User talk:Poco a poco/2016-11
|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page. |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casa histórica de Tabatabaeis, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Abyaneh, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castillo de Hanjan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baños del Sultán Amir Ahmad, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antiguo Bazar de Kashan, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bazaar de Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral Vank, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 95-97 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia in Esperanto
Dear colleague! I can give to you an autoreview status at Wikipedia in Esperanto. Do you agree? Gamliel Fishkin 22:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good, Gamliel, I promise not to mess anything up :) just include some HQ pics from time to time Poco2 22:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Done (possibly, my propose about global autopatrolled status can be interesting for you). As far as I see, you like to learn many different languages; I invite you to learn Esperanto and edit Wikipedia in it more actively (if you will have any questions, feel free to ask me). Gamliel Fishkin 22:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Gamliel, I commented that site and as an admin here there is no point in generating work for wikis like Esperanto when moving files, as that move is global Poco2 23:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleos de Yeddi Gumbez, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de los Shirvanshah, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 165-167 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleos de Yeddi Gumbez, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Narikala, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 151-153 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Reloj Mundial, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reloj Mundial, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Georgia
Strange they chose this rather than this which is an FP and would IMO stand a good chance at the international level. And #9? Oh well, at least you got into the top 10. -- Colin (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Colin, yes, I was also surprised. The crepuscular rays are far more spectacular in the other picture but in this one the crop of the window is better, it isn't really a bad choice :) just unexpected, let's see how it goes. Tomorrow we should have the results from Iran btw. Poco2 16:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Did anyone else get into the top 10 :-) -- Colin (talk) 17:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Colin, I've no clue. If they inform the winners before publishing the results, as many orginizers do,
then I'm not among the top 10! If, on the other hand they put each FP in the final then it looks better as the 10th iranian FP is on the way ;) Poco2 17:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC) PD: Colin, I have to rectify, they just did :)
- Colin, I've no clue. If they inform the winners before publishing the results, as many orginizers do,
- Did anyone else get into the top 10 :-) -- Colin (talk) 17:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleos de Yeddi Gumbez, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Templo de fuego, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Baku TV Tower
It is difficult to judge the FOP on the TV tower, as it was built in Soviet Azerbaijan in the Soviet Union. It is no longer in this country, and the copyright of specific performers in the Soviet Union was not considered. I apologize if I'm wrong has issued a comment --AlixSaz18:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. I corrected a message, I hope to do it right. I have little experience, and I almost did not speak English. --AlixSaz 18:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Monasterio de Jvari, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de Jvari, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estación del AVE, Calatayud, 2016-06-21, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fortín, Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Peñas de Misdía, Gabasa, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre de la muralla, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre del Tambor, Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puente sobre el Ebro, Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Peñas de Misdía, Gabasa, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puente romano, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Hortal, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puente Viejo, Monzón, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reloj Mundial, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reichtstag, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 31-33 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta de Brandeburgo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 52-54 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta de Brandeburgo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sala de Conciertos, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleo de Diri Baba, Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de los Shirvanshah, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 14-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Templo de fuego, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Request for FA Wikipedia
Hi Diego. Big fan of your pictures. If possible, can you edit your user page in Persian Wikipedia. The reason I'm asking this is that we have nominated some of your beautiful pictures for fa:ویکیپدیا:نگارههای برگزیده (Wikipedia:Featured pictures) currently and in the past, and in the Nomination template, your username is always in red due to not being complete. It would be great if you decide to make some edits in your userpage. Thanks! --Gnosis (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Gnosis, thank you very much for your encouraging words! Actually, in most of the wikis if there is no user page the user page in Meta is shown, probably in fa.wp you didn't implement this change for whatever reason. I've created a page but in English. Would you be so kind and translate it to farsi? Best, Poco2 13:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- It would be a pleasure. --Gnosis (talk) 23:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monaterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Templo de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 65-74 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Catedral