User talk:PastorPeitl

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PastorPeitl!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File:OblastHaskovo.png

File:OblastHaskovo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: unfree Google map Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Weil der Printscreen nur dafür genutzt wurde, um einen vollkommen neuen Aspekt einzubringen, nämlich aufzuzeigen, wie die zeitliche Entfernung sich landschaftlich darstellt, es aber in dem Bild nicht um die Darstellung der Gegend ging, sondern um die Darstellung der Zeit, handelt es sich bei dem Bild um ein vollkommen neues Bild im Sinne von § 24 Urhg.

Es ist daher nicht das selbe Bild.

§24 Urgh im Wortlaut — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorPeitl (talk • contribs) 06:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hierzu eine Stellungnahme:

Hingegen liegt eine freie Benutzung gemäß § 24 UrhG dann vor, wenn das fremde Werk nur als Anregung für das Schaffen des neuen Werkes benutzt wurde. Beide Werke haben einen deutlichen gestalterischen Abstand voneinander. Ob das der Fall ist, wird im Wege der Gesamtbetrachtung aller wesentlichen, prägenden Merkmale des Erstwerkes mit dem Zweitwerk für jeden Einzelfall ermittelt werden. Als Richtlinie gilt: das fremde Bild darf bei einer freien Benutzung lediglich als Anregung dienen. Ist ein solcher ausreichender Abstand gegeben und stellt das neue Werk eine persönliche geistige Schöpfung dar, die über das allgemein Übliche hinausgeht, dann ist das neue Werk mit einem eigenen Urheberrecht geschützt. Es steht damit rechtlich selbständig neben dem Original. Derjenige, der ein das neue Foto, Logo oder sonstiges Werk geschaffen hat, erwirbt ein eigenes, umfassendes Urheberrecht gemäß § 24 UrhG: — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorPeitl (talk • contribs) 04:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Ganz abgesehen davon, dass ich von der Bearbeitung des Bildes und des Artikels weder finanziellen noch persönlichen Nutzen erwarte, sondern es aus reiner Basis der Nächstenliebe zu der Stadt machte, in der ich wohne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorPeitl (talk • contribs) 06:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

--PastorPeitl (talk) 04:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

---

Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 06:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:MariaKind.png

File:MariaKind.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnus (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo PastorPeitl, du hast das Foto von der Marienstatue wohl nicht selbst aufgenommen. Woher hast du es bekommen? --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Das Bild in dieser Form wurde von mir selbst erstellt. Ich habe den Text, darübergelegt und als Grundlage ein Werbebild der Obnost Haskovo genutzt, welches hier allgemein verwendet werden darf.

--PastorPeitl (talk) 16:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Dann musst du die online-Quelle des "Werbebild", damit wir verifizieren können, dass es unter einer freien Lizenz steht, die unseren Bedingungen (COM:L) entspricht. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:LandkarteHaskovo1.png

Hallo PastorPeitl, du solltest noch die exakte Quelle angeben für die unterlegte Karte und für die beiden Fotos. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Gern, aber wie macht man das? Ich habe es halt OpenStreetMaps wie empfohlen entnommen OpenStreetMaps Haskovo weil mir jemand von Euch geschrieben hat, bitte nicht bei Google Map sondern bei Open Street Map. --PastorPeitl (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

File:LandkarteHaskovo1.png

File:LandkarteHaskovo1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Das Bild wurde von mir als Fotokollage auf Basis von OpenStreetMap erstellt und ich wüsste daher nicht, wem die Urheberrechte gehören sollen als mir? --PastorPeitl (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:SchifkowUzhundovo.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SchifkowUzhundovo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SchifkowUzhundovo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:FlughafenHaskovo.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FlughafenHaskovo.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

BevinKacon (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violations

---

Hello PastorPeitl. You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

For claiming File:KircheUzhundhovo2.png is your own work.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:KircheUzundhovo.png

File:KircheUzundhovo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not own work, already available elsewhere in higher resolution Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:HaskovoInfo.png

File:HaskovoInfo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not own work, already available online in higher resolution Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 2 weeks. The reason for the block is uploading unfree files after warning (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

