User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 17

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riol Kirche Sankt Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Lokrichthalle innen (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sandstone rock near Newel-Lorich, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1858) north of Newel, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1894) near Aach, Rhineland-Palatinate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1737) near Aach, Rhineland-Palatinate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine with relief of Pietà (1836) in Trier-Euren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1824) near Aach, Rhineland-Palatinate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreis Dorfbrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aach Wegekreuz 1894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newel-Lorich Sandsteinfelsen am Erlenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Euren Brunnenhaus (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biewer Sankt Jost Bildstock 1643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 01:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Newel, Germany, Kapellenstraße..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful -- Spurzem (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church St. Martin in Riol, Rhineland-Palatinate (view south)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Only image of this church and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Side portal and crucifixion group after restoration at the southwestern wall of Basilica St. Paulinus, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Beautiful image, used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Lokrichthalle aussen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Euren Brunnenhaus (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Euren Wegekreuz 1834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former locomotive repair shop in Trier-West (view south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope for entire building. I might have said "south view of building" -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spring house (1909) in Trier-Euren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1834) in Trier-Euren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Village fountain in Dreis, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Kehrbachstraße 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Wegekreuz Kehrbachstraße 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Wegekreuz Kirchstraße 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Wegekreuz 1710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Wegekreuz 1870 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Wegekreuz 1735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nittel Kreuzwegstation 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Nischenkreuz Leukbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building in Trassem, Germany, Kehrbachstraße 2..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Do you know anything about the building? Is it residential? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Not really, I only know what the List of cultural heritage monuments tells me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (18^th century) in Trassem, Germany, Kehrbachstraße 16..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nittel Bildstock 1814 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nittel Bildstock 1814 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarburg Kreuzwegstation 1677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Paulin Seitenportal und Kreuzigungsgruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough for me. --Tournasol7 09:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Höhe ü M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1710) in Trassem, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 22:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (c. 1600) in Trassem, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1870) near Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station of the Cross no. 5 near Nittel, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benchmark by the "Königlich Preußische Landesaufnahme" at Saint Erasmus Church in Trassem, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope an the only of this benchmark, useful -- Spurzem (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1735) at the bell tower of Saint Erasmus Church, Trassem, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Wegekreuz 1870 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wettlingen Brücke Agatha-Relief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Paulin Seitenportal Kreuzigungsgruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1814) near Nittel..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment We seem to have many pictures of this. Perhaps create a category and tailor the scope to it? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuerburg Sankt Nikolaus Kreuzigungsgruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastel-Staadt Kunstinstallation T-Lot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Bonn 1 Million 1923.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of Saint Agatha of Sicily on the bridge at Wettlingen, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Very good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Gartenpavillon Schöndorferstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former garden pavilion (early 18^th century) in Trier-Nord.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Art installation "T-Lot" by Roland Michel near Kastel-Staadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Helena statue at spring house in Trier-Euren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tympanum with crucifixion group (11^th century) at Saint Nicholas church in Neuerburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Sievenicher Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former monastery building (1762) "Deutschordenskommende - Orangerie" in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Serrig, Germany (northwest view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical estate "Sievenicher Hof" near Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Jim Evans (talk) 12:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Wegekreuz an der L131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freudenburg Bildstock Marktplatz 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town wall including northeast tower in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Trassem, Germany, Kirchstraße 9..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Has details not visible in the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan; details is more visible here. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan; better details and lighting. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Trassem Wegekreuz Kirchstraße 9.jpg: +3
2. Trassem Wegekreuz 1.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Trassem Wegekreuz Kirchstraße 9.jpg: Promoted.
File:Trassem Wegekreuz 1.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--

--Palauenc05 (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1819) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shaft of a wayside cross (1841) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)