User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 7

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
80 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog (Germany), 1920.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Deggendorf (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Notgeld" banknote of Bonn, 1923: 100000 Mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog (Germany), 1920, RV: Nikolaikirche..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
60 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog (Germany), 1920.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüterbog 90 Pfg 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful one. -- Ikan Kekek 09:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bonn 1 Million 1923.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bonn 1 Million 1923.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lübeck 50 Pfg view of the old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lübeck 50 Pfg Burgtor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lübeck 50 Pfg Holstentor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lübeck 50 Pfg Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüterbog 50 Pfg 1920 Tetzel's coffer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deggendorf 50 Pfg 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
90 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog, Germany (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog, Germany (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:38, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüterbog 70 Pfg 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lübeck 50 Pfg Heiligen-Geist-Hospital.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 12:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog/Germany (1920), RV: Hl. Geist Kapelle..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and really awesome! This one should definitely be nominated for FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Go ahead! --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I'll get around to it sooner or later, sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Lübeck (1921), RV: view of the old town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Lübeck (1921), RV: Burgtor..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog, Germany (1920), RV: "Tetzelkasten"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Deggendorf (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Lübeck (1921), RV: town hall..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

My FP-Nomination "Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus"

Thanks for your vote. I offered an alternative according to the comments of the opponents. Could you please have a look on the nomination again? --Llez (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2019 (UTC) @ Llez Alles klar, mach ich. --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 25 Pfennig 1921 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 25 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Lübeck (1921), RV: Heiligen-Geist-Hospital..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Lübeck (1921), RV: Holstentor..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
70 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog/Germany (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and another beautiful one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Speedometer of an NSU Lux motorbike, built 1952.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Jüterbog, Germany (1920), RV: Dammtor..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Trier, RV: three churches..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - What does "RV" stand for? Verso, perhaps? I see two pictures of 50-Pfennig notes from Trier in the linked category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment RV --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - So reverse, rather than verso. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Fischers Maathes Gedenktafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seffern Brücke 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratzeburg Notgeld 25 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratzeburg Notgeld 50 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Palauenc05! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 75 Pfennig Stadtmauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 75 Pfennig Viskulenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 50 Pfennig Der alte Kran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 23:43, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerolsteiner Schutzmarke Mineralwasserflasche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überkinger Mineralwasser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Ratzeburg (c. 1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and excellent again! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Ratzeburg (c. 1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Selters Mineralwasserflasche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: town wall..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: "Viskulenhof"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhenser stoneware bottle, 19th century..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: "Der alte Kran"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apollinaris Mineralwasserflasche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhenser Mineralwasser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier 1 Pfennig Fritz Quant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Mehlsäcke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 75 Pfennig Roter Hahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921), RV: "Roter Hahn"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Arne (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Potsdam (1921), RV: "Mehlsäcke"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Arne (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jüterbog 25 Pfg 1920 Hl Geist Kapelle.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jüterbog 25 Pfg 1920 Hl Geist Kapelle.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Heufresser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Flensburg 50 Pfg 1920.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Strippenjungs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Paddenstecher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Bombenschmeißer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Potsdam (1921), RV: "Heufresser".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg 50 Pfennig Auf dem Meere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier 2 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier 100 Millionen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier 50 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Potsdam (1921), RV: "Paddenstecher".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote, Potsdam (1921), RV: "Strippenjungs".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)