--Gbawden (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Eigentlich kann ich mir nicht vorstellen, dass Bilder die ich vom englischen Wikipedia übernommen habe, daher stammt nämlich sowohl das Bild des FLughafens, als auch das von der Kirche, nicht auch im deutschen wiederverwendet werden darf oder?7 Zugeben, die dritte Beanstandung war wirklich ein Bild, dass ich erstellt hatte, weil ich nicht wusste, dass man auf Basis von google map keine Bilder erstellen darf. Die Fotocollage von Haskovo habe ich selbst auf Basis von OpenStreetMap erstellt. Da wüsste ich überhaupt nicht, wem die Rechte gehören sollten ausser mir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorPeitl (talk • contribs) 15:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC) --PastorPeitl (talk) 15:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Actually, I can not imagine that pictures I took from the English Wikipedia, so both the picture of the airport, as well as that of the church, may not be reused in German, too? 7 Admit, the third complaint was real an image that I had created because I did not know that you cannot create images based on google map. I created the photo collage of Haskovo myself based on OpenStreetMap. I wouldn't know who the rights should belong to except me. translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC) " Decline reason: "If you took the images from English Wikipedia and they were freely licenced, while they can be hosted on Wikimedia Commons, you must properly attribute them rather than claiming them as your own work, and following the licensing requirements as indicated. If the licence tag is unclear, the onus is on you to find out the terms of the licence. Secondly, not all the images on English Wikipedia are under a free licence--those that are not cannot be hosted here. Thirdly, while OpenStreetMaps is under a free licence, you have not properly attributed their work. Fourthly, you have added other works to the maps without clearly indicating the source, the author, and whether those images under a free licence. As such, I am declining your request to be unblocked. Please read Commons:Lizenzen, Commons:Derivative works, Commons:Fair use/de, and other policies that govern this site. Thank you for your understanding. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:HGP7.png

And also:

• File:FlughafenMalevo.png
• File:HaskovoBild3.jpg
• File:HaskovoBild2.png
• File:GeographischeLage.png
• File:HaskovoFlughafen.png

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

File:DaBulgaria.png

File:DaBulgaria.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: TV screenshot Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Das Bild ist wie man sieht, ein Schnapschuss auf den Fernseher. e-tv. Das auch über Fernsehen ausstrahlt. Wo soll da eine Urheberschutzverletzung sein. Oder wäre es neuerdings auch eine Urheberschutzverletzung, wenn ich ein Foto von einer RTL Sendung knipse? --PastorPeitl (talk) 04:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Borissov2.png

File:Borissov2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: TV svreenshot Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Das Bild ist ein von mir persönlich erstellte Collage aus

.) einer Burg, die ich pixabay entnommen habe, .) einem Bojko Borissov, den ich Wikipedia entnommen habe und wie dort steht aus flickr stammt und .) einem Delphin, unserem Logo, wo das Bild auch das pixabay stammt

Es es daher eine eigene Fotocollage aus Rechte freien Bildern. Wo bitte ist dann die Urheberschutzverletzung? --PastorPeitl (talk) 04:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

I slowed the deletion process so we can discuss and work through some missing details. Specifically, a derivative work needs to have specific links to all the originals, not just "commons and pixabay websites" in general. DMacks (talk) 10:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Keine Urheberschutzverletzung

Meldung von Urheberschutzverletzungen: Scheinbar wird neuerdings, gleichgültig ob ich den Fernseher fotographiere oder aber eine eigene Fotocollage aus Rechte freien Bildern erstelle, von Grund auf einmal die Meldung "Urheberschutzverletzung" gemeldet. Nicht, weil es eine verkörpert, sondern weil da jemand die Meinung hat:

Ich finde sonst wenig zum Melden an den Texten. Daher melde ich wenigstens das.

