User talk:Pline/archive 1

Cliquez sur ce lien pour me laisser un nouveau message ! / Click here to add a discussion

Derivative works

Hello, these images are derivative works of copyrighted originals. We need the name and a licence of the original author to keep these images:

• Image:Exposition-palais-de-tokyo .jpg
• Image:Exposition-palais-de-tokyo.jpg

If you could please supply them. The images will have to be removed otherwise. --Wikipeder 22:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

You can delete these ... derivative works but keep the kids...--Gébé 23:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Parc-de-la-tete-d-or-et-le-.jpg

Bonjour. Je viens de créer une catégorie pour le parc de la Tête d'Or et j'hésite vraiment à y inclure ta photo car je ne vois pas très bien de quel endroit il s'agit! Il me semble que ce n'est pas le parc de la Tête d'Or! Peut-être ses abords (peut-être des arbres qui dépassent) mais àmha c'est abusif de parler du parc sur cette photo. J'attends tes commentaires et précisions... Cordialement. --TwoWings (jraf) * Wanna talk? ;-) 13:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour, la photo est prise du pont Winston Churchill. Effectivement le commentaire devrait plutot parler des abords du parc. Je corrige. Cordialement--Gébé 14:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bassin-du-Danube.gif

Hi,

In Image:Bassin-du-Danube.gif, Montenegro is shown to be much bigger then it is. This left part of its coast, south of Bosnia, is Croatian. Couls you please fix it. --78.3.120.21 14:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:11734784 9836057d5d o Paris RER ligne E station Saint Lazare.jpg

Hello.

This image has a wrong source at flickr and I have been not able to find the right link. could you please correct it? thank you -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 09:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

you are right. Finally I found the link but forgot to cancel the message. Sorry.-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 15:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Dessins

Salut,

Tu fais de jolies photos de trains, métro, etc. J'ai un ami qui dessine magnifiquement les trains, bus, métro, etc. de tous modèles et époques. Je lui ai proposé de contribuer à Commons, avec ses oeuvres. Il ne connait pas du tout Commons, n'a ni ordinateur, ni adresse mail. Aurais-tu des conseils à me donner, pour que je les lui transmette ? Quels sujets, par exemple, serait intéressants qu'il traite. Il connait, de mémoire, une quantité inimaginable de véhicules et les dessine fort joliment.

Merci !

Basili 07:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Métro de Paris - Ligne 14

Bonjour, J'ai crée un site sur les transports urbains ( [1] ) et dans le cadre de l'info trafic RATP, j'ai besoin de photos des différentes lignes. J'ai fait appel à un ami mais il ne possède pas de photo de METEOR m'autorisez vous à publier cette photo : http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Metro-Paris-ligne-14-statio.jpg ?

Merci de votre attention et bonne soirée ! --Billy69150 16:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Bonjour, toutes les photos sur wikipédia sont libres de droit et peuvent donc être utilisées. Bon courage pour votre site : pour l'agglomération parisienne vous ne mentionnez pas le transilien qui transporte pourtant par exemple à la gare Saint-Lazare 1/2 million de passagers / jour (le rush du matin y est d'ailleurs particulièrement impressionnant). --Pline (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality images nomination

Dear Pline, Thank you for uploading Image:Chausey flotille de voiliers a maree bassemaree basse.JPG and Image:Chausey maison de Marin Marie.JPG, I nominated your images for Quality images, your images are listed here.   ■ MMXX^talk  13:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Congratulations! Image Image:Chausey flotille de voiliers a maree bassemaree basse.JPG, which was nominated for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted.   ■ MMXX^talk  19:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Tradale

Tu fais bien de me rappeler cette traduction en cours, j'allais oublier ! C'est comme tu veux. A priori il n'y aura pas d'éléments particuliers à la France puisque c'est une politique Commons.

Je suis au courant pour Bologne, l'une des plus belles collections françaises de céramiques grecques hors de Paris... Bibi Saint-Pol voulait y aller avant de découvrir que les photos étaient interdites :( Un peu dans le même genre, j'ai dans le collimateur le musée Vivenel de Compiègne. J'espère que ça sera OK pour les photos... Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Gardens in Paris

Bonjour, je viens de remarquer que vous avez modifié cette catégorie pour qu'elle redirige vers Category:Parks and open spaces in Paris. Premièrement, je ne pense pas qu'on puisse dire qu'un jardin est exactement la même chose qu'un parc. Et deuxièmement, cette catégorie fait partie d'une liste dans Category:Gardens in France by department, donc elle me semble utile. La seule redondance que je voie, c'est avec Category:Public gardens in Paris, mais je pense qu'il serait judicieux de la déplacer vers Category:Gardens in Paris justement, pour plus d'uniformité. Je voudrais donc défaire votre modification, mais je pense qu'il est plus constructif de se mettre d'accord avant. Qu'en pensez-vous? --Tryphon (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Page France

Bonjour,

Oui, je suis passé sur cette page par hasard. Comme je m'interessais à la partie Bourgogne, j'ai cherché à l'améliorer avec des illustrations trouvées rapidement. De fil en aiguille, j'ai fait ce que je pensais être quelques améliorations de présentation. Je viens de regarder la page de la Pologne, ma première impression c'est que c'est très bien fait et les documents photographiques sont de meilleure qualité que ceux que je trouve pour le moment pour les régions françaises. Pour la page France il y a déjà un gros travail qui est fait. Mais il reste encore du boulot pour atteindre une bonne qualité. Il est certainement difficile de trouver ou de choisir l'illustration qui est la plus représentative de la région concernée.

