User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 19

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narbonne Jardin des Vicomtes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Schedel Damaskus 1497.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trimbs Wegekreuz 1689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polch Relief Ostergasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polch Wegekreuz Vormaystraße 1798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1798) in Polch (Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief (18^th century) of the Holy Family in Polch, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruitsch Kapelle St Cruzis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boutenac wayside cross D61 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piesport Bildstock Pietà 1686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polch Wegekreuz 1593 und Bildstock 1646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please delete the non-existent Category "Wayside crosses built in 1646" or create it. --Tagooty 04:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for reminding me. --Palauenc05 07:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel "St. Cruzis" in Polch-Ruitsch (Germany)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1593) and wayside shrine (1646) in Polch (Germany)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seal of a mineral water bottle of "ROISDORFER MINERAL-QUELLE", Bornheim-Roisdorf..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Only in scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polch Wegekreuz 1760 Detail St Georg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1689) near Trimbs (Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Beautiful and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1724) and wayside shrine in Polch (Germany)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (16^th century) in Polch-Ruitsch (Germany)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1704) in Polch-Ruitsch (Germany)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruitsch Bildstock Schöpflöffelform 16tes Jh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question IMO the shadow in upper part is too dark. Is it possible to correct? --LexKurochkin 10:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC) @ LexKurochkin The light was difficult on that day. I've now brightened the shadow as much as possible. Regards --Palauenc05 10:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)  Support IMO now it is OK --LexKurochkin 18:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen (Thür) 50 Pfennig 1921 RV Wallenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mendig Wegekreuz 1689 und Bildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 RV Luther bei Frau Cotta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Krahnenstraße 38 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 08:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Krahnenstraße 39 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 08:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 30-31 Wappen 1677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Bildstock 1673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 33 Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße Mettlacher Hof (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northern wall of former "Mettlacher Hof" (around 1600) in Krahnenstraße 11, Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Krahnenstraße 30-31 (16^th century) in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque portal of Krahnenstraße 33 (1782) in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful: listed on Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Trier-Kernstadt/Straßen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße Jesuitennoviziat Hauptportal 1604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Bildstock 1673 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Novitiate of the Society of Jesus: Main portal (1604) in Krahnenstraße, Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Housemark of Historical building Krahnenstraße 33 (1782) in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 33 Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you reduce the highlights? Some areas look blown --PantheraLeo1359531 17:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Palauenc05 08:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Thanks, much better --PantheraLeo1359531 16:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wittenburg 1922 299 Pfennig.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wittenburg 1922 299 Pfennig.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 31 Hausmarke 1730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 30 Petrus 1727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House mark (1730) in Krahnenstraße, Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 38 Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schöllkraut Mauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:36, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Housemark of shipmaster Claus Clotz (after 1801) in Krahnenstraße (Trier), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of historical building (1713) Krahnenstraße 38 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former portal of "Mettlacher Hof" (around 1600) in Krahnenstraße 11, Trier, Germany (defaced with graffiti)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The work of art painted inside must be indicated in the scope or discreetly erased. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
   Done Against better knowledge, I used the plural "graffiti" for one single "piece of modern art", just to avoid that someone might complain about the singular "graffito". --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I respectfully disagree with Archaeodontosaurus. The art is incidental to the main subject, the portal. It should not be part of the scope, or erased since that would be portraying the subject "inaccurately". —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I've added the vandalism as an additional information in brackets, that's fine with me. For the scope, it doesn't make a big difference anyway. I wouldn't like to erase that "piece of art", as IMO it is also important to show which idiots are around who have no respect for cultural heritage monuments. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC
•  Best in Scope So the image makes even more sense --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief (1727) of Saint Peter at historical building Krahnenstraße 30 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The damage to the face is sad, but useful nonetheless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nitteler Stele an der K108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 18:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 30-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical timber framed building (1730) Krahnenstraße 31 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Ercé (talk) 07:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wincheringen-Söst Bildstock 1631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 38 Hausmarke mit Schiffermotiv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Some door sign related categories would be useful. --Ermell 07:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, so-called "Nitteler Stele" near Nittel, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1631) in Wincheringen-Söst, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Krahnenstraße 30-31 Fenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 11:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building (1760) Krahnenstraße 6 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. I would not have guessed it was constructed in 1760! Are the windows on the roof original? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment It's been horribly restored! IMO it's unbelievable what some architects do to historical buildings. This one is listed as a cultural heritage monument, hence, it should have been protected by official authorities. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building (1851) Krahnenstraße 1 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konz-Hamm Altarkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wawern Bildstock 1813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (around 1900) in Konz-Hamm, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1813) in Wawern, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)