User talk:Pudelek/Archive10

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Königstein - Magdalenenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Königstein (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Königstein (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohnstein, Saxony (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Festung Königstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Königstein - Georgenbatterie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxon Switzerland - view from Festung Königstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polish-Saxony CoA in Festung Königstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fields near Festung Königstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Děčín (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Děčín (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Děčín - Dlouhá jízda (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Děčín - Dlouhá jízda (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Elbe in Saxon Switzerland.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elbe in Saxon Switzerland.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Děčín (Tetschen), Czech Republic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Děčín - Dlouhá jízda (by Pudelek) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Děčín (Tetschen) - Rose Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Děčín (by Pudelek) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for a late afternoon light image. --Hubertl 17:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Šaunštejn (Schauenstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sokolí hnízdo (Falkennest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 18:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pravčická brána (Prebischtor) - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice hole... Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holy Cross Church, Bad Kreuznach - stained glass window.JPG[edit]

File:Holy Cross Church, Bad Kreuznach - stained glass window.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Code (talk) 04:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chișinău - Memorial complex Eternitate. Soldier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]

Hallo Pudelek!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sighetu Marmației (Máramarossziget) - Strada Tudor Vladimirescu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 04:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chișinău - Memorial complex Eternitate (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 04:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chișinău - Memorial complex Eternitate (by Pudelek) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciuflea Monastery, Chișinău - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, would be even better without the people :) --Tsungam 14:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyírbátor - Greek Catholic Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chișinău - Memorial complex Eternitate (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Romania - landscape near Iași.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK. --C messier 11:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krásná Lípa (Schönlinde) - Masarykova ulice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benešov nad Ploučnicí (Beneschau) - Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seifhennersdorf - Denkmal für die Gefallenen des Ersten Weltkrieges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rumburk (Rumburg) - Lužické náměstí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kladovo - Dijana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kladovo - Dijana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kladovo - Dijana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fetislam, Kladovo (СК 287).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fetislam, Kladovo (СК 284).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fetislam, Kladovo (СК 285).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:31, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fetislam, Kladovo (СК 286).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 11:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hřensko (Herrnskretschen) - shop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krásná Lípa (Schönlinde) - cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krásná Lípa (Schönlinde) - cemetery (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krásná Lípa (Schönlinde) - socha lva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kladovo - Dijana 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial complex Eternitate, Chișinău, Moldova.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zalesie Śląskie (Salesche, Gross Walden) - banhow 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Grains of dust should be removed, please! Elsewhere good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zalesie Śląskie (Salesche, Gross Walden) - banhow 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. Spots (birds) in the sky should be removed. --Rbrechko 11:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hřensko (Herrnskretschen) - hotel Lipa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to use your pictures on my post about Prague[edit]

I have used your pictures:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kostnice_Sedlec.JPG and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sedlec_Ossuary_-_the_Schwarzenberg_coat-of-arms.jpg

on my post about Prague (http://www.millennial-revolution.com/freedom/lets-go-exploring-prague-castles-peacocks-and-human-skulls). As you requested, I've specified your name as the photographer and linked to the wikipedia page. Hope that's okay! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.20.117.42 (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using you Photo[edit]

Hello, I use your photo on http://www.laender-reisen.de/europa/estland-reisen/besonderheiten-von-estland.htm is that o.k.?

Thank you very much and best regards Peter

email@boedeker.de — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:DE:1BD8:699F:C04E:31C2:47:7FDF (talk) 12:50, 01 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regietów Wyżny (Рeґєтiв) - dzwonnica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regietów Wyżny (Рeґєтiв) - dzwonnica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zalesie Śląskie (Salesche, Gross Walden) - banhow 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer[edit]

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaworzyna Konieczniańska (Javorina), Beskid Niski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regietów Wyżny (Рeґєтiв) - czasownia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regietów Wyżny (Рeґєтiв) - stary cmentarz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady, Połonina Caryńska in the evening 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zyndranowa (Зиндранова) - orthodox church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NEON in Wrocław (Breslau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vier-Kuppel-Pavillon (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard near Tokaj, Hungary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady, Połonina Caryńska in the evening 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Báthory várkastély, Nyírbátor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyard near Tokaj, Hungary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barania Góra - observation tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower in Nyírbátor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bieszczady, Połonina Caryńska in the evening 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bieszczady, Połonina Caryńska in the evening 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)[edit]

