User talk:PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 0

Deutsch: Archiv 0. Hier werden abgeschlossene Diskussionen angezeigt.
English: Archive 0. Here you can find older discussions.

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates[edit]

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear PantheraLeo1359531, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your sounds for the FS Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. -- Eatcha (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clash of Clans Heimatdorf HW 21062019.jpg[edit]

File:Clash of Clans Heimatdorf HW 21062019.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 11:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:40k Bearbeitungen 20062019.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Misiurewicz-Punkt 17062019 6666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spirale 17062019 16K.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Misiurewicz-Punkt 17062019 2222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Julia-Menge -0,5R 0I 30062019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 00001 2.51e101 bis 00050 4.47e086 27062019 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiralarm Julia-Menge -0,5R 0I 01072019 16K.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brücke mit Fluchtpunkt bei Stams 01082017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dach mit holzartigen Platten 20082019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blumenmeer in Lienz 20082018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think that are so called "Busy Lizzie" (Impatiens walleriana). Is it right? QI -- Spurzem 20:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotoserie Defereggental 20082018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 19:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:00001 2.51e101 bis 00050 4.47e086 27062019 017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:00001 2.51e101 bis 00050 4.47e086 27062019 017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotoserie Defereggental 20082018 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, focus to the left part of the photo --Michielverbeek 20:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotoserie Defereggental 20082018 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 17:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and too much plastic in the environment --Ermell 17:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Left message for you at GRDN711 Talk Page[edit]

--GRDN711 (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 13:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 13:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 13:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 139.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Left another message for you at GRDN711 Talk Page[[edit]

--GRDN711 (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Left a second message today for you at GRDN711 Talk Page[edit]

--GRDN711 (talk) 17:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotoserie Defereggental 20082018 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerschwammaufschnitt Beispiel 3481589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have a concern about the file size of this image. Please email me at my User Page to discuss. --GRDN711 00:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Major issue of file size has been corrected. This fractal image could be stronger if there was more purple pink background area created evenly on all sides of the fractal. --GRDN711 17:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mandelbox (Frontalaufnahme) (ganzes Fraktal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I have a concern about the file size and cropping of this image. Please email me at my User Page to discuss. --GRDN711 00:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Major issue of file size has been corrected and I support promotion. would be a stronger image if there was more blue space created evenly around the Mandelbox so that the Mandelbox can project out of the blue background. Right now, it is a little cramped. --GRDN711 17:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierpinski-Oktaeder (Frontalaufnahme) (ganzes Fraktal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support File size has been corrected without any loss of resolution. I support promotion but would suggest that this image could be stronger if there was blue space on all sides of the Sierpinski octahedron similar to the top. With the points at the bottom and right of the fractal almost touching the edge for the frame, this balanced geometric shape seems unsettled. --GRDN711 17:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armaturenbrett Grenztrabbi Mödlareuth 19052019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 137 Kaiser Franz-Josef-Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --IM3847 17:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For uploading File:Visit of the Mandelbulb (4K UHD; 50FPS).webm on my request. Thanks, Eatcha (talk) 16:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mandelbulber-Logo.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Mandelbulber-Logo.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mandelbulber-Logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plamort 20170731 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 16:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok, slightly soft. --ArildV 16:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mandelbox front 17072019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --大诺史 10:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File size is hyper-inflated. Without any loss of resolution, 6,000 pixels per (long) side would be a good dimension for high quality. Any further description of how this fractal was created would also help in better understanding it. A little more background space around the Mandelbox might also help, Feels very jammed. --GRDN711 11:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Added some void around Mandelbox and downsized the Mandelbox to 6000px. --~~~~
Support Support. Issues have been addressed. Mandelbox is 6000-pixels square; image is 7000-pixels square but good enough. There is still tremendous resolution in the image and you can see all the detail.. --GRDN711 15:57, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Mandelbulber-Logo.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mandelbulber-Logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mandelbulber-Logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ju Ta 00:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahngleis Hof Hbf 23072019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudo Kleinian OpenCL 214854124 25K.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 17:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komposition Denkmal "Treue der Heimat" mit Sonne 24072019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:13, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotoserie um St. Jakob im Defereggental 22082018 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fotoserie Dubai 20180702 040.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Flossenbürg 27072019 041.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Flossenbürg 27072019 038.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schnabeltierähnliche Holzskulptur 22082018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Flossenbürg 27072019 040.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudo Kleinian 29072019 002 8K HQ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 22:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotoserie um St. Jakob im Defereggental 22082018 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The reflections on the water are clipping, but I believe this can be tolerated, as it appears natural. --Smial 14:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großglockner Hochalpenstraße 21082018 452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

fractal images[edit]

hi. Thx for your great images. Can you give more informations about it. For example here what type of function/map was used ? I can read some info from exif: "FractalType: 0" but it doesn't help. You can also make some notes in the wikibooks. TIA. --Adam majewski (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PantheraLeo135953:

You never asked but I have a few thoughts on some of your recent fractal images.

The 4 fractals you put up on August 1st were very sophisticated and showed much thought and skill.

I suggest you upload only your very best and most developed fractals, not early, multiple iterations in which you are still learning the form. Of the approximately 175 Pseudo Kleinian fractals, how many are your very best?

Uploading examples that are distinctly different will help others appreciate the form. You will also likely find that multiple iterations of the same fractal will bring requests for deletion.

While Commons does not specify, a good resolution for a fractal is about 8000-pixels long side which is what you have been making recently.

The best file format is probably a vector-based SVG but if your mandelbulber2 cannot write to this format, a lossless PNG is the next best. Loseless PNG is better than lossless JPG for this type of image.

Best - --GRDN711 (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PantheraLeo1359531:

Featured Pictures is a tougher competition than QI. Right now, the ther photographers don't know what to think of your Mengerschwamm fractal. I would suggest you create a new version of your nominated image with the following 3 changes:

1 - Make the image darker so that the light seems to stream out of the Menger sponge center. Feature Pictures have to be appealing (have "Wow"). This will make the image more dramatic. 2 - Crop the image tighter on all sides so that the Menger sponge stands out in the frame. 3 - Save as an SVG or lossless PNG file format.

Take a look at the your current nomination and the one with changes and keep the one you like best.

Best regards,

--GRDN711 (talk) 18:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam majewski: Thanks for your review. That's right, die Exif data information is non explanating (I think, that 0 expresses the standard formula, which is the Mandelbrot set). I added some information. When I have enough time, I can work at the Wikibook article. :)

Regards, --08:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I have put kfr file on the image file. It seems that it is a modification of standard Mandelbrot set algorithm by changing the seed to non-zero value so the strange, but nice spirals can be seen. So I have moved it to different category> Mandelbrot set derivatives. Also not all file have exif info. TIA--Adam majewski (talk) 09:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Thanks for your work :). That's a good intention. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GRDN711 (1): It is hard to say, which ones are best, to be honest :). The video (which will be hopefully uploaded today to Wiki Commons) and so the image sequence should show phenomenoms and special characters of the fractal, which is based in the Kleinian group. With 227 images, I wanted to offer a large repository of different views of the fractal, but (nearly) abundant images can be an issue, that's right. I am sorry, but saving the images as PNG curses a problem to the limited ressources of PCs today :). The video series contains 3400 JPG images, which are together roughly 136 GiB (Gibibytes) large. That is equal to 2 GiB of raw material per video second. While JPG needs about 25-40 MiB (I use the best quality factor so that the lossy compression is quite low), PNG can need up to 140 MiB per image file. That would be about 476 GiB. I hope, that in the near future, these data amounts wont be a problem anymore, but today I think that this is too soon :).

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 08:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GRDN711 (2): Thank you very much for your thoughts :). I will consider it and take a newer version of that today.