Könnte man den Ton in Wikipedia wieder ein wenig freundlicher gestalten? --PastorPeitl (talk) 04:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Borissov2.png

File:Borissov2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 10:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:OstawkaSofia.png

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:OstawkaSofia.png, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

File:MartinLutherKing.png

File:MartinLutherKing.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 190+ Tineye hits - not won work Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Der MartinLutherKing stammt, wie gesagt aus dem freien Datenbestand von pixabay. Ist die Verwendung der Bilder die dort frei zum download bereit stehen nun auch schon eine Urheberschutzverletzung? https://pixabay.com/de/images/search/martin%20luther%20king/ --PastorPeitl (talk) 12:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Du darfst es dann aber auch nicht als eigenes Werk bezeichnen, sondern musst allermindestens den Link zum Bild angeben (die Suche ist es schon mal nicht …). Ebenso ist die Lizenz falsch. Siehe übrigens für Pixabay-Bilder die Vorlage mit dem passenden Namen {{Pixabay}}. Im konkreten Fall bin ich mir icht so sicherm dass die Bildvoerlage frei ist, müsste das abre erst selbst recherchieren. — Speravir – 00:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Pixabay ist leider nicht immer vertrauenswürdig und alle seit 9. Januar 2019 dort hochgleadnen Bilder sind nicht Commonskonform. — Speravir – 00:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, ich sehe gerade, dass Du noch weitere Bilder von Pixabay hochgeladen hast. Da Du gesperrt bist: Bitte hier oder einem eigenen Diskussionsabschnitt für jedes deiner von Pixabay hierher transferierten Bilder den genauen Link angeben. Ich werde es mir dann ansehen, kann aber nicht garantieren, dass sie bei Comons bleiben können. — Speravir – 00:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Habe ich nicht, sondern weil ich das andere Hochladetool noch nicht kannte, in den Begleittext angegeben, dass es sich um ein Pixabay Bild handelt. Gestern bin ich dann drauf gekommen, dass es da noch ein weiteres Hochladetool gibt. Das hatte mir leider niemand erklärt. Ich stand vor einem Hochlade-Tool, welches nur dann frei gab, dass ich hochladen kann, wenn ich dieses x wo setze, wo es eigentlich meines Erachtes und da gebe ich Dir Recht, falsch ist. Eigene Bilder sind es nicht. Ich habe nur einfach das freie Nutzungsrecht von pixabay erhalten. --PastorPeitl (talk) 04:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Doch, Du hast noch mehr Bilder von Pixabay kopiert. Aber ich denke inzwischen, es ist besser, das alles in einen eigenen Abschnitt zu setzen. — Speravir – 21:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Stimmt. Mir wahr ursprünglich nicht bekannt, dass ich Bilder, die bei pixabay unter freien Lizenzen laufen, nicht nützen darf. Für mich waren freie Lizenzen ganz einfach freie Lizenzen. Man lernt nie aus. --PastorPeitl (talk) 15:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Da verwende ich extra ein Bild aus den freien Downloads von pixabay und werde dafür gesperrt. Warum? https://pixabay.com/de/images/search/martin%20luther%20king/ --PastorPeitl (talk) 12:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Armutspartei.png

File:Armutspartei.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quedel (talk) 01:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Problematische Bilder

Fehlende Quellenangaben – Link zum Bild, nicht zur Suche, und der Text „Bild ist Pixabay frei entnehmbar“ oder „Aus dem Gratisbereich von Pixabay“ ist nicht ausreichend – bei folgenden Pixabay.Bildern:

• File:Armutspartei.png, vermutlich deshalb von Quedel schon beanstandet.
• File:Narodniki.png, bisher ohne Beanstandung – und ich hoffe auf dich, dass du den Link hier ergänzt.
• File:MartinLutherKing.png, du hast an anderer Stelle den Bildlink https://pixabay.com/de/vectors/martin-luther-king-portr%C3%A4t-gesicht-155551/ genannt, ich glaube hier aber, dass das Bild trotzdem gelöscht werden muss, weil die Fotovorlage nicht frei ist.

Ergänze die Links hier unterhalb.

