franklin Keolaokalani Pitman.jpg

Could you clean this? I think a larger version can be extracted.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Same for File:Auwae Noa Kepoikai.jpg, File:Alfred S. Hartwell (Hawaiian Gazette).jpg, File:George Charles Mooheau Beckley.jpg, File:Maria Beckley Kahea.jpg and File:Liliuokalani receiving Red Cross card, 1917.jpg.
Could you improve these too?Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you crop and clean File:Charles Nicholas Spencer (Hawaiian Gazette).jpg and File:Charles T. Gulick (Hawaiian Gazette).jpg? You might want to use the original JP2 file.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 09:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Bornholm in Europe.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Barnstar of Diligence
To keeping these animals 'border free'. :-) Praveen:talk 01:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your hard work in cropping images. I really appreciate it. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
File:أحمد مطر.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Help with video edit

Hi Ras, I've been trying find someone who can slit off part of this newsreel video: File:1958-02-03 First US Satellite Launched.ogv to just show the portion from 1:50 ("Egypt and Syria form United Arab Republic") for wikipedia's article on Gamal Abdel Nasser. I was told you might be able to help with this kind of thing. If you are able to do so and have the time, I would greatly appreciate it. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome, i have created the new film Egypt, Syria Merge In New Arab Republic.webm from it's original MPEG2 source in high quality. --Ras67 (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! --Al Ameer son (talk) 05:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
File:STATION hengelo gezondheidspark.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liamdavies (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Station hengelo gezondehidspark overzichtskaart.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liamdavies (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Col de vergio01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Myrabella (talk) 13:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Mala currant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Resolution 36-1975 of the Cyprus House of Representatives, recognising the Armenian Genocide.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Resolution 36-1975 of the Cyprus House of Representatives, recognising the Armenian Genocide.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 23:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Chaes cz 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

File:German warship in Apia Harbour 1900s, photo AJ Tattersall Timeframes NZ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Parsecboy (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, High Contrast (talk) 12:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Butterfly by N A Nazeer.jpg

Hi, could you crop this image like other ones?--Praveen:talk 16:25, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you :-) --Praveen:talk 02:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello & question

Great work! I too love astronomy, manned spaceflight, and old images of aristocrats and royalty in pretty clothes.  :) I appreciate the editing work you've done on some of the Bain photos.

I was wondering why you had marked File:Princess Alix of Hesse 1894.jpg with the Copyright claims template. Has the Royal Collection made a copyright claim against Wikimedia? I am only aware of the NPG claim, and as far as I know that applies only to the set of images that a specific user uploaded by bot in 2009. In other words, it is not necessary to put the notice on images (even those from NPG) that weren't uploaded by that person at that time. I have never seen the Copyright claims template on other images from the Royal Collection. Laura1822 (talk) 23:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your appreciation and question. I have done this of caution. Indeed Royal Collection claims nothing directly to Commons but it says everywhere "Royal Collection © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II". The sweat of the brow doctrine could be applied in England, the location of the pictures and so a warning is reasonable. The fact, that a warning template without NPG exists, is a confirmation for me. Of course you can present this to the copyright specialists on Commons. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I understand your feeling of wanting to act with an overabundance of caution, just in case; it's perfectly reasonable. I'm not sure where the copyright specialists on Commons are, but I used to be one myself, and here's what I think: the warning template says "one or more third parties have made copyright claims against Wikimedia Commons in relation to the work from which this is sourced or a purely mechanical reproduction thereof." There are probably some others besides the NPG claim, but the template doesn't say that someone might make a claim in the future, or that the possibility of a claim might exist. It says a claim has been made about this specific image. This means a formal complaint. So if the RC hasn't made, much less pursued, any allegations against Commons, the template does not apply. I am unaware of a warning template that allows for the possibility of a future claim. If one exists, then it might apply here, but I would argue that it is unnecessary, and if such a template doesn't exist, that suggests that Commons also deems it unnecessary.
The copyright notices are very clear that the image is PD in the US and in other countries where the law is similar. It is up to a copyright holder to pursue the allegation that a copyright is being violated, and one can lose a copyright claim through failing to pursue it. Furthermore, the law for decades in both the US and the EU is that copyright notices are irrelevant: they do not convey protection by their presence, nor does their absence preclude it.
The copyright notices such as {{PD-old-100}} (or -90, -80, etc.) and {{PD-1923}} for photographs and {{PD-art-100}} in the case of images of paintings, are sufficient. {{PD-old}} is deprecated in favor of more specific sub-templates. You might want to review Commons:Copyright tags as well. Warm regards, Laura1822 (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Male nude pose.Man and Steel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Male nude pose.Man and Steel.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Wissekerke (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Male nude pose.Man and Steel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Male nude pose.Man and Steel.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Wissekerke (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