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 08:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Flossenbürg 27072019 240.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe perspective corr. needed? But imo OK for QI --Isiwal 09:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudo Kleinian OpenCL 31072019 8K HQ zbuffer.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 17:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menger 4D Mod1 gleichwinklig 25072019 8K.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 17:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerschwamm mit Schatten 31072019 35K.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 17:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Flossenbürg 27072019 237.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but it needs additional cats --Poco a poco 18:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks, some categories are added. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudo Kleinian OpenCL 31072019 8K HQ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
In the wavy area in top left corner are some trace lines that look like artifacts. Is this intentional or can they be cleaned up? --GRDN711 17:38, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CommentOh, good intervention, this is on purpose, it is a little rise (3D) in the bottom circles. This is included in the fractal :) --PantheraLeo1359531 20:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You have 175 Pseudo Kleinian fractals. What makes this one appropriate for QI versus the others? --GRDN711 20:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1. The perspective. Through the image center can be found a vertically line und two symmetric curves to the image end. The vertically line has its functions as symmetry axis. 2. Apart from that, the rendering technique was set to high quality multiple rays for calculating the ambient occlusion effect, so that dark (shadowed) areas are realistic in its darkness shown. :) --PantheraLeo1359531 08:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure that was the answer I was looking for but I support this fractal as good quality. --GRDN711 16:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flossenbürg 27072019 267.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Flossenbürg 27072019 215.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments dof could be better but QI to me --Cvmontuy 12:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der Stallebach bei Rinderschinken in Österreich 041 Blick von Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der Stallebach bei Rinderschinken in Österreich 013 Gegenansicht auf Wasserfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der Stallebach bei Rinderschinken in Österreich 031 Nahansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der Stallebach bei Rinderschinken in Österreich 047 Wasserspiel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilderreihe rund um St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082018 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilderreihe rund um St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082018 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudo Kleinian 29072019 002 8K CPU fixed zbuffer lossless.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilderreihe rund um St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilderreihe rund um St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082018 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder aus Flossenbürg[edit]

Hallo, Du hast viele Bilder in Flossenbürg gemacht. Jetzt ist die Kategorie ziemlich voll. Magst du das nicht etwas einsortieren? Ich war jetzt im August in Flossenbürg. Da die ja für kommerzielle Zwecke um Erlaubnis gefragt werden wollen habe ich gefragt ^^. Ich soll jetzt die Genehmigungsnummer mit in die Beschreibung schreiben. Wäre sicher besser, wenn du deine auch jeweils rein schreibst.

Gruß vom --Keks by 16:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Keks,
ich werde mich darum kümmern, die Bilder einzusortieren :). Es ist richtig, dass bezüglich der kommerziellen Nutzung eine Genehmigung eingeholt werden, jedoch vermute ich mal, dass eine Einholung der Genehmigung in diesem Fall nicht nötig ist, da zwar die Bilder veröffentlicht werden, aber Wikimedia Commons ist ja eine Non-profit-Organisation und damit auch die Dateien auf dieser Seite, wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe :). Darüber hinaus habe ich leider keine Genehmigungsnummer.

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 16:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Öhm ich weiß nicht, ob das gut ist, denn du veröffentlichst die Dateien ja unter der Creative Commons Lizenz in einer nicht-NC (Non Commercial) Version. Siehe auch: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing/de#Zul%C3%A4ssige_Lizenzen

Gruß --Keks by 16:32, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hab gerade noch mal nachgelesen; ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass die kommerzielle Komponente hier nicht von Relevanz ist, was nicht stimmt, weshalb ich auch keine Nummer eingeholt habe. Ich guck mal, ob es Möglichkeiten zur Lösung gibt, danke für den Hinweis.

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, ich sitze übrigens seit Stunden dran und mache offline für meine Bilder Beschreibungen (nachdem ich den entsprechenden WP Artikel auf Stand gebracht habe). Die kannst du dann gerne nutzen, d.h. ich bitte sogar darum, denn das hier ist nicht nur ein Gebäudeinnenraum sondern das Arrestgebäude, in dessen Vorhof u.a. Dietrich Bonhoeffer und die Männer des Attentats auf Hitler am 20. Juli 1944 exekutiert wurde! Wo du das Foto aufgenommen hast, standest du übrigens gerade in einer Zelle, deren Wände nicht mehr da sind... --Keks by 16:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für das Angebot; ich muss zugeben, dass meine letzte Führung durch das Gelände etwa 3 Jahre her ist und damit dessen Informationen verworren, werde aber diese Infos nachtragen :).

--17:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Musst nur ein bissl warten, bis ich die Bilder online habe --Keks by 17:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Stress, Qualität braucht seine Zeit :) --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 18:34, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mengerschwamm aus Sicht Koordinatenursprung[edit]

Hello PantheraLeo1359531:

I can see in your QI nominations, you are moving up again in file size – 12000 x 6000 pixels; 245 MB lossless PNG. While Commons allows files of this size to be uploaded, Commons is not an archive for huge fractals where a hyperinflated file size serves no purpose.

Have you considered using mandelbulber version 2 to write to lossless PNG (8000 pixels long side is fine) and then use an SVG converter to convert your fractals to much smaller SVG file? This file format creates a smaller file for graphic subjects that is expandable.

Best - --GRDN711 (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GRDN711, I used a similar px size to the other nominations (72 MP next to 64 MP) so that the quality is comparable. I can upload a little file and try to find appropiate ways to establish SVG analogons, that are high in quality and not so large in file size. Thanks for the suggestions.

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturtheater Felsengarten Sanspareil 04082019 026 Gegenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerschwamm aus Sicht Koordinatenursprung HQ 64MP Fischauge.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturtheater Felsengarten Sanspareil 04082019 032 Bögen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Better now, imo OK for QI. --Isiwal 08:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mengerschwamm without main light light strength 0,65 8K.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mengerschwamm without main light light strength 0,65 8K.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Vulp here 19:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fußweg Felsengarten Sanspareil 04082019 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grasende Kuh auf einer Weide bei St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082019 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blickende Kuh auf einer Weide bei St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082019 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerschwamm mit kleinieren Pendants 13082019 8K 002.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auf dem Weg zum Obersee (Grenze Italien-Österreich) von Österreich aus 23082018 043 Berge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staller Sattel 23082018 001 Berge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staller Sattel 23082018 004 Obersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entfernungsschilder bei Stallersattel 22082018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umgebung des Staller Sattels mit Bergenund Zeichen 23082018 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umgebung des Staller Sattels mit Bergen 23082018 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuhabtrieb am Staller Sattel 23082018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnschiene 06102018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Eine originelle Idee und daher QI für mich. --Manfred Kuzel 15:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kugel auf Wasser OpenCL 20190827 8K HQ Wechselwirkung.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der spiegelnde Pfaffenteich in Hof 20190827 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. But why HDRI? It is not necessary, taking as RAW is enough. --XRay 19:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Der spiegelnde Pfaffenteich in Hof 20190827 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Why only f/3.5? Sharpness would be better at f/7.1 or f/8. --XRay 19:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 018.jpg[edit]

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ralf Roletschek 19:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisierung von Bilderserien[edit]

Hi PantheraLeo, du lädst oft größere Bilderserien hoch, und tust alle Bilder direkt in die betreffenden Kategorien. So findet aber niemand mehr was. Mach doch bitte die paar extra Klicks, und mach eine eigene Kategorie für die Bilderserie. Bei Bildern wo die Beschreibung wichtig ist, lohnt es sich auch ein gleichnamiges Template zu machen, und auf die Beschreibungsseite zu tun. (Beispiel) Ich habe das jetzt mal für die folgenden Bilderserien gemacht: Pseudo Kleinian flight (228), Mengerschwamm (170), Julia sets (74), Schwäne (163). Grüße, Watchduck (quack) 22:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Watchduck,

vielen Dank für die Anmerkungen. Ich habe manchmal überlegt, ob Kategorien, wo ich der einzige Datenbereitsteller wäre, dann eher gelöscht werden, aber wenn genau dies gewünscht wird, werde ich dies bedenken. Über die Möglichkeit mit Templates war ich eher weniger informiert, deswegen danke für diesen Einwurf :).