		*** * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * ***
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Condrița monastery, Moldova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barania Góra - view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo, nice winter weather.--ArildV 13:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Pudelek, if you crop out just a little bit on the bottom of the picture frame to eliminate the stray portion of a slanted branch on the left, I think this photo could be featurable. I can't help hearing the song "Winter Wonderland" in my mind's ear while looking at this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 15:36, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Info Ok, I cropped photo --Pudelek 21:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I would surely vote to feature this photo if it were nominated at COM:FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 08:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coconilor church of John the Baptist in Suceava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bílý Kříž (Weisses Kreuze) - former "Berghotel".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Barania Góra - observation tower.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barania Góra - observation tower.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suceava fortress (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 22:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Humor Monastery, Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mănăstirea Humorului - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Humor Monastery, Romania - church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Demetrius Church in Suceava - inscription.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Barania Góra - view from tower.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barania Góra - view from tower.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fields near Suceava, Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iași - the Metropolitanate of Moldavia and Bukovina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iași - Saint Nicholas Princely Church and Dosoftei House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road R1 in Republic of Moldova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity Cathedral, Chișinău.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciuflea Monastery, Chișinău (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciuflea Monastery, Chișinău.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciuflea Monastery, Chișinău - shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chișinău - Memorial complex Eternitate (by Pudelek) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. -- Ikan Kekek 20:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Regietów Wyżny (Рeґєтiв) - dzwonnica 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regietów Wyżny (Рeґєтiв) - dzwonnica 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lakes near Chișinău, Moldova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:10, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moldova - landscape in Hîncești District 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moldova - landscape in Hîncești District 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hâncu monastery - iconostas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hâncu monastery, Moldova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World War II memorial near Leușeni, Moldova 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Râşnov (Barcarozsnyó, Rosenau) - market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Râşnov (Barcarozsnyó, Rosenau) - view from castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Râşnov (Barcarozsnyó, Rosenau) - view from castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Râşnov (Barcarozsnyó, Rosenau) - view from castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified church in Codlea (Feketehalom, Zeiden) - WWI memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified church in Codlea (Feketehalom, Zeiden).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Câlnic (Kelling, Kelnek) - main street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Făgăraș Citadel (Fogaras Vár).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - Orthodox cathedral bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - Roman Catholic Cathedral (interior) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - Roman Catholic Cathedral (interior).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

File:Tirana - Ministry of Public Works, Transportation and Telecommunications.JPG Taivo (talk) 09:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - Orthodox Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you remove the spot on the left of the towers (bird?)? --Basotxerri 19:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info Done :) -Pudelek 09:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK now, thank you. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - churches in fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - Orthodox Cathedral (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Râşnov Citadel (Rosenauer Burg) 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - fortress (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - fortress (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba Iulia (Gyulafehérvár, Karlsburg) - University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Câlnic (Kelling) Citadel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sibiu (Hermannstadt, Nagyszeben) - City Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sibiu (Hermannstadt, Nagyszeben) - Holy Trinity Metropolitan Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hunedoara Castle (Vajdahunyadi vár) by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. There are so many strange angles on this castle that judging the perspective seems impossible, but I can't see any big signs of distortion. --Peulle 22:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sibiu (Hermannstadt, Nagyszeben) - Large Square (Piața Mare, Großer Ring).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxon Church in Grossau (Chrisian).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments With a little more room on the left for the remainder of the tree branches, it would be even better, but it's a solid QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutheran church in Miercurea Sibiului (Reußmarkt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa (by Pudelek) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa (by Pudelek) - artefacts 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa (by Pudelek) - artefacts 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danube near Brza Palanka (Брза Паланка) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 20:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drobeta Turnu Severin - view from Kladovo fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron Gate (Serbia-Romania) in 2016 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ArildV 14:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View to Iron Gate, Danube.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 15:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron Gate (Serbia-Romania) in 2016 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron Gate (Serbia-Romania) in 2016 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hunedoara Castle (Vajdahunyadi vár) by Pudelek.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hunedoara Castle (Vajdahunyadi vár) by Pudelek.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tugboat "Saturn" in Ram, Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 11:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferry Ram-Stara Palanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal Danube-Tisa-Danube near Stara Polanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danube near Brza Palanka (Брза Паланка) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Immediately struck me on this page. Lovely light and colors. -- Ikan Kekek 18:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boka (Bóka) - catholic church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI but a bit bright -- Spurzem 18:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tihany-Szántód ferry (Kossuth Lajos).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Rodrigo.Argenton 15:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Połonina Caryńska in the evening 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Połonina Caryńska in the evening 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tirana - The Ministry of Defence and MAFCP.jpg[edit]

File:Tirana - The Ministry of Defence and MAFCP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ksamil - church.JPG[edit]

File:Ksamil - church.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tanks for your photo of Traffic in Oslo (E18 Bjørvika)[edit]

Hello, Pudelek:

I used your photo traffic in Oslo for un academic work, thank you very much.

