User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 29

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Sankt Matthias Kreuzgang Sakristei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Sankt Matthias Kreuzgang Westflügel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Terragio67 12:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western aisle of the Cloister of St. Matthias Abbey, Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Very good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cloister of St. Matthias Abbey (Trier), entrance to the sacristy..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Up to now the only in scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walportzheim Wegekreuz Pfaffenbergstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Contrast could be better. --XRay 17:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC) Ist inzwischen erledigt. -- Spurzem 21:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ettringen Wegekreuz 1616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:22, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms (1602) of the armourer Conrad Hanff in Judengasse 23, Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes 190 SL 1957 cockpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Wegekreuz 1631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1616) near Ettringen (Eifel), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Walporzheim, Walporzheimer Straße/Pfaffenbergstraße..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 4 CV 1956 rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1631) near Bell (Mayen-Koblenz).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buick Riviera 1971 engine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 10:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Wegekreuz 1631 (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rear view of a 1956 Renault 4 CV.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Very good and useful; probably the only of this view in the commons -- Spurzem (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1680) in Dernau, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dernau St-Johannes-Apostel innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG TD 1953 dashboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add more categories --Ermell 09:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC) @ Ermell, thanks for the hint. I've added some more categories. --Palauenc05 11:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R69 S Zylinder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
V8 engine of a 1971 Buick Riviera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nave of church "St. Johannes Apostel" in Dernau, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zettelmeyer Z2 1936 Konz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image of a rare tractor -- Spurzem 18:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche Junior F109 1963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front / side view of a 1983 Lamborghini Countach LP500S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Typo in the file name? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I've added the official info sign to the file description. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, didn't make myself clear. Need to correct file name and description 5000 to 500. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Karl der Große.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 03:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Löwe mit Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Litfasssäule Großneumarkt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting object, good quality of image -- Spurzem 12:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Flut 1962 Rödingsmarkt 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Carolus Magnus by Engelbert Peiffer at Catholic parish church St. Ansgar und St. Bernhard in Hamburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flood level sign commemorating the North Sea flood of 1962 in Hamburg-Altstadt, Rödingsmarkt 27..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze sculpture (1889) of a lion with armorial shield at parish church St. Ansgar and St. Bernhard in Hamburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Very good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 16:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Simon und Juda Friedhofskreuz 1748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful lighting, good quality -- Spurzem 15:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Speicherstadt Block V Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, good quality -- Spurzem 12:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieval side portal of St. Catherine's Church in Hamburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful, obviously the only image of this view in the scope. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical advertising column in Hamburg-Neustadt, Großneumarkt..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Isn't there a risk this image will be deleted for showing copyrighted advertisements? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment No problem in Germany. --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

• Good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment COM:FOP generally applies on permanently dispalyed works. COM:POSTERs mostly are temporary works. They are being protected by copyright, even the author is unknown. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per my above comment. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment The image shows a registered historical monument in Germany. The advertisements on "Litfaßsäulen" are subordinate to the main motif and fall under the category "unwesentliches Beiwerk" (§ 57 UrhG) which are not protected. There are hundreds of similar images in different categories, none of them has ever been called into question. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The subject is the column, the scope is legitimate. If we applied this pseudo rule, we would have to delete several hundred thousand images in commons... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Pallien Luftschutzraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Simon und Juda Friedhofskreuz 1748 (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery cross (1748) at church St. Simon und Juda in Trier-Pallien..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Very good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Pallien Martinerhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance to a former air raid shelter at Mühlenweg in Trier-Pallien, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. The only in scope, very good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Palliener Straße 18 in Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martinerhof in Trier-Pallien, northeast view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Peterstraße 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peterstraße in Hamburg, west view from Hütten..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support As Peterstraße is a long street, a subscope of "west view from Hütten" would add clarification. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 10:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberbillig Wegekreuz B 419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historically reconstructed building Peterstraße 34 in Hamburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserliesch Kreuzigungsbildstock Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserliesch Kreuzigungsbildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberbillig Unglückskreuz 1900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konz Wegekreuz Kloster Karthaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross at the B 419 near Oberbillig, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in the boundary wall of Kloster Karthaus in Konz, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caspary Werbung 1929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1776) in Wasserliesch, Germany, after restoration..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, so-called "Unglückskreuz" (1900) near Oberbillig, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Advertisement (1929) of Caspary-Brewery, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and only image of this brewery up to now, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 14:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Bildstock Bonnerstraße 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goo quality -- Spurzem 15:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Porta Nigra Straßenpflaster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image, good quality -- Spurzem 17:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Peterstraße West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Segment of an ancient Roman street at the Porta Nigra, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Interesting and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)