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

--PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 08:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das würde vielleicht passieren, wenn die Kategorie zu allgemein ist, und der Eindruck entsteht, dass es sich um eine Benutzer-Kategorie handelt - also sowas wie Tierfotos von PantheraLeo. Die sind an sich OK, haben aber im Haupt-Namensraum nichts zu suchen. Mir geht es also nicht offene Kategorien, in die du immer wieder was rein tust, sondern um ein geschlossene Kategorien, die Bilder mit einer ganz klaren Gemeinsamkeit zusammenbündeln. Wenn du jetzt noch ein paar Mengenschwamm-Bilder rendern würdest, die genau zu den anderen passen, dann würden sie natürlich auch da dazu gehören - aber typischerweise vergrößern sich Bilderserien nicht.

Dass man Fotos zu Bilderserien zusammenfassen sollte ist eher selten (Ein paar klare Ausnahmen habe ich hier gesammelt.) Deine Schwanenfotos sind sich aber so ähnlich, dass es mMn nötig war. In solchen Fällen könntest du auch einfach stärker aussieben. Von den über 200 Bildern hätten auf 5 gereicht. (Zumal Cygnus olor swimming schon voller guter Fotos ist.)

Der Vorteil an den Templates ist nicht nur, dass man die Beschreibung noch ändern kann, sondern auch, dass man (bei richtiger Formatierung) eine klare Trennung von Beschreibung der Bilderserie und Beschreibung des Bildes hat. Siehe z.B. hier. Grüße, Watchduck (quack) 18:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Infos. Es stimmt, Image sets sind ganz sinnvoll, wenn man einen großen Schwung an Fotos zu einer Kategorie hinzufügt, ohne diese zu überschwemmen. Es ist halt dann ärgerlich, wenn man viel Zeit in eine Sammlung von Bildern gesteckt hat und übersehen hat, dass ein Kritierium nicht erfüllt oder missachtet wurde, und damit die Bilder gelöscht werden müssen.

Es ist durchaus eine sinnvolle Möglichkeit, sich auf die 5 bedeutsamsten Bilder zu beschränken, aber ich habe mir gedacht, dass speichertechnisch es wohl trivial wäre, da die Gesamtdatenmenge in beiden Fällen unter einem GiB wäre (oder nah dran) und so verschiedene Ausführungen verfügbar sind. Verschiedene Menschen legen Wert auf verschiedene Dinge und haben somit eine Auswahl. Natürlich kann man dagegenargumentieren, dass dann eine Auswahl erschwert wäre, aber das kann ja sachlich diskutiert werden.
Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion[edit]

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Visit of the Mandelbulb (4K UHD; 50FPS).webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Visit of the Mandelbulb (4K UHD; 50FPS).webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malzhaus mit Mauer in Plauen 20190828 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 018.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlplakat der PARTEI an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Wrong category needs fixing. --Ermell 12:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThanks for the hint, I corrected it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlplakat der PARTEI an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlplakat der PARTEI an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benesi - Pine Tree mit Licht OpenCL 20190902 8K 005.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 22:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Gmünd - Hochaltar 20190822 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Blown highlights. Is that fixable? --Ermell 19:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Is this version better? --PantheraLeo1359531 21:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better. Thanks. --Ermell 06:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atelier Nordstrand Putgarten 20181030 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please reduce the power of white --Michielverbeek 18:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review. I made the white areas slightly darker. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benesi - Pine Tree mit Licht OpenCL 20190902 8K 006 kleineres Licht.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --SH6188 07:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 0,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großer Keller in Sparneck 20190901 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steintürmchen bei Putgarten 20181030 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hyperkomplexe Mandelbrot-Menge HQ 20190908.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good graphic as always. --D-Kuru 01:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bild(erreihe) Leuchtturm Kap Arkona 20181030 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bild(erreihe) Leuchtturm Kap Arkona 20181030 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kap Arkona Peilturm 20181030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen "Durchgang zu den Weberhäusern gesperrt" in Plauen 20190828 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you add an english description. --C messier 14:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done --PantheraLeo1359531 09:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --C messier 18:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang auf Weg nach Schaprode 20181031 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dost spot in the sky. --Steindy 12:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, dust spot removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quaternionsche Mandelbrotmenge 20190830 zbuffer.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 15:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang auf Weg nach Schaprode 20181031 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Atrium 20190915 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality, but the description should be a little more detailed. --Manfred Kuzel 09:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Danke für den Hinweis, Infos zur näheren Lokalisierung wurden in der Beschreibung hinzugefügt.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Atrium 20190915 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality, aber welches Atrium und wo? --Manfred Kuzel 09:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Danke für den Hinweis, Infos zur näheren Lokalisierung wurden in der Beschreibung hinzugefügt.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Atrium 20190915 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality, aber welches Atrium und wo? --Manfred Kuzel 09:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Danke für den Hinweis, Infos zur näheren Lokalisierung wurden in der Beschreibung hinzugefügt.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Atrium 20190915 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality, aber welches Atrium und wo? --Manfred Kuzel 09:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Danke für den Hinweis, Infos zur näheren Lokalisierung wurden in der Beschreibung hinzugefügt.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Fassade an Atrium 20190915 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ichwarsnur 17:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:JCRG Hof Graffiti an den Tischtennisplatten 20190915 131.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Graffiti an den Tischtennisplatten 20190915 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Graffiti an den Tischtennisplatten 20190915 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 0,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Brücke 20190915 174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:JCRG Hof Brücke 20190915 176.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Brücke 20190915 176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you remove dush spot in the sky?--Armenak Margarian 14:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good composition, sligthly dark imo. --ArildV 16:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, I removed the dust spots I could find :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Ok now --Armenak Margarian 03:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptkeller Schloss Wildenroth 20190907 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Blick auf Rauchschlot 20190915 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality: sharp in most segments of the chimney --Axel Tschentscher 18:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:JCRG Hof Blick auf Sportbereich unter Brücke 20190915 234.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Blick auf Sportbereich unter Brücke 20190915 234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JGAW Hof Atriumsbereich 20190915 396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 18:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wegweiser in Putgarten zum Leuchtturm 20181030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quaternion 4D Julia-Menge x0,25 y0,6 z0 20190922.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 19:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quaternion 4D x0,25 y0,5 z0 20190922.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 19:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JGAW Hof Gang zum Atrium 20190915 376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too dark --Poco a poco 09:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review. Better now? --PantheraLeo1359531 10:32, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better now, I promote it now, but please, fix the slight purple CA (e.g. top left corner) --Poco a poco 09:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwerk über den Filmnächten am Elbufer Dresden 02082019 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilt CW or distorted. (See bulding at left). Fixable --George Chernilevsky 14:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, I tried to fix it. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Flachbau 20190915 464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Description should be better --Ermell 19:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, information have been added. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Brückenansicht 20190915 206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carschten 11:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Graffiti an den Tischtennisplatten 20190915 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang auf Weg nach Schaprode 20181031 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The horizon falls to the left. --Steindy 12:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the information, I corrected the tilt. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:24, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support: looks a bit pixelated (artifacts) to me, but the exposure is great and it's ok for QI --Carschten 08:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry[edit]

Hi, I just unlocked your account. It was of course a terrible mistake by me, that should have not happen. I very much apologize for that :-((( Regards --Schniggendiller (talk) 12:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Schniggendiller,
no problem, mistakes happen :). I was quite confused to be honest, but the case was solved very quickly, so this is no problem :).

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please preselect your images[edit]

As mentioned above, it would be really useful if you preselect your images. Currently it often seems like you are indiscriminately uploading the content of your camera. I have heard this weird rumour that storage space is so cheap, it's basically free - but if everyone believes that, we will soon see that it's not. Your Reinhart-Gymnasium set is an extreme example, because it contains many photos that differ only in aperture etc. There is absolutely no point in having ten versions (File:Wagen am JCRG Hof 20190915 537.jpg-...546.jpg) of the same photo of a construction trailer. The point of taking many images with slightly different settings is to actually select the best one. Please do. Watchduck (quack) 13:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Watchduck,

I see.

