User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 8

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Laubfrösche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:19, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Trier, 1920.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Potsdam (1921), RV: "Bombenschmeißer"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Potsdam (1921), RV: "Laubfrösche"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüterbog 10 Pfg 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüterbog 50 Pfg 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
100 million Mark "notgeld" banknote of Trier (1923).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and another great one. I wonder how much bread you could buy with this note. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Three days after it had been issued, it was just enough for one doughnut. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Wow! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Trier, 1920, RV: Kaiserthermen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: "Auf dem Meere"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt-Oder 1921 10 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Frankfurt (Oder) (1921), RV: Marienkirche..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt-Oder 1921 100 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Trier, 1920, RV: Kornmarkt..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt-Oder 1921 25 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt-Oder 1921 50 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
100 Pfennig (= 1 Mark) Notgeld banknote of Frankfurt-Oder (1921), RV: Marienkirche (view South)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Frankfurt (Oder) (1921), RV: Rathaus (view South)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 5 Pfennig 1921 (Lyra).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 10 Pfennig 1921 (Möserhaus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Württemberg 50000 Mark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted' ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted' ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 25 Pfennig 1921 Pernickelturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 1 Mark 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 12:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50,000 Mark Notgeld banknote of Württemberg (1923).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 50 Pfennig 1921 Bocksturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 19:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 50 Pfennig 1921 Bierstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Even nicer. -- Ikan Kekek 19:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted' ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), "Pernickelturm".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 50 Pfennig 1921 Marienkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 50 Pfennig 1921 Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), "Bierstrasse".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), "Bocksturm".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Württemberg 50000 Mark.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Württemberg 50000 Mark.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 50 Pfennig 1921 Waterlootor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osnabrück 50 Pfennig 1921 Vitischanze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), "Dom".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), "Marienkirche".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), RV: "Vitischanze".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Osnabrück (1921), RV: "Waterlootor".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leobschütz 50 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leobschütz 25 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuschreck Platte am Zollhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments needs better categorization --MB-one 10:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)  Done I've added two more. --Palauenc05 14:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 75 Pfennig Gilbrecht und Hildegund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Leobschütz (1922), RV: Battle scene of 1438..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and beautiful. I made a small edit to your scope (battlescene -> battle scene). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for the correction. Silly mistake by me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
• No problem! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Leobschütz (1922), RV: town seal of 1265..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 50 Pfennig Lüneburger Heide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), historical scene: "Gilbrecht befreit Hildegund"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: "Lüneburger Heide"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dockendorf Wegekreuz 1633-Detail1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 50 Pfennig Sulfmeisterbrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leobschütz 10 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: Sülfmeisterbrunnen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Leobschütz (1922)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straßenschild nach Bilzingen Helenenkreuz 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1831) in Gilzem, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Le Baisé

Je te remercie de ton vote pour la statue de Bourdelle que tu trouve laide. Tu n’en a que plus de mérite! La majeure partie des œuvres d’art que je photographie sont effectivement laides mais, en bon soldat, j’en fais la promotion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leobschütz 75 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 08:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leobschütz 5 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 08:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg 2 Mark Artillerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:45, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:50pfg-koeln2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Leobschütz (1922)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Leobschütz (1922)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Mark "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Hamburg, RV: Artillery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Great and certainly useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Portrait of Paul Trappen.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zagreb Hotel Esplanade Mihanovića 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pag wayside shrine Drazica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very good lighting -- Spurzem 21:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)