User talk:Poco a poco/2012-06

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edificio principal, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 04.JPG

Hi Poco. I don't know if you were aware of that, but I nominated your image at FPC. Do you want to vote? Tomer T (talk) 09:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop could be wider at the sides, but QI for me. --Kadellar 18:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hidrante de agua, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --WhiteWriter 18:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bayerische Staatskanzlei, München, Deutschland16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --WhiteWriter 18:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placa en honor a Karl von Goebel, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --WhiteWriter 18:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorámica Allianz-Arena, Múnich, Alemania2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus, München, Deutschland11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 cilindros de BMW, Múnich, Alemania3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well, it's certainly descriptive. --Mattbuck 16:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asamkirche, Múnich, Alemania24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Off-centre, but ok. --Mattbuck 16:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus, München, Deutschland11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silo, Königsplatz, Múnich, Alemania2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few minor bits of R/C CA, but generally ok. --Mattbuck 16:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Several noticable CAs. --Mattbuck 16:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Hi, I am not sure what CA you mean, could you add a note? Poco a poco 20:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Ok, CAs are now fixed, thanks for your help Poco a poco 19:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 22:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Disappearing reviews, answer to your message

Hello Poco a Poco,

I'm sorry, I don't understand what happened here...

I did not review any of the pictures you reviewed, so I can't explain why your comments disappeared.--Jebulon (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Glockenturm Elsterschloß 1.jpg

Hallo Poco a poco, vielen Dank für Deine Kritik, für welche ich immer sehr dankbar bin, denn ich betrachte mich beim Thema Fotografie irgendwo als Laie und deshalb gehe ich bei meinen Kandidaturen nicht unbedingt davon aus, dass diese auch sofort durchkommen. Mein Problem an Deiner Kritik ist, dass ich den Turm durchaus als gerade betrachte. Zumindest sieht man das, wenn man einen Schnitt von der Spitze zur Uhr hin macht. Was den Himmel angeht. Der war an diesem Tag tatsächlich so blau. Die Lichtverhältnisse waren sehr gut und es ist eine Reihe schöner Bilder entstanden.--Viele Grüße S. F. B. Morse (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Poco a poco, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort und Deinen Tipp.--Viele Grüße S. F. B. Morse (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solenostemon scutellarioides, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 22:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice point of view, good quality.--Vassil 22:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Leibnitz2610 20:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiental entre Herrsching y Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The colours seem a bit odd. Mattbuck 20:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Buf, I cannot confirm, a row of pictures like this one look the same, it is natural Poco a poco 20:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)  Support Well, i like it. Good size and quality --WhiteWriter 22:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Bilder des Länderspiels

Hallo Poco a poco,

bezüglich Deiner Frage: ganz einfach. Ich wurde als Pressefotograf von Wikimedia Österreich für das Länderspiel akkreditiert und habe dieses und auch alle anderen Bilder hier Category:Länderspiel Österreich-Ukraine 1. Juni 2012 geschossen. Muss allerdings dazu sagen, dass ich (a) kein ausgesprochener Fußballfan/kenner bin, damit auch vergleichsweise wenig Ahnung und (b) auch noch zum ersten Mal überhaupt Bilder dieser Sportart gemacht habe. Im Sportbereich fotografiere ich sonst eher sowas. Beste Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Eine Bitte vorab: bitte die Diskussionen nicht auseinanderziehen und sie auf der Seite belassen, wo sie begonnen wurden.