Il y a une chose à laquelle il faut peut-être faire attention : c'est le message d'avertissement concernant le poids de la page : AVERTISSEMENT : cette page a une longueur de 62 Kio ; certains navigateurs Web gèrent mal la modification des pages approchant ou dépassant 32 Kio. Peut-être devriez-vous diviser la page en sections plus petites.

Je ne sais pas trop ce qu'il faut en penser. G CHP (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riviere-restonica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Love the view and the lighting, everything is crisp as well. --IvanTortuga 22 January 2009  Comment Nice picture. I've been in this area a few times. You captured its beauty as it is. --JuliusR 08:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouchot baie de Wissant P1030356.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition, interesting image. kallerna 12:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Rame-MF2000-portes-ouvertes.jpg

Salut, oui, je voulais juste enlever la cat ligne 7 puisque l'image n'en montre pas grand chose et que dès lors, la catégorie n'apporte pas d'élément d'information intéressant à la photo (et vice versa). La suppression de la cat MF 2000 est une manipulation trop rapide. Désolé. greenski (talk) 01:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Peut etre que l'on se connait ? !

Bonjour

Je suis un ancien du CNES... Peut etre que l'on se connait ! J'ai vu avec plaisir, (pour ne pas dire... "avec attendrissement" !), que votre illustration 2009 pour "Orbite héliosynchrone" réalise (en beaucoup mieux, et en couleurs...) ce que j'avais essayé de faire, il y a 23 ans... lors de la redaction du "Guide des utilisateurs de données SPOT" pour le compte de SPOT Image !

Bien amicalement

R. Zaharia raymond.zaharia [ at ] wanadoo.fr

Club des Argonautes -> [2]

Bonjour,

Non je n'ai jamais travaillé au CNES (j'aurais aimé mais j'ai fait des mauvais choix d'orientation ...). J'en profite pour vous signaler que les articles de Wikipedia relatifs au programme spatial français et européen (Kourou, Ariane, Diamant, satellites et sondes spatiales francaises ou européennes) manquent de photos (et de schémas); vous disposez peut être d'illustrations de votre cru ou réalisés par votre entourage qui pourraient enrichir Wikipedia. En effet le CNES et de l'agence spatiale européenne ne mettent pas sous licence libre les photos réalisées par leurs photographes ou les sondes spatiales contrairement à la NASA ce qui interdit leur utilisation. Les articles sur nos programmes spatiaux sont du coup pauvrement illustrés (on peut par exemple comparer les articles Delta et Ariane ou Centre spatial guyanais et Complexe de lancement 39). Les photos pertinentes et de qualité chargées dans Commons (sur ce site) sont généralement réutilisées dans les articles de tous les wikipedia de la planète (anglais, allemand, japonais...), la célébrité anonyme assurée... Si vous disposez de photos vous pouvez soit les charger vous même (fonction importer dans Commons) ou me contacter sur cette page pour que je puisse vous guider dans le maquis des licences libres ... Amicalement --Pline (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort National (Saint-Malo).

review

•  Support I tend to prefer this image, because it clearly depicts the structure of the fort, and it is more informative about its topographic situation. --Myrabella (talk) 13:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I've added a candidate. --Eusebius (talk) 18:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Scores:
1. Fort-National-DSC 6293.jpg: +1 
2. Saint-Malo - Fort National.jpg: +0
3. Saint-Malo - le Fort National à marée basse.JPG: +0
=>
File:Fort-National-DSC 6293.jpg: Promoted.
File:Saint-Malo - Fort National.jpg: Declined.
File:Saint-Malo - le Fort National à marée basse.JPG: Declined.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Cercle-reflexion-Lenoir.jpg

Bonjour Je m'appelle Manuel Capdevila, et j'ai travaillé 30 ans chez Bull, a part d'avoir naviguée les dernières 50 années Je vous felicite pour vos colaborations a Wikipedia mais j'ai du inserir ce commentaire a votre fichier. This file is unproperly named for it's a Mendoça's reflecting circle, as stated by Jean Randier in his book "L'instrument marine" ISBN 2-7003-0213-3, page 127. I reproduce the text commenting the very same instrument: "Cercle à reflexion de Mendoza. On distingue parfaitement les deux cercles gradués concentriques e l'étrier support des axesde ces deux cercles, caractéristiques dans ce type d'appareil, Grâce a ses deux poignées, le circle de Mendoza peut être utilisé pour la mesure des distances angulaires a plât aussi bien que verticales"

Celui-ci c'est un vrai Borda-Lenoir... comparez les deux File:Cercle de reflexion img 2600.jpg

Cordialment --Mcapdevila (talk) 11:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Merci pour cette correction. Je retournerais au fr:musée de la Marine à Paris (mais pas tout de suite) pour vérifier qu'il s'agit d'une erreur de ma part (plusieurs instruments de marine étaient exposés côte à côte) ou s'il y a une erreur d'étiquetage dans la vitrine auquel cas je la signalerais au conservateur du Musée (hypothèse assez improbable car ce sont, je pense, de bons professionnels). Je vous tiens au courant. Pline (discuter) 4 janvier 2010 à 17:33 (CET)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sellers translating along truss during EVA-3 on STS-121.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sellers translating along truss during EVA-3 on STS-121.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Propagande socialiste

