User talk:Picknick99

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Picknick99!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

== File source is not properly indicated: File:Ps0027.jpg ==

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ps0027.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am not quite clear what is wanted from me. I took the photo nearly fifty years ago

Humbug, my bad. Everything is properly done by you. My apologies. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hedwig. thanks for your reply. So I take it everything is ok with Ps0027.jpg. I uploaded it as an experiment really - it's a photo I took nearly fifty years ago! Now I am having some trouble uploading a couple of other photos. My theory was if I got the subject/owner of the photo to gift it to me along with all associated rights to do with as I wish (I have this in writing) then I assume that legally it then belongs to me and I can use it. If this is not acceptable to Wiki then what is? 2.223.56.188 16:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the steamer is fine. And yes again. I explained it on my talk page User talk:Hedwig in Washington#Louise Golbey, please have a look there. I think that would be the safest way to go. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hedwig I emailed permissions as you suggested, so that may take a while I guess. The reason there are THREE sizes is that I could not work out how to resize it in the editor, so I just resized till I found one that fitted the box! I'm all for copyright by the way, but I do think Wikipedia take it a bit far. I was reading the rules and even a garden may be the copyright of the gardener! And what about, say, a photo my late mother took of me fifty years ago? I guess the lawyers make a hell of a lot of money from all this and it seems to get a point where it is in danger fo stifling free speech and expression. Maybe the train photo could be held to be a breach, since it is a photo of someone else's patented design (the train) who I never asked any permission from. It's a minefield of philosophical and legal minutae! best wishes Picknick99 (talk) 18:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a minefield. But you are fine with the train. Trains and cars (and stuff like it) is allowed to be photographed (in genral that is) :-) We have the problem that our servers are in the USA, meaning we have to obey the US copyright law. On top, we also have to be certain that the media that is uploaded here, is free to reproduce in the country of origin, resp. the country of the photographer. Then you add art (what is art anyway?) to the mix and you need a degree in international law or a cup of tea to figure it out. Let me know which of the three images you'd like to restore. Sizing in Wikipedia is easy. Just add the amount of pixels you want to see. :-)))) [[File:Example.jpg|250 px|thumbnail|right|Here's your cation]] Best regards, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:05, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]