User talk:Rachmat04/Archive/2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Regards, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Deli Serdang site visit by Wikimedia Indonesia; January 2020 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not that high resolution, but good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 11:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baitul Makmur Ateuk Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Deli Serdang.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ariella Calista Ichwan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mutiara Azzahra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Logo of Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic of Indonesia.svg

File:Logo of Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic of Indonesia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moeno Sumida.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silek Lanyah 2020 - Two men performing martial art in a stream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Kualitas bagus. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Learn to Dance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice but it needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 21:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Nice but the categories are too generic --Poco a poco 21:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 Comment - I agree. this is a great photo, a possible Featured Picture, especially if you have a larger full-size version you can upload instead, but you need some category of dance and dance instruction. For example, there's a Category:Dancers from Bali. -- Ikan Kekek 00:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done adding category as suggested. --Rachmat04 07:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Terima kasih.  Support. You might add some category related to children. I would vote for this at FPC, even if this is full size. -- Ikan Kekek 08:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anak Daro Ketek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanjidor, by M Jeffry Hanafiah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tari Tenun Nyoman Hendra Adhi Wibowo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MYF00859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressive image, very good quality but poor file name -- Spurzem 15:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 Comment Saya bersetuju dengan Spurzem. Selepas gambar ini jadi Gambar Kualitas, sila tukarkan namanya untuk mengguna nama yang menerangkan apa yang orang lihat. Nanti boleh mencalonkannya sebagai Gambar Istimewa (Featured Picture). -- Ikan Kekek 22:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear everyone! Suggestion taken. I will do the renaming once this process is done. Have a nice day! --Rachmat04 03:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 Comment - I thought this was promoted. If it's not promoted and goes to CR, I will support. -- Ikan Kekek 04:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malumbo Padi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silek Lanyah Kubu Gadang, Minangkabau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Very bright daylight but good quality to me in the depiction of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek 07:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pertunjukan Wayang Kulit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality. For people who don't know what wayang kulit is: It's a shadow play. The dalang is the puppet-master who manipulates the puppets and speaks in the voices, traditionally, of characters from the Ramayana who are represented by most of the puppets. Most of the area behind the screen is dark - it has to be, because the audience on the other side of the screen should see only the puppets that are relevant to each scene, and it's only because light is shined through those characters, which are put close to the screen, that they see them. Therefore, it would be unreasonable for any of the dark areas in the photo to be any brighter. -- Ikan Kekek 03:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Proposed flag of State of Triangulo.svg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Proposed flag of State of Triangulo.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ixocactus (talk) 22:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girl Cirebon Mask Dance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

File:UNMSM escudo XVI-XXI transparente nombre vertical.svg.png

File:UNMSM escudo XVI-XXI transparente nombre vertical.svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rujomar (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Pacu Jawi in Tanah Datar.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pacu Jawi in Tanah Datar.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, GammaThetaMu (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Detective Conan character manhole cover in Hokuei, Tottori; August 2013.jpg

File:Detective Conan character manhole cover in Hokuei, Tottori; August 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banyuwangi Ethno Carnival.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, an English description would be appreciated. --Trougnouf 13:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Shibuya crossing, Tokyo; May 2018.jpg

Copyright status: File:Shibuya crossing, Tokyo; May 2018.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shibuya crossing, Tokyo; May 2018.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Mdaniels5757. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pendet Dance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Wikimania 2019 di Stockholm, Swedia, hari ketiga; 18 Agustus 2019 (07).jpg

File:Wikimania 2019 di Stockholm, Swedia, hari ketiga; 18 Agustus 2019 (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pekarangan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baiturrahim Mosque, Tanoh Mirah.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kajhu Grand Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamrabo Great Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sabili Jannah Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Ikhlas Grand Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Ikhlas Grand Mosque domes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pante Baro Grand Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Istiqamah Grand Mosque dome.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Ganti gambar

Bung Rachmat, tempat permohonan untuk mengganti gambar secara global itu di mana, ya? Labdajiwa (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Labdajiwa: Maksudnya mengubah nama berkas? Coba ikuti langkah berikut ya: Commons:File renaming#How to rename a file. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
@Rachmat04: Bukan mengubah nama berkas, tetapi mengganti File:I3 window manager logo.png yang telah digunakan di beberapa wiki dan menggantinya dengan File:I3 window manager logo.svg. Labdajiwa (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
@Labdajiwa: Oh begitu. Coba gunakan aplikasi ini: Commons:GlobalReplace. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarian Gandrung sewu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 Question Rachmat04, is that a physical sign or a watermark on the upper right? -- Ikan Kekek 23:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 Comment
It's a physical sign. Here's a picture at the same location from a different angle that shows part of that same sign --ReneeWrites 00:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Nabila Razali

Hello Rachmat, since you have been created article of Nabila Razali at Indonesian Wikipedia recently, why not you find her photos either at Flickr or YouTube to beautify her Wikipedia pages. Thank you.–Fandi89 (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