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 13:15, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die exakten Entsprechungen der drei QIs die ich oben sehe hab ich schonmal in die Unterkatiegorie duplicates verschoben, denn da hast du ja schon entschieden, welches das beste ist. Bitte mach das doch entsprechend fuer die anderen Bilder auch. Und dann einfach ein Loeschantrag fuer alle Bilder in der Unterkategorie. Sorry wenn ich hier etwas noergelig bin, aber ich glaube mit mehreren GB fuer ein paar Fotos von einem Schulhof bist du subtil oberhalb irgendeiner ungeschriebenen Grenze. Umlautlose Gruesse, Watchduck (quack) 13:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alles klar, ist wohl diffizileres Thema :).

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 13:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cat-a-lot kennst du ja, oder? Ohne dieses Tool waere das eine Menge Arbeit.

Einrueckungen sind auf Diskussionsseiten uebrigens ungemein nuetzlich. ;) Watchduck (quack) 13:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, kannte ich tatsächlich noch nicht. Danke für den Tipp :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 13:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 0,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diner for two, synchronously eating.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Hinterausgang 20190915 589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodekaeder-IFS 20191002.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seitenansicht des hinteren Bereichs des JCRG Hof 20190915 624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof Hinterausgang 20190915 581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted in ccw direction and there is at least one dust spot (see note) --Poco a poco 07:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, I fixed the issues. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Imagestack[edit]

Hi. Dieses Tool könnte für deine Fraktalserien interessant sein. Siehe z.B. Lumbosacral MRI case 05 und Abdominal MRA case 01. Die Slideshow-Funktion von Commons neigt meiner Erfahrung nach zu Verzögerungen, weil ziemlich große Versionen geleaden werden. Watchduck (quack) 01:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Watchduck,

danke für diesen Tipp, ich werde es bedenken. :)

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mengerschwamm[edit]

Ich hab es mal mit deinem Mengerschwamm ausprobiert. Ich würde die Serie auch gern als Beispiel benutzen, aber nicht mit dem Bildformat. Du verschwendest Platz rechts und links, und am Ende ist das Motiv oben und unten angeschnitten. An deiner Stelle würde ich die Serie nochmal mit dem korrekten Bildausschnitt rendern. Watchduck (quack) 22:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mir mal die Seite angeschaut, sie sieht echt sehr schön aus :). Ich kann gerne morgen eine korrigierte Bilderreihe hochladen, die den Kritierien genügt. Stimmt, am Ende ist nur ein Teil zu sehen, das sollte ich korrigieren.

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Du könntest die bestehenden Bilder einfach mit Commonist überschreiben. (Da musst du dann 100 mal ok klicken, da es den Namen schon gibt.) Die Beschreibung (etc.) muss man dabei in Commonist neu ausfüllen, sonst ist hinterher keine da. Als Beschreibung kannst du einfach {{den Kategorienamen}} als Template eingeben.

An deiner Stelle würde ich die Serie aber komplett neu hochladen. Die Namen könnten kürzer und aussagekräftiger sein. Wenn du eine Achse langfährst, dann nimm die Koordinate doch in den Bildnamen. Und warum eingentlich nur die schnöde Achse? Siehe Menger sponge diagonal section.

Und warum eigentlich JPG? Solche Bilder sind normalerweise PNG. Da könntest du dann auch gleich transparenten Hintergrund nehmen. Lass doch den Nutzer entscheiden ob er schwarz oder weiß oder was auch immer will.

Und was hat es eigentlich mit den Farben auf sich? Die sind nicht gerade selbsterklärend. Und was hat es mit den (ziemlich ungeordneten) dunklen Bildern auf sich? Und von welcher Stufe ist der 4D-Schwamm durch den du da fährst eigentlich? Das ist ja alles ganz hübsch, aber wenn du uns nicht sagst was es darstellt, wird niemand davon klüger.

Man könnte noch darüber nachdenken, wie man die Koordinaten am besten darstellt. Dezimal mit führenden Nullen ist schön und gut. Aber wenn ich sehe wie gedrittelt das alles ist, habe ich den Eindruck, dass balanced ternary am elegantesten wäre. Grüße, Watchduck (quack) 20:48, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Watchduck, danke für die ganzen Anregungen, das sind echt eine ganze Menge :). Ich fange nun ein neues Rendering an, das die möglichst die angesprochenen Themen beinhält. Die Frage mit JPG und PNG hat den Grund, dass die Bilderreihe einem Video entspringt ([dem hier]). Würde jedes einzelne Bild (des ungefähr 1000-2000 Bilder enthaltenden Videos) als PNG gespeichert werden, würde zum einen das Rendering enorm lange dauern (Bilder speichern, Bilder zu Video rendern) und zum anderen das Video enorm groß werden. Ich werde noch ein paar zusätzliche Informationen hinzupacken. Die Farbe dient hauptsächlich dazu, Tiefen sichtbarer zu machen und/oder sogenannte Orbit traps zu visualisieren. Als Koordinatenposition habe ich z=0 gewählt, sodass der Blick symmetrisch ist. Das sogenannte "Balanced ternary" ist für mich, mit Verlaub, zu hoch :).

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Die dunklen Bilder zeigen sozusagen die "Randgebiete" des Fraktals. Um diesen W-Achsenwert "löst" sich das Fraktal auf. Bei der Nummerierung kann ein kleines Durcheinander aufgetreten sein, was zu doeser Unstrukturierung geführt hat.

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Watchduck, das Rendering ist nun fertig, allerdings sind alle Bilder zusammen 3,77 GB groß. Ist dies zu groß? Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schau an, ein Video gibt es auch noch. Davon stand dort gar nichts. Aber dieser Zwischenschritt spielt ja hier keine Rolle. Wir reden hier nur davon ungefähr 200 Bilder neu zu rendern. (Ich hab übrigens die Nacht über die Diagonalensequenz neu gerendert, weil die alte Sequenz nur in einem animierten SVG verbastelt war.)

Oha, Kommunikation in Echtzeit. Das kann schwierig werden. Wie viele Bilder in welcher Auflösung sind es denn? Watchduck (quack) 17:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das wären 100 Bilder á 4000x4000 Pixel. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist mMn völlig in Ordnung. Lass und aber nochmal kurz über die Dateinamen reden, bevor du die Bilder hochlädst... [PL hat hier geantwortet.]

Mit der Koordinate die in den Namen sollte, meinte ich natürlich den von dir w genannten Wert den du veränderst. Ich hab das ganze jedenfalls so verstanden, dass du ein 4D-Gebilde hast, und uns das 3D-Schnittbild mit einer Hyperebene zeigst die senkrecht auf der w-Achse steht... Watchduck (quack) 18:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In Ordnung. Ich würde folgende Dateinamen vorschlagen: Menger4D z.w -0,5 zu 0,5 20191011 001. Menger4D steht für die verwendete Fraktalformel in mandelbulber, z.w für den verwendeten Parameter, -0,5 zu 0,5 für die Reichweite, 20191011 für eine schnelle Datumseinordnung und 001 als fortlaufender Zähler für die Bilderreihe. Die Erläuterung würde ich in die Beschreibung packen. Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531. Nachtrag: Ja, das müsste so passen. (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mach bitte kein Datum in den Dateinamen, es sei denn das dargestellte Fraktal ist vom Datum abhängig. ;)

Die Ordnung in der Kategorie wird das Minus vermutlich nicht verstehen, also 001 auf jeden Fall vorher.

Gibt es einen Grund warum das Intervall [-1/2, 1/2] und nicht [-1, 1] ist? Watchduck (quack) 18:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alles klar, das werde ich bedenken :). Das Intervall wird vermutlich codebedingt (also im Wesen der Fraktalformel liegen) sein, jedenfalls ist außerhalb von -0,5 und 0,5 das Fraktal nicht definiert, also das Bild ist leer. Soll ich es dann so hochladen? --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 18:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Klingt so weit gut. Ich hoffe die Bilder haben nicht rechts so einen Rand wie dein letzter Upload? Wenn doch, dann lass bitte nochmal schnell ein Script durchlaufen. Jetzt ist es noch einfach. (ImageMagick scheint da die übliche Wahl zu sein.)