Sincerely. Sira. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.45.202.222 (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienna - Stadtpark and Wien river 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienna - Stadtpark and Wien river 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dział, Bieszczady.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress Maria Theresia monument in Vienna 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress Maria Theresia monument in Vienna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress Maria Theresia monument in Vienna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress Maria Theresia monument in Vienna 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum Wien - statues "Europa".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum Wien - statues "America and Australia".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Połonina Caryńska in the evening 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Połonina Caryńska in the evening 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria-Theresien-Platz - Fountain near Naturhistorisches Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgtor, Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otto Wagner Pavillon - Karlsplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardens of the Belvedere (Vienna) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardens of the Belvedere (Vienna) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suomenlinna Picture[edit]

Hi!

I play in a amateur wind orchestra in Helsinki and we are having our annual wind music festival day in Suomenlinna. I would like to use your picture of Suomenlinna island in the concert flyer that we are going to hand in to our friends. Naturally, I'm going to give you the credits of the pic in the flyer. The event is free to attend, so the usage is not commercial. :) Thank you for taking such great pictures around the world!

- Aura — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.181.14.131 (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum (Vienna) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeresgeschichtliches Museum - M47 Patton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:02, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum (Vienna) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeresgeschichtliches Museum - Jeep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Empress Maria Theresia monument in Vienna 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Empress Maria Theresia monument in Vienna 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeresgeschichtliches Museum - M48 Patton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienna - panorama from St. Stephen's Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 03:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machowska Droga (Asmusstrasse).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Góry Stołowe (Skały Puchacza, Uhustein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broumovské stěny - view from Szczeliniec Wielki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Góry Stołowe (Heuscheuergebirge) - road to Pasterka (Passendorf).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Deutsch Krawarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps the roof line could have been a bit sharper but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Úvalno (Lobenstein) - Hans-Kudlich-Warte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Úvalno (Lobenstein) - Kriegerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kravaře Palace, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pěchotní srub MO-S 19 V aleji.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pěchotní srub MO-S 20 U orla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pohled z pěchotního srubu MO-Or-S 20 Orel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SU-100, Darkovičky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostra Góra (Nauseney, Scharfenberg) - Góry Stołowe. Military area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is this a bench for military access only? Seriously, could you add some sign and bench-related categories, please? --Basotxerri 17:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, these are military benches ;) --Pudelek 10:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Areál československého opevnění - Hlučín-Darkovičky 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 10:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pěchotní srub MO-S 19 V aleji (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --A.Savin 13:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pěchotní srub MO-S 19 V aleji (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Areál československého opevnění - Hlučín-Darkovičky 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeresgeschichtliches Museum - Saurer 4K 4FA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK. --Peulle 20:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Areál československého opevnění - Hlučín-Darkovičky 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will display your Pernstejn photo 5 with your name[edit]

on the blogpost I will publish later this week at www.wherearezmoleks.blog Thanks for your very fine photo! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.88.143.76 (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. Possibly a very slight CW tilt, but I can tell since the houses aren't straight. --Peulle 12:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valašské muzeum v přírodě - kostel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 14:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Areál československého opevnění - Hlučín-Darkovičky 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Areál československého opevnění - Hlučín-Darkovičky 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum (Vienna) 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum (Vienna) 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Billův měšťanský dům.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Mlýnská dolina. Hamr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question on photo[edit]

I like the photo File:German war cemetery in Valašské Meziříčí.jpg but the marker is contradictory.