Andere problematische Bilder:

• File:Borissov2.png, Du müsstest erstmal die Links zu allen hier benutzten Bildern angeben; danach kann man einschätzen, ob es doch erhalten bleiben kann.
• File:LogoABC2.jpg: Das ist nicht dein eigenes Werk! Du hast die Datei von irgendwo kopiert; dieser Link wird benötigt. Auch ist die Lizenz falsch. Mit viiiel Wohlwollen könnte man sich {{PD-textlogo}} vorstellen, wobei der stilisierte Löwe mir da Bauchschmerzen bereitet. Und der Bildname scheint mir ebenfalls irreführend: Ich hätte entweder direkt kyrillische Buchstaben erwartet oder eine der Transkriptionen.
• File:OstawkaHaskovo.png: Ich werde gleich die fehlende Erlaubnis des Fotografen anmahnen (mal abgesehen davon, dass der riesige Schriftzug auf dem Bild eine sinnvolle Nutzung nahezu ausschließt).
• Bilder, die gelöscht werden müssen, da die Quelle unfrei ist:
  • File:OstawkaDemo.png, es sei denn, Du kannst auf der Website die Seite zeigen, wo deren Bildinhalt als commonskompatibel frei verfügbar deklariert wird.
  • File:EinzelbildDemo.png, Youtube-Video ohne freie Lizenz.
  • File:OstawkaSofia1.png, gleichfalls Youtube-Video ohne freie Lizenz.
  • File:ETVHaskovo1.png und File:ETVHaskovo2.png sind anscheined ebenfalls Schnappschüsse, ohne dass du die Quelle angegeben hast.
  • Auch File:ABCDemo.png ist offensichtlich aus Sofia. Ich wollte das zuerst außer acht lassen (bis auf den irreführenden Namen), habe aber eben entdeckt, dass Du es von ПП АБВ - Десетки граждани и симпатизанти събра ПП АБВ на протестен митинг под наслов ДЕ Е БЪЛГАРИЯ kopiert hast.

— Speravir – 22:59, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Also: Armutspartei.png stammt von pixabay mit folgendem Link https://pixabay.com/de/photos/schlecht-schwarz-armut-obdachlose-1775239/ Ist daher laut dortiger Angabe: Freie kommerzielle Nutzung, Kein Bildnachweis nötig

Die Bilder OstawkaDemo.png, EinzelbildDemo.png, OstawkaSofia1.png, ETVHaskvo1.png von den Ostawka Demos sind Einzelbilder aus Fernsehaufzeichnungen. Ich dachte immer Einzelbilder aus Fernsehaufzeichnungen wären aus Werbegründen erlaubt

ABCDemo.png stammt allen Ernstes aus der Pressemappe der Alternativa, also einer bulgarischen Partei. Parteien neigen meinem Verständnis dazu, wenn sie Pressematerial zur Verfügung stellen auch nichts dagegen zu haben, dass die Presse es dann nutzt.

Narodniki.png Ist ein Bild aus pixabay https://pixabay.com/de/photos/nationalmuseum-narodni-museum-5038271/ welches dort mhttps://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bojko_Borissowit den Attributen Freie kommerzielle Nutzung, Kein Bildnachweis nötig versehen ist.

Beim Bild Borisov2 muss ich ehrlich gesagt auf Wikipedia verlassen. Es ist eine Kombination aus dem Palais Borisov, welches ich pixabay entnommen habe https://pixabay.com/de/photos/roma-denimira-borisova-nacht-stadt-4169779/ welches dort das Attribut Freie kommerzielle Nutzung, Kein Bildnachweis nötig trägt und dem Bild von Bojko Borisov welches ich Wikipedia entnommen habe. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bojko_Borissow Von dem ich mich darauf verlasse, dass es genauso gründlich geprüft wurde wie meine Bilder und daher wohl frei sein dürfte. Denn: Auf flickr finde ich es nicht mehr. Und was den Delphin betrifft, dass ist das Logo der Jump Jesus Bewegung, die ich leite. Das ist also in Wahrheit unser eigenes Logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorPeitl (talk • contribs) 04:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC) --PastorPeitl (talk) 03:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Also das LogoABC.jpg stammt von der Seite der ABW und ist kyrill. Es stammt von der Seite https://www.abv-alternativa.bg/news.php?id=163 — Preceding unsigned comment added by PastorPeitl (talk • contribs) 04:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Zu löschen wären: OstawkaHaskowo.png, Und den Martin Luther King löscht eben. Da nehme ich eben einen anderen. Wieder bei pixabay.

