User talk:Pusleogpixi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pusleogpixi!
Pay attention to copyright
File:Karup Lufthavn Logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-- Nico-dk (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Pusleogpixi!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: Mass upload of copyright violations.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

|EPO| da: 15:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Midttrafik plakat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plakater er omfatter af ophavsret og må ikke uploades uden ophavshaverens tilladelse. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sletning[edit]

Det er ilde set at slette diskussioner fra brugerdiskussionsside, uanset hvad de drejer sig om. Jeg har derfor gendannet ovenstående om Midttrafik-plakaten. Læs i øvrigt da:Wikipedia:Normer for brugersider for de danske regler på området. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Viborg Amt udsnit.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ligeledes er File:Urfuglen frederiks.jpg og File:Byskilt Frederiks.jpg også afledte værker. Da du tidligere har udvist stor mangel på forståelse for ophavsretten, bliver du nu blokeret i endnu en uge. --|EPO| da: 10:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hvad er afledte værker... når jeg nu selv har taget de billeder... et byskilt fra Frederiks ??? Svar udbedes !!! (skrev user:Pusleogpixi)

Afledte værker er blandt andet billeder af alle former for ting, andre har ophavsret til: malerier, plakater, skilte med mere end blot tekst, kort osv. Man skal have de respektive ophavsmænds tilladelse for at uploade dem, og de skal vel at mærke være indforståede med, at det sker med mulighed for fri redigering og kopiering. F.eks. skal en maler (eller evt. arvingerne hvis vedkommende er død indenfor de sidste 70 år) give tilladelse, før man må uploade et billede af et maleri, vedkommende har lavet, også selvom maleriet er fotografens ejendom.
Jeg vil opfordre dig til at benytte din blokeringsperiode til at læse den danske ophavsretslov, så sådanne sager kan undgås for fremtiden. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 22:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christina_Pedersen2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Christina_Pedersen2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JDavid (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Hvad er problemet! - det er mig der har taget billedet. Se alle de andre jeg har uploadet! --Pusleogpixi (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christina_Pedersen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JDavid (talk) 00:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Hvad er problemet! - det er mig der har taget billedet. Se alle de andre jeg har uploadet! --Pusleogpixi (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do not want more problems with commons. If you can not accept the pictures I take and upload, without all your weird bureaucracy, please delete ALL of them I've put up ... so I did not bother to contribute to the commons more and so I prefer all the permissions back! Simply!

Author is Lars Schmidt not Pusleogpixi and Pixi Uno, so special permission should be sent. Everything is written above. JDavid (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am Lars Schmidt!!! If you can not accept this, please delete ALL the pictures I've uploaded ... so I will no longer spend my time taking pictures to commons, to the delight of many! --Pusleogpixi (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But why does information be not written anywhere (here or Danish Wikipedia)? And your last name (Lars Schmidt) is not linked to you User:Pusleogpixi. If there is any doubts ... In all cases the uploader must [..] demonstrate either that the file [..] the copyright owner has released. Remember. JDavid (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because I do not want my full name mentioned on Wikipedia ... we have had unfortunate incidents in Danish Wikipedia where admins have been harassed, that's why! If you look at my history on da-wiki, you will discover that it was deleted in 2009 when my name was on the profile at the beginning! If you still think I should write my full name, please delete ALL images I've uploaded! NOW! - and then you can delete my profile here on Commons! Thanks! --Pusleogpixi (talk) 01:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Before marking file I've checked [1]. I don't have permission to look in your deleted history in Danish Wikipedia to see your full name. If there is no sign that Pusleogpixi is Lars Schmidt, you shouldn't be surprised, that somebody can think that Pusleogpixi has taken files from Lars Schmidt without permission. Please think logically. If you present your full name in Commons, but you don't want present it in Danish Wikipedia, I think is really strange because is so simply to track and find that something connect you by harassing people. However please link nickname to full name and there will be no problem in the future. Thank You. JDavid (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There have been no problems before you saw the 2 pictures with Christina Pedersen ... Why have others not marked at all the other pictures I've uploaded - just a few minutes before? I think logically, but I am also thinking that I would not bothered because my full name is listed under my "profile name". What will be the end of it here? Should I write my full name, or delete all the pictures I have uploaded, incl. my profile? You can accept images as they are now, or you can begin to erase ALL! NOW! --Pusleogpixi (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]