@Fandi89: Hello! Yes, I have tried my best to find one on Flickr, but all images there are copyrighted and not licensed in free license, so I cannot upload it to Commons. I haven't found one in YouTube yet. Thanks, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kanda-myojin, Chiyoda; January 2014 (09).jpg

File:Kanda-myojin, Chiyoda; January 2014 (09).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Edo-Tokyo Museum, Tokyo; July 2016 (25).jpg

File:Edo-Tokyo Museum, Tokyo; July 2016 (25).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruwatan rambut gimbal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add an English description. --Ermell 19:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 03:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
The description is still not available in English. There is no reason to promote the picture. --Ermell 19:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
English description added. --Rachmat04 05:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thanks --Ermell 21:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gandrung banyuwangi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add an English description. --Ermell 19:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
English description added. --Rachmat04 05:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thank you --Ermell 21:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawanan Rusa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusa jantan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sri Mahamariamman Temple, Kuala Lumpur. Dancing Shiva scene. Statues. 2019-12-07 17-23-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Sharpness on the low side, but a funny scene, nice colours. --Palauenc05 17:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sri Mahamariamman Temple, Kuala Lumpur. Sri Durgai Amman sanctuary. 2019-12-07 17-27-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sri Mahamariamman Temple, Kuala Lumpur. Altar for offerings. 2019-12-07 17-19-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Osaka Castle Park, Osaka Prefecture; April 2014 (02).jpg

File:Osaka Castle Park, Osaka Prefecture; April 2014 (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Murals at Kensington Market, Toronto; September 2019.jpg

File:Murals at Kensington Market, Toronto; September 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
At-Taqwa Mosque, Pante Gajah, east exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
At-Taqwa Mosque, Pante Gajah, dome.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Mabrur Mosque, east exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Shinkong Life Tower looking up.jpg

How meaningless or ambiguous name? As for me, the building on the left is partially covered by tree so it's difficult to see all. The skyscraper in the middle of the picture show "Shin Kong Life Tower", but I can't see what means "Shin Kong Life Tower top 20180419".--Kai3952 (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

@Kai3952: Hello! I processed the renaming based on the request. If you find the new name is not what you expected (especially that is the file you uploaded), feel free to request for renaming, and I'm happy to do so if appropriate. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Honestly, this is a reactive approach and does not help solve the problem ahead of time. If you notify me beforehand that you were going to be renaming, then I can stop you in time and tell you what to do. This the attitude I expected all users to have when we face a file that needs to be renamed. Also, I know you have file mover rights, but I have high expectations for those with the rights, so I think that file renaming requires good judgment to avoid unnecessary actions. Anyways, I'm not blaming you for nothing, just saying it's hopeless. I have no control over what you do. As for me, all photos uploaded from flickr are named by the content shown in the photo, so your renaming for the file uploaded for mine implys that I've problems with my eyes. My eyes are blind or my brain is dumb, what am I supposed to see?--Kai3952 (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:A girl set fire to cook breakfast by using a coal-filled clay pot; July 2014.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A girl set fire to cook breakfast by using a coal-filled clay pot; July 2014.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Boneka rajut di Kawagoe, Saitama; Mei 2008.jpg

File:Boneka rajut di Kawagoe, Saitama; Mei 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

File:A girl wearing socks; September 2014 (06).jpg

File:A girl wearing socks; September 2014 (06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Logo of Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic of Indonesia.svg

Halo!

Bro tentang logo Kemendikbud harus dibenerin dah. Gak sesuai dah dengan yang saya baca di Informasi tentang logo kemdikbud. Jadi kalau kau nanya “Kenapa gak minta di a b c aja?”, kan kau yang Upload. Setidaknya di benerin lah. :)

Fahriahmad306 (talk)

@Fahriahmad306: Saya mengambil raw file-nya dari situs Kemdikbud pada saat itu (tercantum pada bagian Source, dan sepertinya saya yakin tidak mengubah pewarnaannya pada saat melakukan pengubahan ke SVG. Karena saya yakini demikian, bisakah Anda memeriksanya sendiri? Selain itu, skala warnanya pada bagian deskripsi bukan saya yang menambahkan, barangkali Anda dapat memastikan pada pengguna yang menambahkan hal itu. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
@Rachmat04: kemungkinan saat anda mengubah format gambar dari .ai ke .svg kemungkinan terjadi kesalahan? Karena disitu tertulis pasal dimana warna Biru dan Kuning itu agak cerah (barang kali sampeyan mau lihat). Atau mungkin kali anda bisa ubah PDF ke SVG? (Soalnya saya gak bisa main file .ai,.pdf,.svg :V). Fahriahmad306 (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
@Fahriahmad306: ✓ Done oleh Mrmw. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rachmat04/Archive/2020&oldid=524186986"