de Sioni, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 100-102 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Sioni, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 100-102 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 74-79 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monaterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 83-85 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaza de la República, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 113-114 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 09-14 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 80-82 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Río Arpa, Jermuk, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 65-68 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Sevanavank, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edificio en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edificio en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Balcones en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 03-05 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Río Moscova, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 16-17 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Aide sur Quality images candidates
Bonjour Poco a poco. Merci pour ta vigilance et ton aide, en effet, je découvre et j'ai eu un peu de mal... Je vais utiliser à l'avenir le gadget pour plus de sécurité :) --B-noa (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cementerio marino y faro, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antiguo puerto, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Costurera, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Costa de Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Biblioteca Central de la Universidad de Bucarest, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arco de Triunfo, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ateneo Rumano, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia católica, Galati, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia Mavromol, Galati, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museo Nacional, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museo Nacional, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! I Amsterdam, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edificio en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Commons (copyvio) question
Hi Poco- Could I ask a favor please? I do not speak Spanish (and don’t want to rely only on Google translate), could you look at the wording here and let me know if my understanding is correct: Mexican currency which is less than 100 years old (based on PD-Mexico) requires explicit government permission before it can be reproduced (on Commons). Less than 100 years old without permission is a copyright violation. Many thanks in advance.--Godot13 (talk) 05:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. Congratulations on your great successes in WLM2016!--Godot13 (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Godot13, sorry for the late answer. Indeed, you cannot reproduce by any means coins or notes (both mexican Pesos or any other foreign currency). That means that a reproduction of foreign currencies, as we have everywhere on Commons is ilegal according to Mexican law. Btw, according to the note (in English) at the end of the section coins or notes before 1928 are in public domain. Best regards and thanks for your congratulations! :) Poco2 19:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Río Azat, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 27-29 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia antigua, Socaire, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 94-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 11-15 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Puerta de Brandeburgo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puerta de Brandeburgo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 65-74 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 65-74 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No es el ayuntamiento de Boquiñeni
Hola Poco a poco. La imagn de la derecha no parece coincidir con el ayuntamiento de Boquiñeni, del que tenemos otra foto. ¿Podría ser que se trate del ayuntamiento de Tauste o Cetina? Lo digo por la estatua al dance que hay a la derecha. Un saludo, --ecelan (talk) 09:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hola ecelan, muchas gracias por el aviso. Efectivamente, llevabas razón, no era Boquiñeni, sino Luceni, un pueblo vecino. Ya he corregido los títulos, categorías y descripciones. Fue un día de esos locos en los que fue a la caza de municipios sin foto en Wikimedia y me lié con esos dos. Saludos!Poco2 22:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bazaar de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calle en Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casa histórica de Abbasi, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edificio en Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Sioni, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua de Vakhtang Gorgasali, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Abo de Tiflis, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 67-71 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia Kashueti, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer
Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Sioni, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua de Vakhtang Gorgasali, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Narikala, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua de Baratashvili, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Abo de Tiflis, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 25.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 25.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 31-33 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vista de Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 03-06 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de Metekhi, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Jvari, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
picture
Thank you. Sünbül (talk) 15:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Lucas, Toconao, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pucará de Lasana, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edificio en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 230-232 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleos de Yeddi Gumbez, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Zu deinem QIC-Kommentar
Hallo Poco a poco,
