User talk:PetarM/Archive 9

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Divje Babe flute (Late Pleistocene flute).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Divje Babe flute (Late Pleistocene flute).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Anita Rani.jpg

Copyright status: File:Anita Rani.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anita Rani.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austrian Embassy in Belgrade (Ambasada Austrije u Beogradu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Hoka_One_One

Hoka One One has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Gnangarra 14:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, PetarM! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Christmas table (Serbian cuisine).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Asparagus soup (spargelsuppe).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Something about Soviet Production

Hey,Your Father had a Soviet Camera. How it's work and show me the first picture taken by this Russian Camera. I am pretty instered to see the quality of a Soviet Production and a Russian production.

By an Indian. 2409:4060:E9D:7642:0:0:354A:5013 07:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Perfect, i have family album, many photos. Even from Lubitel 2. You wont see any difference between Leica, Kodak or Lubitel, Zenit. Lens was good enough and beside is film - not sensor. Mile (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ljubljana in Ljubljanica.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 00:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Dish of blueberries.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Vegetarian Pizza.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kiev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xiaomi Poco F1 on Wikipedia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genex Tower (кула Генекс, Западна капија Београда).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 17:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svetosavski plato (Beograd).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 13:59, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Genex Tower (кула Генекс, Западна капија Београда).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Genex Tower (кула Генекс, Западна капија Београда).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golubac Fortress (град Голубац).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meat burek (GAK bakery, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good sharpness! Are the whites a little glary and perhaps a tad overexposed on the left side? -- Ikan Kekek 16:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek I've edited highlights. It's tasty meat burek. --PetarM 15:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)  Support I'll bet it is! -- Ikan Kekek 20:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Golubac Fortress (град Голубац).jpg

Hi PetarM, I like your picture, thanks for your contribution. I think you can avoid stitching errors by using blend masks. For example, you could take the moving wind turbine out of just one frame so that it's sharp. Maybe the following links will help you:

https://hugin.sourceforge.io/tutorials/Blend-masks/en.shtml

https://ptgui.com/examples/masktutorial.html

I look forward to more photos from you! :-) Regards -- Wolf im Wald 21:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

@Wolf im Wald : Photo is not single, but it is not stitchind. Its Hi-res shot, something like binning. Camera doesnt move that time, it just take more time than single shot. --Mile (talk) 08:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I understand! Thanks for your answer. I know a similar mode of my Sony. Unfortunately, you can only use this mode if absolutely nothing is moving in the picture. Maybe you'll do more stitchings in the future. Regards :-) -- Wolf im Wald 03:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pobednik (The Victor, Belgrade).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pobednik (The Victor, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chariot from Dupljaja, Serbia, c.1300 BC (Bronze Age).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hayelom Shegae Maeregu (2022 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yirga Dagne Siranesh (left) and Hailemichael Sentayehu Lewetegn (2022 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vidičeva hiša v Radovljici (Vidich House in Radovljica).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 19:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruth Chepngetich (2021 Chichago Marathon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 12:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 Slovenia

Slovenščina: Dragi Petar, hvala za tvoj prispevek za četrti natečaj Wiki Loves Monuments v Sloveniji! Žirija je ocenila prispele fotografije in to soboto, 10. decembra, bomo ob 20h razglasili zmagovalce. Priključiš se lahko temu namenjenemu Zoom srečanju in si ogledaš zmagovalne fotografije ter kratko predstavitev natečaja. Vabljen!

English: Dear Petar, thank you for participating in the fourth Wiki Loves Monuments competition in Slovenia! The jury has completed scoring the contributions and we will announce the winners this Saturday, 10th December, at 20h. You're invited to tune in to the dedicated Zoom meeting at this time, to see the winning photographs and a short presentation of the competition (it will be in Slovene only). Best,

— Yerpo ^Eh? 17:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Povezava do srečanja/Link to meeting, Meeting ID: 502 969 5167. MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi in Hazrat-e Turkestan, Kazakhstan.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, PetarM! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Црква Светих Ћирила и Методија у Љубљани.JPG

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 11:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Calibrate

Hi Petar - what do I need to do please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Color space, its Uncalibrated. Normally we put in RGB - red,green,blue. But, maybe i would check, since you have birds; in many colors they come (fur). You can see space are a bit different in color mix. Mile (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postna sarma (vegetarian sarma, Cuisine of Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 21:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear PetarM/Archive 9,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Postna sarma (vegetarian sarma, Cuisine of Serbia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Postna sarma (vegetarian sarma, Cuisine of Serbia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Божићна вечера (traditional Christmas dinner; Folklore of Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)