Bonjour pas très honnête cette propagande insidieuse pour le parti socialiste dans l'article France. De une, les deux "madones" (comment les qualifier autrement, je pensais à "idoles des wikipidiens socialistes" mais j'ai opté pour le choix le plus neutre) ne sont pas des "Hommes politiques", de deux elles ne représentent rien à part les wikipidiens socialistes qui ont voté pour elle et voudré bien les voir à l'égal des présidents, tous les autres sont des présidents. les "hommes politiques" sont en réalité des "présidents de la Ve république" d'où la section séparée pour les deux rombières et l'ajout de "(chef du gouvernement)" à fillon qui n'est pas chef d'état comme les autres. et de trois mettre la photo des deux socialistes est une imposture et de la propagande, car le fait qu'elle soient socialistes ne justifie pas qu'elles puissent bénéficier de la propagande des wikipidiens du même bord, de même que rien ne justifie qu'elles méritent de figurer ici plus que les autres représentants du parti socialiste et leur grosse trompe, ni ne justifie leur présence ici plus que les candidats des autres partis. à quand les portraits de robert hue, georges marchais, neunoeil de st.cloud, le vicomte du puy du fou, bayrou et ses oreilles, le facteur du npa, ou le chasseur nihous?! aussi avant d'accuser les autres gratuitement comme vous venez de le faire, sachez de quoi vous parlez. Madame Grinderche (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

exposer des faits et une argumentation n'est pas de la paranoia, mon action était totalement justifiée, si vous avez un problème avec les esprits égalitaristes allez vous faire voir. Madame Grinderche (talk) 20:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Palette navigation

Bonjour,

Hum, oui, disons que ça me paraissait une bonne idée quand je l'ai faite pour la placer sur une toute nouvelle page de Règle ; elle me paraissait déjà une beaucoup moins bonne quand sur d'autres pages il m'a fallu enlever la palette d'aide globale pour mettre celle-là. Puisque ça ne te paraît une bonne idée du tout, tu as bien fait de remettre celle d'avant.

Toutefois, petit bémol concernant ton commentaire de modif : « palette navigation doit être conçue pour les utilisateurs pas pour les admin ». Mon but n'était pas de la faire pour les admins (je pense que la plupart connaissent toutes ces pages) ; mais bien pour les utilisateurs souhaitant en apprendre plus sur les règles et recommandation. Ce sont quand même les pages les plus importantes (hors aide, mais je me comprends : la politique de blocage est en elle-même plus importante que la page d'aide de conversion SVG — même si cette dernière est sans doute plus utile pour l'utilisateur lambda).

Personnellement, je trouve la palette d'aide actuelle hyper-dense (tellement que je ne m'en suis jamais servie). D'un point de vue ergonomique, ça me semble pas idéal de vouloir caser à peu près tous les items de Commons:Table des matières de l'aide dans une palette. De même, des pages comme Commons:Patrouille ou Commons:Révocation n'intéressent probablement pas le contributeur lambda, cible de cette palette.

Mais bon, le fait est que je n'ai pas mieux à proposer, et que je débarque un peu avec mes gros sabots alors que cette palette a de toute évidence une histoire et fait l'objet de réflexions et de discussions. Un peu d'humilité de ma part quoi .

Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Bassin-fluvial-de-l-Ob.png

Tarko-Salé n'est pas une capital régionale. C'est Salékhard. Pourriez-vous le corriger? — Klimenok (talk) 08:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Bassin de l'Arsenal

Bonjour, je me suis permis, en vieux parisien, de rajouter une petite note sur votre photo concernant l'Opéra Bastille. Et je vous recommande, si vous ne le connaissez pas, le petit restaurant (poissons), là, au bord de l'eau.--Jebulon (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Re. Je suis nouveau, et j'ai trop de photos déjà prises à offrir: donc peu de choses sur Paris, comme tu peux le voir. ça va s'arranger !--Jebulon (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Luna 9

Hola, estoy escribiendo sobre astronomía y esta imagen me vendria muy bien, es para publicar en una enciclopedia, quisiera saber si puedo usarla y bajo que condiciones, muchas gracias! LauraP

Hola, Cualquiera puede copiar, usar y modificar cualquier fichero de los que hay disponibles aquí para cualquier propósito incluido el uso comercial; siempre y cuándo se acredite la fuente y los autores y siempre y cuándo sus versiones de las copias/avances garanticen la misma libertad de uso para otros. De nada. --Pline (talk) 08:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Images for ISS Science and Research Facilities

I created 'ISS Facilities' Category before checking for existing categories, my bad. I intend to do a lot more uploading, and would like to solve as many issues, before it's too much. Please check Research and Science on the International Space Station for better picture (no pun intended). I propose a new group 'ISS Research and science facilities' and will start move with my files in about 12 hours. ThorX13 (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I have not moved a thing, had a bit of second thoughts, because i already use link to that category on a couple of places. I have to clean that up, and don't fell like it right now, to be honest. The least painless solution to this laziness would be, to put existing images temporary in both categories, and upload new images to the new category. I have also received hints, that words after ISS should start with lower-case, which means = ISS research and science facilities. I apologise for not replying sooner, was not on Commons.--ThorX13 (talk) 07:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

They are all moved to Category:ISS research and science facilities, and all links are updated. --ThorX13 (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chausey bateau de pêche à marée basse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and well composed --Croucrou 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Toile dont le peintre est inconnu (?)