Moment mal: Ich hab dein "-0,5 zu 0,5" jetzt schon so verstanden, dass der erste Dateiname dann sowas ist wie "Menger4D 000 (w -0,5).png", nicht dass da überall "-0,5 zu 0,5" steht. Das wäre Quatsch. Falls du keinen Nerv für Gefriemel mit den Dateinamen hast, dann belass es bei "Menger4D 000.png" etc. Hauptsache man kann hinterher jedem Bild klar einen w-Wert zuordnen. Wenn du mir eine Liste gibst, dann bastel ich ein Template daraus. (Die kleine Text-Matrix in der Beschreibung von Bildern wie diesem kommt z.B. aus diesem Template.) Watchduck (quack) 18:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, dann werde ich eine Liste zukommen lassen. Jedoch ist der W-Wert pro Bild um ziemlich genau 0,01 größer (also -0,5; -0,49; usw.). So hat das Bild mit Laufnummer 001 den Wert -0,5, 002 den Wert -0,49 usw. Ich hoffe, die Infos reichen für das Erstellen der Liste :). Ich habe jetzt mit IrfanView die Bilder korrekt geschnitten, sodass der Rand rechts in etwa mit dem linken in der Dicke identisch ist. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn du die exakten Werte noch hast, dann schmeiß sie nicht weg. Kann ja sein, dass es mal jemand genau wissen will. Ich pack solche Details gerne in Klapptabellen (wie die Code-Schachtel hier.)
Bleibt nur noch die Frage wie neue Kategorie heißen soll. Wie wäre es mit "Menger4Dtransfadditionconstantw" plus ein paar Leerzeichen? Watchduck (quack) 19:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In Ordnung, ich gucke, ob ich sie herbekomme. Ist der Kategorienname in etwa so gemeint: "Menger4Dtransfadditionconstantw "? --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wie gesagt, wenn du sie hast kopier sie rüber, ansonsten belassen wir es dabei.

Der Name ist in etwa so gemeint: "Menger4D transf addition constant w"

Ich unterstelle jetzt mal, dass das die Begriffe sind, wie sie Mandelbulber verwendet werden, und du nicht einfach nur "transformation" abgekürzt hast. Watchduck (quack) 19:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Die Unterstellung ist korrekt :). Also ich hätte sie in einer CSV-Liste. Allerdings weiß ich nicht, wie und wo ich sie senden soll :). Den Kategorienamen können wir so übernehmen. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich würde doch eher sagen Mandelbulber Menger4D along w ist besser. Hab mir erlaubt das mal so zu erstellen.

Die Liste ist in ihrer Schachtel, und die Diskussion hab ich wieder hergestellt. [Antwort kam dazwischen.]

Danke sehr, beim Versuch, die CSV-Datei einzufügen, hat es mir die Diskussion zerschossen. :) Hier die Liste: [dort]

--PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt ist nur noch die Frage wie du hochlädst. Das Template {{Mandelbulber Menger4D along w}} müsste in eine sprachneutrale Schachtel wie in Commonist. Geht das von dir aus? Watchduck (quack)

Och nööö. Jetzt hast du ja doch statische Beschreibungen auf jeder einzelnen Beschreibungsseite. Der Sinn von Template:Mandelbulber Menger4D along w war, dass man die zentral bearbeiten kann. Watchduck (quack) 20:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Der erste Schwung wird gerade veröffentlicht. Ich lade die Bilder über den UploadWizard hoch. Wo konkret müsste dieses Template implementiert werden? --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UploadWizard ist Murx. Watchduck (quack) 20:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mist, das tut mir Leid, gab wohl ein Missverständnis :(. Lässt sich der Fehler noch korrigieren? --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt verstehe ich, dann korrigiere ich halt die 50, das geht schon :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 20:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Problem. UW wickelt dir halt immer ein Sprach-Template um die Beschreibung, was natürlich blöd aussieht, wenn dann verschiedene Sprachen drin sind.

Und für Uplads in dem Umfang wie du sie machst ist das Ding doch eh viel zu unhandlich. Du musstest vermutlich gerade 50 mal das Datum anklicken und die Kategorie hinzufügen, oder?

Commonist ist auf jeden Fall eine Bisschen Java-Gefriemel bei der Installation wert. Die Zeit hast du nach einer Woche wieder drin. Watchduck (quack) 20:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beim UW kann man glücklicherweise die Attribute der ersten Datei auf die restlichen übertragen :). Commonist habe ich auch schon ausprobiert, aber da ist irgendwie immer der Upload abgebrochen. Aber danke für den Tipp. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, dann sieht es halt ertmal blöd aus. Auch egal. Ist das eigentlich Absicht, dass da immer "CGI." mit auf der Seite steht? (Was auch immer das ist, es gehört da nicht hin. Aber auch das ist erstmal egal.) Watchduck (quack) 20:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das CGI soll nur darauf hinweisen, dass es sich um ein computergeneriertes Werk handelt. Bin gerade dabei, die restlichen Bilder hochzuladen. Ich sage schon mal danke für die Mühen und ich hoffe, dass da eine brauchbare Bilderreihe rauskommt :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 20:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sowas gehört auf jeden Fall auch in das Beschreibungsfeld. In diesem Fall also ins Template. Dafür wird es dann {{Created with Mandelbulber}} geben. Darin sollte die Information dass es CGI ist ja enthalten sein. Ansonsten halt noch ein zweite Box. Um sowas kümmert sich häufig Sarang. Watchduck (quack) 21:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info. Nun sind alle Bilder hochgeladen :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fertig[edit]

Ja, das ist auf jeden Fall sehr hübsch geworden. Aber irgendwie ist die neue Serie anders als die alte. Die Farben sind ganz anders. Kein Blau und nicht so starke Kontraste. Rein optisch finde ich die alten Bilder auf jeden Fall interessanter. Sei's drum. Für heute hatte ich erstmal genug Mengerschwämme. Watchduck (quack) 21:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das rührt daher, weil ich leider die Farbzusammensetzung der damaligen Reihe nicht mehr fand und musste daher eine neue nehmen. Aber ich hoffe, das geht so :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Siehe #FRACT-Datei. Watchduck (quack) 15:40, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Das geht so" ist doch nicht der Standard nach dem wir hier streben. :)

Das ist echt schade, denn jetzt haben wir ein interessantes Video (samt Bilderserie), von dem man nicht mehr klar sagen kann, was es eigentlich zeigt. Besser wäre gewesen, du hättest die Farbzusammensetzung damals auf die Beschreibungsseite des Videos kopiert oder ein Pastebin verlinkt. (Das hier sieht ganz gut aus.) Idealerweise sollten solche Bilder durch andere Nutzer reproduzierbar sein. Bei einen Fraktal wäre es z.B. naheliegend, dass jemand an ein Detail heranzoomen will, um dann in einem Artikel zu sagen: Das ist eine Sowieso-Stelle. Gib anderen Nutzern doch die Möglichkeit Bilder zu erzeugen, die konsistent mit deinen sind.

Ich versteh übrigens nach wie vor nicht, was wie Bilder darstellen - einfach weil es nicht dran steht. (Ist es sowas wie die Mandelbox?) Momentan sind viele deiner Bilder direkt in Menger sponges, obwohl sie eindeutig nicht einfach nur Mengerschwämme zeigen - und seien es vierdimensionale. Es kann doch nicht sein, dass der Nutzer jetzt herumsuchen soll, was Mandelbulber etwa unter "Menger4D" versteht. Ich schlage vor, dass du für jedes Objekt von dem du Darstellungen hochlädst eine Kategorie anlegst, sofern es noch keine gibt. Wenn die erstmal einen schlechten Namen wie Mandelbulber Menger4D fractal hat, dann ist das eben so. Ich hab gerade mal Mengerbulb angelegt. (Drei Bilder sind mMn ungefähr die Grenze ab der sich eine eingene Kategorie lohnt.)

Dieses Bild sollte z.B. in Hybrid of Menger sponge and Amazing Surf sein. So verstehe ich jedenfalls die Beschreibung. Und die sollte dann natürlich auch in Amazing Surf (fractal) sein. Und natürlich muss es dann noch Fractal hybrids geben.