ich habe deinen Kommentar zur Kenntnis genommen und kann ihn auch nachvollziehen, allerdings werde ich auch in nächster Zeit daran wenig ändern - zur Erklärung: Kein einziges der Bilder ist mein eigenes, ich arbeite im Moment die Jahresergebnisse des Festivalsommers durch und dabei fallen die Nominierungen als Beiwerk zu einem Haufen anderen Baustellen an - wenn sie nicht erwünscht sind, werde ich sie wieder einstellen. Persönlich habe ich aus verschiedenen Gründen (u.a. neben der Vollbeshcäftigung und einer großen Familie aktuell die tägliche Fahrt zum Kreißsaal) nur sehr wenig Möglichkeiteneit, mehr Zeit und Arbeit als die bereits in die verschiedenen Projekte investierte beizusteuern; wenn das nicht reicht, ist das für mich o.k.. Wie Hubertl gerade mal wieder beweist, ist es eh nicht erwünscht, dass dort Leute Bilder nominieren - man will offensichtlich unter sich bleiben; seine persönich gegen meine Nominierungen gerichteten Anwürfe sind nicht haltbar, werden aber offensichtlich goutiert. Gruß und Danke für die bisherigen Kommentare, ich bin dann mal wieder raus. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 14:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo Achim, meine Intention ist es nicht dich oder jemanden anderen zu verjagen. Alles worum ich frage ist, dass diejenigen, die Arbeit generieren, auch Arbeit wegschaffen. Ansonsten funktioniert das System nicht und es wird gestresst. Vielleicht ist sogar dieser Stress ein Grund warum einige QIC Veterane frustriert sind, keine Ahnung. Fakt ist, dass seitdem die Stipendien rum ums Thema Fotografie QICs in den Zielen vorsehen, die reguläre Benutzer von QIC müssen das ausbaden. Den gleichen Hinweis habe ich auch heute den Kollegen von Wiki Loves Parliaments gemacht. Gibt es in deinem Wikiprojekt keinen der sich für Fotografie interessiert und bereit wäre (mit anderen Bildern) auszuhelfen? Vielleicht ist das die Lösung. Poco2 17:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo Poco a poco, ich werfe dir nichts vor - und im Festvalsommer, der im nächsten Jahr ins 5. Jahr geht, gibt und gab es auch nie Vorgaben zu QI-Quoten. Da ich heute morgen QI-Bilder wegsortiert habe und allein heute bereits eine 4-stellige Zahl an commons-Edits durch Sortierungen vorgenommen habe, bin ich mir sicher, meinen Beitrag im Projekt zu leisten - QI-Berwetung bei Gebäuden und Landschaften kann ich nicht leisten, ich bin kein Fotograf und habe bei dem, was ich tue, meine Spezialgebiete. Hinzu kommt, dass QI für Konzertfotografie imho nicht wirklich taugt, da die Kriterien für unbewegte Gegenstände bei optimaler Beleuchtung ausgelegt sind und Bewegungsunschärfen, Lichteffekte etc. als Kritikpunkte dominieren; die Erfahrung hat bereits vor Jahren alle Teilnehmer des Projektes von den QI abgeschreckt und ist der Hauptgrund, warum bei bislang 90.000 Bildern des Projekts in den letzten Jahren kaum etwas an die QI weitergereicht wird. Nach den aktuellen Diskussionen um CC-by-sa 3.0 vs. 4.0 hat sich das nun auch bei mir wieder erledigt - ich weiß mit meiner Zeit schlicht Besseres anzufangen als mich für Fremdvorschläge beschimpfen zu lassen; ich bin und bleibe primär Autor der WP. Again: Keine Kritik an dich, du gehörst zu den konstruktiven Benutzern und das nehme ich sehr wohl wahr. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry fürs Einmischen. Ich glaube, hier sind gerade Mißverständnisse unglücklich aufeinandergetroffen. Das Ganze begann (glaube ich) mit Nominierungen aus Afrika, mit teilweise wirklich schlechten Fotos von Wiki Loves irgendwas. Es kommen immer wieder Nominierungen, die vermuten lassen, daß irgendwelche Normen oder Vorgaben von WMF oder WMDE oder sonstwas dahinterstecken - und da reagieren die langjährigen Mitarbeiter hier mitunter etwas gereizt. Nicht wegen der Nominierungen, sondern weil es hier "zum guten Ton" gehört, daß man etwa so viele Bilder selbst bewertet wie man nominiert. Ob das nun sinnvoll ist, sei dahingestellt. Und @Achim Raschka: manch einer bewertet hier so abwegig, da würden deine Bewertungen sicher positiv herausstechen. Besonders bei Viechern tue ich mich z. B. immer schwer, weil der enzyklopädische Nutzen eines Fotos nicht unbedingt mit der technischen Qualität übereinstimmt. Ich würde es begrüßen, wenn du ab und zu mal sagen könntest: "Foto ist zwar nicht perfekt aber der Fühler des Krabbeltieres ist perfekt getroffen und das ist sein Alleinstellungsmerkmal" (sinngemäß). Daß es Konzertfotos bei QI sehr schwer haben, ist altbekannt und ungerecht, kann man aber kaum ändern. Und die Bemerkungen von Hubertl gehören nicht auf QIC. --Ralf Roleček 17:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC) PS: Diego, ich habe meine Beispiele in der QIC-Disk. gepostet, um zu zeigen, daß ich beschnittene Porträts gut finde, das hat mit dem WLP-Projekt nichts zu tun.
- Hallo Poco a poco, ich werfe dir nichts vor - und im Festvalsommer, der im nächsten Jahr ins 5. Jahr geht, gibt und gab es auch nie Vorgaben zu QI-Quoten. Da ich heute morgen QI-Bilder wegsortiert habe und allein heute bereits eine 4-stellige Zahl an commons-Edits durch Sortierungen vorgenommen habe, bin ich mir sicher, meinen Beitrag im Projekt zu leisten - QI-Berwetung bei Gebäuden und Landschaften kann ich nicht leisten, ich bin kein Fotograf und habe bei dem, was ich tue, meine Spezialgebiete. Hinzu kommt, dass QI für Konzertfotografie imho nicht wirklich taugt, da die Kriterien für unbewegte Gegenstände bei optimaler Beleuchtung ausgelegt sind und Bewegungsunschärfen, Lichteffekte etc. als Kritikpunkte dominieren; die Erfahrung hat bereits vor Jahren alle Teilnehmer des Projektes von den QI abgeschreckt und ist der Hauptgrund, warum bei bislang 90.000 Bildern des Projekts in den letzten Jahren kaum etwas an die QI weitergereicht wird. Nach den aktuellen Diskussionen um CC-by-sa 3.0 vs. 4.0 hat sich das nun auch bei mir wieder erledigt - ich weiß mit meiner Zeit schlicht Besseres anzufangen als mich für Fremdvorschläge beschimpfen zu lassen; ich bin und bleibe primär Autor der WP. Again: Keine Kritik an dich, du gehörst zu den konstruktiven Benutzern und das nehme ich sehr wohl wahr. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Narikala, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Sioni, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panteón de Mtatsminda, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parlamento de Georgia, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pucará de Chiu Chiu, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Abyaneh, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cascada, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Carretera al monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cascada, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antiguo comercio, Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|