User talk:PereslavlFoto/QI-2013

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-veskovo-2010-bell-1106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-moskovskaa-057-7449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-abramov-sm-8277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-amelkin-sa-8906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add and English description to the photo. --Tuxyso 15:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Good quality, very good sharpness. IMHO the face is a bit too bright, but OK. --Tuxyso 15:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-smirnov-av-8178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus is on the glasses and not on the eyes, but still OK for QI. --Tuxyso 20:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-abramov-sm-amelkin-sa-8288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-panteleimon-9387-face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - only the water bottle is a bit disturbing. --NorbertNagel 16:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-agadjanyan-ak-9434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but somewhat oversharpened. Please use somewhat lower settings for future uploads. --Smial 09:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-marasanova-vm-9571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but somewhat oversharpened. Please use somewhat lower settings for future uploads. --Smial 09:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-sokolov-nv-9366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but somewhat oversharpened. Please use somewhat lower settings for future uploads. --Smial 09:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-vasilieva-mv-9401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but somewhat oversharpened. Please use somewhat lower settings for future uploads. --Smial 09:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-alexeev-vn-9785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Lmbuga 18:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-kolchin-dv-9803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 18:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-cherkashin-na-9515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-vasilenko-an-9879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but red eye--Lmbuga 18:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC) OK Fixed. --PereslavlFoto 10:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 12:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-panteleimon-9341-stand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Haneburger 09:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-demurova-8573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems a very harsh photo - I'd suggest softening the colours a bit and making it less sharp. Mattbuck 22:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Less contrast and less sharpness means less quality. The reportage photo needs to keep as much truth as possible. Please don't think this image to be an artistic fiction. PereslavlFoto 14:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-kardovsky-grave-9475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-stone-balls-0517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 08:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-stone-balls-0545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 01:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-book-frame-1255-9979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF not perfect, but ok --Poco a poco 14:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botik-arka-0654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-library-2254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-yuzhnaya-42-2293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ips-nscf-2013-immers-3808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 23:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-gallery-2126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mu-gorki-zal-5357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 00:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ips-nscf-2013-aquarius-3728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ips-nscf-2013-vniief-3659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay. DerHexer 13:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ips-nscf-2013-banner-3565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very weak  Support. --XRay 06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-amelkin-sa-3768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)