Wenn Du Interesse hast, Dich an einem Foto-Projekt zu beteiligen oder selbst eine Idee dafür hast kannst Du Dich hier melden (Vorsicht, die Seite hat bei mir eine EXTREM (!) lange Ladezeit und friert stets meinen kompletten Browser für ca. 10 - 15 Sekunden ein, Du musst Geduld haben, ist nervig, aber ist so, liegt wohl an deren lahmen Server) bzw. auch eine Ausrüstung ausleihen. Du kannst Dich aber auch direkt an Kurt wenden. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto von Wittelsbach, München, Deutschland3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO reworking has worked well. --Kadellar 21:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC) sorry, but strong artefacts on the roof, otherwise a nice image --Taxiarchos228 18:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded Poco a poco 21:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC) okay now --Taxiarchos228 08:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cisne (Cygnus olor), Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Couple of dust spots. --Iifar 16:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)  Fixed Poco a poco 17:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC) QI to me now. --Letartean 18:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 21:20, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Missing arguments

On the picture nomination page its too complicate to explain something longer, but I try to explain here a little bit more. That picture is really too much compressed and colors and also details are lost (watch for example that bird on the picture – which bird, which color?). Probably You removed dust, maybe used a little bit strong blur, I don't know. This image will be very good for resolution 682 × 1024, but in original resolution (2592 × 3888) it is really low quality image. Sorry, hope You understand. -- Ahsoous (talk) 21:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiental entre Herrsching y Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cancha de baloncesto diferente, Riesstr., Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice image composition, but strong CA. --NorbertNagel 18:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC) I made a mistake and uploaded the original version twice, now should look better Poco a poco 19:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment good quality (and sharpness ), but pixelation in the sky. --Carschten 13:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded with the hope to fix the problems Poco a poco 21:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)QI to me, now.--Jebulon 15:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista panorámica desde Olympiapark, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality., schöne Bildaufteilung, natürliche Farben --Ralf Roletschek 11:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior del Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments die Kontraste und "Verläufe", einfach Spitze in meinen Augen --Ralf Roletschek 11:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice --Ralf Roletschek 21:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