Bonjour. Je voudrais savoir qui est le peintre auteur de ce tableau svp. : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Lorient-au-18-eme-siecle.jpg Merci par avance de me renseigner. ;-) JRH (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Jean-R%C3%A9my_Homand)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Passerelle Base de Plein Air de Cergy Pontoise P1030534.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle Base de Plein Air de Cergy Pontoise P1030534.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is maybe a little noisy, but the composition is very good to me. Nice pic, IMO.--Jebulon 09:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barges in Paris P1000596.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Cayambe 07:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I placed a Category:River locks discussion in the village pump

Today a new category Category:River locks was introduced. I wonder if this is a useful category, as we already have Canal locks and it is not so simple to categorise locks in rivers with a parallel lock canal. Please transfer this item to another discussion forum when appropriate. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Transferred to Commons:Categories_for_discussion --Stunteltje (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa arcachonnaise P1050162.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need a perspective correction.--Jebulon 09:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)  Done--Pline 12:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Ok. --Berthold Werner 15:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River floating dry dock P1050226.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal d'Orléans P1050352.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dune du pyla 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, although the sky is slightly overexposed (still without a disturbing visual effect) and the sharpening halos around the people on the dune are only just bearable at full resolution. --Johannes Robalotoff 15:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of la Genevraye P1050471.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... please, add geotag. --Cayambe 19:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Loing a Nemours P1050502.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 13:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Tugboat in ... Morbihan, Finistère

L'affectation des remorqueurs change régulièrement. L'Abeille Languedoc est je crois basé à La Rochelle. La catégorie créée ne me semble pas très pérenne. Le port d'attache pourrait être également utilisé mais il est souvent peu significatif (Brest pour l'Abeille Languedoc). Pline (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Pline,

je suis nouveau sur Commons (pas sur Wikipédia France) donc je ne maîtrise pas forcément les ficelles de la catégorisation des illustrations. Je n'ai pas inventé le rangement que j'ai fait mais ai copié la catégorisation des bateaux de pêche (exemple : Category:Trawlers in Charente-Maritime). Le nom de la catégorie dit "in Charente-Maritime", donc on parle ici de localisation du bateau et non pas de l'origine. C'est ce que j'ai fait en me basant sur le lieu de la prise de vue et non pas sur le port d'attache du bateau.

Je peux me tromper, ou ces catégories peuvent être superflues. Si vous estimez que c'est le cas, merci de corriger mes erreurs.

Cordialement. Badzil (talk) 07:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de l'Ourcq pres de Vignely P1050588.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments really nice composition but exposure should imo be a bit darker --Mbdortmund 22:23, 8 August 2010 (UTC) I agree on the excellent composition but brightness and exposure are ok for me. --Ikiwaner 14:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC) Very good. Identifiable by me as a french landscape even in thumbnail.--Jebulon 23:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church Acheres la Foret P1050637.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI (Style "Roman" of the twelfth century) --Archaeodontosaurus 08:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relais Herzien sur le plateau pres de Retolut P1050721.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Iotatau 21:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entree Forum des Halles et Bourse de Commerce P1060107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourse de Commerce P1060092.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good... but with a slight regret for the crop on the pyramid in the foreground. --Cayambe 17:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eustache et Jardin des Halles Paris P1060104.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eustache church Paris P1060101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concorde Air France Musee du Bourget P1020006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image Centre spatial de Kourou

At this Image in the map symbology is the colum railtracks listed. But nowhere are any railtracks drawned. Question: are there no railtracks?

In diesem Bild ist in der Legende die Zeile Bahnline enthalten. Aber es sind nirgends Bahnlinien eingezeichnet. Frage: Gibt es da keine Bahnlinien?

Mon français n'est pas encore très bien. Je regrette.77.189.143.200 21:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Ja, es gibt Bahnlinien, aber sie sind nur auf dieses Bild - File:Carte Detail port spatial de Kourou.svg - mit mehr details, aufgezeichnet. Pline (talk) 22:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P1080469.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 16:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de l'Ourcq a Bondy P1080487.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 16:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Henri-Frenay P1070112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the composition --Carschten 16:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC) Me too, but the perspective should be corrected.--Jebulon 17:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)  Done Because I don't think it needs the consensual review I tried a distortion correction by myself. Jebulon, better now? --Carschten 19:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC) OK very good now. Back to "promotion"--Jebulon 23:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de l Ourccq pres de Claye Souilly P1080301.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Jovianeye 17:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Solidor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

What about this one? Looks very "Brittany"... Not geocoded, but it is the same point of view.--Jebulon (talk) 22:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I prefer the nominated photo or this but after some retouch.--MrPanyGoff 14:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

 Support Finally - I support this photo.--MrPanyGoff 22:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill de Choix near Gastins Seine et Marne P1080838.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Confluence du Mort et de l'Orge à Villiers sur Orge P1090246.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Axe majeur P1100061.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise de Rampillon P1100388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp, IMO. Saffron Blaze 21:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Sharpness increased --Pline 06:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Saint Loup de Naud P1100431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Harrison49 21:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofs of Bonnieux Provence France P1110634 14-06-2011 10-24-52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 19:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ménerbes P1110794 14-06-2011 13-48-52 14-06-2011 13-48-52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 13:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Taillades Provence France P1110929 14-06-2011 16-02-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with sharpening. Mattbuck 13:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment  Done--Pline 20:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC) Good. Mattbuck 14:28, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval fortifications of Provins P1120608.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a panorama of both pictures would be better in this case --Taxiarchos228 11:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval fortifications of Provins P1120605.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a panorama of both pictures would be better in this case --Taxiarchos228 11:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise-de-Saint-Hilliers-P1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems to be too noisy and there is a strange effect between roof and sky (See annotation). --Berthold Werner 20:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC) I check on the original picture and it seems to be something real, perhaps the sun reflecting on plaster like on the top of the roof. I apply a noise filter.--Pline 20:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Good now --Berthold Werner 17:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Photos moches

