User talk:Pataki Márta/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ez nem újrafelhasználás

File:Book of Ágnes Szokolszky.jpg
Én szkenneltem.--Pataki Márta (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Bánáti bazsarózsák

Lemaradt az aláírásod. Cassandro (talk) 21:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Azt ugye tudod, hogy max 15 pontot oszthatsz ki egy kategóriában? Cassandro (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Képverseny

Commons:A Wikimédia Magyarország képversenye/Értékelés

Sajnos, hogy csak 15 pontot lehet adni egy-egy kategóriában, ezt is próbáltam betartani, így sokmindenre nem futotta, a bazsarózsára se, kár:-( Oké, persze a szabály az szabály:-)--Pataki Márta (talk) 08:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Bocsánat, hogy csak most válaszolok, de szabadságon voltam. Átnézem az egészet. Cassandro (talk) 12:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Engedély szegedi egyetemi oktatók arcképeinek és fényképeinek feltételére

Jósa Piroska, Nagyvárad

File tagging File:Cristian_church_(Jordan,_33-70)_in_Magyar_Kurir_12_06_2008.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cristian_church_(Jordan,_33-70)_in_Magyar_Kurir_12_06_2008.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cristian_church_(Jordan,_33-70)_in_Magyar_Kurir_12_06_2008.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Not free enough. Permission must also be given for every form of reuse, only reuse not includes modification. Also the permission must be perpetual. If permission on the website is intended to allow free reuse by everyone, everywhere for every purpose including commercial reuse and modification perpetually it should be easy to ask and confirm the freedom. --Martin H. (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

creative commons

Hi,

there are a few noticed on this page already, but I'd like to notify you about File:Arshile Gorky Agonia 1947.jpg. On the source page herre on artportal.hu stand a Creative Commons lincense. "by-nc-nd/2.5/hu/" to be exact.

Which means: Nevezd meg!-Ne add el!-Ne változtasd! 2.5 Magyarország[1] - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Hungary

In other words: The work may be re-used but only in a non-commercial way and no derivative works may me made. This kind of license is not allowed on commons, because the source is not considered Free.

Something else, the photo in question was a 2D representation of a paiting, this paiting is also copyrighted I believe, because the work is not in the public domain untill 70 years after the death of the author. Reading the date is 1947 (2010-1947=63) it's less then 70 years ago, not the mention the fact when the author died.

-- Krinkletalk 23:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Permission for File:Szeged The Palace of Reformation Ede Magyar, 1912.jpg

Hi! Can you please check the permission for this image? It is just a link to the page on Picasa? --MGA73 (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi! It is my page on Picasa. Ferenc Somorjai is my friend. --Pataki Márta (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Did you just remove the image on Picasa? I can not see it right now. Also, could you perhaps change the license on Picasa? --MGA73 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Pardon, I just remove image:-(

http://picasaweb.google.hu/npataki/SzegedEsVideke#5129286424703534258

He he ok that is why... The license is now http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ and the nc and the nd will not work for commons. See Commons:Licensing. License can for example be cc-by-3.0 or cc-by-sa-3.0. --MGA73 (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Just a follow up. License is still ...nc... It would be a help if you could get that removed :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
http://picasaweb.google.hu/npataki/SzegedEsVideke#5129286424703534258

Innen a saját (User:Pataki Mártáé) Picassa webalbumomból hoztam át a barátom (Somorjai Ferenc) fényképét, jogtalanul töröltétek.--Pataki Márta (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Howard_Gardner_Approved3_2009_Hi_Res.JPG

File:Howard_Gardner_Approved3_2009_Hi_Res.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teemeah (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

All right, just above and in the Hungarian Wikipedia can be copyrighted.--Pataki Márta (talk) 22:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Eliminate picture from commons, just use an article on the Hungarian Wikipedia.--Pataki Márta (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Eliminate picture from wikimedia commons, just use an article on the Hungarian Wikipedia.--Pataki Márta (talk) 20:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Photo of Hildebrand bronze

Hello! I was surprised to see that you have substituted an old and small black-and-white photo for my newer and larger color photo. [[2]] Why do this? It would be better just to upload your photo to Wikimedia Commons as an entirely separate file instead of replacing the other version. The two can coexist peacefully on Commons. They can even be linked to each other in the "Other Version" rubric. I would suggest that you upload your photo and revert the previous action replacing my version. What do you think of my suggestion? --Jdsteakley (talk) 14:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bleier_Vilmos_pécsi_emléktáblája.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bleier_Vilmos_pécsi_emléktáblája.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