Übrigens sind einige deiner Bilder so gigantisch, dass die Thumbnail-Generierung an ihnen scheitert. Man kann sie nur in Standardgrößen darstellen (etwa 320px). Überschreiben mit einer 4000px-Version wäre sinnvoll. Die große Version bleibt ja in der History, und in 20 Jahren wird es vielleicht revertiert, weil das dann die üblichen Auflösungen sind.

Grüße, Watchduck (quack) 00:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, puh ist jedenfalls ein diffizileres Thema :). Ich werde mal ein bisschen für Ordnung sorgen. Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass man eine (Unter-)Kategorie namens Fraktalhybriden (Fractal hybrids) erstellen könnte und dann weitere Gruppierungsmaßnahmen einleiten. Würde man für jede mögliche Hybride eine Kategorie erstellen, würden das wohl zu viele Kategorien werden :). Ich hatte einmal den Fall, dass eine fraktale Kategorie (meines Wissens waren das Kali Set-Fraktale) gelöscht wurde (vermutlich wegen zu geringer Relevanz), weshalb die Frage nach der Anzahl der Kategorien wohl mehrerer Meinungen bedarf. Ich kann von manchen Versionen gerne eine Verkleinerung in 4K hinzufügen, sofern ich zeitlich dazu komme. Das Thema ist leider noch sehr jung, weshalb bspw. Literatur zu dem Thema noch sehr rar ist. Ich hoffe, dass in Zukunft noch Wikimedianer hinzukommen, die in fraktaler Geometrie sich gut auskennen (oder natürlich bereits auf Wikimedia Commons Tätige :)). Ich würde vorschlagen, dass wir gerade die Fraktalhybriden erstmal in der Kategorie Created with Mandelbulber gruppieren, und wenn das Thema in Zukunft besser strukturiert ist, kann man Kategorien anlegen. Die Mandelbulb und die Mandelbox sind die Vorbilder für die dreidimensionale Fraktalgeometrie, und die Fraktale sind erstmal 10 Jahre alt; in der Wissenschaft ein extrem junges Alter. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Würde man zu jeder möglichen Hybride Bilder hochladen, würden das zu viele Bilder werden. Aber sobald es mehrere Bilder zu einer Hybride gibt, sollte es auch die Kategorie dazu geben. Erstmal alles auf einen Haufen werfen ist definitiv keine Lösung. (Schon gar nicht wenn der Haufen nichtmal ein Thema, sondern nur eine Software bezeichnet.) Wenn das Thema in Zukunft vielleicht besser strukturiert ist, dann kann man provisorische Kategorienamen durch Fachbegriffe ersetzen. Aber alle Bilder sollten von Anfang an danach geordnet sein was sie darstellen. Watchduck (quack) 00:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Verstehe, dann ist dies sicher der Königsweg. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 12:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FRACT-Datei[edit]

Gute Neuigkeiten, ich habe die FRACT-Datei für das Video gefunden. Ich habe sie eingefügt, damit lässt sich theoretisch ein Teil oder das gesamte Video rekonstruieren. Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 16:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist schön. Damit wir einen adäquaten Ersatz für die alte JPG-Serie kriegen, würde ich vorschlagen, dass du damit nochmal eine endgültige Version renderst. Ich sehe keinen Grund weniger Bilder als in der ursprünglichen Serie zu haben. File:Menger4D along w 123.png wären naheliegende Dateinamen. Das Template kann man unverändert übernehmen. Die zweite Version mit dem etwas drögen Farbschema kann dann genauso gelöscht werden wie die JPGs.

PS: Für den Upload habe ich kürzlich Pywikibot entdeckt. Damit könntest du theoretisch jedem Bild eine individuelle Beschreibung geben. (Hab ich z.B. hier gemacht.)

Grüße, Watchduck (quack) 16:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created with Mandelbulber[edit]

Hallo, hab mir angesehen um was es geht. Die Created with ... templates empfehlen sich dann, wenn sehr verschiedene Dateien generiert werden; dazu haben sie jeweils eine grosse Anzahl von Parametern. Hier scheint das nicht der Fall zu sein, zumindest bisher nicht - es gibt also nichts zu parametrieren. Die gegenwärtige Vorlage macht alles Nötige und ich sehe keinen Handlungsbedarf. mfg -- sarang♥사랑 12:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte nicht zwischen ältere Beiträge schreiben. Da sieht doch sonst niemand mehr durch.

Ich glaube das siehst du zu technisch. Diese Templates sind einfach der übliche Weg auszudrücken welche Software benutzt wurde. Genau wie etwa {{Povray}}. Ursprünglich war auch {{Inkscape}} nur das. Die ganzen Parameter die du da hinzugefügt hast sind nicht der Grund warum irgendjemand dieses Template benutzt. In Ermangelung eines Icons für Mandelbulber würde ich File:Mandelbulb detail.png vorschlagen. Watchduck (quack) 13:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blöd, dass es keinen englischen WP-Artikel gibt. Auf englisch gibt es nur Mandelbulb, aber nicht Mandelbulber. Auf deutsch nur Mandelbulber, aber nicht Mandelbulb.

@PL: Vielleicht hast du ja Lust Abhilfe zu schaffen. Watchduck (quack) 15:37, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo sarang und quack,

vielen Dank für Eure Mühen; schon sehr nützlich, wenn man weiß, wie es geht :). Die Artikel existieren tatsächlich so, wie beschrieben. Ich habe mir mal die Mühe gemacht, den Mandelbulber-Artikel zu schreiben und kann gerne, wenn ich Zeit habe, mich um die englische Version kümmern. Der deutsche Mandelbulb-Artikel benötigt neben Aussehen des Fraktals u.a. auch den mathematischen "Code" und weiteres eventuelles mathematisches Hintergrundwissen. Da wäre es gut, wenn sich eine (oder mehere) Person(en) einklinken könnte(n), die sich damit auskennt/-en (vermutlich eher schwierig, da das Thema relativ jung ist). Bei der Mandelbox bin ich jedenfalls kläglich gescheitert :).

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frag vorsichtshalber erstmal auf Talk:Fractal-generating software ob die Software relevant genug für einen eigenen Artikel ist. Vielleicht reicht ja auch ein Abschnitt in dem Artikel. Mir geht es nur darum, dass man darauf verlinken kann. Watchduck (quack) 00:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werde mich heute Abend drum kümmern. Gute Idee, wobei ich vermuten könnte, dass es für einen eigenen Artikel reicht, aber Fragen ist hier die bessere Wahl. Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Featured video UserBox[edit]

Hi PantheraLeo1359531,

If you wish you can use the new userbox for FV which shows

This user has uploaded featured media to Wikimedia Commons.

. -- Eatcha (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eatcha, thank you for this information :). I'll add the template to the user page.
Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fußweg Talsperre Falkenstein 20191012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minibrot 20191011.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 09:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Telefonstelle in Mödlareuth 20191003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction needid. --Steindy 11:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the info, issue fixed. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective correction[edit]

Hi there, I noticed that you use Photoshop. Great tool for fixing perspective is Lightroom so if you have it too, it should be an easy thing to fix. Shift+T is a good way to go :) Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the hint :) Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 12:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanklöschfahrzeug der FFW Bamberg 20191003 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Main subject good. Though I dislike the bus at the right. --Dirtsc 06:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gang zu Plattform Talsperre Falkenstein 20191012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Thanks --Moroder 19:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Hof von hinten 20190915 635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The photo looks lazy. Should not contrast and color be amplified a bit? --Steindy 12:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, colors slightly amplified. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! But now are some spots in the sky to see. --Steindy 16:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Spots removed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 12:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, not done! --Steindy 22:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done But now :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 23:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hütte bei TS Falkenstein 20191012 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a specific cat about the subject --Poco a poco 18:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, more categories added. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick auf Hütte 20190818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gleise in Mallnitz 20190818 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gleise in Mallnitz 20190818 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiralmeer 16K 20191019.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Streetdeck 13:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing unnecessary manual work ![edit]

Hey PantheraLeo1359531,

I noticed that you were updating the QI count on your user page. You don't have to do that, the box counts the total files under Category:Quality images by PantheraLeo1359531. You should only use {{User QI|username=PantheraLeo1359531|category=Quality images by PantheraLeo1359531}}. It prints

PantheraLeo1359531 has uploaded 1398 quality images to Wikimedia Commons.

