User talk:Poco a poco/2017-12

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Checa, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romanillos de Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 12:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Sagrario, Garcinarro, El Valle de Altomira, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left side is leaning in, fixable --Llez 09:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 18:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)  Support OK now --Llez 06:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Monterde, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-25, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Valdeherrera, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-05, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción de Nuestra Señora, Bárboles, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough forQ1 --Michielverbeek 09:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Pedregal, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budia, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/GT1976

Meint schon wieder, seine Kategorien per cat-a-lot verschieben zu müssen und meine Watchlist ist schon wieder im Arsch... --A.Savin 15:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

A.Savin: 2 Wochen, es reicht! Poco² 18:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Trinidad, Bello, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nave de máquinas del FF.CC., Tarazona, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-23, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odón, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rollo de justicia, Alocén, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is it slightly over-exposed, or it's me? Also, the top could be slightly sharper...--Rafesmar 19:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 19:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Rafesmar 14:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

GT1976

Sorry, for ma bad english, but this is not teh casue, that I don't understand your action with GT1976. Why do you block in a kind, that he cannot other people send a mail. It's not forbidden, that he can contact other people. Otherwise it's a sensless action, because he is able, to contact via each other Wikimedia project. In german, es ist einfach unverständlich ihn für andere zu sperren, denn die Schuldigen sind die Beginner dieser Änderungen. --K@rl (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Haben Sie sich erst gefragt, ob GT1976 nicht evtl. auch die E-Mail-Form missbraucht hat, um "die richtigen" Leute auf seine Disk zu "beordern"? --A.Savin 16:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wozu braucht man da E-Mail, das sieht doch eh jeder in seinen Benachrichtigungen. Ich habe von ihm kein Mail bekommen, obwohl ich auf der Liste stehe. Aber warum wird e.g User:User:Mindmatrix nihct gesperrt. Er beginnt mit diesen Kategorien? --K@rl (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Haben Sie und GT1976 je versucht, mit etwas anderem zu argumentieren als mit Gleichbehandlung im Unrecht. Und haben Sie versucht zusammenzuzählen, wie viele Dateien auf die wirklich wichtige Kategorisierung warten? --A.Savin 16:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

K@rl: Deutsch ist auch ok. Also, es ist eine Tatsache, dass GT1976, anstatt plausible Argumente zu liefern, warum die Sperrung aufgehoben werden soll, über seine Diskussionsseite Wirbel (32 Leute um Hilfe zu bitten gegen die bösen Admins) machen will. Warum soll ich überhaupt andere Kommunikationskanäle ihm offen halten? Sicherlich kann er andere Benutzer über andere Wege ansprechen, das kann ich außerhalb Commons nicht verbieten aber ich kann es hier erschweren. Eigentlich ist das im Moment eher eine Schutzmaßnahme gegen ihn selbst, denn wenn er so weitermacht, werden nicht Wochen sondern eher Monate sein, was er aussetzen soll. Ich habe Geduld ohne Ende gehabt, aber irgendwann reicht es auch. Wenn er weiterhin sein Ding machen will, ohne die Themen mit der Commons Community zu besprechen, dann ist er halt nicht dafür geeignet Teil davon zu sein (zumindest temporär mit der Hoffnung, dass er seine Einstellung ändert). Poco² 16:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Ich versteh aber trotzdemnihct, war um er und nicht, die Úser, die mit dem Unsinn oder nicht Unsinn begonnen haben - das ist das was ich nihct verstehe. Er hat hat ja ur fortgesetzt, was anderen nie verboten wurde. --K@rl (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

K@rl: wenn andere Benutzer das gleiche durchziehen wie GT1976 und nicht einlenken, dann wird es auch für sie eng, keine Frage. Den Fall kenne ich jetzt aber nicht, und muss mir vorerst ein Bild machen. Poco² 16:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

For the record: unter den letzten 500 von Mindmatrix erstellten Kategorien habe ich nichts derartiges wie bei GT1976. Wenn der Benutzer auch Unsinn macht, wäre der richtige Weg das Thema in Admins Board zu melden. Ich glaube, hier ist es nicht der richtige Ort. Poco² 16:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry - I don't read or write German. I saw a notice about my username being mentioned here. If I read (and translated) the message above correctly, there's a complaint that I haven't responded to email - is that correct? I'm updating my email contact info, but for most questions, I'd prefer discussing it on my talk page, or some other public page here on Commons. There's no reason to hide discussions in email or chat. This appears to be about some category I may have created - can someone give me a brief synopsis (and link to the category) so that I can check into it. Thanks. Mindmatrix 17:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

It subject the categories date and location like Category:Photographs of Austria by date - many categories are created from GT1976, but also from the others. But only while some user like you categorize some photos, he generate there consequently and so many users are feeling disturbed onb there oberservation page. --K@rl (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Than you for the explanation. I guess my involvement is minor, but if any of my edits are a concern, can someone post them on my talk page. Mindmatrix 17:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Mindmatrix for coming along. Poco² 17:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