Auf Deutsch: Ein unbekannter Deutscher Soldat Leutnant Hans Thiele 31.12.1924 4.1945 In English: An unknown German Soldier Lieutenant Hans Thiele 31.12.1924 4.1945

This makes no sense. How can he be unknown if they know his rank, name, and dates of birth and death? I know you didn't make the marker but am just wondering if you can explain this contradiction. PumpkinSky talk 17:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the marker is for two different people. See marker behind it. PumpkinSky talk 17:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gruň - Kaple Panny Marie Pomocné.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! German war cemetery in Valašské Meziříčí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like the use of DoF here. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bílý Kříž - chata Sulov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Filipka - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesian Beskids - hiking trial to Barania Góra peak 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przysłop pod Baranią Górą, winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesian Beskids - hiking trial to Barania Góra peak 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Mlýnská dolina. Hamr.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Mlýnská dolina. Hamr.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki mountains - view from Prehyba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesian Beskids - hiking trial to Barania Góra peak 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesian Beskids - hiking trial to Barania Góra peak 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and interesting. Some annotations would be instruktiv --Milseburg 22:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie nieskategoryzowane[edit]

W kategorii Beskid Sądecki jest nagłówek: To jest główna kategoria. Czy nie zauważyłeś, że oprócz twoich zdjęć nie było tam żadnych innych ?. Ty po prostu wrzuciłeś je do wspólnego worka bez szczegółowego skategoryzowania, a ja przerzuciłem je do kat nieskategoryzowanych. Jeśli ci przeszkadza, że w niej są, to je stamtąd wyrzuć i wówczas będą tylko a kat. Pasmo Radziejowej (nawiasem mówiąc ona też ma podkategorie). To wrzucanie zdjęć do głównej kategorii to wielka plaga na commons. Robią to laicy i IP-ki, którzy pierwszy raz wstawiają tutaj zdjęcia, ale po tobie spodziewałbym się jednak dokładniejszego skategoryzowania. Selso (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ale liczne podkategorie są w kat. Beskid Sądecki (szczyty, polany, przełęcze itd.). Selso (talk) 12:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Sądecki - winter 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valašské muzeum v přírodě - Valašská dědina 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Silesian Beskids - hiking trial to Barania Góra peak 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silesian Beskids - hiking trial to Barania Góra peak 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beskid Sądecki in winter 2016 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opole (Oppeln) - Reymonta street, gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Culture and Science, Warsaw (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Otto Wagner Pavillon - Karlsplatz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Otto Wagner Pavillon - Karlsplatz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Лупків) - train station in winter 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Lupkiv) - old cemetery in winter 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Lupkiv) - old cemetery in winter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Лупків) - train station in winter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Helfštýn - vchod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old house in Łupków (Лупків), Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Лупків) - old shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radegast - socha z Radhoště.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velehrad - Stojanovo gymnázium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bojszów (Boitschau, Lärchenhag) - wooden church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierakowice (Schierakowitz, Graummannsdorf) - wooden church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Głuchołazy (Ziegenhals) - Bohaterów Warszawy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Głuchołazy (Ziegenhals) - hotel "Germanenbad".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Głuchołazy (Ziegenhals) - Górny Stawek (Goldenteich).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čermeľská železnica - narrow-gauge lokomotive "Krutwig" 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čermeľská železnica - narrow-gauge lokomotive "Krutwig" 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kojšovská hoľa - hut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kojšovská hoľa - weather station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kojšovská hoľa - weather station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kojšovská hoľa, Slovensko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa (Warsaw) - old buses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa (Warsaw) - old polish cars (Fiat126p and Fiat125p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaleskie (Zolieckai) - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ogrodniki - Lazdijai border crossing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Border marker of Lithuania (near Lazdijai).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sistiema - border of the USSR 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sistiema - border of the USSR 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fields near Lazdijai, Lithuania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Becejły - wooden small house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape near Szypliszki, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iłgieł Lake in Becejły, Poland (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset in Baranowo, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pleasant and good. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baranowo, Poland - view from observation tower (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iłgieł Lake in Becejły, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017[edit]

Hallo Pudelek!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baranowo, Poland - view from observation tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baranowo, Poland - view from observation tower (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualitymaybe some more information/category about the place and the tower, or a geocode?--ArildV 20:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal Stadium, Suwałki (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal Stadium, Suwałki (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suwałki - Mickiewicza street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints Orthodox church in Suwałki, Poland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Lewis Hulbert 22:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints Orthodox church in Suwałki, Poland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Devil's Cave[edit]

May I have your permission to use this picture for use in a YouTube video? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklightparade (talk • contribs) 21:42, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MÁV Class V43 - Balatonföldvár.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --SDKmac 01:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golf course Mikołów - Fiat 126p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunčice pod Ondřejníkem - wooden church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Łupków (Лупків) - train station in winter 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Łupków (Лупків) - train station in winter 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]