User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 9

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zagreb cathedral portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals should be checked. --Ermell 16:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. --Palauenc05 18:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Esplanade in Zagreb, Croatia (view W).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Pag Town on the Island Pag, Croatia (view W)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Zagreb Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. Note: Perhaps vertical perspective correction is desired. --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pag Bartol Kašic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:18, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht Vogel Struys 1730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pag Spitzenklöpplerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze statue of a Pag lace-maker, Pag (town), Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze bust of Bartol Kašić in Pag (town), Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Trier Meisner (1625).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Category:Basilica of the Assumption of Mary, Pag (town), Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pag Türsturz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pag Basilica of the Assumption of Mary rose window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 07:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rose window in the facade of Basilica of the Assumption of Mary, Pag (town), Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festessen Kaiser Wilhelm 1898 (front page).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg 1 Mark Jäger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg 50 Pfennig Tambours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Menu card (front page) of the banquet for Emperor Wilhelm II (1898) at Hotel Kaiserhof (Porta Westfalica).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Wonderful document (useful of course)! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Only in Scope Nice + useful! Buidhe (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Hamburg, RV: "Jäger"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Hamburg, RV: "Tambours"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 13:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Meissen Böttger 1935.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzingen 50 Pfennig 1921 Schifbauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzingen 50 Pfennig 1921 Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:29, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banyuls-dels-aspres tobacco shop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 08:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Mehlsäcke.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Mehlsäcke.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Kitzingen (1921), AV: shipwright and model, RV: coat of arms..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarforst Wegekreuz 1670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 19:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Festessen Kaiser Wilhelm 1898 (front page).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Festessen Kaiser Wilhelm 1898 (front page).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarforst Wegekreuz 1670 (Detail 3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1670) in Trier-Tarforst, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Heiligkreuz Station 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:26, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Heiligkreuz Station 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Heiligkreuz Station 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Bernhardstr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Adding some Metadata would be fine. --Milseburg 11:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)br/> Support Auch ohne Metadaten gute Qualität -- Spurzem 12:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Comment I've explained many times that my system for some reason does not provide metadata. As they are not mandatory, I won't buy new equipment. --Palauenc05 12:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Heiligkreuz Station 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 14:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Third Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --pandakekok9 06:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Second Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --pandakekok9 06:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --pandakekok9 06:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medaille Conservatoire Dijon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fourth Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Don't forget to change the orientation to portrait if the photo has a higher height than the width. Anyway,  Support for being best in scope. --pandakekok9 03:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sixth Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Don't forget to change the orientation to portrait if the photo has a higher height than the width. Anyway,  Support for being best in scope. --pandakekok9 03:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Copper medal (c. 1900) of Conservatoire de Musique de Dijon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Stresemannstr. 3 Türsturz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Kreuzweg Heiligkreuz Station 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seventh Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fifth Station of the Cross in Trier-Heiligkreuz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is each cross really notable enough to merit its own scope? —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
• Yes, each of the seven is an individual piece of antique craftsmanship of excelent quality. Besides, these are the last two of the series. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope then. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --pandakekok9 03:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Treppenturm Stresemannstraße 3 (Trier) (view W).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstrasse 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 48, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 23:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragmentary crucifix, 17th-18th century, Saarstraße 46, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 23:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstrasse 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Konstantinsäule Barbaraufer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 24, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 04:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 12, so-called "Villa Ehses" in Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Konstantinsäule St.-Barbara-Ufer (Trier).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, best in scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope. Also, it's cool that we have an annotation that allows us to zoom in to the top part of the column! :) --pandakekok9 08:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Antonius Church (view W) in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Buidhe (talk) 04:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstrasse 129-131 (detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 22:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstrasse 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstrasse 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 133, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 123, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 49, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Beautiful, used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 12:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 45, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful, good image -- Spurzem (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 129-131, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eitelsbach Duisburger Hof Wappen Hugo von Schönenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)