Dear Ras67,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

File:Habsbourg-1700.png

Hello
I just wanted to let you know about something I think should be shown in this map. In the English derivative of the file (File:Habsburg dominions 1700.png), Switzerland is correctly shown to have gained independence in 1648. Could you include that in this file?
Thanks King Philip V of Spain (talk) 06:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate El Grafo (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 15:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate St1995 18:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

The outdated EU location files (with only 27 members) have been replaced by the vector version showing the present situation. The vector versions shall be used from now onwards. David Liuzzo (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 12:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate russavia (talk) 00:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you've added a small exclave of West Thrace into north Macedonia, which is different from the old versions and other maps. Is this data correct? If it is, then I could change the derivative maps accordingly. If you could name the source for the borders, that would be great. ~ Nelg (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bulgaria after Treatry of Neuilly-sur-Seine.png is where I obtained that information. Sorry for the confusion, also that 1923 should be 1919. —Spesh531, My talk, and External links 02:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate odder (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate russavia (talk) 19:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 03:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Martin H. (talk) 05:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 199.36.124.142 21:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Template:Autotranslate Huntster (t @ c) 23:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

HRR

Hello. If you have, please, can you send me empty (no text) version of this picture? Here's my E-mail: eternal.laka@gmail.com. Thanks in advance--SHOTHA (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Sealle (talk) 06:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Image cropping

I highly disagree that "white border and the caption belong not in the picture". Images uploaded to commons are not used just as illustrations of articles, but there are actually people who downloading these images to their computers and who using them for other purposes. Therefore, I make maps which will achieve certain standards of easthetics and which will be useful for various purposes. But, let alone my map for a momment, I also noticed what you done with this file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caffa_and_Theodoro.PNG What you done with it is increadibly bad because you removed two very important things: map info and image background. Here is why these two things are important: without info which you removed one who download that file into his computer will not know later that this map shows situation in the 15th century. Second thing: without white background map downloaded into computer will appear with dark background, letters currently written on that background will be fully unreadable, and so if one who downloads it into his computer want to have this map useful, he would have to import it into Photoshop, to recreate its white background, and then to save this file into computer again. I totally hate when I download some file with transparent background or without proper description because instead just simply hitting "Save" button, I am forced to "improve" such files in Photoshop to make them useful. Therefore, I see only trouble when useful file like this one is changed and left without useful description and background. Why you doing that anyway? Is there any benefit from such file change? Or to be more precise, if we examine one of the articles where this map is used, I see no difference for this article if any of the two map versions is used in it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feodosia However, there is huge difference if one downloads this map into his computer and map version uploaded by you is the one with error. PANONIAN (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Could you crop away the red part and straighten it keeping postcard intact? Thank you. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 09:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Could you also create an oval crop of just the queen?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)--KAVEBEAR (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralgis (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 13:51, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Deine Nominating for deletion

Hallo. Du hast heute morgen 2 Dateien zum Löschen vorgeschlagen (File:โต๊ะจีนตับ.jpg‎ und File:โต๊ะจีนไหว้ตับ.jpg‎). Wie hast Du die Bilder eigentlich im Netz gefunden? Ich frage deshalb, weil ich gestern mehrere Dateien mit ähnlichem Dateinamen kategorisiert habe (sieh mal meine Contributions). Möglicherweise sind ja da auch Löschkandidaten dabei? Einen tollen Beitrag zu Commons stellen die jedenfalls nicht dar. --hdamm (talk) 08:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Tja, das ist eigentlich ganz einfach, die Google Bildersuche ist ein sehr mächtiges Tool. Ich habe alle Thaifood-Bilder zum Löschen markiert. Falls ich eins übersehen habe, weißt Du ja jetzt, wie es geht:-) --Ras67 (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

ˑDanke. --hdamm (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Gunnex (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Vensatry (Ping me) 17:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Egghead06 (talk) 07:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Underlying lk (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:AutotranslateRP88 22:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate Edkaprov (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Edkaprov (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Leyo 00:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate    FDMS  4    14:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate McZusatz ([[User talk:McZusatz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Kroppmeister gefragt

Hallo Ras67, ich bin mal wieder im Internet fündig geworden: Category:Cycle de Saint Louis (Martin Feuerstein). Ich danke dir für deine losless Bearbeitung mit jpegcrop und wünsche dir einen schönen Tag! --Edelseider ([[User talk:Edelseider|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

PS: Bei genauerem Hinsehen fällt mir gerade auf, dass die Goldrahmen bloß gemalt und daher auch zweidimensional sind! Eigentlich sollte man lediglich die Schrift herausschneiden. Oder ist das urheberrechtlich gar nicht nötig? --Edelseider ([[User talk:Edelseider|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Das scheint tatsächlich wie auf die Wand gemalt und 2D zu sein. Wenn man den Text zum Bild gehörig betrachtet, sehe ich hier keine Probleme. Vielleicht sollte man noch jmd. anderen zu diesem Spezialfall befragen. Viele Grüße --Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:56, 14 July 2016 (UTC)