Eh bien désolée, on m'a quasiment sommée d'importer mes vieilles photos de MH, alors je l'ai fait. Si elles ne te plaisent pas, propose-les à la suppression, que veux-tu que je te dise ? Ce n'est pas facile de prendre un soleil levant à travers un bâtiment quand il fait froid, qu'on est fatigué, qu'il n'y a rien pour s'appuyer et que l'appareil photo n'est pas de très grande qualité. Si tu les juges indigne de commons, supprime-les. Je n'ai jamais prétendu être une photographe professionnelle. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Je n'exige rien, mais comme, au fil du temps, comme le nombre de photos ratées du même sujet se multipliait (il y en a quand même une soixantaine), je me suis inquiété .... Puis ca fait un peu tache pour les contributeurs français dans le cadre d'une compétition amicale européenne. Par ailleurs la présence d'un grand nombre de photos non utilisables est un des facteurs qui contribue à rendre le contenu de Commons plus difficilement exploitable avec le temps. --Pline (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Avec des termes tels que « pellicule foirée » ou le fait de parler directement d'« une soixantaine de photo ratée », je pense que les limites de l'amabilité ont été dépassées. Quant au nombre, il n'y a pas de murs limitant la quantité sur Commons. Pour moi, les participations d'Harmonia ne sont pas un problème. Ton attitude l'est d'avantage et j'espère pour tout contributeur à Commons que cela n'est pas une habitude chez toi. Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 18:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Objectivement, oui : libre à chacun de faire. Mais je lui dis gentiment que pour avoir toutes ses chances, il faudrait mieux en sélectionner quelques unes. Tu as raté le coche. Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 08:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Ta réponse est un amalgame malheureux entre un incident isolé et l'ensemble de tes contributions sur lesquelles il n'y a rien à dire, bien au contraire. Pour ma part, je n'ai de reproches à te faire que sur tes remarques à Harmonia, bien trop brutales. Je ne saisis toujour spas pourquoi tu as été aussi dur, alors que tu as prouvé plus d'une fois que tu étais un contributeur de talent. Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 16:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Concernant ta réponse sur la page de Trizek, si tu as des reproches à faire à des gens fait le en face, pas indirectement. Concernant les photos moches trizek a déjà tout dit. PierreSelim (talk) 22:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

"No FOP in France"

Bonjour Pline,

Je viens de supprimer une de tes photos qui représent un bâtiment récent (un édicule Guimard). Il n'y a en effet pas de liberté de panorama en France, et même si c'est bien dommage, Commons se doit de respecter cette interdiction. Cette image sera restaurée en 2013.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Il y a déjà eu plusieurs PàS sur le sujet (dont une qui concernait spécifiquement des édicules Guimard : Commons:Deletion_requests/French_architects), donc non, il ne me semble pas nécessaire de re-repasser par une PàS.

La photo est : File:Station Pigalle P1050879.JPG.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Je ne crois pas qu'on puisse couper court à une procédure de suppression notamment en cas d'application de la clause de minimis (on ne peut pas être à la fois juge et partie dans ce domaine). Ma liste de suivi m'indique que tu as supprimé une autre photo File:Metro parís .JPG. Vu son nom je vais avoir un peu de mal à la retrouver dans mes archives. Est ce que je suis à l'origine de son chargement ou est ce que je suis simplement intervenu en modif ? Les droits de Guimard tombent dans 6 mois, faut peut-être pas non plus faire de zèle ... --Pline (talk) 11:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Tu veux sérieusement prétendre au de minimis pour une photo dont le titre et le sujet principal est l'objet illégalement représenté ? Si c'est le cas, je veux bien restaurer et lancer un PàS mais il est très peu probable que l'issue soit la conservation.

Pour File:Metro parís .JPG, tu as juste faire une catégorisation.

Aux dernières nouvelles, Hector huimard est mort 20 mai 1942. Ses œuvres ne sont donc pas dans le domaine public avant le 1^er janvier 2013, soit dans 15 mois.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise de Themericourt et ancienne croix du cimetière P1120428 14-07-2011 14-06-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment To me, it needs perspective correction and it's too tight at top and at bottom (I don't like the composition)--Lmbuga 11:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC) I like it. Mattbuck 23:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Laon Liszt

Salut.

Mes grands-parents s'étant mariés dans cette église (et je possède leur maison à 15km), je suis toujours intéressé et ému par les images de cette Cathédrale de Laon qui couronne si bien sa montagne.

J'ai donc examiné avec intérêt ton image et sa légende, et n'ayant pas trouvé de musicien se nommant "Litz", j'ai pensé que tu voulais parler de Liszt (je ne parle pas non plus le magyar...). J'ai donc modifié en conséquence, avec les liens. J'ai aussi mis le lien pour le "stub" de l'orchestre "Les Siècles".

J'espère ne pas avoir commis d'erreur.

Amitiés asiniennes, --Jebulon (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