My qusetion: Is the Category:October 2015 Austria photographs allowed or not. If yes - must be allowed also the filling of the category. If not, then the category should be deleted as sooon as possible - and this is the main question in th problem complete. --K@rl (talk) 18:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

K@rl: as there is no clear rule about the naming of date-related categories, the author of the category can opt for both, with and without the suffix "photographs". What is not okay is coming later on and creating new categories following a personal preference and moving tons of images around. Yes, we need a convention but until then we should leave things like they are Poco² 07:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Okay, but he was creating new categories but not the systematic for there. It should be allowed too to create new missing categories in this systematic. And not more he made. This is not possible vie a bot, so the the other user must life with it and is not a caus to block. --K@rl (talk) 08:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

K@rl: I've replied here. Poco² 11:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ermita de Santo Cristo de Miranda, Santa María de las Hoyas, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 65.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ermita de Santo Cristo de Miranda, Santa María de las Hoyas, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 65.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Roque, Budia, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Roque, Henche, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Pobo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masegoso de Tajuña, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Andrés, Torres de Berrellén, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Ntra. Sra. de la Junquera, Luesma, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanillos del Extremo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masegosa, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Garcinarro, El Valle de Altomira, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atalaya, Llumés, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-25, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcoroches, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orea, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca Pública del Estado, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alique, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mantiel, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peralejos de las Truchas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 08:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villanueva de Alcorón, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Alaminos, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cincovillas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Soledad, Cincovillas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you remove the spots in the sky, please? --Basotxerri 16:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanillos del Extremo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malasombra, Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castil de Griegos, Checa, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Ntra. Sra. de la Junquera, Luesma, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo palacio, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Virgen del Cerro, Castejón de las Armas, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piqueras, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some slight red CAs on the church tower, please remove. --Basotxerri 12:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC) That was really slight... but ok,  Done Poco a poco 13:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Good quality, thank you! --Basotxerri 19:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita, Miedes de Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a series of dust spots. I would remove the motion blurred birds, too. --Basotxerri 12:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 13:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. In Africa two weeks later. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

Categories are not based on the nationality of the uploader, if the wildlife or the scientist is from a country X, it is suggested to upload under country X, but there is no strict rule, it's mainly good sense. If you have an images related to science to one of the countries that are still open, please upload. It would be nice to have good finalists specifically form the "minor" countries (mostly those without national juries). In italy we will probably print them in a public exposition.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nogueras, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retascón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín de Tours, Torrellas, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-23, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción de Nuestra Señora, Bárboles, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anchuela del Campo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mochales, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valverde de los Ajos, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Segeda, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks sad, but good image quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 168-170 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 168-170 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañizar del Olivar, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María Magdalena, Los Fayos, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-23, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Bautista, Tierga, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-24, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villaseca de Henares, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castejón de Henares, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio de Comunicaciones, Plaza de Cibeles, Madrid, España, 2017-05-18, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Comunicaciones, Plaza de Cibeles, Madrid, España, 2017-05-18, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Recuenco, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcantud, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villaseca de Henares, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacecorbo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piedra del Tormo, Fombuena, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Are those CA on the trees against the sky?--Peulle 20:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC) I see nothing that I'd call CA Poco a poco 18:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Comment OK, I'll take your word for it; it's probably just some slight colour bleed or something where the green trees meet the blue sky.--Peulle 12:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de Santa Lucía, Campillo de Aragón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-07, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Nogueras, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inmueble en la calle Jota Aragonesa 3 y 5, Alagón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taravilla, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-25, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retascón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vadillo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de Santa Lucía, Campillo de Aragón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-07, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 10:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpanseque, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antigua Lonja y Pósito, Plou, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Anchuela del Campo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty light, possible FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peirón de Santa Bárbara, Retascón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Retascón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción de la Virgen, Retascón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alconaba, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Ayuda

Hola Poco a Poco:

Soy un wikipedista bastante activo al que le gustaría contribuir más al mantenimiento de esta gran y maravillosa templo de las imágenes, que tanto me ha servido y de la que tanto he disfrutado.