--PastorPeitl (talk) 03:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

The Pixabay license does not meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons. Therefore, media published on Pixabay from 9 January 2019 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Die Pixabay Lizenz die nicht den Anforderungen an die Lizenzierung kostenloser Inhalte in Commons entspricht. Daher gelten in Pixabay veröffentlichte Dateien seit dem 9. Januar 2019 nicht mehr als frei lizenziert und werden auf Commons nicht mehr akzeptiert.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Verstehe ich nicht. Die schreiben doch ausdrücklich was ich darf und was nicht. https://pixabay.com/de/service/license/ I dont understand. The write what is allowed an what not. --PastorPeitl (talk) 05:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Pastor, Commons ist nicht Pixabay. Hier wird die Angabe der Quelle und des Autors samt daraus folgender Lizenz zwingend verlangt, auch für gemeinfeie Bilder. Bei Pixabay kommt hinzu, dass die Macher die Lizenz am 9. Januar 2019 geändert haben, und zwar so, dass sie seitdem inkompatibel zu Commons ist. Deshalb muss übrigens leider auch das Bild File:Narodniki.png zwingend gelöscht werden. Nachtrag: Auf die Collage File:Borissov2.png trifft dasselbe dann auch zu.

Für Schnappschüsse, letztendlich ja Standbilder, also als ob jemand ein Foto gemacht hätte, gilt dieselbe Lizenz wie für die Videos. Für Bildzusammenstellungen gilt die strengste Lizenz – und wenn die sich gegenseitig ausschließen, muss man das Bild wieder löschen.

Noch was anderes: Wieso konvertierst Du die JPG, wie man sie bei Pixabay erhält, in PNG? Lass das, das bringt überhaupt keine Verbesserung (ich wollte eine höhere Auflösungvom Bild des Obdachlosen hier hochladen, muss das aber nun bleiben lassen).

— Speravir – 00:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, Jeff hat das Martin-Luther-King-Bild für sauber erklärt, dann werde ich mich nicht dagegen stellen. — Speravir – 00:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Jeff, I may have misunderstood you, but images uploaded before 9th January 2019 to Pixabay still can be copied to Commons. — Speravir – 00:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:OstawkaHaskovo.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:OstawkaHaskovo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:OstawkaHaskovo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Speravir 23:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:OstawkaDemo.png

File:OstawkaDemo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: From what I see unfree content. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 23:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:EinzelbildDemo.png

File:EinzelbildDemo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Screenshot from copyrighted Youtube video. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 23:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:OstawkaSofia1.png

File:OstawkaSofia1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Screenshot from copyrighted Youtube video. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 23:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ETVHaskovo1.png

File:ETVHaskovo1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Apparently. content from eTV - Видео - Haskovo.NET. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 23:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ETVHaskovo2.png

File:ETVHaskovo2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Apparently. content from eTV - Видео - Haskovo.NET. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 23:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ABCDemo.png

File:ABCDemo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Image is from ПП АБВ - Десетки граждани и симпатизанти събра ПП АБВ на протестен митинг под наслов ДЕ Е БЪЛГАРИЯ. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:LogoABC2.jpg

File:LogoABC2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.abv-alternativa.bg/news.php?id=163 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Narodniki.png

File:Narodniki.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Uploaded to Pixabay after 8 January 2019, hence website license is incompatible to Commons. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Speravir 00:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:MartinLutherKing.png

File:MartinLutherKing.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 18:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:HaskovoBild1.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HaskovoBild1.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:HaskovoBild1.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quedel (talk) 12:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

OK. Hoffe die englische Wikipedia Version wird sich nicht zu sehr ärgern. Das Bild ist nämlich nicht von mir. --PastorPeitl (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)