–Tryphon☂ 21:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I sent an email giving permission from G. Robert Nagy.--Pataki Márta (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
G. Nagy Róbert fényképezte, szerkesztőtársam volt, csak még neki nem ment a kép feltöltés, kérte, hogy tegyem fel, emailban adott engedélyt, hogy szabad licenc alatt tegyem fel. Nem véletlen van rajta engedély szám, majd újra írok neki, ha muszáj, ez borzasztó, hogy ennyit kell futni, amikor én becsületesen járok el, néha tévedek persze, de ebben az esetben nem!--Pataki Márta (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Esperanto congress collages

If the postcards are general commercial postcards, then permissions from Esperanto-congress organizers are unlikely to cover them. AnonMoos (talk) 19:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I do not know good English. I guess the problem is with some pictures.--Pataki Márta (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


Hi Pataki Márta,
your upload File:Leonardo da Vinci Madonna of the Rocks 1483 Louvre.jpg has been tagged for deletion due to the heavy watermarking of the image. Could you consent to the deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi! S'il vous plaît ne pas supprimer. C'est une image magnifiquement retouché, il n'est pas sombre.--Pataki Márta (talk) 09:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Leonardo_da_Vinci_Madonna_of_the_Rocks_1483_Louvre.jpg

File:Leonardo_da_Vinci_Madonna_of_the_Rocks_1483_Louvre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 11:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Adolf_von_Hildebrand_Drinking_boy_(1870).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Adolf_von_Hildebrand_Drinking_boy_(1870).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Adolf_von_Hildebrand_Drinking_boy_(1870).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

  • File:Trinkender.jpg is not the source of this photographic work
  • Adolf von Hildebrand is not the photographer of this photo

So where is the photo from, who created the photo. Did the photographer release the photographic work under CC. --Martin H. (talk) 16:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Author:Adolf von Hildebrand (1847-1921) sculptor

Source:
http://www.adolf-von-hildebrand.de/seiten/popups/abbildung02.htm
http://www.adolf-von-hildebrand.de/seiten/leben.htm
--Pataki Márta (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
The question is not the sculpturor. The question is: Who is the photographer! This is a photo of a 3D sculpture. To upload this photo here it is required that the sculpture is public domain and that the photographic work is public domain. The sculpture is public domain, the sculpturer died >70 years ago, but who is the photographer? --Martin H. (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I mean, I knew the source is given, I do not know the name of the photographer. Formerly a sculptor of the dead, matter who photographed, not enough resources?--Pataki Márta (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
A photographer who made a photograph of something that is 3D has a copyright on the photo. This copyright will last the photgraphers lifetime +70 years. You have to provide some more information about the photo. At the moment we dont even konw how old the photo is. --Martin H. (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I'm looking for a photographer.--Pataki Márta (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

File:2._Abu_Dhabi_(1).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:2._Abu_Dhabi_(1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

KALARICKAN | My Interactions 19:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Josa Levente Zoltán, Josa Andras was taken off the Internet, I think, to have failed in their recruitment, we subsequently wrote a letter there, which can download, and I hope to get permission.--Pataki Márta (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

File:CZIGÁNYDezső (1883-1937) painter Self-portrait 1912.jpg

Hi Pataki Márta. I was wondering if there was a problem with the initial version of the file. If yes, you should probably list it for deletion.

The other image you uploaded doesn't seem to be from 1912 so it might not be a good replacement. It should rather be uploaded under a new name. --  Docu  at 12:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

File:2._Abu_Dhabi_(1).jpg

File:2._Abu_Dhabi_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.186.139 13:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Jósa Levente Zoltán, Jósa András montírozta, levették az internetről, gondolom, hogy nem sikerült a saját felvételük, most utólag írtam levelet oda, ahonnan letölthették, s remélem, hogy kapok engedélyt.--Pataki Márta (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Josa Levente Zoltán, Josa Andras was taken off the Internet, I think, to have failed in their recruitment, we subsequently wrote a letter there, which can download, and I hope to get permission.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pataki_Márta/Archive_2&oldid=827416496"