Best,
-- Eatcha (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, thank you for the hint :)
Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 09:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And you also don't need to update edit count, just use {{User contrib|{{User:PantheraLeo1359531/edits}}|link=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PantheraLeo1359531|insane=yes))}} It's automatic too(updated once in 24 hours). It prints:

150,464+

This user has made over 150,464 contributions to Commons.

-- Eatcha (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thanks :) --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserfallstrukturen Rabischschlucht (HDR) rechts 20190819 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserfallstrukturen Rabischschlucht (HDR) 20190819 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserfallstrukturen Rabischschlucht (HDR) Detail 20190819 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Great photo, but where do the many black points come from? Are the water splashes on the lens? --Steindy 10:02, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, I removed the spots --PantheraLeo1359531 16:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay now, good quality! --Steindy 20:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szenerie vor den 53. Hofer Filmtagen 20191024 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The crop looks too randomed to me, can you remove those heads at the bottm? --Poco a poco 19:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, image cropped. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FotD 059 Aufgeschnittener Mengerschwamm 20191021.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia-Menge mit zentralem Minibrot 29062019.jpg[edit]

Hi. Thx for great image . Can you add parameter file ? TIA --Adam majewski (talk) 09:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I'm sorry, but I don't have the parameter files for older images. But you can find the parameters in the Meta section and copy them into the program (like position, coloring, etc.).

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wanderweg an der Rabischschlucht 20190819 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion[edit]

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Mandelbrotzoom 20191023.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Mandelbrotzoom 20191023.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 02:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Menger4D w 001.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 19:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strommast um Mallnitz 20190819 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist ein Diskussionsbeitrag zu sehen[edit]

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 0, ich finde die Beschreibung Hier sind Berge zu sehen. z.B. in File:Bergwelten um St. Jakob in Defereggen und Richtung Stallersattel 22082018 013.jpg, originell, jedoch wenig enzyklopädisch. Könntest du so knieweich sein und dich entsinnen, welche Berge hier zu sehen sind? Als Beispiel für manche deiner Bilder. Es hilft PeakFinder (am einfachsten wenn du Kamerakoordinaten hast), z.B. [1]. Mit Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator kannst du die Berge im Bild markieren, falls mehrere drauf sind. Kamerakoordinaten bei den Bildern würden generell helfen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki,
ich kann dieses Ansinnen nachvollziehen, allerdings muss ich zugeben, dass ich mich damals mehr auf die Fotografie und die Ansicht konzentriert habe, als auf die Bezeichnung des zu Sehenden. Sofern eine Rekonstruktion möglich ist, kann ich versuchen, zusätzliche Informationen zu Bergen zu finden. Sind etwa keine Koordinaten dabei? Ich dächte, sie stets beigefügt zu haben... Ich guck mal, was ich tun kann. Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Okay, ich habe mir das Bild angeschaut. Ich kann mich entsinnen, dass dieses Bild bei der Durchfahrt entstanden ist und ich leider deswegen nicht mehr die genaue Position und den Bergnamen nachreichen kann. Dass dadurch der enzyklopädische Mehrwert vorenthalten bleibt, ist leider richtig. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist noch ein Diskussionsbeitrag[edit]

Deine Dateiinformationen in etwa File:Bilderreihe rund um St. Jakob in Defereggen 22082018 025.jpg sind wenig aussagekräftig. Es wäre schön, wenn du in den 14 Sprachen den Ort, die Alm und den Namen der Kuh ergänzen könntest, statt das offensichtliche Fotografie etc. hinzuschreiben. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Puh, also Informationen wie Kuhnamen ermittelt zu haben, ist aus meiner Sicht sehr ambitioniert, mit Verlaub :). Ich kann leider mit keiner der gewünschten Informationszugaben dienen, da dieses Bild neben anderen auf einer Wanderung entstanden ist und auf dem Weg die kleine "Weide" mit den Kühen war (ich bin leider nicht dort daheim). Leider kann ich auch keine Informationen nachholen, weil dies ein relativ anonymer Bereich war. An die Kuh bin ich nicht rangegangen, weil dies die Kuh hätte veranlassen können mich anzugreifen, um eventuelle Kälber zu schützen oder aus anderen Gründen tätig zu werden. Ebenso war auch keine ansprechbare Person in der Nähe, die Informationen hätte mitteilen können. Kurzum sind das die Information, die ich über die Kühe habe. Falls jemand in der Nähe wohnt und/oder weitere Informationen hat kann, kann er/sie selbstverständlich hinzufügen, aber hier muss ich passen. Der Ort kann aus den Koordinatenangaben entnommen werden. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich unterstelle jetzt mal, dass Herzi mit "Namen der Kuh" sowas wie Ayrshire-Rind gemeint hat. Auch der Anspruch ist aber in der Tat etwas zu ambitioniert. Das soll jemand hinzufügen, der was von Kühen versteht. Ein sinnvoller Schritt in diese Richtung ist, das Bild zu Unidentified cattle hinzuzufügen. Geographische Details sollte man auch nur hinschreiben, wenn man sich sicher ist. Ansonsten ist die Information in den Koordinaten in der Tat gut aufgehoben. Als Datumsformat würde ich dir allerdings YYYY-MM-DD ans Herz legen. Watchduck (quack) 20:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sakrales Gebilde um Mallnitz 20190819 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 19:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SierpOkt201911068KOpenCL 001 klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SierpOkt201911068KOpenCL 002 klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SierpOkt201911068KOpenCL 003 klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SierpOkt201911068KOpenCL 004 klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sierpinski octahedron[edit]

Edge view of tetrahedron (left) and octahedron (right)

Your images File:SierpOkt201911068KOpenCL 003 klein.png and File:SierpOkt201911068KOpenCL 004 klein.png supposedly show a Sierpinski octahedron, but the hull of the projection is square rather than rhombic. Is it possible, that they acually show a Sierpinski tetrahedron?
PS: No thumbnails are generated for File:Srp3D4D700 14062019.stl and File:SrpxMen700 14062019.stl.
PPS: Timestamps in filenames are distracting cruft, unless the time is relevant for the subject.
Watchduck (quack) 19:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Watchduck,

tatsächlich mag dies aus dieser Sichtweise wie ein Tetraeder wirken, jedoch habe ich die Formel für einen Oktaeder benutzt. Vermutlich wäre es aus diesem Blickwinkel für das Bild gleich, ob es Tetra- oder Oktaeder ist. Ich mache gerade ein Video, wo die geometrischen Besonderheiten des Oktaeders beleuchtet werden, unter anderen ist der oben beschriebene Fall dabei.