PS, pour info, le concert ayant eu lieu le 9 septembre, ta photo doit dater du 8.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orgue et rosace ouest de la cathédrale de Laon DSC 0185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Soissons Laon DSC 0689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloitre de l'ancienne abbaye-S-Martin de Laon DSC 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 20:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloitre de l'ancienne abbaye-S-Martin de Laon DSC 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 20:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Icone serbe de la Sainte-Face conservée dans la cathedrale de Laon DSC 0152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intérieur de l'église de l'abbaye Notre-Dame du Bec-DSC 0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 15:23, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remparts de Provins format jpg DSC 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de la Coquille a Provins DSC 0239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good/Bon -- MJJR 06:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Wilson a Tours DSC 0461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roche du Sault a Villecerf utilise pour l escalade sur bloc DSC 0335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI for me. --Jakubhal 10:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaire et ancienne grille du choeur de la collégiale Saint-Quiriace de Provins format jpg DSC 0179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me it is QI. --Jakubhal 09:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Pline, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail Collégiale Saint-Gervais-Saint-Protais de Gisors .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and usefull description. --Coyau 17:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Installation du port de Rouen près du pont de Brotone DSC 0218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and quality, consider cropping some pixels away on the left side. Mvg, Basvb 10:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)  Done, Pline 17:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dock flottant dans le port de Rouen DSC 0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferry of La Bouille on Seine River DSC 0104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 16:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse 55 de Saint Eau DSC 0424.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good qualityfor me. --Jkadavoor 05:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de Bourgogne vers Pouillenay DSC 0187.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It looks a bit too soft. Can you add some sharpness? --Iifar 13:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)  Comment It really needs a crop of the distracting elements on the left and right as well as some of the sky. Give a bit more emphasis on the building and its reflection. QICbot (talk)  Support Fine with me now, little crop on the left makes it even better. --Iifar 20:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Gissey sur Ouche DSC 0412.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 18:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal entre Commissey et Tonnerre DSC 0379.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good (quality) image --Titodutta 10:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Vinnemer DSC 0340.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port au niveau de Marolles sous Ligneres DSC 0420.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is not perfect: a slight perspective distortion, and the building at the right seems a little bit overexposed. But I like the composition and the atmosphere. QI though for me. -- MJJR 19:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont à Cry sur Armençon DSC 0172.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Der DSC 0062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de la Morge DSC 0401.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A little tilted in clockwise direction. --Moonik 09:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)  Comment OK ?--Pline 11:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC) OK now. --Moonik 17:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse vers Percey DSC 0445.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice composition but seems a bit tilted clockwise. --Myrabella 16:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC) Comment OK  ? --Pline 12:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Good, and good mood/composition with the bicycle.--Jebulon 15:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacelle Audouin Dollfus DSC 0204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 04:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

--Vera (talk) 12:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail-eglise-Ceffonds-193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 13:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Voie verte

Bonjour Pline. Merci pour ton travail de catégorisation des voies vertes (au passage, il n'y a plus de majuscule). Il reste cepedant une petite incertitude à régler aussi avec Coyau: la redirection de Category:Voie Verte. La question est: une voie verte est-elle dans 100% des cas une ancienne voie ferrée ? Si oui, la redirection est justifiée, sinon, il faut inclure la 1ère dans la 2ème. Je laisse ce message aussi chez Coyau. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Tout ce qui suit ne concerne que le territoire français. Une voie verte est un aménagement cyclable qui répond à un cahier des charges défini par des instances françaises. Une ancienne voie ferrée lorsqu'elle est aménagée donne souvent lieu à l'aménagement d'une voie cyclable mais peut faire place à chemin interdit aux vélos. Si c'est une voie cyclable, elle peut répondre au cahier des charges des voies vertes (le plus souvent) ou non. Le fait que le terme voie verte ne figure pas dans l'intitulé de la piste cyclable ne veut pas dire que la piste en question n'est pas une Voie verte. Site de référence malheureusement pas toujours à jour Pline (talk) 10:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse amont de Pont d'Ouche sur le canal de Bourgogne DSC 0572.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, although sharpness not optimal -- MJJR 19:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse canal de Bourgogne entre Veuvey sur Ouche et la Forge DSC 0578.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 21:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse du canal de Bourgogne du Banet entre Gissey sur Ouche et Sainte Marie sur Ouche DSC 0635.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good of QI for me --Marianne Casamance 19:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc Buffon a Montbard DSC 0011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse situee a l aval de Fleurey sur Ouche sur le canal de Bourgogne DSC 0659.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted to the right, if corrected will be QI --Smial 23:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)  Info now rotated. --Alchemist-hp 00:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Ok, thx! -- Smial 07:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse canal de Bourgogne entre Veuvey et la Forge DSC 0590.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view and QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 17:37, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison éclusière sur le canal de Bourgogne a Courcelles lès Montbard DSC 0407.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeoonier et chenil de l'abbaye de Fontenay DSC 0149.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and informative. Belle image! -- MJJR 21:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

map of russia -> 1945

hello,

there is a little bug in your map: Alaska is sold to USA in 1867 (and not 1876). Sincerely yours. Thomas Goussu

