User talk:Plozessor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Plozessor!

-- 07:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-74-133-115 Friedhofskreuz (Dippach am Main).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-78-183-53 Bildstock, Hauptstraße (Sulzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linde am Regnitzufer (Bamberg) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beerberg-Südhang bei Neuschleichach 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Im GLB Halbtrockenrasen bei Unterhaid 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunnen vor dem Rathaus in Grettstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-74-120-25 Bildstock, Neuses 45 (Bundorf).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturdenkmal Mönchgrube (östlicher Bereich).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-78-157-7 Fachwerkhaus, Hauptstraße 24 (Michelau i.Steigerwald).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 06:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teil des DDR-Grenzzauns als Mauerdenkmal (Schweickershausen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flurbereinigungsdenkmal am Ochsenanger südlich von Ebing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Aurach östlich von Zettelsdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trauerschwan im Wildpark Klaushof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-74-164-314 Kriegerdenkmal, Köslau 22 (Königsberg i.Bay.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND 678.N.58 Drei Halbtrockenrasen bei Sulzdorf (östliche Fläche).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der Main mit Sandbank südwestlich von Gädheim 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hasenskulptur im Wildpark Schloss Tambach 2019 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturdenkmal 678.N.49 Stieleiche südlich von Schwebheim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiese östlich von Heinersdorf (Seßlach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-74-180-42 Wegkreuz, Rothhofleite (Theres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-78-157-1 Bildstock, Balthasar-Neumann-Straße 5 (Michelau i.Steigerwald).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND Birnbaum am Schwarzen Berg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND Birnbaum auf der Kreuzerhöhe 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-74-111-91 Stall, Ignaz-Ziegler-Straße 64 (Aidhausen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality But the cut is very narrow at the bottom and I would remove the leaves at the top right.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thx! I can't do anything about the crop but I've removed the leaves. --Plozessor 04:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay better now, thanks.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westlicher Schwappacher See 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabmäler um die Friedhofskirche St. Burkard (Königsberg in Bayern) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Alster bei Memmelsdorf (Untermerzbach), Blick von der Brücke am Sportplatz nach Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der Krummetalstein am Streitberg bei der Ohratalsperre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Informationstafel Steinbrecherweg auf dem Sander Hermannsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fassadenbild am Haus Trosdorfer Hauptstraße 3 (Bischberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ND Quelliger Erlenbruchwald bei Wohnau 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehemalige Zuckerfabrik Zeil am Main 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiese am südwestlichen Fuß des Kirchrangen im Bundorfer Forst 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-6-74-187-48 Wegkapelle, Ortsstraße Theinheim-Koppenwind (Rauhenebrach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 07:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taubenschlag im Motherwell-Park in Schweinfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmrest (nicht Weißer Turm) im Motherwell-Park in Schweinfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historischer Grenzstein 39 (Bayern-Brandenburg) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]