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 08:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habs mir mal genauer angeschaut. Die Hülle ist nicht quadratisch, sondern die Diagonale die in einer Parallelprojektion länger ist, ist bei dir sogar kürzer. Offenbar verwendest du eine kurze Brennweite und bist nah dran. Vielleicht kannst du in dem Video eine dem menschlichen Auge ähnlichere Einstellung benutzen. Watchduck (quack) 01:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das ist richtig, je näher man in dem Programm dem Oktaeder ist, desto verzerrte wird das Gesamtgebilde. Aber bei dem Rendering ist mir bis jetzt keine Störung der Form aufgefallen. Mal gucken, wie es fertig aussieht. --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eine perspektivische Darstellung entspricht unseren Sehgewohnheiten, wenn sie ungefähr so aussieht als würde man das Objekt in der Hand halten. Ansonsten ist Parallelprojektion für geometrische Gebilde natürlich auch eine gute Wahl. Watchduck (quack) 16:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joa, da, sage ich mal, mehrere Perspektivansichten in dem Video zur Geltung kommen werden, sollte auch das Richtige dabei sein :). Auf so Linsen wie Fischauge, Panorama oder Vollkuppel habe ich erstmal verzichtet :) --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:02, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzhütte bei Mallnitz 20190819 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok imo. Not perfect crop. --ArildV 10:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beginn Straßenabschnitt Bleilochtalsperre 20191026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The quality of the left side is very poor, only a crop helps here, dust spots --Poco a poco 18:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, dust spots removed and crop done --PantheraLeo1359531 13:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok --Poco a poco 21:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbinenlaufrad (Francisturbine) Bleilochtalsperre 20191026 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.Background is somewhat overexposed, but that is completely irrelevant in this case. --Smial 17:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerreihung 20191111 10K HQ OpenCL.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:DE-Wikipedia unter Red Star OS 18 11 2019 14 52 11.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DE-Wikipedia unter Red Star OS 18 11 2019 14 52 11.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Castillo blanco (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Error of missing licence status has been fixed. Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gerüstbau an Staumauer Bleilochtalsperre 20191026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Lots of dust spots --Poco a poco 18:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, dust spots removed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. --Steindy 22:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed here I see still a lot of them --Poco a poco 21:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done I did little tweaks, but sorry, I don't see that many dust spots --PantheraLeo1359531 09:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telekom-Telefon an der Altstadt Hof 20191115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 15:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauerattrappe in Mödlareuth 20191109 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

English ∙ español ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ∙ Türkçe ∙ +/−

Hi PantheraLeo1359531,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

-- ~riley (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einkerbung SierpOkt 20191122 klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Julia Orbit-Trap HQ 8K.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gitter 20191201 8K Fischauge klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gitter 20191201 8K Fischauge 002 klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gitter 20191201 8K gleichwinklig klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3D-Gitternetz 20191201 8K.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infostand Schwussnerhütte Stappitzer See 20190820 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WC am Stappitzer See 20190820 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion[edit]

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Beispiel für eine KIFS-Transformation 5K 50FPS 20191109.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Beispiel für eine KIFS-Transformation 5K 50FPS 20191109.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 18:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion[edit]

★ This file has been promoted to Featured media! ★

The file File:Die wichtigsten Klimafaktoren (ZDF, Terra X) 720p 50FPS.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Die wichtigsten Klimafaktoren (ZDF, Terra X) 720p 50FPS.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 18:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statuetten Michaeliskirche 20191206 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Digitale Anzeigetafel Buslinien Hof 20191205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Düster, langweilig, nicht interessant - aber eine Alltagsszene, die nur schwer so einzufangen ist. --Ralf Roletschek 14:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengergang 20191209 360.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good composition and strangely mesmerizing. -- Ikan Kekek 14:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek 19:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Krötenbruck Hof (frontal) 20191207 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Interesting annotations but a lot of uninteresting foreground which should be cropped out IMO --Ermell 12:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, crop added --PantheraLeo1359531 12:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserreflexionen am Stappitzer See 20190820 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freizeit-Zentrum Seebachtal 20190820 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Large size fragtal images[edit]

Hi PantheraLeo1359531! I saw that you uploaded images with fractals and many of them not only have a high resolution but also a large filesize (eg. DIFS Ellipsoid 10K HQ 20191211 03.png with +200MB). You might want to consider adding {{LargeImage}} to the image description pages. See NGC 3372a-full.jpg as example. --D-Kuru (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll do it. Thanks for the info :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 14:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, Murray, one small thing. If you place it at the top or bottom of the {{Information}} template, it will form an optical unity. So eg.
{{LargeImage}}
{{Information
|description=
|date=
|source=
|author=
|permission=
|other versions=
}}
or
{{Information
|description=
|date=
|source=
|author=
|permission=
|other versions=
}}
{{LargeImage}}
You don't have to do it. I just wanted to mention it. --D-Kuru (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information, sometimes I even pay attention for that unity :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FFF-Demo (Hof) des 20190920 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti-Katze Hof 20191211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünes Ampellicht Südring Hof20191212 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bamberg von oben im Sonnenaufgang.webm[edit]

File:Bamberg von oben im Sonnenaufgang.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fahrradampel Hof 20191213 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HAW Hof bei Schnee 20191213 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zufahrt Beamtenfachhochschule Hof 20191213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerschwamm mit Schatten 01082019 8K 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltestelle Bismarckturm Hof 20191213 04 nah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle am JCRG Hof 20191213 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Automobil am Rathaus Hof 20191213 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Standtelefon vor dem Postbank Finanzcenter Hof 20191212 Terminal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Standtelefon vor dem Postbank Finanzcenter Hof 20191212 ganz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beschneiter Weg am JCRG Hof 20191213 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please remove all those spots in the sky --Michielverbeek 18:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. This spots is snowing ;-) --Steindy 00:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yep! -- Ikan Kekek 08:15, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:KIFS OpenCL 7945404518 32K.jpg[edit]

File:KIFS OpenCL 7945404518 32K.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Watchduck (quack) 19:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ihre Sensorflecken[edit]

Hallo PantheraLeo!
Sie stellen jede Menge Fotos ein, die mit Sensorflecken übersät sind. Wollen Sie nicht einmal Kamera reinigen oder reinigen lassen (kostet im Fachgeschäft 10 bis 15 Euro)? Zumindest sollten Sie Ihre Fotos kritsch prüfen, ehe Sie diese zur Bewertung stellen. Ich glaube nicht, dass es sinnvoll ist, dass Bewerter für Sie auf die Suche nach spots gehen müssen. Sie stehlen diesen damit auch deren Zeit. Grüße --Steindy (talk) 20:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe schon einige Maßnahmen ergriffen, die Flecken dauerhaft loszuwerden, leider ohne Erfolg. Ich bemühe mich, in Photoshop sorgfältig diese zu entfernen, nur leider gelingt mir das nicht immer. Der Tipp mit dem Fachgeschäft klingt gut, da werde ich mich mal informieren. Ich glaube, es ist von keinem ein gewollter Umstand, dass nach diesen Punkten gesucht werden muss, aber ich versuche im Rahmen meiner Möglichkeiten diese ausfindig zu machen und bin auch teilweise viele Minuten über einem Bild. Der Schwung mit den teils noch übersähten Fotos ist bald fertig, ich hoffe, dass ab nächstem Jahr das Problem gelöst sein wird. Trotz allen Umständen vielen Dank für die Mühen, und trotz allem viel Spaß beim Bewerten :).
Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Front FFW Hof Schriftzug 20191212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontalaufnahme Spielplatz Bismarckturm (Hof) 30042019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heft Sächsische Staatstheater - Opernhaus Dresden Hoffmanns Erzählungen 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grtek 15:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weihnachtsbaracken in Sachsen 20191208 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erker Gebäude Jens Bretschneider Internationale und Handelsagentur GmbH 20191208 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grtek 13:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9-armiger Leuchter vor Michaeliskirche Hof 20191220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infoschild Bahnhof Hof 20191212 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The crop doesn´t make sense to me and should be tighter IMO. --Ermell 22:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, tighter crop added --PantheraLeo1359531 15:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DIFS Ellipsoid 10K HQ 20191211 01.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2020, PantheraLeo1359531! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nebentür Postbank Finanzcenter Hof 20191212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ezarate 16:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehemalige Mädchenschule Hof 20191212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice image and it's nearly QI, but if you can slightly improve the perspective correction. --Tournasol7 14:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review, I hope it is better now :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also dust spots to remove. --Steindy 20:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Dust spots removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

★ This file has been promoted to Featured media! ★

The file File:NASA's Fermi Links Cosmic Neutrino to Monster Black Hole.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:NASA's Fermi Links Cosmic Neutrino to Monster Black Hole.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV promotion[edit]

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Visit of the Sierpiński octahedron 20191124 5K.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Visit of the Sierpiński octahedron 20191124 5K.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infoschild Adenauer Hof 20191212 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Many(!) dust spots to remove. --Steindy 20:15, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Dust spots removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
NO! There are many dust spots. --Steindy 00:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Crop added. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mengerwand Fischauge 20191223 8K klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 11:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]