Corrigé. Done Pline (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nord est paris vu depuis le dome du Sacré Coeur DSC 0239.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it, but the curve is a bit distracting. Mattbuck 21:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC).  Comment Perspective distortion should be corrected. --Iifar 07:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)  Info Perspective distortion corrected. -Pline 08:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 10:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sud-de-Paris-vu-depuis-le-dôme du Sacré-Cœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Mattbuck 21:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC).  Comment Very nice, but imo perspective distortion should be removed before promotion. --Iifar 07:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)  Info Perspective distortion corrected. -Pline 08:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont d'Arcole et Hotel de ville de Paris DSC 0046.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 13:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Paris North west from the dome of Sacré Coeur DSC 0047.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very slight CW tilt, but excellent image nevertheless -- MJJR 21:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Lamarck haut de la butte Montmartre DSC 0410.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good quality -- MJJR 12:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris view from Sacre Coeur DSC 0371.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow on the tower at right is a bit distracting... but QI nevertheless to me. --Cayambe 13:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse pres de Bazolles DSC 0707.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine with me. --Iifar 09:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charolais dans le Nivernais DSC 0553.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 09:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau-de-Villemolin-DSC 0466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 09:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse de Marcy DSC 0577.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a very nice image.--ArildV 07:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crue de l'Yonne pres de Crain DSC 0361-001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paysages du Morvan DSC 0493.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison-de-1328-a-Cravant-DS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau-de-Villemolin-0484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 14:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grain sur Paris DSC 0154.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very cool, but some overexposure. I'm unsure on this one. Mattbuck 13:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)I'm sure, for me it's QI ;) --Ralf Roletschek 16:54, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Nivernais DSC 0726.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A rather odd compositional choice but it works. --Saffron Blaze 11:11, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Sardy-les-Epiry sur le canal du Nivernais DSC 0598.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:11, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise de l'abbaye St Germain à Auxerre DSC 0007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Marianne Casamance 20:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse sur le canal du Nivernais près de Sardy-les-Epiry DSC 0604.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echelle d'écluses sur le canal du Nivernais pres de Sardy lès EpiryDSC 0637.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Anguison à Corbigny DSC 0544.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TER a la Gare de Chatel-Censoir DSC 0322.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 05:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Anguison a Corbigny DSC 0406.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 00:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale d'Auxerre DSC 0010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 21:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fosse-Dionne-a-Tonnerre-DSC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Image documentaire de qualitéJLPC 10:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Tanlay DSC 0236.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Selbymay 11:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazolles et le canal du Nivernais DSC 0716.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Tanlay DSC 0211.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye St Leonard a Corbigny DSC 0414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 15:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle St Georges Pacy Sur Armançon DSC 0341.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 23:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse pres de Panneçot DSC 0869.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. --Myrabella 06:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Denis de Merry-sur-Yonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight yes... but QI nevertheless imo. --Cayambe 14:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amphibie utilisé par les mytiliculteurs de la baie du Mont st Michel DSC 0337.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 09:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux gréement au port de Cancale DSC 0383.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 03:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux gréement à Cancale DSC 0388.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage sur le Couesnon au Mont St Michel DSC 0312.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairie de Courtils DSC 0172.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:57, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moteur d avion SALMSON type P9 1915 DSC 0077.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 12:36, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont St Michel DSC 0212.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:41, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Saint-Michel DSC 0203.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux gréement à Cancale DSC 0386.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont St Michel Attention aux moutons DSC 0155.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for Qi. --NorbertNagel 22:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse sur le Canal du Rhone au Rhin vers Bretagne DSC 0374.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 10:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usine Solvay a Tavaux DSC 0629.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent ! --Orikrin1998 15:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silos sur la Saône pres de Esbarres DSC 0668.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway Mulhouse DSC 0107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 15:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway-Mulhaouse-DSC 0047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 15:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway Mulhouse DSC 0098.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 15:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway Mulhouse DSC 0165.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 15:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Sully sur Loire DSC 0143.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 09:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau-de-Sully-sur-Loire-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Sully sur Loire DSC 0098.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good / très bien fait. -- Aisano 16:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port fluvial de Saint-Jean de Losne DSC 0658.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please correct or remove the red category below the file descr. --Cayambe 18:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bras du Doubs à l'Isle sur le Doubs DSC 0812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 14:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Sully sur Loire DSC 0188.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jagro 11:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte-St-Jean du chateau de Chateau-Thierry-DSC 0007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor flaws in the sky IMO, but QI nevertheless.--Jebulon 12:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau-de-Sully-DSC 0182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 12:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway de Reims pres de la gare DSC 0257.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could be improved but QI though. --Poco a poco 08:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway de Reims pres de la gare DSC 0252.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 06:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc scientifique du Près-la-Rose sur l'Allan a Montbéliard DSC 0563.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now. --Cayambe 08:53, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Sully DSC 0152.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, It lacks the geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus 17:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse de Mont Saint Père sur la Marne DSC 0079.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallée de la Marne vers Courcelles DSC 0121.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice landscape, nice capture, very good light and composition. Très agréable à contempler, ravissant.--Jebulon 14:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La montagne de Reims DSC 0226.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 13:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise de Ceffonds DSC 0167.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vignoble vers Courcelles DSC 0124.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 20:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway de Reims pres de la gareDSC 0248.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise de Verneuil Marne DSC 0132.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vignobles de Champagne pres d Ay DSC 0267.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view -- MJJR 07:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vignobles de Champagne pres d Ay DSC 0204.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulvérisateur pour vignes DSC 0249.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 09:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Marne a Dormans DSC 0117.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecluse sur le canal du Rhone au Rhin près de l'usine Solvay de Tavaux DSC 0626.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine place de la Révolution a Besançon DSC 0254.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Allan vers Fesches le Chatel DSC 0449.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support. QI for me. -- JLPC 21:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Doubs vers Audelange DSC 0575.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 12:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Doubs a Dole DSC 0611.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usine Solvay a Tavaux DSC 0632.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a perspective correction IMO --Moonik 07:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)  Done--Pline 17:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Loewenfels a Mulhouse DSC 0125.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. J'aime bien l'effet de profondeur et la légère perspective en diagonale. Moi, je n'ose pas...--Jebulon 00:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Rien d'intentionnel : juste une rue étroite et une voiture mal placée... --Pline 11:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC) La force normative des faits... -- Aisano 23:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Yonne à Villeneuve sur Yonne DSC 0422.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. -- JLPC 19:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poterne de Moret-sur-Loing DSC 0022.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:50, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Moret sur Loing et Porte de Bourgogne DSC 0018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Disturbing cars... but QI nevertheless to me. --Cayambe 18:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Larros DSC 0044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Larros DSC 0056.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voilier dans le port de Larros DSC 0032.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taichi plage Pereire Arcachon DSC 0089.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Jolie image de plage. La géolocation est souhaitable. --Cayambe 05:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voilier dans le port de Larros DSC 0026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baignade surveillée a la TesteDSC 0158.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise-de-Nonville-DSC 0071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Good quality. --High Contrast 20:37, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piste cyclable a Arcachon DSC 0120.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Larros a sec DSC 0023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau d Eguilly DSC 0044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 06:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau d Eguilly DSC 0050.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison a Arcachon DSC 0149.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 15:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 août 0209 Canal vers St Urbain Maconcourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit saturated, but QI for me. --JLPC 21:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 août 0412 Pont-canal sur la Marne à Foulain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 04:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 août 10395 la Bèze à Mirebeau sur Bèze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 04:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 août 0330 écluse Choignes canal Marne Saone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 11:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 août 0400 Pont-levant sur le canal à Luzy sur Marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Image du jour Wiki Loves Monuments 2012

Your picture File:2012 10248 Chateau de Fontaine-Française.jpg has been selected by the volunteers of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 in France as picture of the day from the volunteers of 1 September 2012.