He estado realizando unas pequeñas tareas de mantenimiento, categorización, plantillas, solicitudes de borrado y me gustaría saber como ayudar aquí, pensé en la verificación, soy verificador en Wikipedia pero no veo en páginas nuevas nada que no haya sido verificado y me gustaría llegar a ser algún día administrador en esta Comunidad. --MONUMENTA (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hola MONUMENTA, las tareas en las que puedes participar que "más puntos suman" a la hora de ganarte la confianza de la comunidad son Commons:License review (o Category:License review needed) y comentar en Commons:Deletion requests (Category:Candidates for deletion), también participar en Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems (no exclusivo para administradores) o Category:Requested moves. Eso sí, para renombrar y para verificar licencias necesitas flags. Saludos, Poco² 11:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monasterio de San Juan de Duero, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 19.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de San Juan de Duero, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 19.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle abandonada en la calle Harper, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Depressingly nice, good quality. --Akela NDE 10:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo masónico, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radio local, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zona arqueológica de Valdeherrera, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-05, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malasombra, Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The twigs look a bit strange. But the wall is fine for me.--Famberhorst 18:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monterde, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-25, DD 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monterde, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-25, DD 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 10:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 11:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Antonio de Padua, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The higher the church the less sharper, for me not a Q1. Especially the top of the church is too hazy. --Michielverbeek 10:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC)  Support Good for me. A bit tight at top Lmbuga 11:29, 17 December 2017 (UTC) I disagree: 1) the bell tower in the back is not part of the facade, expecting the same sharpness like in the case where the tower is at the front is not fair 2) yes, the top is not as sharp as the rest, but that is rather the rule if the focus is on the facade, in some cases, that's a problem, in this case it looks ok to me 3) I've uploaded a new version to clear any doubts Poco a poco 11:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Ok, a weak  Support --Michielverbeek 14:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Ok and sorry ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Franciscano, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I wish the top was a bit sharper and the walls perhaps a bit darker but IMO: Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca pública, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficina de correos, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see your Yukon images a bit yellowish, could you check that, please? Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:47, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia católica de Santa María, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Banner competition of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Hello! Thank you for participating in the banner competition of Wiki Loves Monuments! Some of your page banners are already in use in Wikivoyage travel guides. The full gallery of banners, their current usage, and the results of the competition can be found here. We look forward to your future contributions to Wikivoyage. See you next year!

On behalf of the organizers, --Alexander (talk) 07:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 04-05 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte Kaštel, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Pula, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tienda de recuerdos, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 17:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Westmister, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peluquería, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentYou forgot to remove the purple color fringing on contrasting edges. --Granada 09:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 11:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC) Thank you! --Granada 17:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olmedilla de Eliz, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 31-33 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beluga Point, Anchorage, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Dog Saloon, Juneau, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-17, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Front, Juneau, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-17, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 33-35 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would crop the left part with the unsharp picture frame (see note with suggested crop) --Llez 14:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abánades, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Gemina, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Gemina, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio abandonado en la calle Front, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navío histórico Keno, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio de la legión canadiense, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Straight verticals, sharp enough, not too much space in top, a Q1photo, only forgot to enter after a nomination --Michielverbeek 09:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Andrés, Torres de Berrellén, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Though the perspective is not the best, imo still good quality --KPFC 11:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Downtown, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Triple J, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escuela de artes visuales, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercio en la calle Front, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

	Christmas Card
	Feliz Navidad! Artix Kreiger (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hostal, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 10:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercio en la calle Front, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercios en la calle Front, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Montreal desde el Monte Royal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 126-137 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quuality --Llez 10:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel El Dorado, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Red CAs on the left, green CAs on the right. ¡Lo siento mucho pero están ahí! --Basotxerri 18:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)  Done ya no los veo :) Poco a poco 22:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Danke, perfect now! --Basotxerri 15:15, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Poco a poco! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 13:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia católica de Santa María, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 13:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tercera Avenida, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 13:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa en la Tercera Avenida, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 13:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 35.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 35.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Pula, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 18:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa en la Calle King, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 13:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Consulta para subir imagen

Hola, tengo dudas para subir archivos de otro autor; hace poco subí dos imágenes y seguí los pasos que indica commons para trabajos de otra persona, enviando la autorización a permissions-es@wikimedia.org pero a pesar de eso los archivos fueron eliminadas. No se que error cometí, espero me puedas ayudar. --Pedro 1293 (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Hola Pedro 1293, no sé si voy a poder ayudarte, necesita a alguien que tenga acceso a la lista de OTRS en español y que pueda confirmar que se ha enviado un permiso para esas imágenes. En ese caso se restaurarán. Saludos, Poco² 18:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monasterio de la Monjía, Golmayo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 89.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de la Monjía, Golmayo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 89.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:49, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Phra Ram, Ayutthaya, Tailandia, 2013-08-23, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:49, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wihan Phra Mongkhon Bophit, Ayutthaya, Tailandia, 2013-08-23, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antiguo taller de reparación de vehículos, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

May the year 2018 give you the opportunity to realize your dreams, rediscover your strengths, muster your willpower and rejoice the simple pleasures that life would bring your way. . --The Photographer 14:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde la iglesia de San Olaf, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreón en Tõnismägi, calle Tuvi, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde la iglesia de San Olaf, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus stacking would have been better, butl good enough. --Smial 12:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wihan Phra Mongkhon Bophit, Ayutthaya, Tailandia, 2013-08-23, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde Toompea, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -Lmbuga 12:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde la iglesia de San Olaf, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -Lmbuga 12:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Margarita la Gorda, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 12:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atalaya, Navapalos, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Albalate de las Nogueras, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Montuenga, Montuenga de Soria, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Rello, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cubilla, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte Kaštel, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Franciscano, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)