User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prizna ferry leaving.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
is this tilted by any chance? --Charlesjsharp 09:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
No --Palauenc05 09:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Good for me; I see no lack. -- Spurzem 10:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zadar City Center Plan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zadar fragment MARC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausnummer 5 in Frankreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Jean-Pla-de-Corts epitaph 1225 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marble epitaph (1225) at Église Saint-Jean de Saint-Jean-Pla-de-Corts, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortaffa château.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cereus Canigou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Palauenc05,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Le lavoir fantôme

Je t'ai répondu par Email dis-moi si tu l'a reçu...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Jean-Pla-de-Corts Porte-sud et ancienne mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 13:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pierreclos Lavoir (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortaffa tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lavoir de Pierreclos, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortaffa Tour Eiffel west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former town hall of Saint-Jean-Pla-de-Corts, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Diözesanmuseum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality. --Steindy 21:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Dom Heiltumskammer Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image -- Spurzem 16:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Euchariushaus Windstraße 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building "Euchariushaus" in Trier, Windstraße 2..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episcopal museum in Trier, southeast view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Johann Hugo von Orsbeck at Cathedral of St. Peter (Trier).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Ortaffa, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance to Episcopal Museum in Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lavoir de Pierreclos, France, view of the inside..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiliger Rock 1933 Wallfahrtsbild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Flanderstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, good quality -- Spurzem 17:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Windstraße Denkmal Sinti & Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Flanderstraße Kurie Rollingen Hintereingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AC-DC symbol (sprocket and three lightnings) at former rectifier building "Löwenbrücken" in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial to the deportation of Sinti and Roma in Trier, Windstraße (west view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flanderstraße in Trier (northeast view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of former Welschnonnenkloster (Trier).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal to the eastern crypt of Trier Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rear entrance of Kurie Rollingen, Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lateral entrance (1689) of "Domherrenkurie Zolvern" in Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Windstraße Denkmal Sinti & Roma (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Museum am Dom (SW).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Flanderstraße Portal AVG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Predigerstraße 17 Umfassungsmauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum am Dom (Trier), southwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aesculus hippocastanum (Chestnut) in Trier, Hinter dem Dom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectural elements in Predigerstraße (Trier).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Jesuitenkolleg Fabeltier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Windstraße Denkmal Sinti & Roma (NO).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal (1779) of Hinter dem Dom 6 in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Windstraße Denkmal Sinti & Roma (S).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Predigerstraße in Trier (northeast view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remains of a Romanesque tower house in Trier, Kapuzinergasse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Sankt Matthias Pfarrhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Franziskanerminoritenkloster Sankt German östliche Mauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Signatur

Hallo Palauenc05, vielen Dank für Ihre Bewertung [1]. Leider fehlt die Signatur. Bitte nachsignieren. Grüße --Steindy (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Sankt Matthias Kreuzgang Kapitell Porta Nigra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Sankt Matthias Kreuzgang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Speyerkreuz (1820).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Plaese fix the category --Ermell 10:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze plaque at the Memorial to the deportation of Sinti and Roma in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Gedenktafel Hexenverbrennung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Leyischer Hof Portal 1779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clergy house of St. Matthias basilica, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Quant Krahnenstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cloister (southern aisle) of St. Matthias Abbey, Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque commemorating the victims of witch hunts at Simeonstift in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier GVS-Kaserne Abriss 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fritz Quant Gratulant I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - Spurzem 14:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)