--PierreSelim (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Eglise-de-Seine-sur-Vingeanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 10353 Chateau-de-Rosieres-à-Seine-sur-Vingeanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0191-Chateau-de-Oigny-en-Valois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0170 Mausolée du général Charpentier à Oigny en Valois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 23:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0208-Hôtel-de-Ville-de-Villers-Cotterêts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 23:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0281 La Ferté Millon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0335 Abbaye-Notre-Dame-de-Lieu-Restauré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0346 Chapelle-de-Pondron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me--Lmbuga 02:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 10176 Commanderie de la Romagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper, but ok --Poco a poco 16:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0248-enceinte-fortifiée-du-Château-de-Noüe-à-Villers-Cotterets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0229-Eglise-St-Nicolas-de-Villers-Cotterêts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0092-Chateau-de-La-Ferté-Millon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012

Bonjour et merci pour ta participation à Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Je viens de remarquer que tu as téléchargé le fichier File:2012--DSC 0545-Eglise-de-Martainville.jpg sans l'inclure dans le concours. Pourtant cette église est bien un monument historique. Cet oubli est-il volontaire ?

Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 07:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Toutes mes excuses, j'ai regardé un peu trop rapidement. J'ai confondu Martainville (Eure) avec Martainville-Épreville (Saine-Maritime) et je me suis laissé abusé par le modèle Mérimée utiliser sur le fichier, désolé.

Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0164-Eglise-de-Bézu-la-Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 02:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0302-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0236-Eglise-de-Beauficel-en-Lyons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0605-Chateau--de-Martainville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0320-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 14:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Description photos abbaye

Bonjour, Pline. Ne t'en fais pas : je ne demande aucune justification (de quel droit d'ailleurs ?). Ma remarque n'était qu'une suggestion qui peut permettre un vote plus facile (!) et, peut-être, un choix plus simple pour d'éventuels utilisateurs. Je me heurte parfois au même problème, faisant moi aussi mes photos au hasard de mes déplacements, lesquels se font à pied ou... en voiture ! -- Cordialement. JLPC (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0416-Le-manoir-de-Colmont-et-'église-St-Etienne-a-Perriers-sur-Andelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0265 Eglise de Lyons la Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 07:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0476-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strangeness with geometry, but very nice. --Florstein 16:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0206-Eglise-de--Fleury-la-Foret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0311-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 07:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0365-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (Pourrais-tu préciser les légendes s'il te plaît ?) QI for me. --JLPC 21:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0179-Eglise-de-Bézu-la-Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0341-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0523-Maison--a-Ry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 07:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Abbaye de Mortemer

Même si je suis long à la détente, une question au sujet de ta photo en discussion : n'as-tu pas utilisé un "high-pass filter" qui a été enregistré en léger décalage avec la photo ? Cela m'est déjà arrivé et j'ai l'impression que le léger trait qu'on voit sur la gauche tout au long du bâtiment est un indice. Rien de sûr toutefois : si tu juges que ça en vaut la peine et si tu as conservé l'original, tu peux, éventuellement, vérifier et modifier. -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

J'utilise effectivement les fonctions du logiciel photo notamment pour corriger le contraste mais je ne pense pas que cela ait pu laisser des traces de ce type. Peux tu me rappeler la photo concernée ? --Pline (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0029-Croix-de-St-Denis-le-Ferment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0020-Eglise-de-St-Denis-le-Ferment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0073-Halle-de-Lyons-la-Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0239-Pigeonnier-du-chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 01:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0254-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Slightly strange sharpening, still ok due to high resolution. --Julian Herzog 15:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0248-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0500-Eglise-abbatiale-abbaye-de-St-Germain-a-Auxerre-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 15:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0302-Tour-de-l'Horloge-à-Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, maybe the black spot (piece of the roof) at the very left could be retouched. - A.Savin 08:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0466-Abbaye-de-Saint-Germain-a-Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Something went wrong with perspective correction. The bottom lines of the building is bended, not staight. --Sfu 12:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment I try to fix it--Pline 10:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Sorry, but I don't see much of an improvment. The vertical lines in the bottom of the building are still curved. How do you correct the perspective? --Sfu 13:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)  CommentThis building is old (400+years) and his walls are curved. I can't do better.--Pline 18:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC) If you say it really looks like that then ok. --Sfu 19:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0389-23-rue-de-la-Fécauderie--a-Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 10254 Chateau de Fontaine-Française.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 11:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0178-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The 2/3 format is not the best for this shot nevertheless good quality. --PierreSelim 07:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Pline, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

--PierreSelim (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour. Je t'ai envoyé un mail il y a 8 jours pour la cérémonie de remise des prix. Je crois que tu n'y as pas encore répondu, tu peux vérifier dans ta boîte mail que tu l'as bien reçu ? Merci, GuillaumeG (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Yet another price from Wiki Loves Monuments

Bonjour :) Un petit message pour t'annoncer que File:2012--DSC 0178-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg vient de gagner le prix "MH privé" de Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Léna (talk) 09:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Palais-de-Tokyo.jpg

File:Palais-de-Tokyo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 02:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierge à l'enfant de Jean-Jacques Caffieri Eglise Saint-Antoine a Compiegne DSC 0276.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 09:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tramway-line-T3B-in-Paris-near-canal-de-l'Ourcq-DSC 0048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!