File:El Taj Mahal-Agra India0023.JPG

Your description was very accurate, it's exactly what i did! Moreover I have fixed a little perspective distortion. Best regards! :-) --Angelus^(talk) 19:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-05, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find it very good.--Jebulon 19:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio principal, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There seems to be some CA on the far left side. can you remove? Apart from that, very nice image. --NorbertNagel 12:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)  CA corrected Poco a poco 18:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 08:52, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-05, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too small 1,08M -- Ahsoous 19:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC) What kind of argument is it to decline a picture?! The size requirement refers ONLY to the megapixels, and this picture has 10 Megapixel, far above the required 2MP Please, provide a valid argument, Poco a poco 20:09, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Sorry, but size in this case means, that picture is compressed too much or maybe 2-3 times with repacking and therefore quality of that picture is lost -- Ahsoous 20:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC) This pictured has been developed and processed once out of the RAW file. Please, review the quality of the picture and point out the problems (if any), that is it about here Poco a poco 20:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC) I'd rather have a second opinion Poco a poco 21:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Reverted to nomination: declined on wrong premises. Biopics 22:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Ok. What I must say, details are blurred, but on normal (screen)resolutions it's not a problem. -- Ahsoous 22:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Interesting, You nominate one version, and then upload new one. Is it fair? -- Ahsoous 11:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC) We're here to recognize good pictures and to improve what must be improved, so updated versions are welcome. Other users can see important details of which you didn't thought at first. About the picture, obviously above size level; I like the composition. --Kadellar 18:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Perhaps a touch underexposed for statues with minor CAs on columns of tower but agree with Kadellar in liking the composition and IMO the quality is good for QI. --Scotch Mist 08:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd like to see it sharpened, but nice. --Mattbuck 12:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC) I sharpened it and reduced noise Poco a poco 18:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel Arcángel, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-05, DD 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very niche and qualtiy is OK. Contrast could be a bit stronger IMO. --NorbertNagel 09:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ánade Real (Anas platyrhynchos) en el Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice drake. --Florstein 18:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Olímpico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jagro 11:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa junto al Sagrado Corazón en la Iglesia de la Virgen de la Peña, Calatayud, España1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesucristo junto al monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted I think. Mattbuck 12:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)  Corrected Poco a poco 18:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 13:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-05, DD 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanging Church, Old Cairo, Egypt3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO. --JLPC 21:44, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cono de pino silvestre (Pinus sylvestris), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusual perspective and technical quality is fine. --NorbertNagel 19:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epiphyllum anguliger, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palma de la Virgen (Dioon edule), Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schmuckhof, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrada al Schmuckhof, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool, but CAs need fixing. Mattbuck 12:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)  Fixed Poco a poco 14:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC) Not to my eye. Mattbuck 17:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC) New version, now or never :) Poco a poco 17:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Kinga, Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-05, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Magenta cast (sky)--Jebulon 14:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC) New try Poco a poco 23:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC), Tilted otherwise QI --Moroder 11:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)  Corrected Poco a poco 18:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Good quality (meglio tardi che mai ;-). --Moroder 05:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio principal, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems posterised. It's also rather grey. --Mattbuck 21:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC) I agree. I uploaded a new version that looks better to me Poco a poco 21:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Much better. Mattbuck 15:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, here we have very balanced colours! --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Olímpico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 16:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente en Ökologische und biologische Abteilung, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the true colours are somewhere between the 1st and 2nd version --Taxiarchos228 10:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Habe ich nun getroffen? Poco a poco 18:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)  Support gut. --Carschten 16:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio principal, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed Poco a poco 14:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Hercules, Amman, Jordan2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and crop. --Selbymay 20:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cámara Municipal de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Café Santa Cruz, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me--Lmbuga 22:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Monastery, Petra, Jordan3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ananas comosus, Dole Pineapple Plantation, Oahu, Hawaii, USA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente en Rua Olímpio Nicolau Rui Fernandes, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Manga, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Juan III de Portugal, Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 07:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice Please, identify the CoA in the file description page--Jebulon 00:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great --Carschten 11:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition but there is some green CA (On the stairs it looks like weed :-) you could fix. Maybe you could crop a little bit of that "sensless" sky ;-) --Moroder 22:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)  Fixed Poco a poco 11:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 20:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa Cruz, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, lighten it up!Who cares if windows overexposed --Moroder 22:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Comercio, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful.--ArildV 10:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Nacional Bryce Canyon 2867.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry for the "harassment", but maybe you could fix the blue CA above, between the arch in shadow and the sky.--Jebulon 12:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC) I wouldn't call it harassment, your point is valid, I didn't see that CA, now is fixed, Poco a poco 13:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)I think it is a QI now.--Jebulon 16:49, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment super, but a bit underexposed. --Carschten 11:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)  Lightened up Poco a poco 11:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)  Support yes, super --Carschten 14:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 17:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs more light and a crop of the grass below, IMO--Jebulon 09:34, 23 June 2012 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 13:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Focas, Puerto de Validivia, Chile3.jpg

Hola. Pedí que archivo sea renombrado a "Lobos marinos, Puerto de Valdivia, Chile3.jpg", porque no hay focas en Chile (las focas no tienen orejas visibles y los lobos sí, entre otras diferencias) y porque hubo un error en el nombre de la ciudad. Si te parece preferible otro nombre, por favor edita la plantilla a tu gusto. No recuerdo si estabas en Wikipedia en esa época, pero creo que yo estaba en Valdivia ese día. Un saludo. Lin linao ¿dime? 21:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Your note

Hi Poco a poco! Thanks for looking at my picture. I'm still waiting for an answer to my comment: I'm pretty sure that its an architectonical and not a photographic problem. I appreciate your review, best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Wolfgang, ich hatte dein Kommentar schon gesehen, aber nichts dazu ergänzt, da ich der gleichen Meinung bin wie am Anfang. Ich hatte halt gehofft, dass noch jemand was dazu sagt, aber da dies nicht mehr der Fall war, habe ich das Bild zu Debatte markiert. Viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 18:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral Nueva, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting --Moroder 18:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto de San Sebastián, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but strong CA. --NorbertNagel 21:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)  Fixed Poco a poco 21:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Good quality now. --NorbertNagel 21:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conglomerado BMW, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 20:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)